Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

04-05-2004

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 04-05-2004

    View hazy from atop the Hoop Summit

    By Chad Ford
    Monday, April 5

    SAN ANTONIO -- Dirk Nowitzki was discovered here. So was Tony Parker and Vladimir Radmanovic.

    Minutes after the international team got clobbered by the Team USA at the Nike Hoop Summit here in San Antonio, GMs were quick to point out the obvious. There were no Nowitzkis or Parkers here.

    Despite a nice 20-point shooting clinic by Serbian forward Luka Bogdanovic and some stifling defense on much-hyped U.S. point guard Sebastian Telfair by Croatian point guard Roko Leni Ukic, GMs expressed an overwhelming sense of . . . well being under whelmed at this year's crop of foreign talent.

    They had every reason to be. None of the top-10 ranked draft-eligible international players were here. Some, like Andris Biedrins, Pavel Podkolzine, Kosta Perovic, Nemanja Aleksandrov and Tiago Splitter, were delayed for legitimate team reasons. Others, like Russia's Ivan Chiriaev, claimed that "visa problems" killed his ability to play in the game.

    One scout was furious at the lack of no-shows. "They must think we're stupid," the scout told Insider. "We can get a visa for a kid in 48 hours, they can't secure a 30 day visa for a month? They're hiding. It makes it tough to do our job."

    What was left was a hodge podge of players, many of whom will never have a shot playing in the NBA, against a squad featuring a host of McDonald's All-Americans and future first-rounders like Josh Smith, J.R. Smith, Telfair, Al Jefferson and Rudy Gay.

    The American players overcame a slow start and quickly realized in the second half that their superior athleticism and quickness allowed them to get to the basket at will.

    "I knew I could take my man off the dribble and to the rack whenever I chose," Josh Smith told Insider. "It was a lot of fun."

    GMs walked away scratching their heads.

    "I think we're all a little bit disappointed," he said. "There may have been a couple of late-first-rounders here, but I don't know. Bogdanovic is a great shooter, but he's a little soft and doesn't put the ball on the floor. Ukic's defense was great, but he wasn't able to beat his man off the dribble and get to the basket. Those are real issues."

    USA basketball estimated that they'd given out over 100 credentials to NBA teams for the event. The event played like a who's who of the NBA. Jerry West, Kiki Vandeweghe, Danny Ainge and Chris Mullin were among the headliners in attendance. Many of them skipped the Final Four and flew in just to see these kids play.

    While they may have been disappointed by the international squad, several of them walked away impressed by the performances of Josh and J.R. Smith.

    Josh Smith had a great shooting night, going 12-for-18 from the field and hitting 3-for-6 from beyond the arc for a game-high 27 points. The international players had no answers for his athleticism.

    "You've got to be kidding me," Bogdanovic said after the game. "I've never seen a player jump like that in my life. He's unbelievable. And he's not even in the NBA. I can only imagine what those guys must be like."

    J.R. Smith was impressive for his third consecutive postseason game. Even though his outside jumper was off, Smith took his defenders off the dribble and scored several spectacular dunks.

    Rudy Gay (13 points) and Al Jefferson (14 points) also had great games for Team USA. Telfair posted another disappointing shooting game, going just 1-for-10 from the field. He was hounded by Ukic all game and could never penetrate into the lane. Telfair did, however, have a game-high seven assists.

    Churchill Odia, a 6-foot-5 point guard from Nigeria committed to play at Xavier in the fall, and Juan Diego Palacios, a 6-foot-7 small forward from Columbia, also had good games for the international squad. Highly regarded Chinese forward Yi Jian Lian was fairly disappointing. Scouts reported that he looked very mechanical in practices and he was pretty overmatched throughout most of the game.

    International head coach Alessandro Gamba said he was upset with how his team responded to the more physical, more athletic USA team.

    "I told them that you have to play like a tiger -- a mean tiger -- to beat the U.S.," Gamba said. "Our team was too soft."

    Assistant international coach, Marin Sedlacek, who coached Nowitzki, Parker and Radmanovic in previous Hoop Summits, was even more blunt.

    "I think that these young players are making a mistake, talking about the NBA," Sedlacek told Insider. "It is a fashion right now. They have potential, yes. But they miss too much by leaving Europe so soon. He have hard practices two times a day. Two games a week. They play, they get better. They give all this up to be in the NBA. But if they are not ready, they do not play and they do not develop. I think some of them are throwing away their careers. Not everyone can be Dirk Nowitzki or LeBron. These type of players come along once in a decade."

    GMs were disappointed that they still didn't have a good handle on the huge incoming class of international teenagers. "I've been to Europe twice this year," one GM said. "But for most of the best prospects, I've only seen them work out in a gym. I haven't seen them play. It's very tough to make decisions based just on that. Very tough."

    Who's Going Pro?

    The real question on everyone's mind was who is going pro and who's headed to college or returning to Europe. As of Sunday, there were very few clear answers. Insider talked to six prospects who are all mulling a leap to the NBA. Here's what they, and NBA scouts, are saying about their prospects.

    Josh Smith, F, Oak Hill Academy: Smith had, by far, his most impressive postseason performance. He was aggressive on both ends of the floor and did a nice job of hitting his jumpers (a big question mark). He ended the game with three 3-pointers. For those of you who like the Smith-Darius Miles comparisons, that's three more 3s than Miles hit for the entire season last year.

    In other words, Smith is a better shooter. The 27 points, however, may be a bit deceiving. There was no one on the international team athletic enough to stay with Smith. In the NBA, that will change. Smith also took several terrible shots, including one three that must of missed the basket by five feet.

    Smith sounded like a kid ready to come into the NBA. In fact, he many not even be eligible for college this year. Smith may have already played in too many postseason all-star games, putting in jeopardy his freshman eligibility.

    "It's tough to pass the league up," he told Insider. "College is great, but when your family has bills and stuff, it's tough to say no to the money. I'm not saying it's all about the money, but you've got to talk care of your family, you know what I'm saying?"

    Smith said he'll make his announcement around mid-April, but with most NBA scouts claiming he's a lock for the top 10 (and could go as high as top 5), it looks like he's in for sure.

    Sebastian Telfair, PG, Brooklyn: For the second straight game, Telfair played good defense and showed an ability to run his team, but his shooting was awful. Ukic held Telfair to 1-for-10 shooting from the field. Scouts who have watched him practice the last week in Oklahoma City and San Antonio think that Telfair isn't ready to go pro.

    "He's just no ready, period," one GM said. "He's not even the best point guard in his high school class. I think he's talented but he's still got a lot he's got to learn. How many coaches in the league are going to be willing to turn their team over to him right now? I can't think of any."

    That fact may end up weighing heavily in Telfair's mind. The speculation for weeks has been that he's in the draft. He's gotten a big-time shoe offer and even the scouts who don't like him concede that he'll be taken somewhere in the first 20 picks.

    However, Telfair told Insider that he won't enter the draft unless he's drafted high and only if he's assured that he'll be drafted by a team that will play him his rookie year.

    "I don't want to go to the NBA and sit on the bench," Telfair told Insider. "I want to play. The most important question for me, is who's going to take me? Are they going to play me? If I can't get comfortable with that, or get the right assurances, I'd rather go to college. I know I'll play in Louisville and improve my game."

    If Telfair really believes that, he better go back to school.

    J.R. Smith, SG, Newark, NJ: He's been the best high school player in the country over the past two weeks and did little to hurt his status in San Antonio. While he shot only 3-for-11 from 3 on Sunday, scouts claim that he shot the lights out the past two days in practice. Smith told Insider that he gets his shooting touch from shooting 500 jumpers a day. As we reported on Friday, there is a growing consensus among NBA scouts that Smith would be a lottery pick if he declares. Here's how one Western Conference GM described him to me on Sunday:

    "He's Vince Carter with a jump shot. He has a great body, great athleticism. He needs to play better defense and work on his ball handling a bit, but we can teach those things. The shooting and the athleticism, you can't teach that. Unlike most of these big kids who are flirting with the draft, he could come in and contribute right now."

    Another scout compared Smith to the next Paul Pierce. Another to a taller version of Fred Jones. It was tough to find anyone in the place who didn't like him. Is that weighing on Smith's mind?

    "It don't know what it does, honestly," Smith told Insider. "I've got to go home and try to get some information and talk it over with my parents. If you're a lottery pick, you can't turn that down."

    Al Jefferson, PF, Prentiss (MS): Jefferson had the dunk of the night, slamming a power jam over the head of 7-footer Yi Jian Lian. One scout in attendance who knows the high school players better than most said he believes that Jefferson would go in the late lottery if he stayed in the draft. Others, concerned about conditioning issues and his so-so athleticism, claim that the late first round is more like it. Jefferson claims that he's still deciding what to do. "I'm going to make a decision soon," Jefferson told Insider. "I just got to figure out what's going to be best for me."

