Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

    Originally posted by Peck View Post

    I still believe that this trade was good & ultimately it will help our club, but the offense I've seen the past three games has me less excited each day.

    Can anybody cheer me up?

    I didn't see much of the game last night so I'm not commenting on that, but Tinsley has played at an all star level the past 5 games or so.
    Relax

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

      Originally posted by Jay@Section19 View Post
      PPS - The revamped Pacers are really missing Marquis Daniels.
      AB-SO-LUTELY. We've missed him badly. I think he's the guy you want to go to during those offensive lulls we enevitably run into. He's really our only creator on offense. He's good at getting into the paint, and that's great because he also happens to be good at hitting shots in the paint, as awkward or weird as they may look.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

        Originally posted by PacerMan View Post
        I didn't see much of the game last night so I'm not commenting on that, but Tinsley has played at an all star level the past 5 games or so.
        Relax
        Not for a POINT guard!

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

          I think there were a ton of weird circumstances in this game. I'm biting my tongue until next game. I think they have been very good, and starting with the next game they will continue that trend.
          The Miller Time Podcast on 8 Points, 9 Seconds:
          http://www.eightpointsnineseconds.com/tag/miller-time-podcast/
          RSS Feed
          Subscribe via iTunes

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

            Originally posted by PacerMan View Post
            I didn't see much of the game last night so I'm not commenting on that, but Tinsley has played at an all star level the past 5 games or so.
            Relax

            You mean he's been putting up All-Star numbers? He has not been playing at an All-Star level, at all.

            This is a warning; I've really been nit-picking at Tinsley lately.

            The only difference between the past three games and the rest of the season is that Tinsley has been hitting shots. Other than that, the way he's affected his teammates negates his hot shooting streak. We have very uneven ball distribution and allow too much dribble penetration, both of which are Tinsley's fault and one lowers our 1st quarter points while the other raises our opponents 1st quarter points. Jermaine O'Neal shouldn't be in the position to be the leading shot-blocker.

            Oh, and for the season, Tinsley is still ranked #317th in FG%, though he ranks in the top 50 in FGA. And I'm not sure why his poor play and refusal to pass to certain teammates isn't obvious to everyone.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

              Originally posted by Peck View Post
              I started noticing this about three games ago. You remember when the trade first occured? Dunleavy & Murphy were in constan motion moving from one side to the other? (mostly Dun) Remember how we had great ball movement leading to good shots?

              That all has pretty much gone away because now the new guys have learned the one page play book that we have. Oh it may be complicated & maybe we don't hit the right spots on the floor but I assure the play book still says one thing.

              Get the ball in the post & everybody else go stand on the opposite side for a clear out, assuming the p.g. does not have a shot he does not like (tonight there was no such thing).

              The motion has slowed way down & we've gone back to the worlds most boring & predictable offense.
              I only was able to catch this game...but I saw that too. Reading the Post-Game threads before this game..........I have noticed the increase in scoring and attempts by Tinsley....but haven't noticed if anyone has mentioned the lack of ball-movement compared to our initial start after the trade.

              Although most of you will have to comment ( since you have actually watched the game ), I wouldn't be surprised if there is a connection between the increase in FGA by Tinsley and what appears to be a lack of ball movement by the team ( as a whole ).

              On a related note.....I don't know what was the real cause for this.....but there were several plays where all I saw was 1 player anywhere near the paint ( usually JONeal or maybe Foster ) and the rest of the team was hovering and literally standing outside the perimeter. Either the Warriors were effectively shutting us out of the paint or there was simply no effort on our part....but its like we just reverted to the old team where we stood around waiting for JONeal to do something.
              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                Although most of you will have to comment ( since you have actually watched the game ), I wouldn't be surprised if there is a connection between the increase in FGA by Tinsley and what appears to be a lack of ball movement by the team ( as a whole ).

                Even when he isn't shooting he's only passing to Jermaine and Troy. Other than the Memphis game, Dunleavy is averaging under 2 passes from Tinsley per 1st quarter and Granger is barely over 2. I didn't take stats for the Memphis game, but he certainly passed it around more.

                When Tinsley is in the game there is an average of 1.5 passes per possession and when he isn't the average is over 2.5 passes per possession. I think this is the most telling stat.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                  Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                  I agree completely with the assessment of Tinsley and the offense in general. It's sickening. And it's on Rick's head for either implementing it or not dealing with it if it's Tinsley's fault. The only thing worse than being a bad team is being a boring bad team. That's what we were last night. Bad and very boring.
                  It's funny how all the blame falls on Rick's shoulders, to me atleast. You didn't say that both need to be gone, just that it's on Rick's head.

                  AGAIN I ask, where the ****** is player responsiblity? Tinsley gets this pass like he's a freaking 8y/o little kid and his hand needs to be held and told who to pass to, and when to pass it. He's almost 30 years old, and he needs a coach to remind him that he needs to pass to the other 3 members of the team on the floor?

                  Sorry, but that's just laughable. I'm firmly in the camp, that it doesn't matter what Rick tells Jamaal, he'll do his own thing no matter what. I also firmly believe, if Rick takes Jamaal out than we won't see Jamaal play for a ten game stretch because he'll have "sinuspoutis" and sit there until DA looses his legs and the Ps start to tank, only to come back and act like he's the savior.

                  Yes, Rick does need to nip it, but Jamaal is 65% of the problem to Rick's 35%.
                  Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                    Just wanted to throw a couple thoughts out there.

                    First, I have a hard time believing Tinsley is calling his own number all the time. I think Carlisle is encouraging it, or at least condoning it. Which drives me crazy. Also, Armstrong has said he's encouraging Tinsley to shoot more often. Argh.

                    Second, we certainly call plays for guys not named Jermaine O'Neal or Jamaal Tinsley. Carlisle keeps calling plays for Dunleavy. I don't know what possesses him to do this, but he does.

                    Our team is better than it was. But I still want to see another move before I believe we can do anything this year.
                    This space for rent.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                      Tinsley started out terribly cold. Like 1-for-7 and finished 9-for-24 which is a 38% shooting mark.

                      O'Neal was 7-for-20 (35%)
                      Dunleavy was 4-for-15 (27%)
                      Everyones Favorite DA was 3-for-10 (30%)

                      Who is supposed to shoot? I mean, obviously, the answer is Danny Granger, but the Pacers management is way too conservative with him. They need to tell him to shoot more, to take over games. They don't, he doesn't, so who else would you rather see take shots last night?

                      After the middle of the second quarter, Tinsley shot well, whether you choose to believe it or not. The rest of the game he went 8 for 17.

                      Would you rather see Dunleavy continue to shoot airballs? Or JO continue to brick? Again, other than Granger, Tinsley was pretty much the only option. He did what he had to do. He's had some terrible games this season (talking about shot selection), but this wasn't one of them, in my opinion.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                        Originally posted by Skaut_Ech
                        This is my biggest damper on the new look Pacers. If Jamaal is only going to pass the ball to his homiez, then we are in big trouble. We ARE in big trouble. I am so hopeful again for this team, but as long as it's led by Jamaal Iverson, I can't bring myself TOTALLY back into the sunshine.
                        Ever since the loss in Detroit...Tinsley has averaged 16 FGA a game ( 14 FGA if we don't count his 24 FGA yesterday ) where we ended up winning 3 out of 5 games.

                        Don't misread this as a "Tinsley took alot of shots in the previous games and no one complained about him then...why complain now" question...and I guess this question is more to the rest of the group that posted concerns about Tinsley becoming Jamaal Iverson....but what has been the difference with this loss...where he dominated the ball, took 24 FGA and dished out 10 Assists....and the previous 4 games where he averaged 8 Assists ( other then the additional 8 FGA he took )?

                        Was Tinsley simply not looking for someone else other then JONeal to pass the ball to ( or was no one else simply open )?

                        Did he lose confidence in Murphy and Dunleavy who have been shooting poorly lately?

                        or

                        Is the lack of ball-movement a result of Tinsley dominating the ball and simply going with option A ( look for JONeal ) and option B ( if JONeal isn't open...take a shot )?

                        One more coincidence.....and I think this is something important to note.....but Tinsley's increased role in the offense ( basically taking 3 to 5 more FGA a game above his average 11 FGA and becoming a 1st/2nd scoring option ) not only corresponds with Murphy's recent nose injury ( and therefore his decreased role on offense where he is averaging about 4 FGA over the last 5 games )...but with Marquis being out of the lineup.

                        I really wonder hope that Marquis comes back soon.....cuz I liked what we saw from the team when we weren't forced to play BOTH Tinsley and Armstrong on the floor at the same time.
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                          Originally posted by Dr. Goldfoot View Post
                          Post Trade Tinsley:
                          8 games
                          5-3 record
                          14.6 shots per game
                          .462 FG%
                          .400 3pt%
                          .780 FT%
                          7.0 APG
                          2.3 SPG
                          18.3 PPG
                          Are those really his stats? Thats incredible. I knew he had played well, but I don't think there is anyway we can justify ripping on Tins especially for one game. The Warriors played what might be their best game of the season. Don't read too much into it.


                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                            His performance last night is indicative of his past performances. If this was a one time thing, then I would agree, but it's not. It's something that he goes through way too often.

                            He was Mel-Mel the abuser last night, and that player needs to be traded. Either figuratively or literally.
                            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                              Originally posted by 3rdStrike View Post
                              Tinsley started out terribly cold. Like 1-for-7 and finished 9-for-24 which is a 38% shooting mark.

                              O'Neal was 7-for-20 (35%)
                              Dunleavy was 4-for-15 (27%)
                              Everyones Favorite DA was 3-for-10 (30%)

                              Who is supposed to shoot? I mean, obviously, the answer is Danny Granger, but the Pacers management is way too conservative with him. They need to tell him to shoot more, to take over games. They don't, he doesn't, so who else would you rather see take shots last night?

                              After the middle of the second quarter, Tinsley shot well, whether you choose to believe it or not. The rest of the game he went 8 for 17.

                              Would you rather see Dunleavy continue to shoot airballs? Or JO continue to brick? Again, other than Granger, Tinsley was pretty much the only option. He did what he had to do. He's had some terrible games this season (talking about shot selection), but this wasn't one of them, in my opinion.
                              Our backup PG who is supposed to be the mature leader goes 3/10 and the fact that you are the first one to mention it sickens me. The fact some of you will crucify Tins for his shooting last night and let a 3/10 night from DA slip is atrocius. I don't care if he is getting effort. DA should only shoot more than 5 times in a game if he has made the previous 4. Don't even get me started on Dun, the dude couldn't hit the broadside of the barn if he wanted to. I would much rather have Quis start when he returns.

                              Regardless though it was one game. We have still won 6 of our past 8 games. There is hardly any reason to be freaking about this. Its still the eastern conference and this is maybe the worst the east has been in the past 5 years. We are still competitive.


                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Odd thoughts from the Warriors game....

                                So now we are reduced to judging how well a player plays based upon their stats. You can count me out of that wrong approach.

                                And judging DA's value to the team based upon his shooting stats is just wrong

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X