Okay, in spite of being on the road a lot, I've seen most of the games (but, ironically, I was not in Chicago for the game Saturday night.)
Quick observations that I'm sure have been covered around here somewhere else...
(1) Tinsley and JO are just crucial to the success of the "new" Pacers. Its going to take time before every one "looks good" in this system. Even if the system seems to leverage JO's and Jamaal's strengths, they still have years of slow-it-down, isolation-ball habits to break. And it shows at times. The Washington game was a prime example - we all know Tinsley still has defensive limitations but without JO's interior presence, our defense was just miserable.
(2) I've been proud that Rick seems to be resisting temptation to tighten it up. Quinn had some fascinating things to say on that topic during the Orlando game - to take it one step further, it will take a while before the players are instinctively ready to just play the game (without looking to the bench for a play call). Its a shame it came to this. After all, basketball is a beautiful game to watch when the players are all in movement and in-sync with each other.
(3) SJax - brace yourselves - I've hardly noticed when he's on the court. And that's a great thing. Because his game is like fingernails on a chalkboard to me. But - to his credit - he seems to be doing a much, much better job of playing his role, understanding his role, not disrupting the offense, not hogging the ball, not taking too many terrible shots (empahsize "too many"). When he remembers that, of our starting five, he's the fourth option at best behind JO, Al, and Tinsley, he *can* compliment their games. There have even been times this season where I've thought that he's made "smart" plays - something he's very rarely been accused of in the past. I hope he keeps it up and accumlates some trade value - it would be nice to have options instead of guys that are untradeable.
(4) David Harrison - lost too much weight. Remember in the Bo Hill era, when the "smart" decision was to have Rik gain weight to play in the post. Well, Rik, as many of us knew, was just a 7'4" small forward, and that didn't work. Larry Brown took one look at Rik in '94 and told him to lose the extra weight, and Rik became a better player.
We've got the opposite problem with David. David is a bruiser, first and foremost. But not anymore. Now we've got that awful combination of a guy who uses his hands too much... but now he really NEEDS to use his hands because he's getting pushed around as he's never been pushed around before.
We're doing him a disservice. Its time to let him bulk back up and go play elsewhere. But I sure don't want to see him on the court until he's back to 280lbs, and you all know that I'm a David Harrison fan...
(5) Powell/ Marshall - Who would've thought that "Throw-in #1" and "Throw-in #2" would've even made the team, let alone play relatively well in their limited roles? Marshall appears headed toward the common young-player problem of playing much better in home games than away games. I'd like the Pacers to try a two week expiriment of giving Foster's minutes to Powell - can Foster's rebounding productivity be replaced in a way that Foster could be used in a trade to improve the backcourt? As for Foster, he seems much more capable of catching the ball this season.
(6) Daniels - I'm starting to really, really like this kid's game. He's heady, he doesn't seem to make mistakes, I like his effort. And he seems very, very adept around the rim. He doesn't really play the same style I don't think, but he's got many of the same attributes as Vern Fleming, who I always enjoyed watching play because he just had a way of making plays out of nothing.
Lastly, and most importantly,
(7) I really underestimated just how good Rick could do at keeping this team competitive most nights while they went through a long learning/ adjustment period. By continuing to emphasize defense overall, even with certain strategic changes defensively, this team is putting themselves in position to win the games it can/ should win (Bobcats, Philly, Orlando, NYK) - something I was concerned about because the last time this team had a real fundamental identity shift like this (toward defense, under Larry Brown) they really looked awful for a number of weeks against every type of opponent.
Quick observations that I'm sure have been covered around here somewhere else...
(1) Tinsley and JO are just crucial to the success of the "new" Pacers. Its going to take time before every one "looks good" in this system. Even if the system seems to leverage JO's and Jamaal's strengths, they still have years of slow-it-down, isolation-ball habits to break. And it shows at times. The Washington game was a prime example - we all know Tinsley still has defensive limitations but without JO's interior presence, our defense was just miserable.
(2) I've been proud that Rick seems to be resisting temptation to tighten it up. Quinn had some fascinating things to say on that topic during the Orlando game - to take it one step further, it will take a while before the players are instinctively ready to just play the game (without looking to the bench for a play call). Its a shame it came to this. After all, basketball is a beautiful game to watch when the players are all in movement and in-sync with each other.
(3) SJax - brace yourselves - I've hardly noticed when he's on the court. And that's a great thing. Because his game is like fingernails on a chalkboard to me. But - to his credit - he seems to be doing a much, much better job of playing his role, understanding his role, not disrupting the offense, not hogging the ball, not taking too many terrible shots (empahsize "too many"). When he remembers that, of our starting five, he's the fourth option at best behind JO, Al, and Tinsley, he *can* compliment their games. There have even been times this season where I've thought that he's made "smart" plays - something he's very rarely been accused of in the past. I hope he keeps it up and accumlates some trade value - it would be nice to have options instead of guys that are untradeable.
(4) David Harrison - lost too much weight. Remember in the Bo Hill era, when the "smart" decision was to have Rik gain weight to play in the post. Well, Rik, as many of us knew, was just a 7'4" small forward, and that didn't work. Larry Brown took one look at Rik in '94 and told him to lose the extra weight, and Rik became a better player.
We've got the opposite problem with David. David is a bruiser, first and foremost. But not anymore. Now we've got that awful combination of a guy who uses his hands too much... but now he really NEEDS to use his hands because he's getting pushed around as he's never been pushed around before.
We're doing him a disservice. Its time to let him bulk back up and go play elsewhere. But I sure don't want to see him on the court until he's back to 280lbs, and you all know that I'm a David Harrison fan...
(5) Powell/ Marshall - Who would've thought that "Throw-in #1" and "Throw-in #2" would've even made the team, let alone play relatively well in their limited roles? Marshall appears headed toward the common young-player problem of playing much better in home games than away games. I'd like the Pacers to try a two week expiriment of giving Foster's minutes to Powell - can Foster's rebounding productivity be replaced in a way that Foster could be used in a trade to improve the backcourt? As for Foster, he seems much more capable of catching the ball this season.
(6) Daniels - I'm starting to really, really like this kid's game. He's heady, he doesn't seem to make mistakes, I like his effort. And he seems very, very adept around the rim. He doesn't really play the same style I don't think, but he's got many of the same attributes as Vern Fleming, who I always enjoyed watching play because he just had a way of making plays out of nothing.
Lastly, and most importantly,
(7) I really underestimated just how good Rick could do at keeping this team competitive most nights while they went through a long learning/ adjustment period. By continuing to emphasize defense overall, even with certain strategic changes defensively, this team is putting themselves in position to win the games it can/ should win (Bobcats, Philly, Orlando, NYK) - something I was concerned about because the last time this team had a real fundamental identity shift like this (toward defense, under Larry Brown) they really looked awful for a number of weeks against every type of opponent.
Comment