Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

    don't know what happened but the Fox news just dropped whatever story they were covering and said "breaking news just now coming in Colts running back dominic rhodes under arrest, we'll have more on that story as it develops."

    what is it with the pacers and colts not able to stay out of trouble? Is it the city?

    At any rate


    EDIT: They said he was doing 81 in a 55...oh well at least he didn't get in a fight. They also said he either refused a breathalyzer test or was above the legal limit....doh

    http://www.theindychannel.com/sports...19/detail.html

  • #2
    Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

    Originally posted by TheDon View Post
    don't know what happened but the Fox news just dropped whatever story they were covering and said "breaking news just now coming in Colts running back dominic rhodes under arrest, we'll have more on that story as it develops."

    what is it with the pacers and colts not able to stay out of trouble? Is it the city?

    At any rate


    EDIT: They said he was doing 81 in a 55...oh well at least he didn't get in a fight. They also said he either refused a breathalyzer test or was above the legal limit....doh
    I am not so sure what I prefer, but I think that I prefer to have him in a fight in a bar, with some black eyes, bruised ribs, at least the chances of him killing someone are a lot more restricted then doing 81 where 55 is allowed and while under the influence.

    But it will end up being a blip on the news, certainly they will be saved by some "news" alleging that the Grand Jury thinks Tinsley should at least be heard before or something like that.
    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

    If you've done 6 impossible things today?
    Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

      Colts Running Back Dominic Rhodes Arrested for Drunk Driving

      Feb 20, 2007 12:33 PM

      INDIANAPOLIS - Indiana State Police arrested Colts running back Dominic Rhodes for drunk driving this morning.

      Police say Rhodes was driving 81 miles per hour in a 55 mile per hour zone on northbound Interstate 65 in Indianapolis about 3:00 this morning.

      State police spokesman Sergeant Dave Bursten describes it as "a normal run of the mill drunk driving arrest."

      Colts officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

      Rhodes rushed for more than 100 yards in the Super Bowl win over Chicago.

      He is currently a free agent.

      (Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)
      http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6111640
      So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

      If you've done 6 impossible things today?
      Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

        Smart move there Nick strike one, but at least...... Bursten said the trooper thought Rhodes might be intoxicated and that he was cooperative through the entire ordeal.

        http://www.theindychannel.com/sports...19/detail.html
        You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

          RWB, am I really living in a different world where I "judge" harsher on speeding while DUI then on "fistycuffs" in a bar?

          I just wonder.
          So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

          If you've done 6 impossible things today?
          Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

            What I find most upsettind is the "different" behaviour of The Star.

            1: not a headline but a byline,
            2: no mention of the speeding
            3: forgiving tone onf.i. wishtv.com

            Quite a difference from the way Tinsley and Daniels were massacred upon allegations, (of similar allegations Cassel and co were just cleared) makes you wonder, well it makes me wonder that is.

            (The Star article)
            Colts' Dominic Rhodes arrested

            Indianapolis Colts running back Dominic Rhodes was arrested early this morning on a charge of driving while intoxicated, police said.

            Rhodes is in the Arrestee Processing Center, Metropolitan Police Lt. Doug Scheffel said.
            He was arrested by Indiana State Police Rhodes early today.

            Records show he faces initial charges of misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated.

            http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...RTS03/70220020
            So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

            If you've done 6 impossible things today?
            Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

              Originally posted by able View Post
              RWB, am I really living in a different world where I "judge" harsher on speeding while DUI then on "fistycuffs" in a bar?

              I just wonder.
              No not at all. A speeding vehicle being driven by someone without all their faculties is not a good thing. The ONLY good thing from this is Dominic's cooperation. Waiting to see if he was actually over the limit, but I suspect if he was close enough in the field usually when you test an hour later you reach the magic number.
              You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                This story has to be false. Everyone knows all the Colts players are perfect in fact the police officer must have mistakenly identified rhodes when in fact it was Tinsley. Afterall the Pacers players are thugs who would be in prison if they couldn't play basketball.

                I can't wait to hear all the Indianapolis sports fans tell us how they will never go to another Colts game as long as Rhodes is on the team.

                And I'm sure Kravitz will blame Polian and Dungy for this. We'll read that tomorrow for sure

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                  I understand your point Able, but I do believe if Rhodes had been involved in an accident or hurt someone then you would have seen a headline.
                  You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                    If you're a non or semi-Colt fan then I can probably see your jealousy or frustration with the handing of Colts players.

                    But you're rep always proceeds you. So if you build up enough good rep it takes awhile to bring it down and vice versa (Fair or not). The Pacers have not always been the red headed step child in this city.For along time it was the Colts.

                    I don't feel sorry for any Pro Player that puts themselves in a compromising position. The Media may sensationalize a story for their own benefit, but they usually can't fabricate one.

                    Why Not Us ?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                      Originally posted by Frank Slade View Post
                      If you're a non or semi-Colt fan then I can probably see your jealousy or frustration with the handing of Colts players.

                      But you're rep always proceeds you. So if you build up enough good rep it takes awhile to bring it down and vice versa (Fair or not). The Pacers have not always been the red headed step child in this city.For along time it was the Colts.

                      I don't feel sorry for any Pro Player that puts themselves in a compromising position. The Media may sensationalize a story for their own benefit, but they usually can't fabricate one.
                      I don't consider myself non or semi colt fan, of course I live to far away to attend home games, but I still pay $ 30 a week to watch the games on the net. (those that are not on telly here)

                      I can see where you are coming from, but.......

                      There are quite a few more "happenings" with (NFL) players in the past and they all have a tendency to "dissapear" over a short time.

                      It has nothing to do with jealousy, just genuinly wondering how the heck there can be such a difference in "news" and "judgement" between two teams representing the same city in that same city.

                      And mostly wondering where society is going to or has gone to if a potentially much more dangerous thing gets swept away as if it was a citation.
                      So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

                      If you've done 6 impossible things today?
                      Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                        Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                        This story has to be false. Everyone knows all the Colts players are perfect in fact the police officer must have mistakenly identified rhodes when in fact it was Tinsley. Afterall the Pacers players are thugs who would be in prison if they couldn't play basketball.

                        I can't wait to hear all the Indianapolis sports fans tell us how they will never go to another Colts game as long as Rhodes is on the team.

                        And I'm sure Kravitz will blame Polian and Dungy for this. We'll read that tomorrow for sure
                        Well he is a free agent so in all likelihood he could very well not be on the team next year so those who boycott the Colts would come back...but yes i see what you are saying. Lets see how people react when the shoe is on the other foot.
                        If you havin' depth problems, I feel bad for you son; I got 99 problems but a bench ain't one! - Hicks
                        [/center]
                        @thatguyjoe84

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                          Originally posted by able View Post
                          I don't consider myself non or semi colt fan, of course I live to far away to attend home games, but I still pay $ 30 a week to watch the games on the net. (those that are not on telly here)

                          I can see where you are coming from, but.......

                          There are quite a few more "happenings" with (NFL) players in the past and they all have a tendency to "dissapear" over a short time.

                          It has nothing to do with jealousy, just genuinly wondering how the heck there can be such a difference in "news" and "judgement" between two teams representing the same city in that same city.

                          And mostly wondering where society is going to or has gone to if a potentially much more dangerous thing gets swept away as if it was a citation.
                          I agree with some of your sentiment. As far as non-Colts fan I was referring to some who may not really follow the Colts and wish their players would have thier feet held to the fire so to speak for whatever infraction and that the media here, which is notoriously "soft" compared to other markets would go easier on the Pacers.

                          While there is less tolerancy right now for Pacer players misdeeds for obvisous reasons. I think if you look around the country for the most part the NBA is singled out unfairly when it comes to off court antics. Their definitley is a different set of standards when it comes to how their actions are reported, part of it has to do with the success of the NFL, guaranteed contracts for the NBA players and the perception that comes with that.

                          So while part of the reason the Pacers are under a microcsope here is because of the past few years, I'm sure if a player is arrested on any NBA team for a certain offense it will usually make more headlines than MLB or NFL as a general rule.

                          Why Not Us ?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                            What, have I missed another event that involved Dom?

                            Why in the world is this being compared to Tinsley, considering this last incident was his second this season, and this is Dom's first?
                            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Dominic Rhodes Under Arrest

                              Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                              This story has to be false. Everyone knows all the Colts players are perfect in fact the police officer must have mistakenly identified rhodes when in fact it was Tinsley. Afterall the Pacers players are thugs who would be in prison if they couldn't play basketball.

                              I can't wait to hear all the Indianapolis sports fans tell us how they will never go to another Colts game as long as Rhodes is on the team.

                              And I'm sure Kravitz will blame Polian and Dungy for this. We'll read that tomorrow for sure
                              I hear ya UB, it's a total double standard and it's not fair at all to the Pacers. I wouldn't be surprised if Kravitz starts blaming Global Warming on the Pacers quite honestly. I've learned to take anything he has to say about the Pacers with a HUGE grain of salt. Rhodes is arrested and it's just a passer-by statement but accusations about the pacers is frontline news for the next 2 weeks. Just goes to show ya what winning will do for you franchise, people are willing to overlook things like this, but if you're a struggling franchise they just LOVE to kick while you're down.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X