Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

    There is some new details in this article. Interesting


    http://premium.si.cnn.com/pr/subs2/s...206/index.html

    A Season Over The Brink


    Look what Ronnie has wrought. The Pacers finally rid themselves of talented but troubled Ron Artest, who made his debut with the Kings last week. But back in Indiana, a team that was once talking title is now facing an overhaul


    By Jack McCallum

    Until last Thursday afternoon the name Artest was still on a chalkboard in Rick Carlisle's locker room office. "Hmm, guess I haven't changed that starting lineup in a while," said the Indiana Pacers' coach, picking up an eraser. When told that he might want to wipe off o'neal too -- All-Star power forward Jermaine O'Neal will miss at least two months, and perhaps the rest of the regular season, with a torn left groin muscle -- Carlisle considered it. "No," he said finally, "I think I'll leave him on."

    Who could blame Carlisle for pretending that his best player was still available? Over the last four months Carlisle has presided over an underachieving and flawed team (21-21 at week's end) held hostage by Ron Artest, a troubled and often troubling soul who was traded to Sacramento on Jan. 25. "The Tru Warier meets the Kings," the 6'7", 246-pound Artest said in a TV interview last week, hyping himself and his record label. Ah, just what they need at sign-happy Arco Arena: a new slogan.

    The Pacers' post-Warier era officially began last Friday with a 93-89 loss to the Cleveland Cavaliers at Conseco Fieldhouse, their fifth straight defeat and 13th in their last 19 games. Still, there were positive signs. Indiana was missing not only O'Neal but also point guard Jamaal Tinsley (sore right elbow) and demon rebounder Jeff Foster (back spasms). Plus, sharpshooting forward Peja Stojakovic, obtained from Sacramento for Artest, was unavailable, having arrived in town only hours before the game. Yet Indy played hard and stayed in the game until the end, getting solid performances from rookie forward Danny Granger (21 points, 14 rebounds) and young gun Fred Jones (20 points). "We fought together," said guard Sarunas Jasikevicius, "and that showed we can be a good basketball team."

    After months -- nay, years -- of being Ar-tested by one of the strangest personalities on the sports landscape, the Pacers could not be blamed for looking at the bright side. In fact, both teams put a happy face on the swap -- It's a deal that helps both teams! -- but no one can say with certainty if any lasting good will come out of it. It's likely that Artest will eventually lock horns with shoot-first point guard Mike Bibby. And though the 6'10" Stojakovic's size and touch have led to comparisons with Pacers president Larry Bird, Stojakovic's model as a player, Peja lacks Bird's toughness, post-up moves, rebounding skills, playmaker aptitude and get-in-the-passing-lane defensive instincts. He is Larry Ultra Lite.

    Larry Legend, who still stops traffic when he goes on international scouting missions, is a central figure in the Artest saga. Bird wanted to swap Artest for Stojakovic after the 2003-04 season -- the deal was nixed by Pacers owners Melvin and Herbert Simon -- yet he is also the member of the organization most closely aligned with Artest, so much so that the Artest Era seems destined to go down as Larry's Folly. If the old, tough-minded Celtic immortal likes him, the thinking went around Pacer Land, everyone had to like him.

    But Bird wasn't the only one seduced by Artest. The Simons liked Artest the people's favorite, a man whose strong rapport and gentleness with fans masked the turmoil within. Pacers CEO Donnie Walsh liked Artest the talent, a player whose on-court repertoire includes three-point range, a post-up game and demon defense. (He was the league's Defensive Player of the Year in '03-04.) Bird liked Artest the gym rat, the human sweatbox who would practice nonstop for two hours in the off-season. "Then Ronnie might get on a plane and go play a couple of pickup games in Chicago," says Bird. "I wish I had a guy like that to work out with when I was playing."

    Fact is, all the Pacers' execs liked Artest so much they were sounding like the Four Seasons: "Ronnie. Ronnie. Ronnie, I am regretting but can't stop forgetting because ... you were my first love."

    Certainly Ronnie-love was in the Hoosier air this past summer. Artest, as is his wont, worked out dutifully, and Bird, among others, became convinced that he would come back physically fit (understandable) and mentally stable. (Huh?) The last glimpse of Artest in the 2004-05 season for many Pacers came after Detroit eliminated them in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference semis, when Artest drove a black Escalade wildly onto the Conseco loading dock in full view of the Pistons' team bus, then jumped out of the SUV, ripped off his shirt and walked into the arena. By some accounts he was heading into Conseco to play a late-night shooting game with teammate Jonathan Bender. It was a classic moment from the Theater of Artest -- strangely endearing, seriously loony.

    Still, says Bird, "with all that happened last season [a reference to Artest's 73-game suspension for igniting one of the ugliest brawls in sports history at The Palace of Auburn Hills], we really felt that this year would be, maybe not perfect, but all right." O'Neal and Stephen Jackson even joined Artest for an off-season tête-à-tête with Walsh and Bird, during which the players argued for keeping the core together, proving that Artest's seductive powers extended even to those teammates he had let down so often.

    But everything went haywire a month into this season, either because Artest believed that the Pacers were trying to trade him (Walsh and Bird say No, no, a thousand times no!) or because, well, because he's Artest.

    Two Pacers told SI that Artest regularly started physical altercations during practice. The skirmishes "weren't boxing matches," says one of the players, but they didn't do much for team unity. If Artest believed that he was being treated unfairly in practice by Carlisle or one of his teammates, he refused to run through a play. Or hours before a game he would announce in the locker room that he wasn't going to play that evening, only to change his mind soon thereafter.

    At least twice this season, he was outside the locker room, in street clothes, talking on a cellphone 20 minutes before tip-off. He came to believe that everything he did wrong in Indianapolis was magnified, which was true, but he ignored the fact that the hometown fans had cut him enormous slack despite his 87 games' worth of suspensions over 41Ú2 seasons as a Pacer. Among his teammates he was closest to Jackson and Tinsley, but eventually the Tru Warier had no true allies. "It was Ron against the world," says one player.


    Still, until Dec. 11, the day Artest announced in an interview with the Indianapolis Star that he wanted to be traded, management spun furiously for him. It was Artest's passion that led him to overreact in games and practices, Pacers execs would say. Sure, the team might be affected by his outbursts, but Artest was "a guy who could walk into a restaurant and get into a conversation with anyone," Bird said last week.

    Despite Artest's rap sheet the Kings weren't the only team that tried to get him. Far from it. Dealing Artest for Corey Maggette of the Los Angeles Clippers would have almost certainly gone down three weeks ago had Indiana not been scared off by recent tests on Maggette's left foot. According to a Pacers source, talks with the Denver Nuggets about Artest for Kenyon Martin were serious, but Indiana was unwilling to take on Martin's contract (five years remaining for $70.9 million). The New Orleans Hornets wanted Artest but offered only draft choices. Walsh and Bird had conversations with many other teams, including the Boston Celtics, Los Angeles Lakers, Minnesota Timberwolves and Golden State Warriors, but nothing ever came close to being cemented. Eventually, only the Kings, who are trapped in their own going-nowhere nightmare, had enough to get it done, offering a player that Bird had apparently wanted before he became reseduced by the beguiling Warier. "We made a mistake, obviously," says Bird. "When you're in the business of figuring out what's best for a team, you can't fall in love."

    So now Indy's spotlight is on Stojakovic, who is in some ways the anti-Artest: shy, modest, congenitally unable to foment discontent. Though the way he found out about the trade angered him -- Kings owners Joe and Gavin Maloof spilled the beans on television before they told Stojakovic -- he seems genuinely glad to be in Indiana under the watchful eye of his hoops role model. "Being on Larry's team," he said last Friday, "is kind of like a dream." Stojakovic, 28, can opt out of his contract at season's end, but Bird says, "I've been after this kid for two years, and I don't want him to be here two weeks."

    Stojakovic will never be the defensive warrior Artest is, but he will have to improve his D to satisfy Carlisle, not to mention the hoops-savvy fans at Conseco. Since Indy plans to dust off some old Reggie Miller-type plays for him, Stojakovic will have ample opportunity to prove that his declining scoring average (from 24.2 points per game in '03-04 to 20.1 last season to 16.5 in 31 games through Sunday) resulted from nagging injuries (pinky, groin, back) and a Sacramento offense that turned from move the ball to move out of Bibby's way.

    There are other issues for a team that was seventh in the East at week's end. With the arrival of Stojakovic, Carlisle will have to find minutes and shots for Granger and Jones. Tinsley's shot-clock-devouring, back-back-back-it-down style needs an overhaul. And with O'Neal out, it might be a good time for Jackson -- a sometimes delightful guy who occasionally stares absentmindedly into the stands during games, as he did on Friday during an abysmal 6-for-20 shooting performance -- to zone in instead of zoning out. Most important, the franchise will have to decide whether O'Neal is a franchise player or just a talented opening act who needs a headliner. Many around the league suspect the latter.