    Luka Bogdanovic, SF, Red Star (Serbia) "My agent (David Bauman) told me that if I play well here I go first round this year," Bogdanovic told Insider. "If I don't play well then I must wait until next year. No pressure."

    Bogdanovic had the most impressive performance of any of the international players. In addition to going 3-for-5 from behind the arc in the game, scouts claim that Bogdanovic made virtually every shot he took in practice on Saturday. "He's a special, special shooter," one GM said. "He's got a beautiful stroke."

    However, questions about Bogdanovic abound. He clearly needs to add another 20 pounds of muscle to play small forward in the league, and by his own admission, he's a little soft. He also doesn't put the ball on the floor much. Scouts right now think he's closer to Bostjan Nachbar than Peja Stojakovic.

    In other words, his status in the first round, despite his stellar play in San Antonio, still isn't assured. Like Telfair, Bogdanovic doesn't want to go to the NBA and sit at the end of the bench. He's getting good minutes in Serbia and doesn't want to take a step backward.

    "I don't want to go to the league and just sit," Bogdanovic said. "My dream is to go to the NBA and play. There aren't very many good shooters in the NBA. I like to work. I like to practice. I think these things will help me in the NBA."

    Bauman will likely keep Bogdanovic in the draft looking for a promise from a team. If he can't get one, he'll pull him out and put him in the draft next year.

    Roko Ukic, PG, Split (Croatia): Ukic answered a major question in scouts' minds on Sunday when he came out and stopped the quicker Telfair from penetrating. Ukic is known as a very good athlete overseas, but he'd never played against a player like Telfair before.

    "I really wanted to show that I am quick enough," he said. "I know what people say and all I can do is come out and show them."

    Ukic's long arms helped extend the floor for them. Despite so-so numbers (7 points, 2 assists), the international team fared much better when Ukic was in the game. While it's clear that Ukic could use more experience and needs to get strength, it's also pretty clear that he's got the head to lead a team. He's the youngest player on Split this year, but also serves as a team captain.

    Like Telfair and Bogdanovic, Ukic wants to be in the NBA only if it means that he'll play. "I've played many minutes since I was 16," he said. "I don't want to come to the NBA and just practice. I think maybe I will not come to the NBA right away until I know this."

    Ukic helped his stock at the tournament, but probably does need another year or two in Europe. Look for Bauman to try and broker a deal with a club in the second half of the first round. A team with multiple picks like the Celtics or Jazz may be willing to draft him and leave him in Europe for another season or two to continue his development there.

  • #2
    Re: 04-05-2004

    Smith sounded like a kid ready to come into the NBA. In fact, he many not even be eligible for college this year. Smith may have already played in too many postseason all-star games, putting in jeopardy his freshman eligibility.

    "It's tough to pass the league up," he told Insider. "College is great, but when your family has bills and stuff, it's tough to say no to the money. I'm not saying it's all about the money, but you've got to talk care of your family, you know what I'm saying?"

    Smith said he'll make his announcement around mid-April, but with most NBA scouts claiming he's a lock for the top 10 (and could go as high as top 5), it looks like he's in for sure.
    I really wish Josh would make up his mind, or if his mind is made up (I think it has been for a while now), then he should make an announcement now. I think this whole situation is becoming ridiculous. Does he think he's fooling anyone right now? He played in three all-star games. I'd love to see Smith at IU, even for only one year, but if he's not coming, then let's know it and move on already.
    Take me out to the black, tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 04-05-2004

      There wasn't any doubt a year ago about whether or not he was going pro. He was never going to be at IU.
      Some of us are eternal optimists.
      Take me out to the black, tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 04-05-2004


        I really wish Josh would make up his mind, or if his mind is made up (I think it has been for a while now), then he should make an announcement now. I think this whole situation is becoming ridiculous. Does he think he's fooling anyone right now? He played in three all-star games. I'd love to see Smith at IU, even for only one year, but if he's not coming, then let's know it and move on already.
        You've heard the saying, "Actions speak louder than words." He's already lost his freshman year, what does that tell you?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 04-05-2004

          You've heard the saying, "Actions speak louder than words." He's already lost his freshman year, what does that tell you?
          Oh, it was beyond obvious some time ago he wasn't going to be in Bloomington this fall. I just wish he'd act grown-upish and say so.
          Take me out to the black, tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.

          Comment

          Working...
          X