Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Chicago trade (JO involved)

  1. #1
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,748

    Default Chicago trade (JO involved)

    I'm as much against trading JO as the next guy but IF we were going to trade him, how about with the Bulls, who need the low-post presence and are under the cap.

    No trade machine on this because I don't know exactly how I would like this to work out.

    I would definitely want Hinrich and their number 2 pick. After that i don't know. I guess we could include Jack (as a salary/player dump) and ask them to include Gordon. Or we could ask them to include Nocioni or Deng as our backup 3s.

    Since the Bulls are under the cap, they can absorb JO's contract fairly easy.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Age
    28
    Posts
    846

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    Indiana Trade Breakdown
    Outgoing
    Jermaine O'Neal
    6-11 PF from Eau Claire (HS)
    20.1 ppg, 9.3 rpg, 2.6 apg in 35.3 minutes
    Jeff Foster
    6-11 C from Southwest Texas State
    5.9 ppg, 9.1 rpg, 0.8 apg in 25.1 minutes
    David Harrison
    7-0 C from Colorado
    5.8 ppg, 3.8 rpg, 0.2 apg in 15.4 minutes
    #17 Pick
    0-0 from
    No games yet played in 2005/06
    Incoming
    Tyson Chandler
    7-1 C from Dominguez (HS)
    5.3 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 1.0 apg in 26.9 minutes
    Andres Nocioni
    6-7 SF from Argentina (Foreign)
    13.0 ppg, 6.1 rpg, 1.4 apg in 27.3 minutes
    Ben Gordon
    6-3 SG from Connecticut
    16.9 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 3.0 apg in 31.1 minutes
    Othella Harrington
    6-9 PF from Georgetown
    4.8 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.5 apg in 11.5 minutes
    Kirk Hinrich
    6-3 PG from Kansas
    15.8 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 6.3 apg in 36.5 minutes
    #2 Pick
    0-0 from
    No games yet played in 2005/06
    Change in team outlook: +24.0 ppg, +1.3 rpg, and +8.6 apg.


    Chicago Trade Breakdown
    Outgoing
    Tyson Chandler
    7-1 C from Dominguez (HS)
    5.3 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 1.0 apg in 26.9 minutes
    Andres Nocioni
    6-7 SF from Argentina (Foreign)
    13.0 ppg, 6.1 rpg, 1.4 apg in 27.3 minutes
    Ben Gordon
    6-3 SG from Connecticut
    16.9 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 3.0 apg in 31.1 minutes
    Othella Harrington
    6-9 PF from Georgetown
    4.8 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.5 apg in 11.5 minutes
    Kirk Hinrich
    6-3 PG from Kansas
    15.8 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 6.3 apg in 36.5 minutes
    #2 Pick
    0-0 from
    No games yet played in 2005/06
    Incoming
    Jermaine O'Neal
    6-11 PF from Eau Claire (HS)
    20.1 ppg, 9.3 rpg, 2.6 apg in 35.3 minutes
    Jeff Foster
    6-11 C from Southwest Texas State
    5.9 ppg, 9.1 rpg, 0.8 apg in 25.1 minutes
    David Harrison
    7-0 C from Colorado
    5.8 ppg, 3.8 rpg, 0.2 apg in 15.4 minutes
    #17 Pick
    0-0 from
    No games yet played in 2005/06
    Change in team outlook: -24.0 ppg, -1.3 rpg, and -8.6 apg.



    Successful Scenario
    Due to Indiana and Chicago being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Indiana and Chicago had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.



    This trade makes me laugh.....DON'T TRADE JO!!!!!

  3. #3
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,748

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    That's too many players anyways...

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Age
    28
    Posts
    846

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    How else are ou going to trade JO to chicago? unlesswe could get Mark Prior

  5. #5
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,748

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    Quote Originally Posted by microwave_oven
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How else are ou going to trade JO to chicago? unlesswe could get Mark Prior
    The point was not for us to give up many players but for Chicago to give up three, four players.

  6. #6
    Raw Talent Robertmto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Nap
    Posts
    5,236
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    Why would Chicago give up 4 of their best 5 players AND the #2 pick for JO and basically no one else??? No deals.
    STARBURY

    08 and Beyond

  7. #7
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,748

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    Quote Originally Posted by Robertmto
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why would Chicago give up 4 of their best 5 players AND the #2 pick for JO and basically no one else??? No deals.
    Agree. I think a more logical trade would be Nocioni, the 2, and Hinrich. Although I don't know if I want to be left weak in the post. Just saying IF we want to trade JO.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Age
    28
    Posts
    846

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    Quote Originally Posted by rexnom
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Agree. I think a more logical trade would be Nocioni, the 2, and Hinrich. Although I don't know if I want to be left weak in the post. Just saying IF we want to trade JO.
    Okay...the Bulls have cap space, but not that kind of cap space. The reason why so many players are involved, is because that is how many it would take to include JO. He simply makes too much. You will need at least 3 or 4 players from Chicago just so they can get JO.

  9. #9
    brs14ku
    Guest

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    I don't think they would even give us Hinrich for JO. Maybe the #2 pick and someone else for him and Jack, but I doubt Hinrich would be moved. Same with Gordon.

  10. #10
    Raw Talent Robertmto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Nap
    Posts
    5,236
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    I don't even think they want JO. They would rather use the #2 pick on a big man like Thomas, Aldridge, or Bargnani. They are younger and cost alot less on the cap.
    STARBURY

    08 and Beyond

  11. #11
    Redneck #007
    Guest

    Default Re: Chicago trade (JO involved)

    No way the Bulls give up Gordon or Hinrich for JO or even JAX included.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •