Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

    http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...ll/8610362.htm


    Heat can't erase 23-point deficit as Artest leads rested Pacers
    BY ISRAEL GUTIERREZ
    igutierrez@herald.com


    INDIANAPOLIS - The Heat came into its second-round series on a euphoric high, evident from the downright giddiness in the pregame locker room to the quick start to Thursday's game.

    The Indiana Pacers, though, have a way of taking the joy out of the playoff experience. They did it to the Boston Celtics when they swept them out of the first round, and they started the Heat off in the same fashion.

    Despite the resilient Heat's attempt to stay within shouting distance, the Pacers won 94-81 at Conseco Fieldhouse to take a 1-0 advantage in the best-of-7 Eastern Conference semifinal series. Game 2 is scheduled for 7 p.m. Saturday.

    Ron Artest, who received his Defensive Player of the Year Award from NBA legend Bill Russell before the game, led the Pacers with his offense, scoring 25 points on 7-of-17 shooting, and Jamaal Tinsley contributed 17 points, all but two coming from three-point range.

    In typical Indiana fashion, the Pacers perfected the inside-outside halfcourt attack, going inside to Jermaine O'Neal and Artest, then finding open shooters who went 9 of 18 from three-point range.

    ''They stick with their game plan, they run their sets, and if they don't like the first option they go to the second,'' said Heat reserve point guard Rafer Alston, who had his best game of the postseason with 17 points and four assists. ``If they don't like the second they go right back to the first.''

    While it's the vaunted Indiana inside game that got the Pacers this far, O'Neal had just 13 points on 5-of-17 shooting. Tinsley, meanwhile, hit five of his six three-point attempts, three coming during a devastating 26-5 run that gave the Pacers a 60-37 lead with 7:57 left in the third quarter.

    The Heat tried to recover, trimming their deficit to eight several times in the fourth quarter, but could not complete the comeback. Dwyane Wade, who finished with 22 points and seven rebounds, led the Heat's comeback attempt with 15 second-half points.

    ''I just felt that I wasn't taking what the defense was giving me. I was trying to take more,'' Wade said of his first half. ``In the second half I just took what they gave me.''

    Regardless of how the Pacers got their 1-0 advantage in the series, it's a comfortable position. The Pacers have never lost a second-round series in five previous trips. And the team is 11-2 in playoff series after winning the first game.

    The Heat, on the other hand, is 1-4 when losing the first game of a series, the only win coming after losing Game 1 of the 1997 second-round series against the Knicks. The Heat won that series in seven games.

    The start of this series was promising for the Heat, as Wade began the game with a three-point play and Caron Butler followed with a jumper that gave Miami a 5-0 lead 1:35 into the game. Another Butler jumper 20 seconds later gave the Heat a 7-2 lead, and it looked like the momentum from Tuesday's Game 7 traveled with the Heat to Conseco Fieldhouse.

    But, these were still the Pacers, which had beaten the Heat in nine previous meetings, so it wouldn't stay that easy for long.

    Artest led the Pacers' surge, scoring 15 first-half points and forcing Miami to double-team him in the post. That opened up Tinsley and Reggie Miller on the perimeter.

    ''It's tough,'' Alston said of Indiana's three-point shooting. ``It stops you from wanting to help.

    ``But you need to help sometimes, especially when guys get it going. Artest, he got it going tonight.''

    The Heat's growing frustration was evident on the bench, too, when one Pacer tried to interfere with a Miami huddle.

    Lamar Odom's 0-for-5 start also stalled the Heat's early push, and the team missed 13 straight shots at one point in the first quarter.

    Eddie Jones took just three shots and played only 24 minutes due to foul trouble. He finished with four points. That took all the joy out of the once-euphoric Heat, and the Pacers took full advantage.

    ''Looks can be deceiving,'' said Odom, who finished with 12 points on 5-of-15 shooting. ``We didn't do anything different. It's the same Miami Heat basketball. We just lost.''




    http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...d/8610363.htm?

    How to avoid being roadkill?
    DAN LE BATARD
    dlebatard@herald.com

    INDIANAPOLIS -- There are no moral victories, not this time of year, not when only eight NBA teams are still breathing, but you have to admire the way the fearless Miami Heat keeps coming into these fights face first.

    The mighty Indiana Pacers kept throwing the Heat down a flight of stairs Thursday night, telling them to stay down, but Miami is too young and stupid to be afraid. So they kept wobbling back up those stairs, looking for more, Caron Butler and Lamar Odom literally bloodied during the fray but asking through a winded, weary smile, ``Is that all you got?''

    Reggie Miller finally finished Miami on this 94-81 night, finished the Heat the way he has been finishing NBA teams since Dwyane Wade was 9 years old, but not before Miami sent a message that was both warning and truth:

    We're not going away quietly.

    Indiana has its bloody hands full.

    One problem: The Heat has played a lot of very good basketball during this season of resurrection, but virtually none of it has been on the road.

    This is not a criticism as much as it is a statement of irrefutable and mathematical fact: The Heat is a bad professional basketball team outside of Miami.

    Not mediocre. Not decent. Not even almost-kind-of-sort-of OK.

    Bad.

    So the Pacers literally bloodied Lamar Odom (three stitches under the chin) and Caron Butler (knee to the face) before figuratively throwing the rest of their teammates in the trunk of the car, too. Miami banged around back there for a while when things got desperate, making a lot of noise when panicked in the fourth quarter, but never found anything that resembled light or escape.

    Miami again became roadkill.

    A STARTLING STAT

    You know how many winning teams Miami has beaten away from home this season?

    Zero.

    Think about that for a second.

    Miami has played half of its 90 games this wonderful season away from home and has not once managed to luck into or stumble upon a triumph against a team that finished the season with a winning record.

    Usually, when you find this kind of stink on the road, it is surrounded by circling buzzards.

    It isn't a lack of talent. It isn't a lack of want or will. And it certainly isn't a lack of effort.

    It is, however, a lack of confidence.

    They don't expect to win on the road because they have nothing in the way of tangible proof that they can.

    Confidence is built by stacking successes atop one another, but Miami was 13-28 on the road this season, losing more than twice as often as it won. This is normal for teams this young, the travel wearying the body in a game where fresh legs are pretty important.

    ''Miami was tired,'' Miller said. ``You could see it. Late in the game, they were dragging.''

    Miami was better than teams like New York this season but still managed to lose by 29 to the Knicks on the road.

    And now all it must do to advance in these playoffs is win at least once here against the team with the NBA's best record, a team that was 34-7 at home this season.

    RESERVED ON ROAD

    You never see the fist-pumping, chest-beating Wade on the road. He reserves the histrionics and outward displays of emotion for the home crowd that showers him with love. He'll learn, over the years, to derive a certain joy from the silencing of the rabid strangers on the road, too, but that's something that is going to come with growth.

    About the best you can say for the Heat on this night? They didn't quit. They never do. Unfortunately, that's something that only gets said about losing teams.

    Doesn't help that Indiana got the star treatment from the referees. Miami has no stars, so they aren't going to get any calls. Refs are human, too. They watch TV commercials. They know that's MVP candidate Jermaine O'Neal out there with the ball. And they get a certain thrill from making the big look-at-me call that makes 20,000 people scream as if they had flipped a noise switch.

    Miami might as well have had players in foul trouble before the game even started.

    Miami won't win a game in this series if Jamaal Tinsley (6 of 7, 17 points) shoots this way when the Heat is busy double-teaming the real threats, O'Neal and Ron Artest. But there is some solace to be taken from keeping the game close late despite a 32-18 free-throw disadvantage and Tinsley's absurd shooting, especially given the 22-point deficit that inflated when a shaky Miami kept shooting airballs and missing point-blank shots.

    You've seen those NBA commercials where various NBA stars pretend to flirt with the golden NBA trophy as if it were a pretty girl?

    The Heat can't expect her to just land in its lap.

    It needs to go on the road and get her.




    http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...te/8610366.htm

    Heart matters more
    GREG COTE
    gcote@herald.com

    INDIANAPOLIS -- The general consensus entering this NBA playoff series was that Miami's valiant season had been sentenced to death. There would be no appeal, either. No last-minute stay. So strong was the assignment of doom, you half expected Heat players to walk onto the Conseco Fieldhouse court here Thursday night wearing blindfolds and smoking cigarettes, lined up and helpless but to face their fate.

    Indiana's Pacers would be required to show up, sure, technically -- if only for appearances' sake -- but the prohibitive favorites would be gliding on auto pilot. Before long, the Game 1 rout on, you imagined Pacers players huddled beside their bench around a small TV, dabbing tears while watching the final episode of Friends.

    The idea that this series' conclusion was foregone -- over before it began -- seemed like a fairly grievous disregard and disrespecting of the Heat.

    It also seemed a rather unearned pedestal for the Pacers, who, despite the league's best regular-season record, brought no championship pedigree into this postseason.

    GETTING CLOSER

    Game 1 drew the teams a little closer, is what it did. In perception, at the very least. Game 1 should siphon a little of whatever overconfidence may have existed among the Pacers, and should give a little bit of hope (a little) to the Heat.

    The Pacers won 94-81, yes, but the Heat won a measure of respect.

    Indiana should win this series. Should. But it might not be in four or five games. And it will not be without a fight. That's what Thursday showed.

    It was more than not quitting, even as the Indiana lead ballooned past 20 in the second half. It was the idea the young Heat was not intimidated -- despite its awful road record, despite the Pacers' great success at home.

    It was the idea the Heat still believes, even if nobody else outside of its hard-core fandom does.

    Miami got a struggling night from Lamar Odom, next to no offense from Brian Grant, and hardly anything at all of Eddie Jones.

    And yet the Heat gave itself a modest chance, cutting the lead to eight with time to play.

    Of course, the fact we are praising the Heat effort after a 13-point defeat tells you how much work Miami has to do.

    The disparity between the teams seemed accurate in spurts and batches Thursday night, and it remains an onus on the Heat to prove it's not.

    If Thursday was a small moral victory, those are consolations that won't cut it for Miami anymore. Not now.

    It's going to take a Heat win on the road, right here, somehow, for the underdogs to have any chance in this series.

    And a Heat team with a 13-32 road record, against a Pacers team 37-7 at home, looks to be as close to an impossible task as you'll find anywhere in these playoffs.

    Again: Can the Heat prove it's not?

    The Pacers have been saying all the right things to publicly respect the Heat, even as Indiana entered this series as confident as it was rested.

    Indiana's Jermaine O'Neal complimented Miami's spunk, saying, ``Heart can be tougher to play against than talent.''

    THE RIGHT WORDS

    It's a nice bon mot. Ready made for a fortune cookie, or maybe a Hallmark verse. But it's pretty much a lie, too.

    Pacers coach Rick Carlisle? He likened Dwyane Wade's game to no less than that of LeBron James.

    For all the Pacers' praise, Miami in this series faces Jermaine O'Neal, a true star, not the sort-of one New Orleans' Jamaal Magloire supposedly was. It faces Reggie Miller, thespian, dive artist, one of great clutch performers in NBA history. And it faces Defensive Player of the Year Ron Artest, whose hobby is collecting technicals.

    Earning a measure of national respect will be easy for this Heat team if it works throughout this series as hard as it did Thursday night.

    But earning more than that -- earning an elusive, essential road victory to have any chance at all in this series -- will be immeasurably tougher.

    The Heat can show all the heart it has and all of the fight it can muster in this series, and it still might not be enough.



    http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...ll/8610347.htm

    Odom comes up short
    By STEPHEN HOLDER
    sholder@herald.com

    INDIANAPOLIS - This postseason has been Lamar Odom's personal coming-out party, his opportunity to show the world what he was so thoroughly convinced of long ago. It was his chance to prove he belongs here -- in the playoffs, in big games, among the best.

    And then Thursday arrived.

    The Pacers crashed Odom's party with the subtlety of a sledgehammer, frustrating the Heat's go-to man, forcing him into a poor shooting display. He missed eight of his first 10 shot attempts in this 94-81 loss to kick off the second round.

    Odom tried to rally his team in the fourth quarter, long after the Heat had fallen behind by as many as 23. Odom added three big baskets in the fourth quarter and finished with 12 points on 5-of-15 shooting, but six points through three quarters was far from enough.

    Odom's fourth-quarter contributions were too little and too late for the Heat's primary offensive option. His team needed him to get things going three quarters before, back when the Pacers were playing as if they didn't want this crucial game, back when the Heat was screaming for an individual to take a stand.

    Instead, that's when Indiana sent Odom to the locker room, where he was treated for a cut to his chin that required several stitches, his second such injury during the playoffs.

    ''That's one thing I didn't need when I started off cold, to come in here and get stitches,'' Odom said. ``It's not an excuse. I didn't play well offensively. I came up a little short.''

    In Game 3 at New Orleans, Odom needed stitches on his eyelid just as he was beginning to heat up after a long afternoon. It's the third time this season Odom has required stitches during a game, but, like a boxer, he keeps getting up off the mat.

    ''It's like a fighter who keeps getting cut in the same area,'' Heat coach Stan Van Gundy said.

    But after leaving late in the first quarter and returning early in the second, Odom couldn't connect. He missed from the perimeter, missed in the paint, missed from pretty much everywhere.

    By halftime, when the Heat trailed by 10, Odom had had a minimal impact on the game, his 1-for-7 accuracy and three points registering barely a blip on Miami's radar.

    Had this been almost any other Heat player, maybe Miami could withstand it. But this was Odom, the most consistent player the Heat has in these playoffs, and in this eighth postseason game, the Heat had long become accustomed to getting big efforts from its biggest star.

    Odom had led the Heat in scoring through the postseason, averaging 16.3 points per game against the New Orleans Hornets. He also shot 43.8 percent despite being guarded by P.J. Brown, a very capable and experienced defender.

    Odom had dropped 25 points on the Hornets in Game 4, 18 points in Game 3 and 17 in Game 1. But, suddenly, Al Harrington and Jeff Foster of the Pacers had found a way to disrupt Odom's rhythm -- or, more accurately, found a way to prevent Odom from finding that rhythm in the first place.

    ''It's going to be like that sometimes,'' Odom said. ``I just have to keep plugging, keep going. Nothing changes from my part.''



    http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...ll/8610349.htm

    Pacers take control with halfcourt game
    By MICHAEL POINTER
    Special to the Herald

    INDIANAPOLIS - Perhaps the last thing Indiana coach Rick Carlisle wanted to see was a game played at breakneck speed Thursday night.

    ''They play with an angular, hard-driving kind of force,'' Carlisle said before Indiana's opening game against the Heat. ``We've got to make sure we don't turn this into a track meet. If we turn this into a 100-yard dash, we're going to get beat.''

    Mission accomplished. The veteran, deep Pacers got the Heat into a halfcourt game early and withstood a mild rally en route to victory.

    ''We've got to play at our tempo, which is an opportunistic transition tempo, and we've got to play inside-out as often as we can,'' Carlisle said. ``It's tough because Miami makes it tough to get the ball into the post.''

    Still, there isn't much to complain about in Indianapolis. Average winning margin through five playoff games is 16 points. The 11-day layoff since the Pacers swept Boston in an opening-round series hardly seemed to bother them.

    If anything, it may have made them fresher -- especially against the Heat, which had just one day to get ready for the Pacers after a Game 7 victory over New Orleans.

    ''Miami was tired,'' Indiana's Reggie Miller said. ``You could see it at the beginning of the game. They were really dragging. They really didn't have time to prepare for us.''

    Added Carlisle: ``It really felt good to go out and play the game. The effort was there. I thought we were a little overanxious at times. But I thought we played pretty well.''

    Ron Artest, who missed the Pacers' morning shootaround because of a headache, scored 25 points and added six rebounds. Indiana's Jamaal Tinsley had a career playoff high of 17 points. He was 5 for 6 from three-point range.

    ''He made some mistakes along the way, but he did a great job of making shots,'' Carlisle said. ``He made some three-pointers when we kicked it out from a double-team in the paint that came at really key times.''

    The Pacers took the lead for good when Artest's two field goals made the score 11-10 with 5:51 left in the first half.

    They stretched their first-half lead to 10 points three times, the final coming when Jonathan Bender's basket with 3.9 seconds left made the score 46-36 at the break.

    Indiana then opened the second half with a 14-1 run. Miami did not get its first basket of the second half until Rafer Alston hit a free throw with 7:43 remaining. The Heat played better after that, but the game was out of reach. They cut the deficit to 84-76 on Caron Butler's basket with 3:26 left.

    But Miller answered with a three-pointer 15 seconds later, and the Pacers coasted home.

    ''Miami is going to keep coming at you,'' Carlisle said. ``They've got a strong will. I'm afraid when we go and look at the tape, we're going to see they outworked us at times.

  • #2
    Re: Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

    Thanks for the articles Will.

    I'd like to say I've never been a fan of Le Batard. Guy annoys me to no end.
    Mickael Pietrus Le site officiel

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

      "Artest collect technicals" WTF? Must have been last season's beat writer.
      The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

        Indiana gets star treatment from the referees? I'd love for Le Batard to explain that one to me. ed:

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

          I emailed Dan Lebatard at the email provided.

          Here is my message:

          "Mr. Lebatard:

          In your most recent article about the Pacers-Heat game, you said the following:

          "Doesn't help that Indiana got the star treatment from the referees. Miami has no stars, so they aren't going to get any calls. Refs are human, too. They watch TV commercials. They know that's MVP candidate Jermaine O'Neal out there with the ball. And they get a certain thrill from making the big look-at-me call that makes 20,000 people scream as if they had flipped a noise switch."

          Could you further explain that paragraph? Can you detail any specific scenarios or instances where this occured? I've been to about 40% of the Pacers games this year and, in no instance, seen where the Pacers have gotten "the star treatment" from the refs. In fact, everyone's favorite tough-guy Ronnie Artest usually gets held to the "scumbag treatment" (refs calling things based on his reputation from his previous playing days).

          That's the only question I have. Thanks for the time.

          Go Pacers!"


          Now, this is the response I received from him:

          "the reason brian grant got his technical is because he was called for a
          foul in which his main crime was not being jermaine o'neal."

          There you go! LOL.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

            Now, this is the response I received from him:

            "the reason brian grant got his technical is because he was called for a
            foul in which his main crime was not being jermaine o'neal."

            There you go! LOL.
            Fascinating.
            Take me out to the black, tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

              http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/b...la-sports-heat











              SKOLNICK: Desperation drives Pacers
              Published


              INDIANAPOLIS -- Sometimes, it's not enough simply to know your opponent, as the Heat will get to know these deep, disciplined and very determined Pacers much better over the next week, or two, in the unlikely event this exercise lasts that long.

              Sometimes it's necessary to feel what your foe has felt.

              So it's not just that the Heat can't match the Pacers' size, depth, experience, overall skill at most positions and indignation about being disrespected, all of which became apparent during Indiana's 94-81 victory in Game 1, at the end of which Pacers star Jermaine O'Neal said not-so-reassuringly, "We know we didn't play the way we're supposed to play, and still, we were able to control the game."

              The Heat, for all its heart, can't be expected to match the Pacers' either.

