Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Keeper League Transactions Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Keeper League Transactions Thread

    OK everyone, this is the thread where, for now, all KL transactions must be conducted.

    Transaction rules are pretty simple.

    1) For a trade to be valid 2 messages must be posted - one from each trade partner (and if you work a multi-team deal, one from each owner involved)

    2) For trades, you can trade draft picks from each of the next 2 drafts - fall 2008 and fall 2009. I don't want to have to keep track of picks from 5 years from now.

    3) All traded draft picks will be unconditional - no top-10 protected or anything.

    4) For FA's, you can simply announce add/drops here. No priority since nobody's played a game. Dropped players will immediately be available for acquisition. We may change that once the season starts but for now, once they're dropped, they're available.

    5) Roster size must be kept at 12 - at least for now. If you want to change that, start a vote thread. The current league rule has 12 as max roster size but can be changed by a vote.

    I'll add to the above as more issues come up - I'm sure they will.

    I'll also be editing this initial post by inserting the rosters for each league team once I get them added to my file. I'll edit those as I get the chance as transactions take place.

    Here are the rosters - check them over and make sure they were correct AT THE TIME THE DRAFT ENDED.

    I'm a little fried right now and am gonna take some time to get away from the PC. I'll get on later this PM and update once the initial add/drop frenzy cools down.

    Amsterdam Mourning
    Speedy Claxton
    Mo Williams
    Etan Thomas
    Channing Frye
    Shelden Williams
    Udonis Haslem
    David Lee
    Shaun Livingston
    Charlie Villanueva
    Greg Oden
    Jordan Farmar
    Sergio Rodriguez

    Bad News kerosene
    Leandro Barbosa
    Brevin Knight
    Steve Nash
    Tim Duncan
    Erick Dampier
    Alonzo Mourning
    Richard Jefferson
    Rashard Lewis
    Tony Parker
    Carlos Arroyo
    Reggie Evans
    Adonal Foyle

    Bangkok jose slaughter
    Kobe Bryant
    Andre Miller
    Gerald Green
    Anderson Varejao
    Hakim Warrick
    Kendrick Perkins
    Pau Gasol
    Kirk Hinrich
    J.J. Redick
    Spencer Hawes
    Robert Swift
    Amir Johnson

    Burnzone Burnzone
    Monta Ellis
    Kevin Martin
    Brandon Roy
    David West
    Shawne Williams
    Boris Diaw
    Emeka Okafor
    Joel Przybilla
    Marvin Williams
    Mike Conley Jr
    Martell Webster
    Aaron Gray

    Venice Los Angeles
    T.J. Ford
    Deron Williams
    Eddy Curry
    Andre Iguodala
    Mickael Pietrus
    Chris Kaman
    Rudy Gay
    Danny Granger
    Grant Hill
    Yi Jianlian
    Primoz Brezec
    Keith Bogans

    Cedar City Dr Badd
    Sam Cassell
    Jason Williams
    Antawn Jamison
    Jason Richardson
    Dirk Nowitzki
    Rasheed Wallace
    Carmelo Anthony
    Sebastian Telfair
    Tyrus Thomas
    Jeff Green
    Rafer Alston
    Daniel Gibson

    Cleveland Scott H
    Anthony Parker
    Chris Paul
    Shane Battier
    Josh Childress
    Shawn Marion
    Shaquille O'Neal
    Ron Turiaf
    Nenad Krstic
    Troy Murphy
    Bonzi Wells
    Rashad McCants
    Louis Williams


    Denton Rimfire
    Mike Bibby
    Jarrett Jack
    Nate Robinson
    Mehmet Okur
    Carlos Boozer
    Francisco Garcia
    LeBron James
    Joe Johnson
    Josh Smith
    Andres Nocioni
    Antonio McDyess
    Shareef Abdur-Rahim

    Dynamite tnt
    Steve Francis
    Jason Terry
    Caron Butler
    Vince Carter
    Ben Wallace
    Steve Blake
    Nene Hilario
    Luke Ridnour
    Stromile Swift
    Joakim Noah
    Theo Ratliff
    Kenyon Martin

    Gnawbone PacerTom
    Rodney Carney
    Allen Iverson
    Kyle Lowry
    Ryan Gomes
    Paul Millsap
    Tim Thomas
    Brad Miller
    Amare Stoudemire
    Jameer Nelson
    Luis Scola
    Jeff Foster
    Dorrell Wright

    Gotham City Boston Connection
    Stephon Marbury
    Rajon Rondo
    Gerald Wallace
    LaMarcus Aldridge
    Al Jefferson
    Hilton Armstrong
    Nick Collison
    Marquis Daniels
    Luol Deng
    Acie Law
    Chris Mihm
    Walter Hermann

    Harlem Mr. Chill
    Manu Ginobili
    Marcus Williams
    Craig Smith
    Tyson Chandler
    Chris Wilcox
    Andrew Bynum
    Jose Calderon
    Randy Foye
    Tracy McGrady
    Al Horford
    Julian Wright
    Andray Blatche

    London able
    Jamaal Tinsley
    Quentin Richardson
    J.R. Smith
    Adam Morrison
    Tayshaun Prince
    Francisco Elson
    Andris Biedrins
    Mike Miller
    Hedo Turkoglu
    Brandan Wright
    Morris Peterson
    Eduardo Najera

    Manila SuperReggie
    Raja Bell
    Desmond Mason
    Elton Brand
    Paul Pierce
    Kenny Thomas
    Jamaal Magloire
    Earl Boykins
    Zaza Pachulia
    Michael Redd
    Marco Bellinelli
    Steven Hunter
    Mikki Moore

    NZ GO!!!!
    Richard Hamilton
    Cuttino Mobley
    Andrei Kirilenko
    Kyle Korver
    Al Harrington
    Dwight Howard
    Andrew Bogut
    Mike Dunleavy
    Bobby Simmons
    Rodney Stuckey
    Donyell Marshall
    Aaron Afflo

    Roaming Gnome
    Raymond Felton
    Zach Randolph
    Glen Davis
    Damien Wilkins
    Marcus Camby
    Drew Gooden
    Jason Kidd
    Ruben Patterson
    Dwyane Wade
    Juan Carlos Navarro
    Jorge Garbajosa
    Morris Allmond

    San Antonio Sycamore Ken
    Chauncey Billups
    Luther Head
    Larry Hughes
    Chris Bosh
    Kevin Garnett
    Zydrunas Ilgauskas
    Jamal Crawford
    Lamar Odom
    Luke Walton
    Thaddeus Young
    Kurt Thomas
    Derek Fisher

    St. Somewhere Doug
    Ronnie Brewer
    Baron Davis
    Josh Howard
    Ron Artest
    Matt Barnes
    Ike Diogu
    Yao Ming
    Gilbert Arenas
    Darko Milicic
    Corey Brewer
    Nick Young
    Sean Williams

    Serenity Valley Browncoats Mal
    Ricky Davis
    Stephen Jackson
    Jason Maxiell
    Wally Szczerbiak
    Andrea Bargnani
    Travis Diener
    Charlie Bell
    Brendan Haywood
    Peja Stojakovic
    Kevin Durant
    Javaris Crittenton
    Mark Blount

    West Lafayette Kraft
    Ben Gordon
    Devin Harris
    Delonte West
    Trevor Ariza
    Corey Maggette
    Samuel Dalembert
    Jermaine O'Neal
    Ray Allen
    Darius Miles
    Al Thornton
    Travis Outlaw
    Kalenna Azubuike
    Last edited by DisplacedKnick; 10-29-2007, 05:44 PM.
    The poster formerly known as Rimfire

  • #2
    Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

    Browncoats drop Tony Battie

    Browncoats pick up Travis Diener

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

      I'm dropping Anthony Johnson and picking up Ronnie Turiaf.

      I'm also adding Louis Williams from the Sixers to round my roster out at 12 players
      Last edited by Skaut_Ech; 10-20-2007, 12:21 PM.
      Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

        W. Laf -- Drop Walter Hermann, add Kalenna Azubuike.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

          Roaming Gnome drops Chris Webber.

          Roaming Gnome picks up Glen "Big Baby" Davis.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

            Dynamite drops Juwan Howard.

            Dynamite picks up Theo Ratliff.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

              Looks like I need to make some moves.

              Guards: Kobe Bryant - Andre Miller - Kirk Hinrich - J.J. Redick

              Guard/Forward: Gerald Green

              Forward: Anderson Varejao - Hakim Warrick - Amir Johnson

              Center: Pau Gasol - Kendrick Perkins - Spencer Hawes - Robert Swift

              I'm looking ok at G, thin at F & over stocked at C. Varejao is still unsigned & Gasol, usually a FC is only listed as a C on NBA.com.

              Anyone need a C thats over stocked at F?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                Originally posted by Jose Slaughter View Post
                Looks like I need to make some moves.

                Guards: Kobe Bryant - Andre Miller - Kirk Hinrich - J.J. Redick

                Guard/Forward: Gerald Green

                Forward: Anderson Varejao - Hakim Warrick - Amir Johnson

                Center: Pau Gasol - Kendrick Perkins - Spencer Hawes - Robert Swift

                I'm looking ok at G, thin at F & over stocked at C. Varejao is still unsigned & Gasol, usually a FC is only listed as a C on NBA.com.

                Anyone need a C thats over stocked at F?
                Weren't we keeping the same Positions that we previously had on sports.ws?
                PACER FAN ON STRIKE!!!-The moment the Pacers fire Larry Bird I will cheer for them again.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                  Originally posted by Jose Slaughter View Post
                  Looks like I need to make some moves.

                  Guards: Kobe Bryant - Andre Miller - Kirk Hinrich - J.J. Redick

                  Guard/Forward: Gerald Green

                  Forward: Anderson Varejao - Hakim Warrick - Amir Johnson

                  Center: Pau Gasol - Kendrick Perkins - Spencer Hawes - Robert Swift

                  I'm looking ok at G, thin at F & over stocked at C. Varejao is still unsigned & Gasol, usually a FC is only listed as a C on NBA.com.

                  Anyone need a C thats over stocked at F?
                  Tell me if you see anything you like.

                  Of course, I reserve the right to laugh at unbalanced trade offers.
                  “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                  “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                    Originally posted by DrBadd01 View Post
                    Weren't we keeping the same Positions that we previously had on sports.ws?
                    Its my understanding that we're using the NBA.com positions until they pass a vote. In my case, Gasol has been a F most of his career that has played C & passed a vote to be listed as a CF. This year he's listed as a C. Finding enough info to get a FC vote passed will be a little tougher.

                    That leaves me with 4 players that only play C.

                    Gasol, Perkins & Swift are all starters & I think Hawes is going to be the next really good big man. So, for now, I'm kinda stuck, especially with Varejao unsigned.

                    I can look around for some offers but the bottom line is, if Gasol can pass a FC vote in the first week or two of the season, I'll keep what I've got.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                      If that is the case. . . . . . . . . . .
                      PACER FAN ON STRIKE!!!-The moment the Pacers fire Larry Bird I will cheer for them again.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                        Originally posted by Jose Slaughter View Post
                        Its my understanding that we're using the NBA.com positions until they pass a vote. In my case, Gasol has been a F most of his career that has played C & passed a vote to be listed as a CF. This year he's listed as a C. Finding enough info to get a FC vote passed will be a little tougher.

                        That leaves me with 4 players that only play C.

                        Gasol, Perkins & Swift are all starters & I think Hawes is going to be the next really good big man. So, for now, I'm kinda stuck, especially with Varejao unsigned.

                        I can look around for some offers but the bottom line is, if Gasol can pass a FC vote in the first week or two of the season, I'll keep what I've got.
                        If that is the case then we are on opposite ends of the spectrum. I have one center, Z. and seven forwards. If Bosh does not get F/C eligability I'm in trouble and need to make a big trade.

                        I have a question regaurding about which area we are getting the position eligability from? On the player pages they only list one position for the player:

                        http://www.nba.com/playerfile/ricky_....html?nav=page

                        but in the fantasy section it lists the postitions they are eligable for fantasy wise:

                        http://www.nba.com/fantasy/depthcharts_wc2.html

                        This is also different from the team roster page:

                        http://www.nba.com/timberwolves/roster/

                        We need to get this matter resolved ASAP so everyone can know where they stand with their rosters. I will probably need to make a move any how since Bosh only has eligability as a F.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                          Originally posted by SycamoreKen View Post
                          If that is the case then we are on opposite ends of the spectrum. I have one center, Z. and seven forwards. If Bosh does not get F/C eligability I'm in trouble and need to make a big trade.

                          I have a question regaurding about which area we are getting the position eligability from? On the player pages they only list one position for the player:

                          http://www.nba.com/playerfile/ricky_....html?nav=page

                          but in the fantasy section it lists the postitions they are eligable for fantasy wise:

                          http://www.nba.com/fantasy/depthcharts_wc2.html

                          This is also different from the team roster page:

                          http://www.nba.com/timberwolves/roster/

                          We need to get this matter resolved ASAP so everyone can know where they stand with their rosters. I will probably need to make a move any how since Bosh only has eligability as a F.
                          I hear ya. If the eligibility changes than I have 5 forwards and lose my starting center.
                          PACER FAN ON STRIKE!!!-The moment the Pacers fire Larry Bird I will cheer for them again.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                            Drops Oleksiy Pecherov

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Keeper League Transactions Thread

                              Originally posted by SycamoreKen View Post
                              If that is the case then we are on opposite ends of the spectrum. I have one center, Z. and seven forwards. If Bosh does not get F/C eligability I'm in trouble and need to make a big trade.

                              I have a question regaurding about which area we are getting the position eligability from? On the player pages they only list one position for the player:

                              http://www.nba.com/playerfile/ricky_....html?nav=page

                              but in the fantasy section it lists the postitions they are eligable for fantasy wise:

                              http://www.nba.com/fantasy/depthcharts_wc2.html

                              This is also different from the team roster page:

                              http://www.nba.com/timberwolves/roster/

                              We need to get this matter resolved ASAP so everyone can know where they stand with their rosters. I will probably need to make a move any how since Bosh only has eligability as a F.
                              This is actually an able question - I don't have an answer. Personally, Okur's player page and Utah's roster page both have him listed as F - based on that alone I know I'll have at least 1 vote to put up and probably more, if that's where the position assignments come from. Not terribly worried right now but by this weekend we should all think about voting.

                              Keep in mind I do have the position assignments from the 05-06 season (for players who were on a roster that summer). If everyone prefers and IF it doesn't screw up what able needs to do I can use that - but keep in mind that at the end of the 1st KL season we decided to not carry over position changes from 1 year to the next but to go with the site assignments and vote on any changes the next year. So I guess that would take a vote, along with it being OK with able.
                              The poster formerly known as Rimfire

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X