Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Key thing missing from PG position

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Key thing missing from PG position

    Not shooting, not ball handling, not defense, not attitude, not turnovers...
    Not just all of those things combined, with several others.

    What we lack and have lacked since Mark Jackson left the roster in our PGs is

    Certainty. Consistency. Reliability.

    We never, ever know what we're going to get from our PGs, from one day to the next. How many championship teams in the last 25 years have had teams with as much unpredictability at the PG position than the Pacers have had? Shoot, go ahead and throw in the runner ups as well. There are very few teams that have won without a consistent, reliable and effective PG.

    Champion Runner-up
    San Antonio Spurs - Tony Parker Detroit Pistons - Chauncey Billups
    Detroit Pistons - Chauncey Billups Los Angeles Lakers - Derek Fisher
    San Antonio Spurs - Tony Parker New Jersey Nets - Jason Kidd
    Los Angeles Lakers - Lindsay Hunter New Jersey Nets - Jason Kidd
    Los Angeles Lakers - Ron Harper Philadelphia 76ers - Iverson/Snow
    Los Angeles Lakers - Ron Harper Indiana Pacers - Mark Jackson
    San Antonio Spurs - Avery Johnson NY Knicks - Chris Childs/Charlie Ward
    Chicago Bulls - Ron Harper Utah Jazz - John Stockton
    Chicago Bulls - Ron Harper Utah Jazz - John Stockton
    Chicago Bulls - Ron Harper Seattle SuperSonics - Gary Payton
    Houston Rockets - Kenny Smith Orlando Magic - Penny Hardaway
    Houston Rockets - Kenny Smith New York Knicks - Derek Harper
    Chicago Bulls - BJ Armstrong Phoenix Suns - Kevin Johnson
    Chicago Bulls - BJ Armstrong Portland Trail Blazers - Terry Porter
    Chicago Bulls - John Paxson Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson
    Detroit Pistons - Isiah Thomas Portland Trail Blazers - Terry Porter
    Detroit Pistons - Isiah Thomas Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson
    Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson Detroit Pistons - Isiah Thomas
    Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson Boston Celtics - Dennis Johnson
    Boston Celtics - Dennis Johnson Houston Rockets - John Lucas
    Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson Boston Celtics - Dennis Johnson
    Boston Celtics - Dennis Johnson Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson
    Philadelphia 76ers - Maurice Cheeks Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson
    Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson Philadelphia 76ers - Maurice Cheeks
    Boston Celtics - Tiny Archibald Houston Rockets - Calvin Murphy
    Los Angeles Lakers - Magic Johnson Philadelphia 76ers - Maurice Cheeks


    How many guys in the left column were guys with Tinsley-itis?

    He's a good PG, but not good enough to win the big one.
    Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team. -- Scottie Pippen

  • #2
    Re: Key thing missing from PG position

    Maybe Mark will come out of retirement???

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Key thing missing from PG position

      Thanks for taking time to compile the list... Impressive tally of names, that's for sure.
      "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Key thing missing from PG position

        [QUOTE=jcouts]

        I want Tinsley gone as bad as the next guy, I think he's our major problem. However, he's good enough to run a championship team. He's as good or better than these guys.


        Champion Runner-up

        Los Angeles Lakers - Derek Fisher
        Los Angeles Lakers - Lindsay Hunter
        San Antonio Spurs - Avery Johnson NY Knicks - Chris Childs/Charlie Ward
        Houston Rockets - Kenny Smith Orlando Magic - Penny Hardaway
        Houston Rockets - Kenny Smith New York Knicks - Derek Harper
        Chicago Bulls - BJ Armstrong
        Chicago Bulls - BJ Armstrong
        Chicago Bulls - John Paxson

        I think he's our major problem because he's in our most important position. He's injured a lot so there's no continuity. Plus he shoots too much when he's not on.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Key thing missing from PG position

          [QUOTE=Will Galen]
          Originally posted by jcouts

          I want Tinsley gone as bad as the next guy, I think he's our major problem. However, he's good enough to run a championship team. He's as good or better than these guys.


          Champion Runner-up

          Los Angeles Lakers - Derek Fisher
          Los Angeles Lakers - Lindsay Hunter
          San Antonio Spurs - Avery Johnson NY Knicks - Chris Childs/Charlie Ward
          Houston Rockets - Kenny Smith Orlando Magic - Penny Hardaway
          Houston Rockets - Kenny Smith New York Knicks - Derek Harper
          Chicago Bulls - BJ Armstrong
          Chicago Bulls - BJ Armstrong
          Chicago Bulls - John Paxson

          I think he's our major problem because he's in our most important position. He's injured a lot so there's no continuity. Plus he shoots too much when he's not on.

          I contend he is not better than Avery Johnson, Derek Harper or Penny Hardaway at the time that each of them were playing in the finals.


          Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Key thing missing from PG position

            Penny Hardaway in his twilight might not have been as good as Tins but back then he was 100x better!!!
            "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Key thing missing from PG position

              Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the question about reliability and consistency, and not talent?

              It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

              Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
              Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
              NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                I'd be all up for Mark comin out of retirement........anything is worth a try at this point.
                Life without water is tough, life without air is hard,life with one leg only is wobbly, Life without Reggie Miller, is impossible.

                Do Not Trade Austin

                Originally posted by Conrad Brunner
                Veteran Austin Croshere, the longest-tenured Pacers player on the roster, has proven reliable when called upon, invariably ready to step in regardless of the circumstance.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                  Originally posted by Kstat
                  Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the question about reliability and consistency, and not talent?
                  You are correct. We know the talent is there. But as is shown, the most talented PGs aren't always the ones who bring home the trophy.

                  If it was all about talent, names like Stephon Marbury, Steve Francis, Baron Davis, and er, Jamaal Tinsley would probably be seen more in that list. But, you may notice a trend in those names: unpredictability.

                  My case in point, we need stability, predictability, reliability and consistency at our PG position. I don't think Tinsley is going to ever give us that, be it from attitude, injuries or one thing or another. "There's just always something" with him. Larry should know firsthand, having spent how many championship series with one of the most reliable PGs in NBA history: DJ.
                  Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team. -- Scottie Pippen

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                    Originally posted by jcouts
                    You are correct. We know the talent is there. But as is shown, the most talented PGs aren't always the ones who bring home the trophy.

                    If it was all about talent, names like Stephon Marbury, Steve Francis, Baron Davis, and er, Jamaal Tinsley would probably be seen more in that list. But, you may notice a trend in those names: unpredictability.

                    My case in point, we need stability, predictability, reliability and consistency at our PG position. I don't think Tinsley is going to ever give us that, be it from attitude, injuries or one thing or another. "There's just always something" with him. Larry should know firsthand, having spent how many championship series with one of the most reliable PGs in NBA history: DJ.
                    You're right, but you've gotta have both, or you've gotta have another backcourt player who completely dominates the game (See Jordan, Michael). Every player on that list was both consistent and also had a solid season the year they went to the finals. I think what this shows is that your PG has to be healthy, but he also has to be a smart passer and a threat to score 20. Also, just about every guy on that list was a good enough ballhandler/smart enough passer to not get flustered by a full-court press.

                    I see where you're going with this, saying Tinsley isn't one of those guys. I agree, currently he's not one of those guys. But if he stays healthy for an entire season/post-season, he is one of those guys. One other thing I can tell you, Anthony Johnson and Sarunas Jasik(etc.) are NOT those kind of guys. They aren't good enough as ball-handlers, and Anthony Johnson is not a smart enough passer.

                    Oops! One other thing every guy on that list (with the notable exception of T. Parker) brought to the game: good on-the-ball pressure. Every one of those guys was a decent defender, and especially made it hard for the opposing PG to pick his team apart with clever passes. Tinsley has the ability to do that, but I don't think he'll ever consider it worth his time to play solid defense all the time. He'd lose too much street cred. Johnson and Sarunas are both too slow to get up into their man and cause problems.

                    What this says is that none of our 3 good PGs are likely to ever be good enough to win us a title. So, during the offseason, we need to look at drafting a guy like that, or trading for one. Any suggestions?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                      Originally posted by Eindar
                      What this says is that none of our 3 good PGs are likely to ever be good enough to win us a title. So, during the offseason, we need to look at drafting a guy like that, or trading for one. Any suggestions?
                      Just throwing out a few things here off the top of my head. There's Mike James with is own thread already. Brings some qualities mentioned but probably some drawbacks and then there's the slim chance of us getting him thing. Some only see him as a back-up, too.

                      What does anybody know/think about Marcus Banks? He's young and for the most part unproven. Definitely more of a pass-first type although he's proven capable of contributing some offensively (nothing in the range of 20 ppg or anything) since getting moved to Minn. Good handle and really brings the ability to play D.

                      I'm also unsure of his situation. I think he's in the last year of his contract but don't know how much he would command on the market or how intent the T-Wolves are on retaining him, etc.

                      I also really like Delonte West but don't know how you pry him away from Boston. If you could come up with some deal that included him, maybe we could get em to put Kendrick Perkins in, too. Remember, just fantasizing here. No research on feasibility of any of these.
                      I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                      -Emiliano Zapata

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                        jscout said......"Not shooting, not ball handling, not defense, not attitude, not turnovers...
                        Not just all of those things combined, with several others.

                        What we lack and have lacked since Mark Jackson left the roster in our PGs is

                        Certainty. Consistency. Reliability."


                        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++

                        I believe your premise is wrong. Tinsley could play the whole year and the team would never win a title. He lacks in 3 of the five categories you listed
                        namely shooting, ATTITUDE, and turnovers. He has never been a good
                        shooter and is unlikely to change. His attitude has always reared its ugly head
                        eventually. Sorry, but he has to go in trade. Pacers would never win with
                        Ronnie and the same applies with Tinsley. How many pops to the old noggin
                        will it take before enough is enough? JMHO.



                        owl
                        {o,o}
                        |)__)
                        -"-"-

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                          What you lack from your PG is basketball smarts. He's still an instinctive player.

                          You also lack the consistency and reliability but if Tinsley had - or developed - basketball smarts, you'd have those things.

                          Right now you'd have a better shot with AJ but he isn't the answer either.
                          The poster formerly known as Rimfire

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                            Originally posted by jcouts
                            My case in point, we need stability, predictability, reliability and consistency at our PG position.
                            Thats what you will get from Sarunas, that was his middle names in Europe and will be with the Pacers if he gets the chance.

                            I don't think Tinsley is going to ever give us that, be it from attitude, injuries or one thing or another. "There's just always something" with him.
                            Correct.

                            Larry should know firsthand, having spent how many championship series with one of the most reliable PGs in NBA history: DJ.
                            Yes, he knows and he is never wrong... once again im talking about Sarunas. Greatness knows Greatness.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Key thing missing from PG position

                              What the Pacers need from the PG position is a healthy, pre-brawl Jamaal Tinsley.

                              Too bad that's an oxymoron.

                              One of the lingering effects of the brawl and our shortened lineups is that Jamaal was forced to be a scorer last season.

                              I said, and I think I said it in the famous, "This Team is Built for the Regular Season" thread last season that the Pacers had unexpectedly uncovered their new #2 scoring option last season and his name is Jamaal Tinsley.

                              Unfortunately, the rest of the team is not in sync with that. And Jamaal does not appear to be in-sync with the rest of the team.

                              Jamaal's drive-and-finish or drive-and-dish moves are are second best offensive plays, behind giving the ball to JO in the post. Peja should be relying primarily on JO's post-up game and Jamaal's drive-and-dish to set up his shots. And SJax should be no higher than fourth on the pecking order.
                              Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                              Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                              Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                              Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                              And life itself, rushing over me
                              Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                              Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X