              This group of happy-to-be-here Heat players hasn't suffered. So there's no way they can simulate what these Pacers players felt last April, when they stumbled into the playoffs after a strong start and lost to an underdog Celtics team in six games in the first round. Before you can win big in the NBA playoffs, you have to suffer some first. Recent champions from Detroit, Chicago and Los Angeles tumbled down the hill a time or two before finally scaling to the top.

              The Pacers tumbled hard last April. And it was good for them. It altered some of their attitudes, so they banded together even after an initially unpopular coaching change. It forced them to accept their roles under the new coach and fueled their desire not to let such failure repeat itself.

              "We let ourselves down," Jamaal Tinsley said of the 2003 playoffs. "Guys are just hungry. This is the year everybody came back in shape. Everybody is pulling for each other. Guys are healthy. And we want it. We all want it as a group. Not just one individual."

              "Before training camp started, we said this is our year," O'Neal said.

              Before training camp started, many Heat players didn't know any of South Florida's street names, let alone each other's.

              So while the Heat comes in on a joyride, the Pacers come in on a mission.

              How determined are the Pacers?

              Well, Game 1 provided a primer. If there was ever a game to slack off or come out sluggish, this was it. The Pacers had the ideal excuse. After burying Boston in four and sticking that sour memory in the coffin, they had 11 days to lie, and even nap, in wait for their next opponent, and be groggy for Thursday.

              After all, their opponent didn't turn out to be the sort that roused you awake, like coffee splashed across the face. It turned out to be the modern-day version of the 1953-54 Milan Indians, the famous Indiana underdogs impersonated in the movie Hoosiers by a fictional school called Hickory. Now, a half-century after the legendary event -- Milan's win against powerful Muncie Central -- the new impersonators took the form of a bunch of fresh-faced NBA guys in black and red.

              The city, set in Basketball, USA, was so jazzed up for this matchup that it didn't sell all the tickets until just before game-time. The players had every reason to start looking ahead to a likely Eastern Finals matchup with the Detroit Pistons, and all the subplots that will feature: former Pistons coach in charge of the Pacers, former Pacers coach Larry Brown now leading the Pistons.

              And, at most, they gave the Heat just the smallest sliver of false hope it can seriously challenge in this series. Indiana started slow, as expected, missing its first five shots. But it got as warm as the surprising local weather soon enough, hitting 50 percent by the half, while harassing the Heat into 13 consecutive misses in one second-quarter stretch. Indiana kept coming in waves of shooters, rebounders, defenders. By the middle of third quarter, the lead was 23. The gutty Heat, to its credit, trimmed it to 12 by the start of the fourth, then 10, then eight, with Malik Allen somehow cast in the role of little Ollie. But there would be no miraculous underhanded free throws or unexpected celebrations on this late night.

              The Pacers won without a single fast-break point, with defense that O'Neal said they could turn "up four or five notches."

              "This team can play so much better," said Reggie Miller, who clinched it with one of his ho-hum clutch threes.

              Miller and the Pacers, winners of 66 of 87 games, won't be satisfied until there's a celebration in Indiana this June. And if there is, they'll credit it to the frustration of last April.

              "Trials and tribulations, we've been through all that," O'Neal said.

              "These guys tasted bitter defeat last year," Indiana assistant Ron Rothstein said. "Understand that."

              The Heat players can't yet understand how that feels, though they'll learn, and be better for it in the future. The Pacers, who believe -- no know -- this is their year, are determined to be good teachers.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Game One coverage from the Miami Herald.

                http://www.palmbeachpost.com/sports/...702a610e0.html


                Heat only a practice partner for Pacers

                By Dave George, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
                Friday, May 7, 2004



                INDIANAPOLIS -- Pushing, shoving, flopping on the floor, the Miami Heat tried to improvise a way to minimize its muscle deficit against Indiana. The scary part is that it worked as well as it ever will Thursday and the Pacers still won by the almost casual margin of 94-81.

                This opening game of the Eastern Conference semifinal teetered toward disaster at several points, and that's with Ron Artest suffering from migraine headaches, Jermaine O'Neal doing nothing all that special and Reggie Miller saving his big-game heroics for, well, a bigger series.

                If this is what happens after an 11-day layoff for the Pacers, what is Heat coach Stan Van Gundy going to cook up for Saturday's Game 2, when Indy is really into it? Bullish and sometimes a little bored, Indiana just kept leaning on Miami and got 14 more free throws than the Heat did as a reward.

                More on the Heat
                • Heat: News, stats, more
                • Photos: Pacers | Hornets
                • Calendar: Home playoff games
                • NBA: Follow the playoffs
                • Weekly email newsletter
                "I've got to find some answers that I don't have right now," said Van Gundy, whose team won the rebound battle 47-39 Thursday but still struggled to push themselves over the 80-point mark. That's with Rafer Alston scoring a career playoff high of 17 points and rookie Dwyane Wade pitching in 22 to outscore everybody but Artest.

                The only surprise in this game was Pacers guard Jamaal Tinsley throwing five in from three-point range. Everything else went according to form from Indiana's 3-0 regular-season dominance of Miami. Even with a sluggish start, the Pacers flirted with 100 points. Even with the Heat getting a slow first-quarter pace to its liking, Indiana's defense made Van Gundy regret even that goal. Miami shot 21 percent in that quarter and scored 15 points, which is the worst kind of frustration, and the Pacers merely took it as a chance to catch their breath.

                "This team can play so much better," Miller said of the Pacers, and none of the post-game compliments he paid Miami spoke as loudly as that truth.

                Seven rugged games with New Orleans begins to look like a vacation compared to one evening in Indianapolis. "We Defend... We Win," read a message so constant around here that it is painted on the wall of the Pacers' locker room. It might as well be "We Knock People Down.... They Don't Get Up," for O'Neal and Artest and Al Harrington love to back that ball down on defenseless defenders who can't do much of anything without drawing a whistle or yielding the right of way for an easy layup.

                "We feel like we're the best team in the league," O'Neal said, with 61 regular-season wins to back his claim. "If we play on both ends of the floor, we don't think anyone can beat us."

                When East finally meets West, that may change, but South Florida is barely on the NBA post-season map at all now that the savagery of the second round is upon the Heat. Miami's scrappy players are sparring partners here for some future heavyweight matchup, and you could read it in the stitches under Lamar Odom's chin. Caron Butler had trouble speaking to reporters, too, not because he was angry but because his mouth was bloody and swollen from diving to get a ball and taking a kick to the mouth for his troubles.

                Oh, and Butler got to guard Artest, too.

                "That guy, he was making circus shots," Butler said. "With the credibility he's got as NBA Defensive Player of the Year, it's a little difficult going at him the same way and getting a few calls, but you have to stay aggressive."

                If there's encouraging news, it's that the Heat players just kept sticking their chins in there, fighting for rebounds and winning most of them, sending Wade down the lane as if there were no shot-blockers in the building at all, looking at a 23-point deficit and deciding right then and there that they weren't going to go as quietly as the Boston Celtics did in the opening round.

                Does it even matter what they do at this point and in the games to come? It should, and not just because this series eventually will make it back to Miami and a building where the Heat hasn't lost in 16 games. It matters because.500 teams aren't supposed to knock off the conference's top seed, but they are supposed to show themselves worthy of future consideration. It's the same phase the Pacers had to go through, and in the end it's not much different than the phase they're going through right now, trying to win an NBA title rather than just playing the same loud but broken record every spring.

                Van Gundy, bless him, will get in these guys' faces a little today, but he won't be able to fault their effort. A rookie head coach himself, he knows that even Pat Riley couldn't have worked more miracles with this young unit than already have been worked.

                The Heat will take its lumps in this series. That's all there is to it. The goal between now and Saturday is to figure out how to keep that Pacers score from swelling. Nothing could be more important right now, because Indiana's defense isn't going to let any team, least of all Miami, pile up 90 or 100 points in a playoff game.

                Comment

                Working...
                X