Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

    http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal..._up/?page=full

    After a bruising year, Belichick opens up
    Patriots' head coach admits he made some mistakes
    By Bella English, Globe Staff | March 4, 2007

    FOXBOROUGH -- Leaning forward in his chair, Bill Belichick wants to make one thing clear up front. He agreed to this interview; he didn't ask for it. "The first thing I'd like to come out is that this is not something I initiated," he says, sitting behind his desk at Gillette Stadium.

    "I wouldn't want anyone to think . . . this is some type of a campaign trail," he says.

    That would hardly be Belichick's style. Can you imagine the poker-faced guy in the gray, hooded sweat shirt slapping backs, pumping hands, and kissing babies?

    But if ever there were a time when Belichick could use a little positive PR, this would be it. Though he remains the Zeus of Patriot Nation, his football season last year was peppered with incidents that earned him bad press. Stiffing his former defensive coordinator Eric Mangini after the Pats lost to Mangini's New York Jets. Shoving a Globe photographer out of his way in an overly eager effort to embrace Mangini after the Pats' playoff win over the Jets. Brushing past a victorious Peyton Manning after losing the AFC championship to the Indianapolis Colts. Having his name dragged through the tabloids in a messy divorce case involving a New Jersey couple.


    The New York Daily News ran a story headlined "The Rise of Bill Bully-chick." Sports analyst Boomer Esiason remarked that he was disgusted with Belichick, whose behavior with the media he called unprofessional. Bob Costas commented on Belichick's lack of maturity in ignoring Manning and snubbing a reporter: "Here's a guy who goes down already on the short list as one of the greatest coaches in NFL history. . . . I would hope Bill Belichick's personal graciousness could approach his personal greatness as a coach."

    Then came Ted Johnson. The former Patriots linebacker said last month that postconcussion syndrome has ruined his health and marriage and left him deeply depressed and dependent on amphetamines. Johnson dates his troubles to back-to-back concussions in 2002, the second one occurring after Belichick sent him back onto the field before he had recovered from the first.

    It has been said that athletes don't come to New England to be loved -- they come to win. Belichick seems to embody this truth. He is an unsentimental man in an unsentimental sport. His critics call him arrogant. His friends say he's shy. Evil genius or misunderstood mensch?

    Questioned about the incidents from last season, the coach acknowledges some of the criticism is valid. On shoving the Globe photographer: "It was a mistake, and I'm not going to make any excuses." But he says he and Manning are friends now, having spent a week together in Hawaii last month at the Pro Bowl, where Belichick coached the AFC team to victory. And Belichick disagrees that the season was particularly painful for him: "I'll say this: I've had a lot worse seasons than 14-5."


    Off-season devoted to family, charity

    It is Belichick's first week into the post season, and he's wearing the tired gray sweat shirt turned inside-out, with the sleeves cut off -- hoodless, for variety. His office is a shrine to sports , with photos of Bobby Orr, Bill Russell, the 1980 US Olympic hockey team, and both of Adam Vinatieri's Super Bowl-winning kicks. His son's lacrosse helmet sits on a shelf. So do photos of his former wife and children.

    In a wide-ranging interview in which he is alternately laconic and loquacious, guarded and engaging, Belichick, who will turn 55 next month , says he's looking forward to spending more time with his children, reading, golfing, and fishing in Nantucket, where he owns three pieces of property, including a $4.6 million lot bought a year ago with his then-wife, Debby.

    There will be charitable events, with causes ranging from homeless shelters to children's programs. He is a supporter of Jim Brown's Amer-I-Can Foundation for at-risk youths and AccesSportAmerica for the disabled. And he has his own foundation, which awards college scholarships to students at Annapolis High School, his alma mater, and Struthers High School in Ohio, the alma mater of his late father, Stephen.

    He may face a less pleasant activity this off-season. A New Jersey judge granted a motion in a divorce case that will allow lawyers for Vincent Shenocca to question Belichick about his involvement with Sharon Shenocca, whom Belichick met in the 1980s when she was a receptionist for the New York Giants and he was the defensive coordinator.

    In court papers, Shenocca alleges that his wife has received thousands of dollars from Belichick that she has used to fund "an extravagant lifestyle," including membership in a health club, vacations, and a summer rental at the Jersey shore. She has responded that she and Belichick are just friends.

    Under the judge's order, the coach could be asked to turn over financial records from the past five years that show payments to her -- or the case could be settled without Belichick's involvement. New Jersey is a no-fault divorce state, meaning it does not require proof of fault; either spouse can ask for and receive a divorce despite objections from the other.

    "The whole Bill Belichick issue is not really relevant," says Mario Delmonico, the judge's law clerk. "It's just about trying to destroy a reputation. What it's really doing is wasting money" in attorneys' fees.

    Belichick, known to be fiercely private, declined to comment on the allegations. He did volunteer that he and his wife divorced last summer. She lives in Weston, he in Hingham. The couple, who were high school sweethearts, have three children -- Amanda, 22, a senior at Wesleyan University; Stephen, 19, a senior at Northfield Mount Hermon School in Western Massachusetts; and Brian, 15, who attends the Rivers School in Weston. All three play lacrosse; their father was captain of the lacrosse team at Wesleyan and still likes to play, often with his children.

    Friends invariably say Belichick is a great father. Indeed, one of his rare smiles in the two-hour interview comes when he speaks of his children. "What I try to do is be supportive, so whatever they want to do I'm behind," he said. "I don't want to run their lives. I want them to be themselves. You try to set an example and provide guidelines."


    From Cleveland to New England

    Though beloved by fans in New England, Belichick was hugely unpopular in Cleveland, where he benched and cut star quarterback Bernie Kosar and had just one winning season in five years. As head coach of the Browns, Belichick would work late on Tuesdays and sleep overnight in his office. The job of preparing him for a television show taped at 6 a.m. on Wednesdays fell to Kevin Byrne, who was the team's head of public relations.

    "You've seen his fashion," says Byrne, now a senior vice president for the Baltimore Ravens. "Imagine him at 6 in the morning. I'd suggest he comb his hair and put on a sweater, and he would just stare at me. Debby [Belichick] would send in sweaters for me to get him to wear. But usually he went on just like you see him on the sidelines."

    The money Belichick made from the television show was divided among his assistants "because he felt they were working as hard as he," Byrne said. The coach would also slip $100 bills into the hands of young scouts who didn't earn much.

    After Patriots owner Robert Kraft hired Belichick in 2000, Kraft got a call from Browns owner Art Modell, who had fired Belichick in 1995 for reasons that included a losing record and differences in style. "You're not getting Prince Charming," Modell warned Kraft, "but give him some leeway and he'll deliver for you."

    Modell says Belichick may be the best coach in NFL history, "but the other stuff, the human and public relations, is as important as a 3-4 defense."

    Modell has often said he felt "like Rex Harrison in 'My Fair Lady,' " trying to get Belichick to clean up his act. "The media coverage was not good," he says. "There was no connection with the fans, and the fans are our customer base. He was a good man, but his off-field personality, his deficiencies -- when it came to running a football team, he did it his way and only his way."

    Sometimes his way has been unorthodox. In October 2001, after the Pats lost 30-10 to the Miami Dolphins and dropped to 1-3 overall, Belichick staged a funeral for the Miami game ball in which the players buried it and kicked dirt over it. That game was over, he told them; focus on the future. Twelve games later the Patriots won the Super Bowl. The night before the 2004 Super Bowl against Philadelphia, Belichick showed the team the parade route the Eagles had planned if they won, every street and turn. The Pats won, 24-21.

    Despite the Patriots' loss in the AFC championship game this year, many people still consider the team a dynasty, and Belichick remains on Mount Olympus, but it's a hot seat.

    Asked whether he feels the heat, he replies, "I do think the expectations are high now." Does it stress him out? "I can't worry about what everyone else thinks. . . . If I did, in 2001 Michael Bishop would have been our starting quarterback." Bishop was a fan favorite the few times he played in 2000, but the Patriots released him in August 2001, which paved the way for Tom Brady.

    Though Belichick is often terse -- or worse -- with reporters, Kraft said he respects his "understated manner" in a field of outsized egos.

    "One of the reasons I like him as a coach and human being is that he is never boastful and self-important," Kraft says. "He's not a phony, and to me, at this stage of my life, that's important. I'll say this: I've never known him to lie to me. He might not tell me something, but he's never told me a lie." He adds, "I'm not saying he's always forthcoming."

    As far as the tabloid accounts of Belichick's role in the New Jersey divorce case, Kraft says he hasn't spoken to him about it. "I also try not to sit in judgment of anybody, because no one knows anyone's personal life," Kraft said. "All I can say is I think Bill's main focus after football matters are his children, and I have a great deal of respect for that."

    He also applauds the coach's famous work ethic. Comedian Lenny Clarke was on a plane headed to Los Angeles two years ago, wearing his Patriots golf shirt, when Belichick took the seat next to him. They spoke a little, but mostly Belichick had his head in his laptop, studying plays and players. Clarke, on his way to an audition for a television show, decided to follow suit.

    "The more he worked, the more I worked on my script. I was never so well prepared. I went in and nailed the show that day. It's usually, 'Thank you very much. We'll call you.' And I owe it to Bill Belichick. He's a stickler," says Clarke whose new show, "The Winner," premieres tonight on the Fox network.


    The evolution of Bill Belichick

    Few people know Belichick better than his good friend Rob Ingraham, a classmate from Wesleyan. For Belichick's 50th birthday, he and Debby invited friends to Nantucket. Ingraham, who owns a sports marketing firm and lives on Long Island, brought his rock band to play. But Ingraham says there was one condition: Belichick had to perform a song. He sang "Love Potion Number Nine." "He brought the house down," Ingraham said. "He sang on key and displayed an on-stage flair."

    Says Belichick: "Do you know why I chose that song? It was the shortest one. It's like two minutes and three seconds."

    Ingraham believes Belichick has evolved over the years: "As he's gotten older, he's more willing to show his emotions. . . . He has a better grasp of what's truly important in life."

    Belichick has been wonderful with his children, Ingraham says, giving them a puppy from his English golden retriever's litter and taking his son, Tucker, on the team plane to the Super Bowl in 2004. The two share a regular e-mail correspondence in which Tucker, 11, critiques each Patriots game, and Belichick responds.

    "I hope you are off to a good start at school," Belichick wrote Tucker in one exchange three years ago . "Be sure to sit in the front row and pay attention to the teacher. That is what our best players do when we have meetings. Tom Brady always sits in the front row with his notebook open when the meeting starts. He also does his homework and turns it in when he comes to the stadium in the morning. Just like you, right?"

    But the warm-and-fuzzy Belichick is not someone the public knows. With his players he can be brutally profane. Asked about his relationship with them, he replies: "Some of them I love. I can't say I love 53 guys. I respect all of them, and I hope they respect me."

    Team captains Mike Vrabel and Tedy Bruschi did not respond to the Globe's request for interviews. But sports radio host Michael Holley, a former Globe sportswriter who spent two years following the team for his 2005 book, "Patriot Reign," spoke of the relationship.

    "Even the guy who hates his guts will tell you he's a great coach," Holley said. "He's not interested in being buddies with them, and they're not interested in being buddies with him. All they expect from him is, 'Give us a chance to win.' I don't think people would say Bill Belichick is a great man. He's a great coach. He's an interesting man."
    The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

  • #2
    Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

    Eh....nice article. I just don't think anyone could ever say anything to change my opinion that Belichick is anything other than an immature, petty, arrogant, slob. Maybe he does do those other things behind the scenes, but in a profession like his, you are what you appear to be. Maybe that's unfair, but it's true.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

      Originally posted by the hooded one
      The first thing I'd like to come out is that this is not something I initiated.

      Of course you didn't initate it. I'm sure you get interview requests after every season. The difference is this time you felt compelled to give in.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

        Originally posted by travmil View Post
        Eh....nice article. I just don't think anyone could ever say anything to change my opinion that Belichick is anything other than an immature, petty, arrogant, slob. Maybe he does do those other things behind the scenes, but in a profession like his, you are what you appear to be. Maybe that's unfair, but it's true.
        I think the line that says he's an 'unsentimental man in an unsentimental sport' says it best. I could care less if he's not a nice guy to hang out with..as long as he wins games.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

          Call me old fashioned, but I think how you play the game and how you treat your opponents is just as important as winning.

          Bill has shown he's completely classless, by either stepping in front of Marvin on an interception so he has to slow down and possibly miss a tackle or blows off the opposing coach/player. IMHO he disrespects the game by wearing that stupid cutoff sweatshirt.

          I couldn't support someone who thinks his poop don't stink, and to me he is the posterboy for that kind of arrogance.
          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

            Originally posted by Since86 View Post
            Call me old fashioned, but I think how you play the game and how you treat your opponents is just as important as winning.
            I think for me, the truth is that it is not as important as winning, but you should ACT like it is. That's class.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

              I'm actually involved in something sort of similiar. My HS just recently bought out their boy's basketball head coach's contract because some players didn't like him and their parents *****ed loud and long enough to the school board.

              Once that crap started happening, I hoped they would lose out the season, which they almost did.

              I don't want to see a classless team, whether I'm a fan or not, win. It may just be me, but I hate that crap.
              Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                I'm actually involved in something sort of similiar. My HS just recently bought out their boy's basketball head coach's contract because some players didn't like him and their parents *****ed loud and long enough to the school board.

                Once that crap started happening, I hoped they would lose out the season, which they almost did.

                I don't want to see a classless team, whether I'm a fan or not, win. It may just be me, but I hate that crap.
                A classless team? Because a head coach who isn't even that bad? The only guy on our team you could call classless would be Harrison..but even then, you would be stating how he was a very long time ago.

                But I guess I could understand why some Colts fans would have sour grapes. All those years of being beaten by the Patriots and bad player relations between Belichick and the Colts players. Belichick is one of those guys who isn't personal with all his players, but still gets the most out of them and gets their respect...and there is no way I would trade him for a 'nice guy' who was best friends with his players and every player in the league if he could not win any games.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                  Originally posted by Moses View Post

                  But I guess I could understand why some Colts fans would have sour grapes. All those years of being beaten by the Patriots and bad player relations between Belichick and the Colts players.

                  Rigggght. We just won the superbowl, beating the Pats in the process. I think the Pats eliminating the Colts 2 and 3 seasons ago is the last thing on our mind. The Pats have eliminated us out of the playoffs one more time than we have eliminated them. The Pats haven't beat us since January 2005, we've won 3 straight meanings.

                  I don't think Colts fans are being bitter. I just think that we, along with everyone else that's familiar with the NFL, realize that Belichick is an A-Hole.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                    Originally posted by Adam1987 View Post
                    Rigggght. We just won the superbowl, beating the Pats in the process. I think the Pats eliminating the Colts 2 and 3 seasons ago is the last thing on our mind. The Pats have eliminated us out of the playoffs one more time than we have eliminated them. The Pats haven't beat us since January 2005, we've won 3 straight meanings.

                    I don't think Colts fans are being bitter. I just think that we, along with everyone else that's familiar with the NFL, realize that Belichick is an A-Hole.
                    Do you know Belichick personally? I wont get into this seeing as how this is a battle I can't win on these forums. Belichick isn't a people person and I'll be the first to admit that. I would still take Belichick over any other HC in the league. No other coach in the league could have gotten as much out of the Pats players as Bill Belichick has.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                      Whether I'm bitter or not it doesn't change the fact that Belichick is a classless jerk.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                        Why does everyone think Belichick is such a classless jerk? I'm not trying to start anything, but other then disrespecting Peyton in the past, what has he honestly done that has angered all of you so much? I would have figured after this article your opinions of him may have changed a little bit seeing as how him and Peyton have worked it out. It seems like every player that hates him originally comes to like him once he actually knows him. LT, Peyton, etc.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                          Originally posted by Moses View Post
                          Do you know Belichick personally? I wont get into this seeing as how this is a battle I can't win on these forums. Belichick isn't a people person and I'll be the first to admit that. I would still take Belichick over any other HC in the league. No other coach in the league could have gotten as much out of the Pats players as Bill Belichick has.

                          No, and I'm guessing you don't either, so my guess is as good as yours. All any fan can do is judge by what they see.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                            Belichick has never been media savvy or warm and fuzzy to anybody.

                            He is extremely demanding of his players on and off the field, though. He won't take any crap and he will cut you in a heartbeat if you are not a good teammate and if you are a classless jerk. His players are solid in the community. Kraft demands it and Bill does too, so all the talk about the Pats being classless is in fact lingering sour grapes. Get over it.

                            Being demanding of your players is what makes the Randy Moss rumors so interesting. Bill won't take crap from Randy. If Bill thinks it can actually work out, then the track record says it will.
                            The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Belichick interview, says he and Peyton are good friends after pro bowl week

                              Originally posted by Moses View Post
                              Why does everyone think Belichick is such a classless jerk? I'm not trying to start anything, but other then disrespecting Peyton in the past, what has he honestly done that has angered all of you so much? I would have figured after this article your opinions of him may have changed a little bit seeing as how him and Peyton have worked it out. It seems like every player that hates him originally comes to like him once he actually knows him. LT, Peyton, etc.

                              People in this thread have already clearly pointed out the lack of sportsmanship after losses, the snubbing of the media (and the NFL would be a hobby if it weren't for the media), the holding of Marvin Harrison as he tried to get back inbounds. I would also point out the Patriot's tendency to fake defensive injuries to stall offensive momentum and the repeated abuse of the "no hands on recievers" rule (which was cleary re-emphasized because of the Patriots). While those last two cannot be pinned to the coach for starting it (although it seems like a logical conclusion), he is at least guilty for letting it continue.

                              Look, being a dirty coach or being an a-hole isn't terrible. Reggie flopped all the time and said some horrible crap to the opposition. We aren't saying that Belichick is an invalid coach. He's a great coach and under different circumstances I would love to have him.

                              But he is also a dirty cheating a-hole. It's not a putdown, it's just............true.
                              The Miller Time Podcast on 8 Points, 9 Seconds:
                              http://www.eightpointsnineseconds.com/tag/miller-time-podcast/
                              RSS Feed
                              Subscribe via iTunes

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X