Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

4-16-2004

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 4-16-2004

    2004 NBA Draft lottery team needs

    By Chad Ford
    NBA Insider
    Send an Email to Chad Ford Friday, April 16

    # Mock Lottery, Mock Draft: See 1,716 potential lottery scenarios

    Too early to start breaking down the NBA draft?

    Consider this.

    While playoff fever grips NBA fans, half of the league's scouts and GMs are in Mannheim, Germany right now watching 18-and-under Euros do their thing. In two weeks even more executives will be in Tel Aviv, Israel for the Euroleage Final Four.

    In three weeks, the deadline for underclassmen to declare for the draft will have passed and teams (including those still in the playoffs) will begin individual workouts.

    For lottery teams, there's a lot to do.

    The Magic know they have to strike gold in the lottery to hang onto Tracy McGrady. The Bulls know they need a tested star to teach their high school dropouts how to play. The Wizards need an anti-Kwame to save the season next year.

    The season hasn't been over for 48 hours. There is no rest.

    Insider made some phone calls, and sorted through depth charts and incentive-laden contracts to give you a first look at what each lottery team will be looking for with its first-round pick. We'll continue to add playoff teams to the list as they are eliminated.

    Plus: Latest Draft Rumors | Who's in, who's out? | Top 10 by position

    Orlando Magic
    Chance to win lottery: 25% Team Needs The Skinny
    Emeka Okafor
    Toughness in paint
    Point guard No one needs Emeka Okafor more than the Magic. That's the funny thing about team needs. Sometimes they have nothing to do with positions or talent. Magic fans need something to cheer about. A hometown hero. A basketball Messiah. We have no idea just how good Okafor can really be. But he's the type of guy the Magic have been looking for ever since Ben Wallace left for Detroit. If Tracy McGrady is going to stay in Orlando, the Magic need a guy like Okafor who can step in and help immediately. Without him, all may be lost.

    Assuming the Magic don't get the No. 1 pick, the team will seriously explore trading the pick. If they can't get value, the Magic have several needs to address. They need a real center in the worst way. Unfortunately for the Magic, there won't be one ready to contribute in the top-six picks (the Magic can fall no further than six). Dwight Howard will be an option because of his size and upside, but they'll have to have patience, something running in low supply in Orlando. They also need a real point guard to run the show. The top point guard on our board, Shaun Livingston, isn't ready. The next two, Ben Gordon and Devin Harris, aren't true points . . . but could help.

    Chicago Bulls
    Chance to win lottery: 20% Team Needs The Skinny
    Emeka Okafor
    Point forward
    Physical two guard
    3-point shooting John Paxson has a tough decision to make this summer. Do they move Tyson Chandler and/or Eddy Curry in an attempt to get a tougher, more experienced (even if less talented) core in return. Obviously, Okafor would be a godsend and would give Paxson the courage he needs to at least move one of them.

    The team also expects to lose Jamal Crawford this summer and has never really had a great small forward. If Duke's Luol Deng enters the draft, he'd be a great fit in Chicago. So would an athletic, defensive-minded two guard like Arizona's Andre Iguodala. However, if the Bulls don't get the No. 1 pick, look for them to try to package it with Chandler, Crawford and/or Curry for a star.

    Washington Wizards
    Chance to win lottery: 15.7% Team Needs The Skinny
    Center
    Depth at the four The Wizards are pretty stacked in the backcourt with Gilbert Arenas, Jerry Stackhouse, Larry Hughes, Juan Dixon and Steve Blake. They've drafted small forwards -- Jared Jeffries and Jarvis Hayes -- in the last two lotteries and their power forward, Kwame Brown, was the first pick in the draft three years ago.

    Center continues to be a major problem for them, and the Wizards believe that a combo of Brown and Okafor will work, despite Okafor only being 6-foot-9. After that, things get pretty sketchy for the Wizards. Dwight Howard is another high school project. Everyone else in their range is a guard or an unproven big man. Someone like Pavel Podkolzine may make some sense for them if they had the patience. Expect them to explore trading the pick, along with someone like Jerry Stackhouse or Larry Hughes, for more help in the paint.

    Charlotte Bobcats
    Chance to win lottery: 0% Team Needs The Skinny
    Everything
    Right now the Bobcats are a blank slate. We'll know more about their draft needs after the expansion draft. Unfortunately, that only happens days before the actual draft. The theory is that you need to build your team around a big man or a point guard. If that's true, Okafor, Howard or a big guard like Shaun Livingston are all possibilities. Don't count out Luol Deng, though. If he declares, he'd be a very nice fit in Charlotte.

    Atlanta Hawks
    Chance to win lottery: 10.5% Team Needs The Skinny
    Center
    Point Guard
    Power Forward The Hawks aren't that far off from the Bobcats when talking about blank slate. The team has just four players, Jason Terry, Chris Crawford, Boris Diaw and Alan Henderson, with guaranteed contracts next year. And, there's a lot of talk that the team will shop Terry over the summer.

    The Hawks are crossing their fingers that they get their hands on high school stud Dwight Howard. If they don't land Howard or Okafor, things get tougher. Guys like Luol Deng and Josh Smith don't fit needs. And players like Livingston, Podkolzine and Brazilian Tiago Splitter are a year or two away at the very least.

    Los Angeles Clippers
    Chance to win lottery: 10.4% Team Needs The Skinny
    Point guard
    3-point shooting Pull out the Ouija board, tarot cards, divining rod and dial up the Psychic Friends Hotline. They have about as good of a shot of predicting what owner Donald Sterling will do as we do.

    Murphy's law says that the Clippers will defy the odds, get the No. 1 pick and ruin Okafor or Howard. If they fall to their actual slot at six, things get dicey. The team is set at the three and four. If they are able to lure Kobe, or re-sign Quentin Richardson, they're fine at the two. Last year they spent their lottery pick on Chris Kaman and he appears to be coming along. That leaves the point position, where only one guy, Marko Jaric, is holding down the fort. There's been some speculation that the Clippers are in love with Sebastian Telfair. It tough to see how they could justify drafting such a young, under sized point guard this high. Then again, it is the Clippers we're talking about. More likely, they take a flier on a more seasoned, taller prospect like Ben Gordon or Devin Harris.

    Phoenix Suns
    Chance to win lottery: 6.4% Team Needs The Skinny
    Center
    Point Guard
    Depth The Suns are the most loaded team in the lottery and don't have a huge need for the pick. This summer, they're expected to sign top Euro point guard Milos Vujanic, and they have enough cap room to go after a veteran two or five (everyone from Kobe to Mehmet Okur to Vlade Divac has been mentioned).

    That makes the Suns' pick interesting. They're one of the few teams that will have the luxury to draft the best player on the board, regardless of position or experience. Expect the Suns to take that luxury and grab one of the big centers like Podkolzine. Or, they may try to trade the pick along with an expiring contract like Jahidi White for more cap room this summer.

    Toronto Raptors
    Chance to win lottery: 3.7% Team Needs The Skinny
    Big point guard
    Center The Raptors have zero centers on their roster, so obviously it's a huge need. The problem is that, with the exception of Okafor (who would pair nicely with big man Chris Bosh) there isn't anyone on the board even remotely ready. There are some young guys who could make some sense down the road for the Raptors (like Podkolzine), but the Raptors probably won't have the patience.

    Point guard may make more sense. Alvin Williams isn't cutting it. With players like Ben Gordon and Devin Harris on the board, they could get an immediate upgrade at a position that's bothered them in the past. .

    Philadelphia 76ers
    Chance to win lottery: 3.6% Team Needs The Skinny
    Point forward
    Depth in the paint
    3-point shooting The Sixers are a mess on the court, but their depth chart is actually pretty impressive. Samuel Dalembert has been great at the five this year. Kenny Thomas has done well at the four. Allen Iverson is a staple at the two, and Eric Snow handles the point pretty well. Guys like Aaron McKie, Greg Buckner, John Salmons and Kyle Korver have been contributors off the bench. The big bust has been Glenn Robinson. The Sixers need a three who doesn't need 15 shots a game.

    Enter Stanford's Josh Childress. He seems like the perfect choice for the Sixers. He's long, athletic, can shoot the ball, play multiple positions and uses his huge wingspan to play great defense. He needs to get stronger, but I think this pick would be a slam dunk for the Sixers. If Childress if off the board, more depth in the paint is probably the way to go. A young big Euro like Kosta Perovic or Andris Biedrins could make some sense.

    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Chance to win lottery: 1.8% Team Needs The Skinny
    Point guard
    Center
    Small Forward It's probably a good thing that the Cavs missed the playoffs. They need more help and would've been forced to send their pick to Phoenix had they qualified. Instead, they're in the perfect position to address one of their needs. If a player like Wisconsin's Devin Harris is on the board, he'd be a great fit. Jeff McInnis won't be around forever, and Harris's steady playmaking skills and ability to score should energize the Cavs' backcourt.

    If Harris is gone, there aren't any real centers left who are very different from the team's other big project, DeSagana Diop. However, it's a need that needs to be addressed soon. Zydrunas Ilgauskas is in the last year of his deal. He won't be around forever. Players like Tiago Splitter or Kosta Perovic could make sense. If all else fails, another swingman could help. A kid like Andre Iguodala could end up being a younger version of Eric Williams. His playmaking skills would really complement LeBron's. They are also reportedly high on international big man Andris Biedrins.

    Golden State Warriors
    Chance to win lottery: 0.9% Team Needs The Skinny
    Center
    Athletic power forward Everything depends on what Erick Dampier and Adonal Foyle decide to do. The word is that both will bolt the Bay this summer, meaning that the Warriors will have a big, big hole in the middle of their lineup. Big men like Pavel Podkolzine, Kosta Perovic, Tiago Splitter or Peja Samardziski may be available, but neither can help the team right now. BYU's Rafael Araujo may be able to help them, but it's a little early to pick him. They too are said to be coveting Latvia's Andris Biedrins.

    Seattle SuperSonics
    Chance to win lottery: 0.9% Team Needs The Skinny
    A real enter
    Athletic, physical four
    The Sonics are loaded in the backcourt, even if they lose Brent Barry to free agency this year. Last year they took a power forward, Nick Collison, and a point guard, Luke Ridnour, with their two lottery picks. Collison missed the season with an injury. Ridnour played well in the limited minutes he saw.

    What the Sonics really need is a big man who can draw a double in the post. There aren't many guys like that available. Their best bet is to take a flier on an athletic big man like Kosta Perovic or Tiago Splitter, or a young versatile power forward like high school phenom Marvin Williams.

    Portland Trail Blazers
    Chance to win lottery: 0.6% Team Needs The Skinny
    Point Guard
    Shooting Guard The Blazers are in the lottery for the first time in forever and they need to make the most of the opportunity. The team made a number of trades during the season to shore up its front line. The Blazers are now two deep at the five (Theo Ratliff, Dale Davis) the four (Zach Randolph, Shareef Abdur-Rahim) and the three (Darius Miles, Ruben Patterson). The backcourt now becomes their Achilles' heel. Point guard Damon Stoudamire is in the last year of his contract and he has no real backup. Two guard Derek Anderson is good when he's healthy . . . but he's rarely healthy. Their one backup, Qyntel Woods, is beginning to look like a bust.

    The good news is that there are several players out there who could fit the needs of the Blazers. Start with Arizona's Andre Iguodala who, as a defensive-minded, athletic swingman, could be a perfect fit in their system at the two. The team is also high on CSKA Moscow swingman Sergei Monya and high school phenom J.R. Smith. The team also likes point guard Devin Harris, but it's doubtful he's around here. Ditto for Ben Gordon. Jameer Nelson and Sebastian Telfair should still be on the board, but neither player makes much sense for the Blazers. The team already has a very small point, Stoudamire, and has been trying to upgrade to a bigger one for years. A trade, using Abdur-Rahim as bait, may be the best way to lure another top-notch point guard into the fold.

    Utah Jazz
    Chance to win lottery: 0.5% Team Needs The Skinny
    Center
    Power Forward The Jazz are loaded, almost overloaded, at the two and three positions. Matt Harpring, Andrei Kirilenko, Aleksandar Pavlovic, Raja Bell, and Gordan Giricek were all major contributors last season. Of all of those players, Kirilenko moved over to the four at times, but most believe his best position is at the three. Point guard was also solid for the Jazz with the development of Carlos Arroyo, Raul Lopez and Maurice Williams. However, the position could be an issue if Arroyo were to leave via free agency. The frontcourt, however, is barren. Greg Ostertag is a free agent.

    Utah, with three first-round picks, knows that at least two of them have to be used on frontcourt players. The Jazz aren't afraid to draft international players and several good ones may be available when they pick. Look for them to have interest in Serbia's Peja Samardziski and Kosta Perovic, Brazil's Tiago Splitter, Latvia's Andris Biedrins and Brazil's (via BYU) Rafael Araujo. All of those big men could turn into special players down the road if a team can have a little patience. Knowing the Jazz the way we do, they'll have it.

    Is Harris ready to leave Wisconsin?

    By Chad Ford
    NBA Insider
    Send an Email to Chad Ford Friday, April 16

    # Mock Lottery, Mock Draft: See 1,716 potential lottery scenarios

    Also see: Team Needs | Who's in, who's out? | Top 10 by position

    With the college season over and international tournament play heating up, here's our weekly look at who's in and out of the NBA draft and our weekly stock watch.

    Who's In, Who's Out?


    Devin Harris is a likely lottery pick if he decides to declare.
    # Multiple league sources are claiming that Wisconsin's Devin Harris is now leaning toward declaring for the draft. This comes despite pretty serious pressure from the Wisconsin coaching staff for Harris to return for his senior season. It's going to be a tough call for Harris.

    Right now Harris is projected as a late-lottery pick who should slip no further than the mid first round. Given the numerous teams in the lottery that need help at the point (Bobcats, Hawks, Clippers, Raptors, Cavs, Blazers) it's tough to see any scenario in which he slips out of the lottery.

    However, Harris also knows that if he returns to Wisconsin next season, his team will be one of the best in the NCAA. He's been wavering back and forth on the decision, but sources say over the past week the draft has become the more realistic option. The fact that Harris started driving a new Mercedes around campus didn't help the speculation that he's gone. Harris claims that the car is his father's, though he has been exclusively driving it. Wasn't his father unemployed recently?

    If he announces for the draft, Harris said he would probably not sign with an agent, which would give him the option of returning to college. "If that's what happens (declaring for the draft), that will probably be the route I take," he told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "and if I like what I hear, then go ahead and sign with (an agent)."

    # There's been a pretty major shake-up at the top of our draft list. We exclusively reported last Thursday that Lithuanian center Martynas Andriuskevicius, despite being projected at a top-five pick, was reluctant to enter the draft believing he wasn't ready to handle the rigors of the NBA.

    Word came officially on Thursday to Insider, through Andriuskevicius's agency, Interperformance, that it's now unlikely that Martynas will even put his name in this year's draft. While Andriuskevicius could absolutely use another year of seasoning to add strength (he's still pretty skinny) and experience, it's pretty rare (and kind of refreshing) to see a kid pass up the chance to be a top-five pick so that he can improve his game. The fact that he's being trained by NBA great Arvydas Sabonis at his famous basketball institute in Lithuania means that he's being trained as well as any young rookie in the league.


    Tiago Splitter
    # Now, here's the good news for bummed out GMs. Interperformance has switched gears on another of its top prospects, Brazilian big man Tiago Splitter. Insider has learned that Splitter, a 6-10, 19-year-old big man playing for Tau Ceramica, will be in this year's draft.

    The lack of an NBA buyout had most scouts believing that Splitter wouldn't be in this year's draft. However, a source at Interperformance told Insider that a buyout agreement with Tau is now in place.

    Splitter had his coming out party in the Tournament of the Americas in Puerto Rico last summer. He got nice minutes against Team USA and looked like he belonged. He's also cracked the rotation for Tau, one of the top teams in Europe, which says something.

    Splitter's got an NBA body, though he still needs to make it stronger. Most scouts agree that his defense is ahead of his offense right now. He's an excellent rebounder. He does have a nice handle and a good, but not great, jumper. He's very long. Scouts just aren't sure exactly what position he plays. Probably power forward, but he needs to improve his inside scoring if that's the case. He's a good, but not great, athlete. Scouts feel he's probably a little too slow-footed to play the three, which hurts his cause a little. Still, with a buyout in place, Splitter's got a great shot at the lottery.

    # Splitter's not the only international big man flirting with the draft. University of Utah forward and Australian native Andrew Bogut is still flirting with declaring for the draft. He's had his advisors talking to several NBA clubs trying to get a read on his draft stock. Bogut dominated last summer at the World Junior Championships but had an up-and-down year for the Utes. Bogut turned down a huge contract overseas to play for the Utes and now appears to be regretting it. Sources claim that, even if he doesn't get a draft guarantee, he may leave Utah this summer, play overseas for a year, and then hit the draft again next year. If he were to declare right now, he's probably no higher than a late-first-round pick.

    # North Carolina State guard Julius Hodge is returning to N.C. State for his senior season. Hodge had flirted with the draft, but he couldn't find anyone who could guarantee that he was a first-round pick. Hodge didn't want to informally declare for the draft and test his stock, so he decided to return for his senior season. Insider had him projected as a late-first-round pick. If Hodge gets stronger and has another great season, he could work himself into the mid first round next season. But there are always those ifs with college guys.

    # The rumor de jour is that North Carolina recruit J.R. Smith is talking to several agents and appears to be heading to the draft. However, don't put him in just yet. Smith is skipping the Jordan Capital Classic to preserve his freshman eligibility in college. Smith has already played in the Roundball Classic and the McDonald's All-American game and can't play in another high school all-star tournament without risking his college eligibility next season.

    # UConn recruit Rudy Gay continues to flirt with declaring for the draft but said on Thursday that it's more likely that he'll go to college in the fall. "Is there a possibility [of turning pro]? I believe there is. But I believe I could be a better player and also [raise] my stock by going to college. I'll think I'll be there [at UConn]," Gay told the Baltimore Sun.

    # Thankfully, Michigan State forward Paul Davis announced this week that he will definitely be back for his junior season with the Spartans.

    NBA Draft Stock Watch

    Several top young international players took part in the in the Under 18 Championships in Croatia, Greece and Poland last week. Several more of them moved on to the Albert Schweitzer games in Mannheim, Germany this week. Who's helping their stock?

    # Andris Biedrins of Latvia not only destroyed France's Johan Petro, dropping 21 points and 16 rebounds on the highly ranked star, he also had a 26-point, 20-board outing versus France and a 28-point, 11-rebound game against the Republic of Georgia in the under 18s. He finished third in scoring in the tournament with a 21.8 ppg average. He ranked first in rebounds averaging 14.4 rpg.


    Johan Petro
    # France's Johan Petro (who is rumored to be mulling a jump to the NBA) wasn't nearly as impressive. He ended up averaging 9.4 ppg and 7.4 rpg in the tournament. His best game came against Italy when he scored 14 points and grabbed 13 rebounds. Sources continue to claim that Petro is considering declaring for the draft. Petro already has great athleticism and an NBA body, but is still considered very raw at this point, especially on the offensive end of the court.

    # Lithuania's Martynas Andriuskevicius averaged 14.3 ppg, 9.3 rpg and three bpg. Scouts were very impressed with Martynas, but it's apparently not enough to push him into the draft.

    # Another guy to watch is Puerto Rico's Peter John Ramos. Ramos has been on fire lately down in the professional league in Puerto Rico. On Wednesday night, in front of a nice contingent of scouts, Ramos dropped 30 points and had 20 boards against former NBA big man Stanley Roberts. Roberts was held to two points and four boards playing against Ramos.

    Ramos, a 7-foot-3, 280-pound big man, is starting to draw significant interest from scouts. Insider watched several tapes of Ramos in recent games and he looks pretty impressive. He's huge, can run the floor and, at this point, is a little more polished than Pavel Podkolzine.

    # Croatia's Damir Omerhodzic has worked out a buyout with his team (Cibona) and flew to the Cleveland last week to begin working out with trainer Eric Lichter. Lichter is the trainer who prepared LeBron James, Nene and Leandrino Barbosa for the draft. Omerhodzic (19) is a skilled, athletic big man with great range on his jumper and the ability to play both the four and the three.

    However, scouts have major concerns about his body. He's very thin ("Ethiopian thin" according to one scout) and needs some major work on his body. Coming to Lichter may do wonders for his draft stock. Lichter will put him through rigorous strength training for the next few months in an effort to add some real muscle to his body.

    The Future

    # Several top international prospects not in this year's draft firmly established their stock for next season at the Under 18 Championships. Serbian forward Nemanja Alexsandrov continued to wow scouts, averaging 17.4 ppg and 10.6 rpg despite being just turning 17 on Saturday. Italian guard Marco Belinelli (6-foot-6) is being called the best Italian prospect ever. He averaged 26.2 ppg and was named along with Benetton's Manuchar Markoishvili as the top player of the tournament. Markoishvili (6-6) averaged 18.8 ppg, 5.2 rpg and 3.6 apg for the Republic of Georgia. Both players are just 18 years old. Georgian point guard George Tsintsadze (16 ppg, 4.2 apg), Greece's small forward Dusan Sakota (19.6 ppg), Turkey's forward Ersan Ilyasova (17.4 ppg, 9 rpg) and Serbia's combo guard Uros Tripkovic (15.2 ppg, 4.4 apg) all impressed scouts as well.

    # In the Schweitzer games, China's Yi Jian Lian has redeemed himself after a so-so performance at the Hoop Summit. Yi is averaging 18.8 ppg, 10.3 rpg and 2.5 bpg in the tournament. Other top players include Ersan Ilyasova of Turkey (18 ppg), Serbia's Uros Tripkovic (17 ppg) and Nemanja Alexsandrov (16.5 ppg, 6.8 rpg, 2 bpg).

    Dominant players rule NBA playoffs

    By Terry Brown
    NBA Insider
    Friday, April 16
    Updated: April 16
    1:03 PM ET

    With the 2004 NBA playoffs just one day away and the eventual champion being crowned in about two months, we have one question that begs to be asked before anyone makes their bold prediction on who will and won't win the title.

    What came first . . . the MVP or the ring?

    On June 15, 2003, Tim Duncan scored 21 points and grabbed 20 rebounds in an 88-77 victory to give the San Antonio Spurs the NBA title and himself the Finals MVP award after winning the regular-season MVP award.

    The Nets had no one who averaged more than 20 in the series.

    On June 12, 2002, Shaquille O'Neal scored 34 points and grabbed 10 rebounds as the Lakers defeated the Nets, 113-107, to win their third title in a row. O'Neal was named Finals MVP all three times.

    The Nets had no one who averaged more than 22 in the series.

    So . . . did the Spurs win the 2003 title, allowing Duncan to be named MVP, or did Duncan win the MVP and, as a result, the Spurs won the crown? I'll ask it one more time. Did the Lakers win the 2002 title before or after Shaq became the MVP?

    This is more important than you think when we add in one more important statistic.


    The playoffs are made for dominant players such as the Spurs' Tim Duncan.
    Over the past 13 years in the NBA, the eventual Finals MVP has, on average, scored 28.3 points per game before ever beginning his playoff push. And each one is as easy to name as his team.

    Michael Jordan. Hakeem Olajuwon. Tim Duncan. Shaquille O'Neal.

    Count them again. There have been four different NBA champions in the last 13 years and only four different Finals MVPs. From 1991 until last year, there has always been one unmistakable, dominating force on the final day of NBA action.

