Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Great article by Simmons

  1. #1

    Default Great article by Simmons

    Searched and didn't see this posted anywhere. As funny as Simmons can be, he also has a great feel for the NBA game. The only "huh" part of this article is the quote about Hinrich.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...simmons/060517

  2. #2
    It Might Be a Soft J JayRedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Age
    34
    Posts
    12,158

    Default Re: Great article by Simmons

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Searched and didn't see this posted anywhere. As funny as Simmons can be, he also has a great feel for the NBA game. The only "huh" part of this article is the quote about Hinrich.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...simmons/060517
    Yeah...good article.

    When you watched Dallas Mavericks Era Nash, did you ever think you were watching a future back to back MVP? I think what he's saying with Hinrich is that players without 90s superstar-type talent can flourish greatly in this "small ball" game if they have the right skill set.

    Obviously, 3-time MVP Hinrich is not happening, but in the right system, I think he could be considered a Top 3-5 PG in this league at some point in the next decade.
    Read my Pacers blog:
    8points9seconds.com

    Follow my twitter:

    @8pts9secs


  3. #3
    STRAIGHT UP pizza guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,011
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Great article by Simmons

    That was a very interesting read. However, I have trouble buying the Small Ball game. Obviously, Dallas and PHX are doing quite well with it, reaching the WCF. But, honestly, it's going to take a lot for me to be completely convinced. Either of them beating the Pistons' 'old school' game will be a good start at it though.

    I look at Detroit though and I see how the game is supposed to be played. All five of their starters play their positions like the books says you're supposed to - their builds, skill sets, everything. They do it, not only with defense, but with execution on offense; offense that starts with motion, passing, and very good players.

    Maybe teams don't have to be all defense, and maybe they can be all offense. But, give me a team that knows how to play both, and I'll give you a champion.
    BLUE COLLAR GOLD SWAGGER

    @The_Real_CJake

  4. #4
    Headband and Rec Specs rexnom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    8,752

    Default Re: Great article by Simmons

    Didn't we talk about this like last week when the article came out? Right after UB came up with the same theory?

  5. #5
    STRAIGHT UP pizza guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,011
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Great article by Simmons

    Gues I didn't notice it was that old of an article, but yes, UB's theory was right on the same idea.
    BLUE COLLAR GOLD SWAGGER

    @The_Real_CJake

  6. #6
    woman without a team
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    7,055

    Default Re: Great article by Simmons

    The most shocking television moment of May sweeps didn't involve Terry failing to make the final two on "Survivor," thereby costing grace $50 in the process.
    fixed.

  7. #7
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,748

    Default Re: Great article by Simmons

    Quote Originally Posted by pizza guy
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That was a very interesting read. However, I have trouble buying the Small Ball game. Obviously, Dallas and PHX are doing quite well with it, reaching the WCF. But, honestly, it's going to take a lot for me to be completely convinced. Either of them beating the Pistons' 'old school' game will be a good start at it though.
    Simmons has the right idea... as a coach, you play your best five regardless of position. But that doesn't mean that you shouldn't try and build a well-rounded team.

    And any lineup where we play Eddie Gill as the SF cannot be seen as playing your best five regardless of position.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •