Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

I do have one question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: I do have one question

    It doesn't really matter. In fact, if you look all across the league, most teams are playing 4 (or worse) on 5.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: I do have one question

      I agree with what you are all saying, I'm just suprised that everyone is in agreement

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: I do have one question

        I think it helps to have people who are not looking to score. When everyone wants to be the scoring threat, some forget about defense. When you have people out on the floor like Foster he isnt thinking: "Alright I'm getting 20 points tonight." He is thinking "What do I have to do for this team to win." Right now that is rebound and provide solid defense.

        I prefer having at least one big man who doesnt care about numbers and just wants to play defense that way he is out there getting you rebounds, defensive stops and he gets the garbage points (ie putbacks, offense rebs, the occasional dunk or layup).

        Rodman was this type of player. He went out and got you 15 boards a game and 9 points a game, but no offensive players were ever run for him, he got his points from doing the dirty work and he is one of the best to play the game.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: I do have one question

          Originally posted by Unclebuck
          I'm talking about last March and April when Jeff and Dale were starting and the Pacers went 15-8. And now when Pollard and Foster are starting the Pacers are 5-1.

          So do you need 5 offensive threats on the court or not.
          No way do you need 5 offensive threats. You need 5 people playing their natural position to the best of their abilities. That's what we saw during the 15-8 period last season, and it is what we are seeing now. A game plan based on talent and ability and natural position.

          Now, regarding substituting Croshere for Foster: I think that it was nothing more than a gimmick. I don't think it was about offensive threats at all, it was about "spreading the floor" to keep the Pistons from outright punishing JO. If I recall correctly, the Pistons stuck with punishing JO every time he got the ball anyway. Croshere hit a few open looks in the first game he started, which was part of why we won, but he missed them in the second game.

          It could be my fuzzy memory, but I didn't see much adjustment to the Pistons' game plan at all. Their #1, #2 and #3 priorities were all to contain Jermaine O'Neal.

          What use is an offensive threat if he doesn't hit his shots? We didn't need another Reggie standing out on the perimeter. We needed a real center the whole time, to get the buzzards off of JO's corpse.

          When JO comes back this season, we truly do have a dilemma. Suddenly Foster or Croshere will be a third string PF. At least one of them had better be. If either of those guys plays center, it will be confirmation that playing up-tempo when JO comes back was all BS from the beginning.
          “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

          “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: I do have one question

            Originally posted by Unclebuck
            For at least 3 years now an argument has been made by many of you fine Pacer Digest folks about how Foster's lack of offense hurt the team. In fact how many times have we read posts about Foster being benched for the 2004 ECF against the Pistons because Foster just couldn't score.

            The theory was the Pacers needed 5 offensive threats on the floor at all times, or at almost all times.

            So that leads me to this question. How come the Pacers have played their best basketball during the past two seasons when they had not just one but two players who were not threats offensively.

            I'm talking about last March and April when Jeff and Dale were starting and the Pacers went 15-8. And now when Pollard and Foster are starting the Pacers are 5-1.

            So do you need 5 offensive threats on the court or not.
            I'm loath to mention this because I don't want to make to big a deal of it.

            But since you mentioned it & well you asked let me reply.

            Why have the Pacers playd thier best ball since (I will go one step further than you & say since the 00 season) when Jeff has been on with either Dale or Pollard?

            Have you noticed that there is another common denomonator here? What two other players were not playing during this time frame?

            This is why I have disagreed with you so much over the years that Foster is a good match with J.O. Because when you have Jermaine on the floor you must have your other players able to pick up the slack when teams double or even triple team him.

            When your offense can go anywhere that means that there are very few times that you will see a double team.

            Also I will point this out as well. When Jeff plays with Scot or even when he played with Dale he played as the power forward, not the center.

            Jeff Foster played an almost perfect game of basketball last night btw, heck he even had a blocked shot.

            I'm sorry to bring this up but it just can't be over looked when attempting to address your question. But the fact that J.O. & Ron aren't there/here changes our entire offensive scheme.

            I was also happy to see you admit that this is the best ball they have played.


            Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: I do have one question

              Originally posted by Peck
              I'm loath to mention this because I don't want to make to big a deal of it.

              But since you mentioned it & well you asked let me reply.

              Why have the Pacers playd thier best ball since (I will go one step further than you & say since the 00 season) when Jeff has been on with either Dale or Pollard?

              Have you noticed that there is another common denomonator here? What two other players were not playing during this time frame?

              This is why I have disagreed with you so much over the years that Foster is a good match with J.O. Because when you have Jermaine on the floor you must have your other players able to pick up the slack when teams double or even triple team him.

              When your offense can go anywhere that means that there are very few times that you will see a double team.

              Also I will point this out as well. When Jeff plays with Scot or even when he played with Dale he played as the power forward, not the center.

              Jeff Foster played an almost perfect game of basketball last night btw, heck he even had a blocked shot.

              I'm sorry to bring this up but it just can't be over looked when attempting to address your question. But the fact that J.O. & Ron aren't there/here changes our entire offensive scheme.

              I was also happy to see you admit that this is the best ball they have played.

              Oh you're good.


              Certainly not having J.O. and Ron changes the whole offensive scheme.

              You did notice I suggested that Pollard should continue to start once J.O. comes back . But I just don't see how the Pacers can find minutes for DG and Cro. Peck, I'm guessing you want Pollard and DH to play all the Pacers center minutes. Then how can Cro , Jeff and DG all find enough minutes backing up J.O.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: I do have one question

                Originally posted by Unclebuck
                Oh you're good.


                Certainly not having J.O. and Ron changes the whole offensive scheme.

                You did notice I suggested that Pollard should continue to start once J.O. comes back . But I just don't see how the Pacers can find minutes for DG and Cro. Peck, I'm guessing you want Pollard and DH to play all the Pacers center minutes. Then how can Cro , Jeff and DG all find enough minutes backing up J.O.
                I know you didn't ask me, but I'll answer anyway.

                They don't. And that's problem #1 with talent stacking and overpaying reserves.
                “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: I do have one question

                  Originally posted by Unclebuck
                  Oh you're good.


                  Certainly not having J.O. and Ron changes the whole offensive scheme.

                  You did notice I suggested that Pollard should continue to start once J.O. comes back . But I just don't see how the Pacers can find minutes for DG and Cro. Peck, I'm guessing you want Pollard and DH to play all the Pacers center minutes. Then how can Cro , Jeff and DG all find enough minutes backing up J.O.

                  Simple answer, they can't.

                  Something is going to have to give. My preferance would be that Granger never play a min. at the powerforward spot but I understand that sometimes it will happen.

                  How do we determine who get's the min. between Cro & Foster? Your going to be suprised by my answer.

                  Both, the reason I say both is that I bet you see Pollard return to limited playing time once J.O. returns. & thus you will see Harrison & Croshere coming off of the bench. Yes, my guess is that Jeff starts again. I don't like it, in fact I hate Foster with O'Neal. But I am of the belief that we will go right back to the way it was within 7 games of J.O.'s return.


                  Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: I do have one question

                    Originally posted by Los Angeles
                    They don't. And that's problem #1 with talent stacking and overpaying reserves.
                    Exactly.

                    You guys think we can get anything at all for Croshere and Tinsley? I like both guys, but I'd trade them for picks, projects, and cap relief just to get our team to the point where the pieces fit together.
                    This space for rent.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: I do have one question

                      I still argue you need a starting PG if you trade Tinsley.

                      AJ and Saras are NOT starters on a good NBA team. They're doing a fine job of filling in for Tinsley, but neither of them are the "answer" come playoff time.
                      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                      And life itself, rushing over me
                      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: I do have one question

                        Originally posted by Jay@Section204
                        I still argue you need a starting PG if you trade Tinsley.

                        AJ and Saras are NOT starters on a good NBA team. They're doing a fine job of filling in for Tinsley, but neither of them are the "answer" come playoff time.
                        Have to disagree with you - or at least split hairs. AJ has shown 2 year in a row that he is starting material on a good team. The post trade pacers are a great team so far and AJ's doing a great job.

                        Now, if you want to argue if he's starting material on a championship team, I can see where you're coming from.
                        “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                        “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: I do have one question

                          Way to premature to say this is the best ball the Pacers have played since 2000. Most fan friendly, maybe. But all these games have been played at home with plenty of rest between games in front of a friendly crowd. Take the show out on the road and be almost as successful, then I'll buy into the premise. 18 games in March, I think. If the Pacers win 13 or 14 of them, then I will get excited.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: I do have one question

                            I've always thought we lost to Detriot because of guard play.

                            I certainly don't believe that you have five people able to score but you do need all 5 involved (picks, movement, going for O rebounds) in the offense which with the iso-get-back-on-D mentality took away.
                            "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

                            "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: I do have one question

                              The way I look at it.....the less touches from the Center simply means more touches for the rest lineup. Consistent scoring Centers that can put up more then 8 points a game are few and far between.....if all the Center does is rebound, block out, block a shot or two and properly defends the paint......as far as I am concerned......any scoring from the Center is icing on the cake.
                              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: I do have one question

                                Originally posted by Jay@Section204
                                I still argue you need a starting PG if you trade Tinsley.

                                AJ and Saras are NOT starters on a good NBA team. They're doing a fine job of filling in for Tinsley, but neither of them are the "answer" come playoff time.
                                Come playoff time, we'd need a new PG anyway.
                                This space for rent.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X