Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

    As promised, a follow up on my last posted thread on the fundamentals of setting screens. This time, I want to discuss the fundamentals of cutting off a screen, both with the ball and away from it, and talk about why we are weak in this fundamental and what we can do to fix it.

    First, lets discuss coming off a ball screen as the ballhandler. The key to this is patience and technique. Patience, because you have to let the screener come up to get in position....you can't take off or give up on the screen to quickly. Technique wise, you need to be able to occupy your defender and make him guard you before the screen happens, so he can't prepare for it as easily....you need to be able to crossover and get past him away in the direction away from the screen if he cheats defensively.

    After that, and this is a fundamental the Pacers ballhandlers struggle with, you need to come off the screen right at his outside shoulder, so there is no space for the defender to slide thru over the top of the screen. You also need to keep your dribble quick and low thru this move to explode thru it, so your screener can really pop the guy and then get into either his "roll", to his "fade" or to "rescreen" somewhere else.....in other words, you've got to turn the corner sharply, and not go too wide. It also really really helps to have the ability to make a behind the back pass, which few do anymore, to a screener popping back for a shot.....if you dont have that pass you normally have to turn your body to pass the ball back like that, and that can let the defense recover.

    Alright, coming off a ballscreen is fairly straightforward, and most of you probably know that fundamental. But now, lets talk about how to cut off a screen AWAY from the ball, and to be an effective cutter. Here should be the "commandments" of being a great cutter:

    1. Cutters should be FACING THE LANE, and not the basketball. In other words, you should not be facing the half court line, but instead be facing the opposite sideline, or lane line, or however you want to picture it.

    2. Cutters should be WATCHING THEIR MAN, and not the basketball. It is the ballhandlers responsibility and job to find you if you are open....your job is to get open to start with....dont watch the ball, watch how the defense is playing you.

    3. Cutters should set their man up before the screen comes using the principle of "If he plays you high take him higher, if he is low take him lower"....in other words, if the defense is playing you a certain way, use that against him by making him react to your move that can put him even further out of position.

    4. Cutters should FAKE before every cut, as the screener is on his way. This is so your defender can't easily see the screen coming (he is forced to watch you by your fake).

    5. OKAY>>>>>NOW WE HAVE A COACHING PHILOSOPHY DISPUTE>>>>>>
    Step 5 is either A. Cutters should begin their cut and watch their DEFENDER, and cut to where he isnt....

    Or B. Cutters should watch the SCREENER, and shift their cut to how the screener reacts to the direction the defender is going.

    I am a believer in choice A by the way.

    6. Cutter should cut low to the ground, in a good stance, and cut "shoulder to waist". I know the prevailing wisdom is to say cut "shoulder to shoulder" but that usually ends up in your cutter standing up too soon theu the cut, catching the ball without good knee flex, and being too slow to make a move after recieving the pass. At the higher levels of game, its all about athleticism and technique, and coming thru the screen and cutting low and in balance makes you quicker and better able to make a move or shoot after the catch.

    7. Cutters should cut with a TARGET HAND out to show the passer which way they are cutting and where they'd like the pass to be. The passer should be taught to not make a pass to a cutter without a target hand out...that is the key that the ballhandler uses to know whether to make the pass to a cutter or not in most cases. Its at this stage where its alright for the cutter to look for the ball.

    8. Cutters have to be able to "read" their defender (or screener if you are in that school of thought). Cutters have 3 choices : Make a "straight cut" which is what you use to go in a straight line toward the ball or a point on the floor, and is normally used when the defender runs right into the screen and totally is nailed by it. Its creates the shortest and easiest pass for the ballhandler to make. Choice #2 is to make a "fade" cut, which you use when they defender goes over the top of the screen. In this case it creates a longer pass but often an easier one if your ballhandler can make it. Your screener turns his body and slides his feet to block off the cheating defender, the cutter fades to an open spot, gets a pass, and makes a wide open jumper....or fakes the jumper and drives to the bucket. Think how many times you've seen this from Reggie Miller....Choice#3 is to "curl", which is when the cutters defender goes underneath the screen to stop the fade cut....in this case, the cutter sees that, stops and reads, the screener pivots and shifts slightly, and the cutter curls around pinning the defender helplessly along the baseline, hopefully recieves a good pass from the ballhandler, and hits a very short shot.

    In any of the choices, the key fundamentals are the same....just read the defense, follow your rules and how you've been taught, and make the appropriate basketball play.



    Turning this in to a Pacers discussion.....obviously Reggie Miller was an outstanding cutter. I'd actually tell you that I think his ability to read screens was more important than his ability to shoot well. Other great "cutters" we've had were Chris Mullin and Jalen Rose, among others.

    Last year, I was really struck by how really terrible we were at being cutters....until Peja joined us mid season, we didnt have a single player who I considered good in this area. Peja himself was a pretty good cutter but was slower thru the cut than I'd like. He did however provide a great sized target, and was a fine shooter after he caught the ball.

    The two worst cutters we had in my view were Anthony Johnson and Stephen Jackson. Johnson, as a cutter, did almost every single thing wrong. Like all the Pacers now almost he always stared at the ball and not his defender, therefore he often had no clue which wouldve been the proper way to cut to get away from his man. Often, when he was paired with Sarunas, we'd try and use AJ as a cutter and it rarely worked to get us a good shot. Often AJ wouldve beenopen easily had he cut correctly, but he seemed to prefer the "straight cut", and would often run directly INTO his defender instead of away from him. He also hardly ever showed a target, leaving the passer to guess where and when to throw him the ball.

    This would personify itself when Sarunas and AJ were in together. Sarunas would often be asked to pass the ball to a potentially cutting AJ, Sarunas would often have the ball in the air before AJ would show a target because he read which way AJ was going to cut. AJ would come off the screen and get nailed by a pass, and because he almost always cut incorrectly, the screen would be unsuccessful too, leaving AJ off balance with the ball and being guarded. Now, because with the ball AJ was pretty good, he sometimes made it work anyway, but it was plays like this that made our offense look discombobulated.

    Jackson is also an incredibly poor technique cutter. Thats a shame because he has every bit the natural athletic ability and skill to be MUCH better than he is at this. Jackson has almost no patience to wait on a screen, almost never fakes before coming off it, and because he gawks at the ballhandler and not his man he has no clue where the best way to cut is. He is really bad at rubbing his man of a screen too, and often cuts way way too wide, letting his man easily get thru the screen.

    Some of these Jackson "isolations" we are all tired of don't intend to become that, but because he is so bad at coming off a screen they often end up that way....its a really bad fundamental problem that you'd think could be fixed easier than it really can. I've found that thru my coaching experience that for some reason some players can read a screen, and some just can't....and I don't really know why that is. I'd love to be able to personally work with Jackson to see why he is such a bad cutter. Maybe he doesnt want to learn, maybe he just doesnt have the "knack", maybe he hasnt been taught well, maybe he is better than I think he is and Im wrong about all of this....Id love to know the true answer.

    Fred Jones sucked as a cutter too. We tried to use him off screens at times, and while he had good athletic ability and the ability to be a scorer, he too was a very poor cutter. He seemed to be a bit better as a cutter than Jackson and Johnson, but not much. Again, he really struggled with the simple concept of waiting to let the screen develop, and then reading his defender. He took off too soon alot, and didnt like to "fade" off a cut, which I think teams scouted and therefore played him off a screen to try and force him to do that in order to be open.

    RC in my view adjusted fairly well to this motley crew of cutters. Later in the year he used only Peja in any plays that required a decision on how to cut and read the defense. He came up with more plays where the cut was "defined" for both the cutter and the passer, and reading the defense wasnt important.....we ran alot of simpler "A.B.C" type plays (you cut to this spot, then cut here, etc etc) where decision making wasnt part of it. We ran alot of isolations and post ups for Jackson, so cutting off a screen for him wasnt necessary. And we slowed the pace of the game down so some of these issues wouldnt be so obvious, and kept us in most games and got us to the playoffs.

    I would assume that by scouting, the Pacers identified players they wanted to obtain who were better cutters and screeners, and set out to rid themselves if they could of guys who struggled in that area. I would assume (but can't say for myself yet) that Daniels and Harrington are viewed as excellent cutters and readers of screens in addition to being good players. And I would assume the same for Maceo Bastin, James White, and even Shawne Williams. Time will tell whether they seem to have that innate ability to be a good cutter or not. Maybe they see some of this skill in Rawle Marshall even...I can't tell you because I havent seen any of them play enough yet.

    I will say this....RC and his staff hasnt shown the ability to really "coach up" our players in this area and make them better overall basketball players with higher bball IQ's. He has shown the ability to adjust to what he has....but developing players skills in this area doesnt seem to be his strength.

    I would assume that any new "offensive Philosophy" we try and play with (if any) will involve more freedom, more motion offense, and more situations where the players on the floor have to be able to read a screen correctly and cut in the proper effective way. If they prove they can't, then RC will have to control them more and make the game simpler for his players offensively.

    Again, comments welcome and thanks for reading my analysis of "how to be a good cutter of a screen".

    JMO

  • #2
    Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

    Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
    Alright, coming off a ballscreen is fairly straightforward, and most of you probably know that fundamental. But now, lets talk about how to cut off a screen AWAY from the ball, and to be an effective cutter. Here should be the "commandments" of being a great cutter:

    1. Cutters should be FACING THE LANE, and not the basketball. In other words, you should not be facing the half court line, but instead be facing the opposite sideline, or lane line, or however you want to picture it.
    If I'm cutting from a down screen, up to the wing, I would need to be facing the halfcourt line, because that's the direction I'm going. The only time you should be facing the center of the court, is if it's a horizontal cut from the wing to the middle.

    Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
    2. Cutters should be WATCHING THEIR MAN, and not the basketball. It is the ballhandlers responsibility and job to find you if you are open....your job is to get open to start with....dont watch the ball, watch how the defense is playing you.
    If you're watching your man, you'd be looking behind you. You should watch the ball, because if you aren't you're gonna get smacked in the face.

    I don't know how many times I've heard, "SEE THE BALL," at practices. Cutting and not looking for the ball is ineffective, and can lead to broken noses, or other embarassing injuries. Hell, I've been known to bounce it off the back of some of my teammates heads just to get the point across.
    Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

      Originally posted by Since86 View Post
      If I'm cutting from a down screen, up to the wing, I would need to be facing the halfcourt line, because that's the direction I'm going. The only time you should be facing the center of the court, is if it's a horizontal cut from the wing to the middle.



      If you're watching your man, you'd be looking behind you. You should watch the ball, because if you aren't you're gonna get smacked in the face.

      I don't know how many times I've heard, "SEE THE BALL," at practices. Cutting and not looking for the ball is ineffective, and can lead to broken noses, or other embarassing injuries. Hell, I've been known to bounce it off the back of some of my teammates heads just to get the point across.

      I don't know how to argue this, other than just to say that you are incorrect.

      I think that what you said though is a good discussion point. If you are as you say cutting from a downscreen, your job is to read your defender, who is no doubt between YOU AND THE BASKET. The only way for you to see him is to be FACING THE LANE. Your statement implies that when you are cutting off a downscreen that you always go to the wing....if that is where you are going to go no matter how the defense plays you then thats alright i guess, but that type of cutting is what I meant when I described the cutting styles of Fred Jones and "A.B.C." type plays.

      Now, after you've read the defense, decided where to cut and which cut to use, you clear your screener's shoulder and put a target hand out. Thats when you look for the ball, not before.

      If we were on a gym floor together I could probably show this fundamental, why its important, and have you convinced pretty easily. And no, you won't get hit in the face with a ball and break your nose, I promise!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

        Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
        I don't know how to argue this, other than just to say that you are incorrect.

        I think that what you said though is a good discussion point. If you are as you say cutting from a downscreen, your job is to read your defender, who is no doubt between YOU AND THE BASKET. The only way for you to see him is to be FACING THE LANE. Your statement implies that when you are cutting off a downscreen that you always go to the wing....if that is where you are going to go no matter how the defense plays you then thats alright i guess, but that type of cutting is what I meant when I described the cutting styles of Fred Jones and "A.B.C." type plays.

        Now, after you've read the defense, decided where to cut and which cut to use, you clear your screener's shoulder and put a target hand out. Thats when you look for the ball, not before.

        If we were on a gym floor together I could probably show this fundamental, why its important, and have you convinced pretty easily. And no, you won't get hit in the face with a ball and break your nose, I promise!
        Semantics might be getting in the way. When I think of cutting off a screen, I'm thinking the whole process of seeing the screen coming, setting up your man, going through the screen, and finishin the cut.

        My remarks are mostly after the screen has been set, and you're coming off, but I still say you have to maintain eye contact with the dribbler because of the options.

        Cutters don't "see" their defender. They feel them. Reggie is going to be the best example of this, so I'll stick with him throughout.

        When Reggie was setting up his man, he made phsyical contact with him. Most of the time it was by engaging his arms. That allowed him to see the ball, and know exactly where his defender was, and also allowed him to phsyically move the defender into the screen.

        As you're making the cut, to the screen, you feel where your man is so you know what type of cut you want to do after the screen has been set. If you feel you man following you, you curl. You feel your man go over the top, you fade. Or you simply have the option of running to the spot where you're supposed to go.

        If my eyes are squarely on my defender, I can't make eye contact with the dribbler/passer to let him know where I'm going. As a PG, I'm watching your head, because where you go, your eyes/head go first. So if I see you turn your head to the inside, I assume you're curling and throw the ball appropriately.



        I really can't say it any more clearer than this. A good cutter will feel his man, either phsyically or just have good awareness to where he is, and will maintain some type of eye contact. It HAS to happen for the cut to be effective, because the dribbler is one of the most imporant aspects of a good cut. If he isn't in the loop in what's going on, the cut is useless.

        Sidenote: A nose can most certainly be broken from being hit by a ball. I've seen it atleast three times in games/practices.
        Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

          Well, this is turning out to be a good discussion. Let me try and address a few points to that last response so I can try and be as clear as possible.

          1. Reggie DID use to turn and look at his defender, especially when the Pacers used to run the "3 down" (Larry Brown's name for the single/double screen). Reggie would run along the baseline to the side of the double screen, then TURN his head and feet to face his defender to see where he was and how he was going to react to the double screen, then turn and explode thru the screen, then as he was coming off the shoulder of the screen look for and call for the ball.

          2. The passer has to look, if its true motion offense, at both sides of the floor. He doesnt need to be "in on it" so to speak, he has to be taught to read both sides of the floor, make a decision, and read the situation and make the pass. Its quite acceptable and expected that sometimes you as a cutter will make a great cut, be open, and not get the ball because the passer went the other way with his pass or dribble, or missed you. Its all part of motion offense played this way...if it happens you just keep moving and playing....your job is to play the right way and make the right basketball decision....if you dont get the pass then so be it, keep playing.

          3. By your descriptions Im assuming since86 is either playing on a team today or has played on one recently. Let me just tell you that as a coach, if you are a player who stares at the ball when recieving a downscreen, that you are making yourself much easier to guard. When I break down film, I look for players who do that to help plan my overall defensive gameplan on how I want our defense to react to your cuts. I guarantee if you are playing that way you are making yourself much easier to guard than you might know....trust me.

          4. Now, I do agree that on some level, you do have to "feel" your defender or have a sixth sense of where he is....but only the truly great can often do this, and even then its something that comes from being taught well and having the fundamentals down cold.

          5. Remember, its the passers job to also read the situation and where you are cutting....you needn't to have "eye contact" per se, if you follow the fundamental of showing a target for the passer at the proper time, and if he is also reading the screen/cut situation in the same correct way that you are.....I promise by the time you show a target, you've begun to clear space for yourself and the ball can be delivered to you on time, accurately and in rhythm.

          6. Yes, I know a ball can break someone's nose.....but how I teach the game, thats just as much the passer's fault as the reciever's if the reciever didnt show a target before the pass was made, at least in the majority of cases.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

            ThunderBird is right. Its like running a football route for a wide reciever.

            Plus, you are more likely to break your nose by running into a defender you didn't see because you were watching the man with the ball.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

              Originally posted by Isaac@Section216 View Post
              ThunderBird is right. Its like running a football route for a wide reciever.

              Plus, you are more likely to break your nose by running into a defender you didn't see because you were watching the man with the ball.
              Cutting off a screen is nothing like running a football route. A backdoor might be, but in football you don't depend on a screener, or something stationary, to help get you open.

              And both of you, I think, are missing what I'm saying with looking at the ball. You don't fixate your eyes on it, and continously stare at it. It's eye contact. You look for the ball as your coming off the screen, make eye contact with the passer, then make the cut. If the passer has no clue what you're doing, he can't get you the ball. It's a split second thing, not several seconds.

              Saying you'd run into your defender is kind of funny, because it's so far off from what I'm saying.
              1. You know exactly where he is whether or not you see him.
              2. When making your cut, he's either going to be on the side of you, or behind you.
              3. You look where your cutting to.
              4. There's a big problem with technique if your defender remains infront of you, after the screen has been set.
              Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                Cutting off a screen is nothing like running a football route. A backdoor might be, but in football you don't depend on a screener, or something stationary, to help get you open.

                And both of you, I think, are missing what I'm saying with looking at the ball. You don't fixate your eyes on it, and continously stare at it. It's eye contact. You look for the ball as your coming off the screen, make eye contact with the passer, then make the cut. If the passer has no clue what you're doing, he can't get you the ball. It's a split second thing, not several seconds.

                Saying you'd run into your defender is kind of funny, because it's so far off from what I'm saying.
                1. You know exactly where he is whether or not you see him.
                2. When making your cut, he's either going to be on the side of you, or behind you.
                3. You look where your cutting to.
                4. There's a big problem with technique if your defender remains infront of you, after the screen has been set.

                Maybe it is semantics, but I think what Im saying and what we are disagreeing on is the ORDER of what should happen. Here is what the proper sequence of events is for a cutter, in my opinion:

                1. Cutter faces the lane and looks at his man.
                2. Cutter fakes his man to set up the screen.
                3. Cutter recieves the screen.
                4. Cutter, still facing the lane and his man, notices which way his man is trying to fight thru the screen and uses the appropriate cut, in the appropriate direction away from the defender, to get open.
                5. Cutter executes cut with correct fundamentals and on balance, THEN AND ONLY THEN looks toward the passer with a target out as he clears the screeners body.

                There is no split second glance at the passer to say "hey ballhandler, Im going to cut now and flare to the corner, watch for me" or something similar, in my view and how I was taught and teach the game myself.

                I repeat, it is the ballhandlers/passers job to "take the ball to the action" and to where he sees things best developing for the offense as a whole. If that is what you are referring to as a cutter, i.e. making some sort of subliminal eye contact with him to take it to your side...then I dont really think that is the correct way to play it in most cases. And I also repeat that it sounds like you have a common misconception of how to cut properly that too many players have, including some of the Pacers, of that you watch the ball and where you are cutting too much, and it doesnt enable you to read the screen as well as you could have, due to your poor positioning.

                Since86, your picture in your avatar is a Shelbyville player, correct? Are you taught to stare where you are cutting and at the ball there? maybe you are, I dont know.....Im not sure how things are taught and what is emphasized in different areas by different coaches. My own high school coach didnt emphasize facing your man to read the screen either, it was only when I met Coach Knight and got to really studying the game while wanting to coach that he taught that to me and that I learned on my own how important it is, at least in my view. And I freely admit that its not a natural instinct for a player to look at his own defender and not the ball....thats why its hard to do and not taught as well as it should be.

                Someday, I almost wish Hicks or somebody would rent out some space for a Pacers digest coaches clinic, so we could go over some of these topics and discussion on a gym floor for those who could attend. I might even drive to Indy to help with that project sometime this fall or winter. I'd love the chance to go over why some of these things are important, some of the Pacers pet plays, maybe some schemes or plays our opponents like to run, or whatever those in attendance wanted to talk about or ask.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                  Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
                  Maybe it is semantics, but I think what Im saying and what we are disagreeing on is the ORDER of what should happen. Here is what the proper sequence of events is for a cutter, in my opinion:

                  1. Cutter faces the lane and looks at his man.
                  2. Cutter fakes his man to set up the screen.
                  3. Cutter recieves the screen.
                  4. Cutter, still facing the lane and his man, notices which way his man is trying to fight thru the screen and uses the appropriate cut, in the appropriate direction away from the defender, to get open.
                  5. Cutter executes cut with correct fundamentals and on balance, THEN AND ONLY THEN looks toward the passer with a target out as he clears the screeners body.
                  When you say "cutter recieves the screen," you mean that the defender and the picker have had phsyical contact, correct?

                  There's no possible way you look for/at your defender. If you come off the screen turn and look, one, you're giving the defender time to catch up, and two, your fade is going to be out of line or your curl isn't going to be tight.

                  The decision on what route you're going to take is made before you make it to the screen, not during, not after. You know how your man is going to take the screen, by his body positioning.





                  Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
                  There is no split second glance at the passer to say "hey ballhandler, Im going to cut now and flare to the corner, watch for me" or something similar, in my view and how I was taught and teach the game myself.
                  I don't know how you're saying there's no time to glance at the passer, when you're advocating actually turning to look the route the defender is taking. A glance of the eyes forward is much quicker to do than turning your head to look behind you.


                  Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
                  I repeat, it is the ballhandlers/passers job to "take the ball to the action" and to where he sees things best developing for the offense as a whole. If that is what you are referring to as a cutter, i.e. making some sort of subliminal eye contact with him to take it to your side...then I dont really think that is the correct way to play it in most cases. And I also repeat that it sounds like you have a common misconception of how to cut properly that too many players have, including some of the Pacers, of that you watch the ball and where you are cutting too much, and it doesnt enable you to read the screen as well as you could have, due to your poor positioning.
                  The job of the ballhandler is to get the ball to the cutter in the correct position, where he can do something with it. If the passer has no clue where the cutter is going, he has to wait to see, and it wastes time. A pass isn't to a player, it's to a spot. If I see a player starting to curl, I throw it in front of him so he runs into it. If I see a player fading, I throw it farther out behind him, so has he backs up the ball hits him in the hands.

                  A screen/pass should be a bang-bang play. You can't sit back and wait for things to develop. Good players/teams know what's going to happen 3 steps in advance. A tight curl off a down screen isn't going to work if the passer doesn't know he's curling.



                  Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
                  Since86, your picture in your avatar is a Shelbyville player, correct? Are you taught to stare where you are cutting and at the ball there? maybe you are, I dont know.....Im not sure how things are taught and what is emphasized in different areas by different coaches. My own high school coach didnt emphasize facing your man to read the screen either, it was only when I met Coach Knight and got to really studying the game while wanting to coach that he taught that to me and that I learned on my own how important it is, at least in my view. And I freely admit that its not a natural instinct for a player to look at his own defender and not the ball....thats why its hard to do and not taught as well as it should be.
                  No, that's me after sectional in '04. I went to Monroe Central, which is a 1A east of Muncie.

                  And no, you don't "stare." I've not once used the word "stare," in this entire discussion. While I haven't met Coach Knight, I am saying practically verbatium what I learned from Damon Bailey, and my high school coach who still runs the same motion offense from 15yrs ago when he first started coaching.

                  This is going to be a pointless discussion, because you will never, ever, convince me that you should look at your defender after the screen has been set. EVER. I've been to numerous shooting camps, and PG camps/colleges, and they've all taught the exact same thing, and it's never been to look at the defender.
                  Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                    Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                    When you say "cutter recieves the screen," you mean that the defender and the picker have had phsyical contact, correct?

                    There's no possible way you look for/at your defender. If you come off the screen turn and look, one, you're giving the defender time to catch up, and two, your fade is going to be out of line or your curl isn't going to be tight.

                    The decision on what route you're going to take is made before you make it to the screen, not during, not after. You know how your man is going to take the screen, by his body positioning.







                    I don't know how you're saying there's no time to glance at the passer, when you're advocating actually turning to look the route the defender is taking. A glance of the eyes forward is much quicker to do than turning your head to look behind you.




                    The job of the ballhandler is to get the ball to the cutter in the correct position, where he can do something with it. If the passer has no clue where the cutter is going, he has to wait to see, and it wastes time. A pass isn't to a player, it's to a spot. If I see a player starting to curl, I throw it in front of him so he runs into it. If I see a player fading, I throw it farther out behind him, so has he backs up the ball hits him in the hands.

                    A screen/pass should be a bang-bang play. You can't sit back and wait for things to develop. Good players/teams know what's going to happen 3 steps in advance. A tight curl off a down screen isn't going to work if the passer doesn't know he's curling.





                    No, that's me after sectional in '04. I went to Monroe Central, which is a 1A east of Muncie.

                    And no, you don't "stare." I've not once used the word "stare," in this entire discussion. While I haven't met Coach Knight, I am saying practically verbatium what I learned from Damon Bailey, and my high school coach who still runs the same motion offense from 15yrs ago when he first started coaching.

                    This is going to be a pointless discussion, because you will never, ever, convince me that you should look at your defender after the screen has been set. EVER. I've been to numerous shooting camps, and PG camps/colleges, and they've all taught the exact same thing, and it's never been to look at the defender.

                    Well....since Damon and I wouldve learned the same stuff from the same people.....Im thinking that maybe we are closer to thinking alike that is coming across in this forum and way of explaining.

                    I think what Im trying to say that you look at your defender AS the screen is being set, to see how he initially attacks the screen and tries to defend you, then you just react off of him. Im not saying the screen happens, and then you stay stationary waiting to see what happens....it all flows together pretty quickly after all.

                    But, you still need to know which way your defender is going to go, and you need to be in a position such that you can see how he reacts to the screen so you can make the appropriate cut....thats all Im trying to say.
                    I just mean that you need to be able to see how the defender first reacts to the screen so you can know which cut to make...Im not saying make a cut and then stop and turn to look at the defense to see if it worked.....maybe I explained that unclearly I dont know.

                    However, your way of describing your process of cutting (i.e. making eye contact with the passer first) makes me want to ask this follow up question : If you are unable to do make this eye contact with the passer, do you believe you should still make the appropriate cut? Or do you believe that you should wait, reset whatever you are doing, and do something else until you can make that eye contact you believe is important?

                    This is a good discussion, and I hope others who read it will chime in with their thoughts and opinions too.

                    JMO

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                      This is only somewhat related to this discussion, but I thought i'd post it here anyways since it doesn't really deserve its own thread.

                      In my bball game last night, there was a play where I set an on ball screen, slightly off a defender at the top of the key (they were playing a 2-1-2 zone). The purpose was to get our shooter a good look from the 45degree angle on the 3pt line. Our PG sent the pass over to him and the defender tried to rotate, looked up, saw me in the way, dropped his shoulder and purposely ran into me. He was abit smaller than me but fairly well built, so it was a solid hit and knocked me back several steps. Our shooter promptly knocked down the 3, but I was interested if this normally should be called a foul for deliberatley trying to floor the screener? As it is not normally the screener that comes off second best in this sort of conflict the ref ignored it. I had a brief complaint to the ref, which seemed to pay some dividends as this guy got called for a couple of offensive fouls later when he dropped his shoulder on a drive.

                      Its abit of a pointless question as we scored on the play anyways, but does setting a screen assume that you are going to wear a hit, no matter how aggressively the defender runs into it?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                        Originally posted by skyfire View Post
                        This is only somewhat related to this discussion, but I thought i'd post it here anyways since it doesn't really deserve its own thread.

                        In my bball game last night, there was a play where I set an on ball screen, slightly off a defender at the top of the key (they were playing a 2-1-2 zone). The purpose was to get our shooter a good look from the 45degree angle on the 3pt line. Our PG sent the pass over to him and the defender tried to rotate, looked up, saw me in the way, dropped his shoulder and purposely ran into me. He was abit smaller than me but fairly well built, so it was a solid hit and knocked me back several steps. Our shooter promptly knocked down the 3, but I was interested if this normally should be called a foul for deliberatley trying to floor the screener? As it is not normally the screener that comes off second best in this sort of conflict the ref ignored it. I had a brief complaint to the ref, which seemed to pay some dividends as this guy got called for a couple of offensive fouls later when he dropped his shoulder on a drive.

                        Its abit of a pointless question as we scored on the play anyways, but does setting a screen assume that you are going to wear a hit, no matter how aggressively the defender runs into it?

                        Well, yes as a screener there is going to be some contact you have to endure, but if they play unfolded exactly as you described then yes, id say that was a foul on the other guy. The only exception being if you didnt give him room to turn, or if you didnt get fully set and stationary....the lowering of the shoulder would be the part that made it an obvious foul, in my opinion.

                        The official was probably watching the ball, and not the action away from it....thats pretty common Im afraid....but yes, being a screener can be a somewhat thankless task, but a necessary one.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                          You also need to keep your dribble quick and low thru this move to explode thru it, so your screener can really pop the guy and then get into either his "roll", to his "fade" or to "rescreen" somewhere else.....in other words, you've got to turn the corner sharply, and not go too wide. It also really really helps to have the ability to make a behind the back pass, which few do anymore, to a screener popping back for a shot.....if you dont have that pass you normally have to turn your body to pass the ball back like that, and that can let the defense recover.
                          This is where you need Tinsley, he has the low dribble AND the passing. SarJas has the passes but isn't the same ball handler of course. He does work his PnRs and such very sound in terms of spacing which helps a lot.

                          But last year AJ really struggled to make plays like this work, mostly because he lacked the variety of passes available to him.

                          Jack struggles because he carries his dribble too high, you just don't see him work the ball close to the floor very well. Fred was okay, but typically a bit high with his dribble and so weak going to his left that defenders could really cheat.

                          Daniels, possibly White, and even Greene could all be improvements in working these types of plays. I will say that if they want to have an uptempo offense then this is the number 1 area that needs to improve...well, 1B, as a healthy Tinsley and a Cabbages capable of protecting his dribble are the 1A priority.


                          The only strong "screen" type of play they ran last year was the baseline Give and Go. Well, the PnR between Harrison and SarJas was extremely reliable too.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                            Is anyone else concerned but me about how our main scorers cut off screens? Who do you all think is our best cutter without the basketball on this team? Do we have anyone who you consider that to be a strength of on our team, and if not how would you counteract this weakness if you were RC and the Pacers coaching staff?

                            If you have poor cutters, its hard to design and execute good offense in the half court. That, along with an inability to feed the low post, are big concerns offensively for me as I look at our roster at this very moment.

                            JMO

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Discussion of fundamentals, Part 2: Cutting off screens

                              s anyone else concerned but me about how our main scorers cut off screens? Who do you all think is our best cutter without the basketball on this team? Do we have anyone who you consider that to be a strength of on our team, and if not how would you counteract this weakness if you were RC and the Pacers coaching staff?

                              If you have poor cutters, its hard to design and execute good offense in the half court. That, along with an inability to feed the low post, are big concerns offensively for me as I look at our roster at this very moment.

                              JMO
                              TB1245,

                              This is a great concern of mine. Now, I don't claim to be an expert on all aspects of the fundamentals. But my impression of our current and recent core players leads me to the conclusion that we have few, if any, all-around fundamentally sound players.

                              Perhaps in the NBA it's not necesary to have all five guys be highly fundamentally sound, but I suspect you need at least oen or two on the floor at any given time combined with others who are at least marginally competent in this area.

                              As is constantly pointed out, I don't see that we have any players that particularly stand out in areas such as ballhandling, shooting, cutting and off the ball movement, FT shooting, etc.. Arguably you can say well Tins has a good handle and Saras is a good passer, and so forth. But even those guys I think have significant weaknesses in other important areas.

                              In addition, we seem to have had recent groups that don't particularly play well as a unit. This I suspect due to a mismatch of fundamental skill, style of play, personalities, and expectations. Hopefully, a new season with (HOPEFULLY) less off-court drama and an infusion of new players will help in this area to some degree.
                              I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                              -Emiliano Zapata

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X