Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Granger at SG

  1. #1
    Member Swingman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    726

    Default Granger at SG

    Will the Granger to SG experiment stick and if so how good do you think he can play the position?

    He's likely going to have to trim down some and work on getting faster.

    I would imagine he would be one of the bigger SGs in the NBA. Will he be fast to defend opposing guards and can he become an effective outside shooter?

    We all know SF is his natural position but can he be an All Star at SG?

    If he is our SG then I'd say that means we'll likely draft a point guard.

  2. #2
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    I think he'll look like a natural SF trying to play out of position.

    In other words, he'll look awkward and we'll all be glad when we get a legit SF and he gets to play SF again.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  3. #3
    Member Swingman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    726

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay@Section204
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think he'll look like a natural SF trying to play out of position.

    In other words, he'll look awkward and we'll all be glad when we get a legit SF and he gets to play SF again.
    We're likely keeping both Peja, Granger and O'neal. I hate to see one of our rising stars sitting the bench. I hope he can do well at SG.

  4. #4
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    If Peja backs up both forward positions, I'd be fine with that.

    If Peja is used as a S&T bait, I'd be fine with that.

    If Peja gets a payraise and is ahead of Danny on the depth chart, the Pacers are making a collossal mistake.

    And for what it's worth, I'd rather see JO at C (even if he's fifteen pounds lighter) and Peja and Danny playing the forward positions than to put one of them at SG.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  5. #5
    flexible and robust SoupIsGood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lappy Go Hucky
    Age
    26
    Posts
    17,540

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    NO!!! Danny is a SF
    You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

  6. #6
    Member J_2_Da_IzzO's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    26
    Posts
    843

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    It will still be an improvement from Jackson.
    My Dream Team

    PG - A.Iverson
    SG - K.Bryant
    SF - R.Artest
    PF - J.O'Neal
    C - D.Howard

  7. #7
    Member skyfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,558

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    I think Danny will do just fine at SG. He's already been guarding Kobe and VC with some success as a rookie.

    As LB said, Danny can play 3 positions so I dont think he'll have any trouble getting minutes. I think a core of JO/Peja/Granger is very solid and they have skills that complement each other. Get a PG with quickness and a C who can hold the fort until Hulk is ready to start and the team will be in good shape.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lifelong Indy-area resident
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,644

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay@Section204
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If Peja backs up both forward positions, I'd be fine with that.

    If Peja is used as a S&T bait, I'd be fine with that.

    If Peja gets a payraise and is ahead of Danny on the depth chart, the Pacers are making a collossal mistake.

    And for what it's worth, I'd rather see JO at C (even if he's fifteen pounds lighter) and Peja and Danny playing the forward positions than to put one of them at SG.
    Jay, now you and I both know that if the Pacers sign Peja, he will certainly start. And Peja is a better player, AT THIS TIME, than Danny. Doesn't mean he always will be, but he is right now.

    As for defense, I'll throw a figure out there. I figure Danny can probably "effectively" guard half of the leagues PGs. He might be able to "adequately" guard another handful, but there are probably 8-10 starters that he just can't handle.

    If the Pacers do indeed play Danny at SG, I also think it would be a mistake... at least offensively. I don't think it would be wise to ask Danny to play a perimeter game that he has not fully developed yet. However, he does seem to have a remarkably polished mid-range game for his experience, and is probably a little better than average around the hoop.

    Peja, on the other hand, is pretty polished offensively on the perimeter, at mid-range and around the basket as well. Although we have been surprised by Peja's defensive abilities, he doesn't have Danny's perimeter defensive abilities.

    Therefore, regardless of what the Pacers say they want to do with Danny, it only seems reasonable that they would soon discover that, assuming both are on the floor, that Peja play guard offensively and Danny would be the one to guard the better player of the opponent's SG/SF.

    My guess is that Danny will play more minutes but will be a sixth man if the Pacers acquire a new SG, assuming the Pacers also re-sign Peja. There is no way in hell that the Pacers would spend $8.5M - $10M per year on a player that they did not intend on starting. [Croshere excluded, of course. ]

  9. #9
    Fat, Drunk and Stupid Lord Helmet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Richmond, IN
    Age
    24
    Posts
    15,576

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    He's a natural SF, but, I don't care if he plays some SG.

    As for his defense on some marquee SG's, he's good, and he'll be a great defensive player.
    Super Bowl XLI Champions
    2000 Eastern Conference Champions





  10. #10
    Wasting Light Hicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583
    Mood

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    I think Danny may be more versatile than we realize. Scouting reports during the draft had him playing the 3, 2, and even some 1, not 3, 4, and even some (barely) small 5 (like he did with us this season). I want to at least TRY IT and see how he takes to it for a dozen games.

  11. #11
    Banned PacerMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    He's WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too fine a rebounder to have on the perimeter. Can he guard some of the guys? Sure

  12. #12
    Wasting Light Hicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583
    Mood

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Once the ball is in the air, he can still crash the boards. The general rule of thumb anyway, is the longer the shot, the longer the rebound (rant: Someone PLEASE tell the NBA Live series coders this for me ). So if his man or another guard launches one he's out there towering over the other guys going for the board.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lifelong Indy-area resident
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,644

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by PacerMan
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He's WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too fine a rebounder to have on the perimeter. Can he guard some of the guys? Sure
    Offensively, there really is no problem. As Hicks says, we could even try to play Danny at SG and if it doesn't work out, we just switch Danny and Peja. However, you've hit upon the best argument for Danny not playing an SG defensively.

    And if we just say fine, have both Peja at SF and Danny at SG crash the boards along with JO and Jeff, then we obviously we will be playing a lot of half-court sets offensively. Although I suppose that one could argue that we don't run a lot with AJ at PG anyway.

    If the Pacers are to make improvements for next season, obviously there will be trades. But we may not be able to improve everywhere we want improvements, and we may have to make do using more of the known resources (players) that we currently have.

    We may even end up starting what we have now. JO at PF, Jeff at C, AJ at PG and some combination of Danny and Peja at SG/SF.

    If that's the case, then our improvement will come from better health, a better bench and better cohesiveness and performance on the court. For example, a better rebounding percentage. Crashing the defensive boards with 4 players (if Danny plays SG defensively) would likely result in a better defensive rebounding percentage, thereby reducing the opponent's multiple-shot possessions... therefore resulting in a measurable improvement in overall team performance.

    At this time, I'm just hoping that we will see a trade made resulting in a substantial upgrade to one starting position.

  14. #14
    STRAIGHT UP pizza guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,011
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Here's an idea...

    Since the overwhelming majority of folks on here is that the Pacers should adapt the PHX/Dallas style of play, why not play them both at once? JO at 15 lbs. lighter could play C in that style, and Peja has great size for PF, and obviously Danny fits at SF. It would still leave us with PG/SG problems, but heck, why not? It would mean a coaching change of course, but that idea probably doesn't ruffle too many feathers around here.

    IMO, Danny is a SF that can play any position out there, IF NEEDED. I think his official position should be SF, but if he needs to switch for some reason, FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, I'd have absolutely no problem with that.
    BLUE COLLAR GOLD SWAGGER

    @The_Real_CJake

  15. #15
    Wasting Light Hicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583
    Mood

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Better to have Danny as the 4 in that setup a la Shawn Marion in Phoenix.

  16. #16
    STRAIGHT UP pizza guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,011
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Well, considering that it's the Pacers, we wouldn't run it properly, so Danny is the SF, Peja is PF, and JO the C.
    BLUE COLLAR GOLD SWAGGER

    @The_Real_CJake

  17. #17
    Banned PacerMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Once the ball is in the air, he can still crash the boards. The general rule of thumb anyway, is the longer the shot, the longer the rebound (rant: Someone PLEASE tell the NBA Live series coders this for me ). So if his man or another guard launches one he's out there towering over the other guys going for the board.
    '

    If you are a decent defender (and he is) you are going towards your man as he's shooting. That's moving away from the basket, up to 25' away from the basket. He might be a very good rebounder as a "2", but it pale in comparison to what he could do in the lane.
    Where he belongs.

  18. #18
    Member #31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    1,811

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Im with the guys who think "keep both Peja & Danny in at the same time", i dont care if he starts as a Center or even a ballboy, cheerleader, keep him IN!! He will do as good job playing SG as he was playing SF or why not make Peja play SG?

  19. #19
    Member Moses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    3,565

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Could run with a small lineup of:
    C: JO
    PF: Granger
    SF: Peja
    SG: *whoever we get for tins and jack*
    PG: Runi/AJ

    I think Runi could run a faster team better then AJ..but I'd prefer to have a new starting PG by next season. AJ isn't going to be as good as he was this year because he isn't getting any quicker. I would love to package him with Jack or Croshere and get a good SG/PG.

    This does not mean Granger has to bulk up. He is about the same size as Marion.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lifelong Indy-area resident
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,644

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Moses
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Could run with a small lineup of:
    C: JO
    PF: Granger
    SF: Peja
    SG: *whoever we get for tins and jack*
    PG: Runi/AJ
    Unless we would acquire a cat-quick PG and and a quick SG that can consistently hit the perimeter shot along with Peja, and go to a motion game when this lineup is used, I think this lineup would kill us over the long haul.

    Danny can't hold his own over the long haul playing at PF and JO has certainly warn down trying to constantly play in the paint. We would be undersized in the frontcourt.

  21. #21
    Leisure Suit Larry
    Guest

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay@Section204
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If Peja backs up both forward positions, I'd be fine with that.

    If Peja is used as a S&T bait, I'd be fine with that.

    If Peja gets a payraise and is ahead of Danny on the depth chart, the Pacers are making a collossal mistake.

    And for what it's worth, I'd rather see JO at C (even if he's fifteen pounds lighter) and Peja and Danny playing the forward positions than to put one of them at SG.
    Yeah except Peja is a former All-Star and MVP candidate who has just a little more experience than a second year player.

  22. #22
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Better to have Danny as the 4 in that setup a la Shawn Marion in Phoenix.
    Do you think Carlisle would ever run that kind of offense?
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  23. #23

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Moses
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Could run with a small lineup of:
    C: JO
    PF: Granger
    SF: Peja
    SG: *whoever we get for tins and jack*
    PG: Runi/AJ

    I think Runi could run a faster team better then AJ..but I'd prefer to have a new starting PG by next season. AJ isn't going to be as good as he was this year because he isn't getting any quicker. I would love to package him with Jack or Croshere and get a good SG/PG.

    This does not mean Granger has to bulk up. He is about the same size as Marion.
    I was thinking of that same lineup reading this thread.

    Look at the Phoenix Suns, their center is 6'8 215 pound Boris Diaw. Their power forward is 6'7 230 pound Shawn Marion. I think we can have a frontcourt of JO, Danny, and Peja and we would have a lot of success with it.

    As someone mentioned above we would need a brand new backcourt to do this but I think we need a new backcourt no matter what. We also would need a new coach but I expect to have one a year from now anyways. We could draft Jordan Farmar, he would be our point guard of the future and then we could find a shooting guard later on this summer.

    I think that a small frontcourt would work if we have the right players and coaching staff. The Phoenix Suns are proof that positions don't matter much in the NBA anymore. Example, in Game 1 Eric Dampier's size didn't give Boris as much problems as Boris's quickness gave Dampier.

  24. #24
    Raw Talent Robertmto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Nap
    Posts
    5,258
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Granger at SG

    Quote Originally Posted by Moses
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Could run with a small lineup of:
    C: JO
    PF: Granger
    SF: Peja
    SG: *whoever we get for tins and jack*
    PG: Runi/AJ

    This does not mean Granger has to bulk up. He is about the same size as Marion.
    I don't like Danny at the 4. There's a big difference between Western Conference 4 and Eastern Conference 4.
    The WC 4s for the most part are more all around players. And they have the ability to step back easily. Garnett, Marion, Nowitzki, Gasol, Odom, Kirilenko, and Abdur Rahim are examples.

    EC 4s are more back to the basket and physical players. JO, Haslem, Howard, Webber, Okafor, Chandler, Gooden and Bosh are the examples here.

    So even if DG had a good regular season playing the 4 while defending both types of players he would probably have a hard time in the playoffs defending bigger and stringer players nite in and nite out for as long as the Pacers survive. So basically I love the idea of DG doing this seeing as how i'm not a Pacers fan.
    STARBURY

    08 and Beyond

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •