Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

  1. #1

    Default After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Five games amounts to 1/16th of the season. Nothing is decided, but it is time to be making judgments and adjustments. I pose here three questions stimulated by the early team statistics.


    1. Are the Pacers speeded up enough?

    Last year, the Pacers averaged 76.5 field goal attempts. In the first five games of this season, they've averaged 83.8 FGA. The team really is moving to the rim faster. The increased field goal attempt rate is despite a higher turnover rate (18 per game this season, compared to 14.7 last year).

    Is this increase from 76.5 to 83.8 enough, or do you want to see even more FGA per game? Is Sam Mitchell's stated goal of 100 FGA per game for the Raptors reasonable?


    2. Are the Pacers still taking too many 3 point attempts?

    Last year, the Pacers relied very heavily on the 3-pt shot, taking 18.7 attempts per game. So far this season, they are down to 12.8 attempts per game. (In last night's blowout loss, when the Pacers were frar behind and missing their main post player they took 19).

    Is the 3pt shot where it needs to be, or would you want still fewer 3pt attempts?


    3. Who needs to shoot more?

    Harrington and Jackson lead the team in missed field goal attempts, with 40 and 42 respectively. That works out to 13.0 misses per 48 minutes for Harrington and 12.8 for Jackson, who, like last year has played the most minutes through the first five games. Jasikevisius ranks 3rd, chucking misses at the rate of 12.3 per 48 (actually 19 misses in 74 total minutes of play). Jermaine has 30 misses, which factors to 10.8 misses per game. Jermaine has a higher FG% (.524) than either the #2 or #3 options (Harrington is .459 and Jackson is .323).

    Is the shot distribution OK as it is, or do you want to see changes toward more high-percentage shots? If the latter, who should be taking more shots and what adjustments are needed to create those shots?
    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

  2. #2
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    32,995

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    1) I think anyone who is honest has to be surprised at how fast the Pacers are playing. Admit it, you never thought Rick would do it.

    2) I think 12.8 is a good number, but if you take away the two losses the Pacers probably average 8 or 9 in their wins

    3) All I want Jackson to do is take good shots and that depends on who else is on the court and if anyone else is hot or if jax is hot himself. Jax is a player who can get a halfway decent shot off anytime he wants because of his height and the way he shoots it. But he needs to be more selective.

    Saras is the opposite of Jackson, he has trouble getting decent shots, so he needs to shoot when he's open, but no more, he should never force shots

  3. #3

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    My main problem with # 2 isn't the quantity of the shots, but how/why they are taken. I feel like we could get a better shot on about half of the threes we're taking. It's the "settling" mentality that really hurts our team. And I notice that the style of play changes depending on the score. We're not hoisting up threes with a twenty point lead, but when down by ten we're looking for that shot.

    Not sure how I feel about the other two statements.

  4. #4
    Member Moses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    3,565

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    I think a problem we will face later on in the season is Rick's prevent offense.

    If we are up by 10 in the 4th with 10 minutes to go, I get the feeling that we are going to stop playing the way that got us that lead and go into half-court sets to waste the clock..but not get us decent shots.

  5. #5

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Jackson is atrocious. You just can't have someone that inefficient taking so many shots.

  6. #6
    One man show ajbry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,696

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersFan83 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Jackson is atrocious. You just can't have someone that inefficient taking so many shots.


    He hasn't found his shot yet, you overdramatic fool. If you actually know our players tendencies besides the almighty Harrison, you would know he's streaky. Besides, he hasn't been taking 15+ shots a game - he's been contributing extremely well in essentially every other aspect of the game.

  7. #7
    Member Isaac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    26
    Posts
    3,151

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersFan83 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Jackson is atrocious. You just can't have someone that inefficient taking so many shots.
    Man have you been on troll mode for the last week or so.

  8. #8
    You are my Lucifer D-BONE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Nirvana
    Posts
    7,195

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersFan83 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Jackson is atrocious. You just can't have someone that inefficient taking so many shots.
    As inefficient as pretty much the entire team was last night, I guess you'd just prefer we take no shots. Or in the big picture, we could just dump it to JO and let him shot 50 shots a game. We'd be tough to defend. So Granger's underachieving and Jackson's atrocious. Who do you suggest we play the most minutes at SF/SG?

  9. #9
    Member BruceLeeroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    182

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersFan83 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Jackson is atrocious. You just can't have someone that inefficient taking so many shots.
    Don't worry I feel your pain.


  10. #10
    Member BruceLeeroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    182

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by D-BONE View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    As inefficient as pretty much the entire team was last night, I guess you'd just prefer we take no shots. Or in the big picture, we could just dump it to JO and let him shot 50 shots a game. We'd be tough to defend. So Granger's underachieving and Jackson's atrocious. Who do you suggest we play the most minutes at SF/SG?
    Quiseeee son!


  11. #11
    NaptownSeth is all feel Naptown_Seth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Downtown baby
    Posts
    12,638

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Unclebuck View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    1) I think anyone who is honest has to be surprised at how fast the Pacers are playing. Admit it, you never thought Rick would do it.

    2) I think 12.8 is a good number, but if you take away the two losses the Pacers probably average 8 or 9 in their wins

    3) All I want Jackson to do is take good shots and that depends on who else is on the court and if anyone else is hot or if jax is hot himself. Jax is a player who can get a halfway decent shot off anytime he wants because of his height and the way he shoots it. But he needs to be more selective.

    Saras is the opposite of Jackson, he has trouble getting decent shots, so he needs to shoot when he's open, but no more, he should never force shots
    I agree for the most part, though I certainly thought/knew an RC offense could play this way since they did from 98-2K.

    I'd rather watch the OPP FG% vs FGA per game by the Pacers. If you can get more looks without giving up easier looks to the other team, then okay. But if taking more shots means giving up a lot more points, then what was the reasoning for it in the first place.

    This team doesn't have shooters that want to make it an open jump shot competition.

    I simply want more action coming to the rim on plays, rather than settling for jumpers.

    I agree with Imawhat on the 3pt choices. Often there have been other looks behind those 3pt shots that they pass up. 3s from time to time are nice, but attack the rim, draw fouls and get 3 the hard way instead. It helps put the opponent on the baseline which extends their court, puts them in a tough defensive spot due to fouls, and creates a lot more chances for closer looks and tip-ins.

    The biggest key to go with that is that OTHER PLAYERS must follow the ball to the rim. You can't just stand outside and watch a guy drive, at least once your own defender drops off you.

    I'll take the 12-13 3PA because frankly it's been disgusting the previous 2 years seeing it near 20 on average and 25+ on many nights.


    I'd like to see Harrison getting a few more FGAs per, I'd like to see AL and Jack limit their FGAs to 10-12 per night, with JO running maybe 14, Tins around 6-7. Granger could use 7-8 himself on most nights. Then give SarJas, Daniels, Harrison 5-6 as well.

    That gets it to 15-16 left to hit the 83 area that can come from Foster, Armstrong, Marshall, Powell or perhaps give all of the starters one more shot.

    I'd want everyone to make at least 40% to keep those, and really more like 43-45% (better for the bigs).

  12. #12
    You are my Lucifer D-BONE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Nirvana
    Posts
    7,195

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by BruceLeeroy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Quiseeee son!

    OK, I'm not your son. Now that we've got that out of the way, I would be more along that line of thinking but I don't think Quis has shown himself to be playing any better than Granger or Jackson.

    In fact, other than the horrid showing against the Wiz, which goes for everyone by the way, I think Jack has been one of the better performers so far along with JO.

    All this could change going forward. At which point changes would be fine. To this point, though, I don't think you can legitimately be that critical of Jackson.

  13. #13

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by Unclebuck View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    1) I think anyone who is honest has to be surprised at how fast the Pacers are playing. Admit it, you never thought Rick would do it.
    Glad to admit it. I think the improved speed is a substantial achievement.

    Quote Originally Posted by UncleBuck
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    2) I think 12.8 is a good number, but if you take away the two losses the Pacers probably average 8 or 9 in their wins
    It's true, they shot 3s substantially more and worse in the losses:

    1-7 beating Philly
    6-16 beating Charlotte
    8-19 beating the Knicks

    7-16 losing to the Hornets
    4-19 losing to the Wizards


    Quote Originally Posted by UncleBuck
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    3) All I want Jackson to do is take good shots and that depends on who else is on the court and if anyone else is hot or if jax is hot himself. Jax is a player who can get a halfway decent shot off anytime he wants because of his height and the way he shoots it. But he needs to be more selective.

    Saras is the opposite of Jackson, he has trouble getting decent shots, so he needs to shoot when he's open, but no more, he should never force shots

    The shooting guard often has to take a shot when no one else can. I'd much rather Jackson shot at a rate of .32 than we lose possessions via shot clock violations. But the fact that he is missing more shots than the 1 and 2 options tells me he's shooting a few too many. I'm not concerned about the shooting percentages as much as the number of misses. You can't draw a definite conclusion from 5 games (and Jermaine missed one of those). But it is something to keep an eye on.
    And I won't be here to see the day
    It all dries up and blows away
    I'd hang around just to see
    But they never had much use for me
    In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

  14. #14

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by ajbry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote


    He hasn't found his shot yet, you overdramatic fool. If you actually know our players tendencies besides the almighty Harrison, you would know he's streaky. Besides, he hasn't been taking 15+ shots a game - he's been contributing extremely well in essentially every other aspect of the game.
    Quote Originally Posted by Isaac@Section216 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Man have you been on troll mode for the last week or so.
    Why am I getting criticized for wanting a SG who isnt a terrible shooter? He hasnt found his shot yet? Im asusming by "yet" you mean his entire career, in which case I'd agree with you. He cant shoot, and it looks like he'll never learn.

    40% from the field, 35% from downtown, 75% from the line, turnover prone, argues with officials, gets into violent altercations with 3 fingered mutants at 3 in the morning - seriously, whats not to love abotu Stephen Jackson?

  15. #15
    One man show ajbry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,696

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersFan83 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why am I getting criticized for wanting a SG who isnt a terrible shooter? He hasnt found his shot yet? Im asusming by "yet" you mean his entire career, in which case I'd agree with you. He cant shoot, and it looks like he'll never learn.

    40% from the field, 35% from downtown, 75% from the line, turnover prone, argues with officials, gets into violent altercations with 3 fingered mutants at 3 in the morning - seriously, whats not to love abotu Stephen Jackson?
    Okay, you are officially a troll. The last comment is completely unnecessary.

  16. #16

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Not trolling, spealing my opinion - I think Marquis Daniels is 3x the player Stephen Jackson is, and I'd like to see their minutes be reversed, Quis playing 30+ and Jackson playing 20-something.

  17. #17
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,748

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersFan83 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Jackson is atrocious. You just can't have someone that inefficient taking so many shots.
    You pretty much hate all of our players, don't you?

  18. #18
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,748

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by PacersFan83 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not trolling, spealing my opinion - I think Marquis Daniels is 3x the player Stephen Jackson is, and I'd like to see their minutes be reversed, Quis playing 30+ and Jackson playing 20-something.
    You want to play Marquis more because he's a better shooter?

    Now I've heard everything.

  19. #19
    Member BruceLeeroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    182

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by D-BONE View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    OK, I'm not your son. Now that we've got that out of the way, I would be more along that line of thinking but I don't think Quis has shown himself to be playing any better than Granger or Jackson.

    In fact, other than the horrid showing against the Wiz, which goes for everyone by the way, I think Jack has been one of the better performers so far along with JO.

    All this could change going forward. At which point changes would be fine. To this point, though, I don't think you can legitimately be that critical of Jackson.
    D-BONE I hope you know that's just a figure of speach. No disrespect intended.

    I'll admit I'm a Jackson hater but he has played very well so far this season. His shots not falling as usual but he's kept his head in the game and has played great D, but we're only 5 games in and I thought his body language last night was typical of the old Jack. I realize this is a new year and everyone deserves a clean slate and I've done that, but he's been around long enough for some of us to form a legitament opinion of him.


  20. #20

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    When has Jackson ever been an efficient two-guard? Who can honestly say that? He's always relied on volume to score--whether or not that is an effective strategy is up for debate. However, the chemistry (the oh-so-important chemistry) seems to have improven and Jackson is a contributor in that regard as well as providing adequate defense. Way to be reactive to everything, folk.

  21. #21
    NaptownSeth is all feel Naptown_Seth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Downtown baby
    Posts
    12,638

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    That 3pt shooting vs NO/OKC is actually a nice %. Combine that with winning the TO battle and my question becomes "how did they lose that game again?" If they had just closed it out. That's one they'll really want back later on.

    Jack - the fact is that as of now this would be by far his worst scoring season of his career. Sub 1.00 PPS is just crazy, and his 3P% is way, way off his career norm. 35% might not be Ray Allen time, but plenty of "good" players put it up like that and no one seems to mind...including when Jordan and Pippen did it (MJ never got over 37% except when they shortened the line and 10 of 15 seasons he shot 31% or worse).

    Jack's Ast/TO is at 2.25, his steals/TO is 1.25, the steals are 2 per game right now, he just took 2 charges vs NY (not sure about the other games), and is fouling at below 2 per game. If his shot was falling he'd be the best player on the team right now. At his salary no one should expect him to be that.

    We can probably assume that he'll find the shot, get in some hot streak like he does and see it get back to his norm, and if he can just keep a portion of what he's doing elsewhere on the court he'll continue to be a key player for the team.

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthem View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You want to play Marquis more because he's a better shooter?

    Now I've heard everything.
    No kidding. I may have the positive Daniels thread going, but even he knows better than to put up too many outside jumpers. He's not a true SG, he's more like a point SG/SF, a guy that handles the ball, drives it, keeps things moving. I'll take Jack's hot and cold streaks from outside over MD spotting up all night.


    You pretty much hate all of our players, don't you?
    All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    IE, why should he let facts stand in the way of a good hatred.

  22. #22
    One man show ajbry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,696

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Very nicely done, as always, Naptown Seth.

  23. #23
    You are my Lucifer D-BONE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Nirvana
    Posts
    7,195

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Quote Originally Posted by BruceLeeroy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    D-BONE I hope you know that's just a figure of speach. No disrespect intended.

    I'll admit I'm a Jackson hater but he has played very well so far this season. His shots not falling as usual but he's kept his head in the game and has played great D, but we're only 5 games in and I thought his body language last night was typical of the old Jack. I realize this is a new year and everyone deserves a clean slate and I've done that, but he's been around long enough for some of us to form a legitament opinion of him.

    Very well, BruceLeeroy. Apologies for my misinterpretation. I also understand why some people are so negative on Jack from a bigger picture point of view. However, to me he's still, unfortunately, our best SG option.

    If Quis posed any deep threat (for him I mean outside 14 feet) I might agree. Besides whats his FG%? Like 38% or something. I think Quis has good D, but not that significantly better than what we're getting from Jack so far this year.

    What I'd like to see get some minutes upon OG's return is both Jack and Quis in with OG, JO, and fill in the blank with somebody who can board-Al or Jeff. Al probably better since he's a scoring threat. We'd be small but if we could board we could definitely run. D would be strong with the potnetial to convert some TOs into points, too. I suppose DG could be tossed in there somwhere also.

  24. #24

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Opp. FG%/Pacers FGA by game (Outcome) TO Pacers FG%

    47.4/86 (106-99 W) 17 40.7
    44.0/80 (91-100 L) 12 40.0
    43.0/88 (109-95 W) 14 52.3
    45.1/83 (97-86 W) 21 45.1
    51.8/83 (91-117 L) 24 38.6


    So far the stats have been completely random. I see no trends, but there has to be something there.

  25. #25

    Default Re: After 5 Games: Some stats questions

    Here's an interesting stat...it's FTA for each game

    41
    24
    11
    18
    31

    So far, our two best games have been the ones with the fewest free throws. Normally more free throws would suggest that our team is playing more aggressively, which you would think is a result of better shot selection and a sign of energy, right? More free throw attempts also mean more stops and more disruptions of flow. Most likely these stats are coincidence, but maybe the disruptions are helping our opponents since we're fast and athletic. The stops give opponents a chance to rest for a few seconds. It sounds crazy and irrational, but it could be a huge factor, especially early in the season.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •