[QUOTE=Jay@Section204]No. They all pointed back to Jim Gray's report on ESPN. Or prove it was out there by more than one source.
Then why dismiss it either? The only basis for dismissing it is by relying on Jim Gray's report, which is somewhat dubious in the first place. I'm not saying its factual (although Btown is). I'm saying its just as plausible as anything else we've heard.
I'm not dismissing it. I heard the rumors too. And it's a lot more plausible when you add Kaufman's statement. In fact I tend to believe it. The thing is I still don't believe Sac would let the Pacers change a deal submitted to the league office, and that's why I didn't believe Hoopsworld's timeline, and not believing their timeline is the reason I posted.
+ + + + + + +
Sometimes you pick weird things to be dismissive of, and other weird things to believe.
Although the rest of you probably used to think that about me, prior to Ron's total confirmation of everything I said he was.
I just tilt at the windmills I feel like tilting at. It could be just a point of procedure like in the Hoopsworld case. Basically I don't post if someone is making my argument, so that leaves the weird stuff for me. (grin)