Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

    Originally posted by ABADays View Post
    Speaking of creepy - how about your avatar on Pacers Digest. I feel like I have to hold out my cross or throw holy water on the computer screen every time I look at one of your posts.
    I lost a bet. Trust me if you hate looking at it, just imagine how I feel.


    Comment


    • #32
      Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

      Originally posted by heywoode View Post
      NEVER admit that. EVER. We're all in the same league; you just have to have the balls to realize it and act that way.
      I'm not in her league either, I'd just like to play one charity exhibition game with her.
      "Just look at the flowers ........ BANG" - Carol "The Walking Dead"

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

        Originally posted by ABADays View Post
        I'm going to have you cheat for me here. We don't get the show until a day later. Tell me what happens tonight and if they ran an Indy segment.

        BTW - for someone in their mid to late 50's Seymour is pretty damn hot.
        AGREED. I would much rather see Wayne Newton with tits (my pet name for Marie Osmond) leave before Jane. She was a Bond girl, she was close friends with Johnny Cash (and danced to I Walk The Line last night...), and she still looks very elegant. I like her just fine, even though she can't compete physically with the younger girls for dancing skills....

        Willdo on the results tonight. Keep in mind that I DVR them and we watch them after we get our kids to bed around 9pm, so I won't have anything for you until 10pm-ish...

        Glad to help, and I'm glad that we have a little DWTS thread going here! My wife is laughing that I have Pacers Digest talking about DWTS....All it takes is decent action photos of Julianne Hough!



        RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

          Originally posted by heywoode View Post
          AGREED. I would much rather see Wayne Newton with tits (my pet name for Marie Osmond) leave before Jane. She was a Bond girl, she was close friends with Johnny Cash (and danced to I Walk The Line last night...), and she still looks very elegant. I like her just fine, even though she can't compete physically with the younger girls for dancing skills....

          Willdo on the results tonight. Keep in mind that I DVR them and we watch them after we get our kids to bed around 9pm, so I won't have anything for you until 10pm-ish...

          Glad to help, and I'm glad that we have a little DWTS thread going here! My wife is laughing that I have Pacers Digest talking about DWTS....All it takes is decent action photos of Julianne Hough!
          I disagree . . . well not completely this time. (grin) One, I prefer Marie to Jane, always have, even when we were all younger. I look for Jane to leave tonight.

          As for the pictures of Julianna, that second one wasn't decent, it was outstanding!

          On a side note Marie's dad just died so she might not be on the show tonight.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

            Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
            I disagree . . . well not completely this time. (grin) One, I prefer Marie to Jane, always have, even when we were all younger. I look for Jane to leave tonight.

            As for the pictures of Julianna, that second one wasn't decent, it was outstanding!

            On a side note Marie's dad just died so she might not be on the show tonight.
            I grew up watching Donnie & Marie, and never considered comparing Marie to Jane until DWTS...Marie just doesn't have that sexy quality to me. After all, she's a little bit country, and Donnie is a little bit rock & roll....Jane is classically hot. She was the essence of elegance in her heydey, and she has always been widely considered a timeless beauty...

            I'm not saying you're wrong for liking Marie over her, that is your prerogative...For the record, neither of them are out of my league!



            RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

              Originally posted by heywoode View Post
              .For the record, neither of them are out of my league!
              Your wife might have something to say about that! (grin)

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                Your wife might have something to say about that! (grin)
                Nah, she knows how I am. I'm past my prime anyway!

                She puts up with me talking to Pacemates, getting my picture taken with Pacemates, me taking photos of Pacemates....

                She has long noted that I will talk to anyone, at any time, regardless of who that person is...



                RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                  BTW, just for arguments sake...(I hate it when I hijack a thread that I started!).....I didn't just look for hot photos of Jane and fugly shots of Marie....these are the first few of each woman I could find! I'm not even going to bother finding current shots of both of them....

                  Let everyone judge for themselves....



































                  RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                    Sorry to subject everyone to some 70's fashion.....I will attone for it with another Pacemates thread....



                    RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                      Originally posted by ABADays View Post
                      I'm going to have you cheat for me here. We don't get the show until a day later. Tell me what happens tonight and if they ran an Indy segment.

                      BTW - for someone in their mid to late 50's Seymour is pretty damn hot.
                      Jane got sent home....suckly!



                      RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                        That just got weird.
                        “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                        “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                          Originally posted by Los Angeles View Post
                          That just got weird.
                          Yeah, I ruined the thread, didn't I?

                          The other Pacemates shots didn't make up for it??!!!



                          RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                            http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14573491


                            Waltzing out the door: After recovering from food poisoning, Jane Seymour attempted to stage a memorable comeback. It just didn’t happen. In her first routine, a lackadaisical quickstep, Jane fumbled through the footwork. The judges didn’t care for it, and, if the expression on Jane’s face was any indication, she didn’t care for their criticisms. Though her cha-cha was marginally better, it wasn’t enough to keep Jane and Tony Dovolani from landing in last place with the judges on Monday night and with the voting audience Tuesday. Teary eyed with the news of her elimination, Jane called the competition, “the best time of my life.”

                            The new dancing queen: Mel B and Maksim Chmerkovskiy failed to impress with their premiere fox-trot, but when they returned to the stage with the paso doble, they left no doubt about who’s leading the pack. Decked out in black, M&M delivered an aggressive and appropriately passionate paso. Judges Len Goodman and Bruno Tonioli found themselves unable to contain their applause until the end of the routine, which made the resulting perfect score no surprise at all. And their encore performance proved that perfection was no fluke.

                            One bright spot on a dark day: Following the death of her father, George Osmond, Tuesday morning, Marie Osmond was unable to attend the “Dancing” results show. During Monday’s performance show, Marie and partner Jonathan Roberts gave their best effort yet in a quickstepping “Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy” pastiche. It worked on all levels, with Marie putting her best moves forward and incorporating her campy style to perfection. And, in what turned out to be a very appropriate tribute, she dedicated the number to her parents. The initial momentum didn’t follow Johnny & Marie into their cha-cha, but luckily, given the events of the day, it didn’t lead to her exit.

                            Saucy sambo: Last week’s comeback wasn’t evident when Helio Castroneves took the floor to tango, though in fairness to the Indy champ, it wasn’t entirely his fault. The song selection, David Bowie’s “Jean Genie,” hardly lent itself to tango rhythms. Disappointed in the routine, Len griped, “Not one heel lead!” But note, he was looking at Julianne Hough, holding her accountable for failing to instill the moves in her partner. Helio later found his natural match in the samba, the national dance of his home country, Brazil. He wowed the officials, and since he’s still in the game, he must have wowed the fans, too.

                            More of the same: Jennie Garth keeps improving week after week, but she faced criticism for her first dance, the Viennese waltz. While the dance was fluid and well timed, the judges found fault with the choreography. Evidently Derek Hough put together an American style V. waltz, which didn’t contain enough counterturns in this comp. That slight setback didn’t affect their racy rumba, which left the audience cheering.

                            SuperCam still flying high: Somehow Cameron Mathison and Edyta Sliwinska avoided elimination after last week’s appearance in the bottom two. Quite the feat, given that their clumsy and rushed fox-trot, complete with missed steps, constituted a big decline from the daytime hunk. Len’s advice? “I’d put a bit of kryptonite down your pants to calm it down a little bit.” Maybe Cam tried it, as he came back strong with the jive. In what’s typically a dance for the little guys, 6’2” Cameron bounced his way to some praise from the panel.
                            -----------------------------


                            Mel B and Maksim Chmerkovskiy ----- Grade C.
                            Probably the favorites but I don't care for Mel, she has to much attitude for me. Should make the three couple finals.

                            Marie Osmond and Jonathan Roberts ------ Grade B.
                            I have always liked Marie, but I didn't think she had a chance until this last week. Her Bugle Boy number was great. She looks like shes lost quite a few pounds, fifteen more and she would look great. I look for her to leave in the next two weeks.

                            Helio Castroneves and Julianne Hough ------ Grade A.
                            One of my favorites. I like Helio's personalty . . . and he's paired with one of the best in Julianna. Should make the finals, probably second favorites.

                            Jennie Garth and Derek Hough ------ Grade A.
                            Another favorite. Jennie comes across as quite and unassuming. I'm thinking she will make the finals, and would be a dark horse to win.

                            Cameron Mathison and Edyta Sliwinska ------ Grade B.
                            Like Marie, I look for Cameron to leave in the next two weeks.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                              You motorboatin' sonuva*****
                              Read my Pacers blog:
                              8points9seconds.com

                              Follow my twitter:

                              @8pts9secs

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                                Helio Castroneves and Julianne Hough ------ Grade A.
                                One of my favorites. I like Helio's personalty . . . and he's paired with one of the best in Julianna. Should make the finals, probably second favorites.

                                Jennie Garth and Derek Hough ------ Grade A.
                                Another favorite. Jennie comes across as quite and unassuming. I'm thinking she will make the finals, and would be a dark horse to win.[/quote]

                                I've met Helio on a few occasions and was no different than he appears on the show. Extremely likeable guy and I'm rooting for him. Of course, Julianne helps.

                                Jennie has been a huge surprise to me. I thought both of her dances were absolutely elegant (don't call me gay).
                                The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X