    The one certainty is that, for now, all is quieter on the Conseco front. "Ron was a funny dude, and we'll miss some of that," says backup point guard Anthony Johnson. "But it was time for it to be over." Make that way past time, A.J.

    Issue date: February 6, 2006

  • #2
    Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

    A very big thanks for posting, UB.

    You highlighted the right section, even though it pisses me off to no end to read that stuff.
    “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

    “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

      Glad to see some of the other oddities of Ron Artest are coming out . Those close to the team have known this for awhile.

      Ron is a good guy , but you can't depend on him to ever be 100% committed to being a good teammate. I doubt that part of Ron ever changes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

        Among his teammates [Artest] was closest to Jackson and Tinsley
        1 down, 2 to go
        "I'll always be a part of Donnie Walsh."
        -Ron Artest, Denver Post, 12.28.05

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

          Again, we and the world face the truth, Ron is crazy!!!
          He lives in his own world!

          I'm glad we are rid of him!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

            Had I known beforehand what UB highlighted, I would have said trade him last summer.
            "He wanted to get to that money time. Time when the hardware was on the table. That's when Roger was going to show up. So all we needed to do was stay close"
            Darnell Hillman (Speaking of former teammate Roger Brown)

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

              There's really nothing new here.

              Its been widely discussed that this stuff also happened with the Bulls.

              You guys have had your blinders on... some of us have been trying to tell you its really this bad for years.

              Did you really think he just stopped being a jackass to his teammates overnight?
              Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
              Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
              Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
              Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
              And life itself, rushing over me
              Life itself, the wind in black elms,
              Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                Bird wanted to swap Artest for Stojakovic after the 2003-04 season -- the deal was nixed by Pacers owners Melvin and Herbert Simon
                Does this mean that the Sacto owners weren't the ones who killed this deal? Does this obsolve DW and LB of responsibility for keeping Ron?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                  Originally posted by Jay@Section204
                  There's really nothing new here.

                  Its been widely discussed that this stuff also happened with the Bulls.

                  You guys have had your blinders on... some of us have been trying to tell you its really this bad for years.

                  Did you really think he just stopped being a jackass to his teammates overnight?
                  NO ****!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                  I can't believe all the storks here. Head stuck firmly in the sand while the rumors flew for years. We need a "hear no evil, see no evil" icon!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                    Originally posted by PacerMan
                    NO ****!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    I can't believe all the storks here. Head stuck firmly in the sand while the rumors flew for years. We need a "hear no evil, see no evil" icon!
                    Wasn't that an ostrich?

                    I was expecting someone from here at PD to deliver my new baby boy or something....

                    I'm glad Ron is gone too.

                    Thanks for posting the article, UB...



                    RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                      I've always understood it that Sacramento said no in '04, I never heard anything about the Simon's involvement until this week.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                        Originally posted by blanket
                        1 down, 2 to go
                        exactly.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                          I look at the comment about him sometimes not suiting up 20 minutes prior to a game as a "slacker" type of guy....you know...the 16 year old kid that would much rather sleep in and wakes up 10 minutes before he's supposed to show up at McDonald's. Its like Basketball is a game to him...as opposed to his job.....not the main priority....just one of his priorities.

                          But you can say that about many other players that has too much talent for them to know what to with. I guess Artest simply needs to stay focused...that's all. I could only imagine the type of player that he could be if he didn't have all these distractions.
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                            Originally posted by Unclebuck
                            Most important, the franchise will have to decide whether O'Neal is a franchise player or just a talented opening act who needs a headliner. Many around the league suspect the latter.
                            Who is the author referring to when he says "Many around the league suspect the latter"? Are people finally being exposed to the real J.O.? Is his trade value as high as some of us would like to believe?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Interesting SI article on the Pacers and Artest

                              Originally posted by Unclebuck

                              At least twice this season, he was outside the locker room, in street clothes, talking on a cellphone 20 minutes before tip-off. He came to believe that everything he did wrong in Indianapolis was magnified, which was true, but he ignored the fact that the hometown fans had cut him enormous slack despite his 87 games' worth of suspensions over 41Ú2 seasons as a Pacer. Among his teammates he was closest to Jackson and Tinsley, but eventually the Tru Warier had no true allies. "It was Ron against the world," says one player.
                              Does this maybe fit in with my question "Where was Artest (and O Neal) during warmups for the Philly (home opener) game?"

                              -Bball
                              Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                              ------

                              "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                              -John Wooden

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X