    This is no coincidence.

    In this era, scoring is down for whatever reason, one-on-one play still dominates despite rule changes, and in a playoff series where opponents face one another night after night, the game more often than not grinds down to a shoving match between the two biggest bullies on the block.

    You take away Shaq's drop step, he goes to the jump hook. You take away the jump hook, he goes to the turnaround jumper in paint. You take that away, then Derek Fisher or Steve Kerr or Sean Elliott or Mario Ellie are open for the 3-pointer and we can all pretend it's still a team game.

    But this isn't synchronized swimming. We aren't making a quilt.

    This is man stuff. This is ugly, smelly, four-letter-word kind of work. This is lugging a grand piano up a flight of stairs, and if you don't have someone at the bottom bearing the brunt of this load, then you're going to have splinters of enameled wood and ivory all over the place.

    Of course, everyone deserves pizza at the top, but the guy with one hand on a leg holding the door open knows to get out of the way for the first and last slice.

    Back in that 2002 championship run by the Lakers, O'Neal averaged 27.5 points per game during the regular season of the team's 110.4. During the playoffs, he averaged 28.5 points per game of the team's 97.8. And during the NBA Finals, he averaged 36.3 of the team's 106.

    As the games got tougher, the MVP got better.

    In the 2003 championship run of the Spurs, Duncan averaged 23.3 points per game during the regular season of the team's 95.8. During the playoffs, he averaged 24.7 of the team's 94.7. And during the Finals, Duncan averaged 24.1 points per game of the team's 87.8.

    Check the math.

    Duncan was 24.3 percent of the teams points during the regular season, 26 percent of it during the playoffs and 27.4 percent of it during the Finals.

    Similarly, Shaq was 27.3 percent of his team's points during the regular season, 29.1 percent of it during the playoffs and 34.2 percent of it during the Finals.

    You can almost see Kevin Garnett of the Minnesota Timberwolves nodding his head. Jermaine O'Neal and Baron Davis, too. Chris Webber, Dirk Nowitzki and Paul Pierce all know that their teams will only go as far as they take them. Heck, even Carmelo Anthony has already learned this after one season in the NBA.

    MVPs claim NBA titles. Not the other way around.

    Look it up. Despite posting huge numbers throughout their careers, Jordan, Olajuwon, Duncan and O'Neal all have higher scoring averages during the playoffs than they do during the regular season.

    We say this because there are four teams in the NBA playoffs that do not have a scorer on their roster who averages even 20 points a game.

    In descending order, they are Richard Jefferson (18.5 ppg) of the New Jersey Nets, Pau Gasol (17.7 ppg) of the Memphis Grizzlies, Richard Hamilton (17.6 ppg) of the Detroit Pistons and Yao Ming (17.5 ppg) of the Houston Rockets.

    History says that for their teams to win the 2004 title, they are going to have to perform better during the playoffs than they have been able to during the regular season.

    You can blame it on team make-up, chemistry, offensive schemes and game philosophy.

    But the fact remains, the NBA title has been won by the best player on the floor and the best player on the floor is the MVP.

    Peep Show

    NBA Insider
    Friday, April 16
    Updated: April 16
    11:22 AM ET


    James
    Cleveland Cavaliers: LeBron James isn't going to let the hype stop yet. "We can be great," he said in the Medina Gazette. "We surprised a lot of teams this year. I know there's a lot of teams that are happy we're not in the playoffs." And Zydrunas Ilgauskas isn't arguing one bit. "This team is making real progress and I obviously want to be a part of it," Ilgauskas said. "I've been here eight years and there have been a lot of hard times. It's rewarding to see what's happening now." Head coach Paul Silas seems to want him around, too. "His attitude has changed, he's a much more aggressive player now," said Silas. "He's blocking shots, getting offensive rebounds, staying in there battling. That's the biggest thing, he's learned how to battle. He'll never be a leaper or anything like that, but he'll be fine."

    Dallas Mavericks: Steve Nash is making it very clear. "The playoffs," he said in the Dallas Morning News, "are about redemption for us." And Michael Finley is looking forward to it. "It's going to be a tough series, and it should be a fun one to watch," Finley said. "We would have liked a higher seed, but that's neither here nor there. So we move on and use the playoffs as a new season. For us, to get over the hump against Sacramento would [help] put a sub-par regular season behind us." But not too far behind. "I don't think they underachieved," head coach Don Nelson said. "I think everybody tried as hard as they could. We weren't as good as we had hoped."

    Detroit Pistons: Paging Dr. Larry Brown. "I'm a little concerned about Rasheed [Wallace] and Mike [James]," head coach Larry Brown said in the Detroit News. "Chauncey [Billups] looked good. But Lindsey [Hunter] is struggling a little bit. Mike couldn't practice and Rasheed couldn't practice. We're lucky we're playing on Sunday." At least Billups agreed. "It felt pretty good, (although) I still can't really cut like I'd want to and push off," Billups said. "I'm happy with where it's at. At least I know I can play."


    Szczerbiak
    Minnesota Timberwolves: Forget the division title. Forget the Conference title. Wally Szczerbiak is just happy he can play again. "I play my best when I have a smile on my face on the court," Szczerbiak said in the Star Tribune. "You know, when you go through injuries, it is no fun. When you can't play the game you've loved all your life, it's no fun. But this? This is the most fun I've had in a Timberwolves uniform." And it shows. "I'm starting to play at a peak level," Szczerbiak said. "My legs feel really good, I feel really fresh. I want to carry this into the playoffs."

    New York Knicks: That chip on Stephon Marbury's shoulder is getting heavier and heavier. "Being the competitor that he is, he wants that very badly," teammate Penny Hardaway said in the New York Daily News. "Seeing guys that got drafted with him - Kobe (Bryant) getting three championships, Allen Iverson taking the Sixers to the Finals that one year. And now being traded for Jason and Jason taking the Nets to the Finals the last couple years, maybe that bothers him because he wants that same thing. It should bother him. The only way to erase any of that (negative perception) is winning."

    Utah Jazz: Compliments don't come easy from head coach Jerry Sloan, so the Jazz will take this one as it comes. "That's the most important thing for young players -- to believe that they can compete. Once you have that in the back of your mind, that you can do it, that gives you a bit of an upper hand to start off with," Sloan said in the Salt Lake Tribune. "I think sometimes this season we weren't quite sure we believed we belonged and weren't quite sure that we could win. When there's that little bit of doubt, it will cost you a game or two that might have been there to get you over the hump. At least they kept trying to get better." And he's already riding them for next year. "People think, 'Well, next year should be easier because it should be a better team.' I'm not sure of that because I don't know who we'll have here. "We kind of had a free ride this year," Sloan said. "We caught teams that weren't ready to play us and were looking for an easy time. I think for the most part our team played hard."

    New Jersey Nets: Pistons, who? Pacers, when? "Everybody is talking about Indiana and Detroit," Jason Kidd said in the Newark Star Ledger. "But when it comes down to it, we think we're going to be one of those teams at the end." Even if they do have a brand new coach. "It's going to be new ground for me," Lawrence Frank said. "I don't want to be presumptuous to say what it's going to be like. At the same time, I don't think you can fear any circumstance. You have to look to embrace it and look forward to the opportunity."

    * James: 'We can be great'
    Rick Noland / Medina Gazette
    * Redemption is buzzword for Mavs
    Eddie Sefko / Dallas Morning News
    * Pistons wary of injuries
    Joanne C. Gerstner / Detroit News
    * Szczerbiak, healthy and happy, entering playoffs
    Kent Youngblood / Minneapolis Star Tribune
    * 'Z' wants to stay with Cavs
    Brian Dulik / Medina Gazette
    * Steph has point to prove
    Christian Red / New York Daily News
    * Sloan enjoyed season, wants to return
    Linda Hamilton / Deseret Morning News
    * Frank making sure first time's a charm
    Brad Parks / Newark Star-Ledger
Working...
X