Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

    Google Taps NBA To Launch Video Marketplace

    http://www.nba.com/news/google_060106.html

    LAS VEGAS – Jan. 6, 2006 – Google has teamed with the NBA to make current season NBA games available online for the first time as part of the launch of its Google Video Store, the first open video marketplace where consumers can buy or rent a wide range of video content, it was announced today by Larry Page, Google’s Co-Founder and President, Products, at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES).

    Starting today, people who visit the Google Video homepage at http://video.google.com will be able to access 2005-06 NBA games and some of the greatest individual performances in NBA history. Marking the first time NBA fans can purchase full NBA contests online, each NBA game for the rest of this season, including the NBA Playoffs and The Finals, will be available to fans in its entirety for $3.95 per game, 24 hours after its conclusion.

    "Google's innovative presentation of information and content is revolutionizing the way people access media," said NBA Commissioner David Stern. "In the increasingly competitive and rapidly changing world of entertainment, Google Video provides us with a new way to deliver the NBA experience to our fans when and how they want it."

    In addition, the highest scoring games of some of the NBA’s best players will be available including Kobe Bryant’s 62-point performance in three quarters vs. Dallas last month.

    The following career-high scoring performances will be available through Google Video, with more to be added at a later date:

    PLAYER PTS MATCHUP DATE
    Kobe Bryant 62 pts Lakers vs. Mavericks 12/20/05
    Tracy McGrady 62 pts Magic vs. Wizards 3/10/04
    Shaquille O'Neal 61 pts Lakers vs. Clippers 3/6/00
    Allen Iverson 60 pts Sixers vs. Magic 2/12/05
    LeBron James 56 pts Cavaliers vs. Raptors 3/20/05
    Tim Duncan 53 pts Spurs vs Mavericks 12/26/01
    Dirk Nowitzki 53 pts Mavericks vs. Rockets 12/2/04
    Vince Carter 51 pts Nets vs. Heat 12/23/05
    Dwyane Wade 48 pts Heat vs. Sixers 4/14/05
    Kevin Garnett 47 pts Timberwolves vs. Suns 1/4/05
    Steve Nash 39 pts Mavericks vs. Blazers 12/11/01

    NBA games will be the only major professional sports league content available to fans in the Google Video Store. Starting today, users can browse a directory of video by category from the store or search Google’s entire collection of videos by simply entering keywords in the search box. Search results are delivered in less than half-a-second. Other content providers to Google Video include CBS' CSI, Survivor, and classic shows like The Brady Bunch; music videos from Sony BMG; and a host of other programming.

    Google Video is the first open video marketplace where any video producer, large or small, can upload their content for free and distribute it how they wish. For instance, video prices are set by the content provider and can range from free to any price they set with no minimum or maximum dollar-limit. Owners also have the choice to offer their content with or without copy protection – enabling them greater control over its distribution.

    Additionally, all content from Google Video can be viewed with a new player that can be downloaded for free from any playback page. It offers all the traditional playback options (play, pause, stop…) as well as a “thumbnail” navigation feature that enables users to browse through an entire video, or frames at a time, with a simple click of their mouse. The player is designed for viewing Google Video content only, it is a five-megabyte download, and is compatible with Windows XP and Windows 2000.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

  • #2
    Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

    I wonder what format they are... and if they're DRM'ed...
    This space for rent.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

      If it's up already, there's no clear way to access it.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

        So, for the price you pay do you think you should be able to copy it?


        owl
        {o,o}
        |)__)
        -"-"-

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

          After reading the article about this posted on CNN, it seems as if Google is allowing content providers to set their own prices and levels of copy protection. Some providers are offering free content with no restrictions. The NBA is not. Currently for $3.95, you cannot move the NBA game you want to watch to the portable device of your choice, and you must be online and connected to the net to watch it at all. Because of this, I don't see any real benefit, especially at that price. If these restrictions are not lifted, this will be a HUGE flop for the NBA and Google.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

            If I can't save it or transfer it I will NOT be buying. I'll wait for someone to crack it and download it for free.
            "Just look at the flowers ........ BANG" - Carol "The Walking Dead"

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

              Originally posted by Hoop
              If I can't save it or transfer it I will NOT be buying. I'll wait for someone to crack it and download it for free.
              That's the American way. Wait for someone to steal it and then take the stolen goods.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                Originally posted by SycamoreKen
                That's the American way. Wait for someone to steal it and then take the stolen goods.
                I hate it when people say that. It's not theft, it's copyright infringement. That doesn't make it right. But calling it theft is lying, which isn't right either.

                The plain fact is that's a terrible deal for customers... but who ever accused the NBA of caring about things like that?
                This space for rent.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                  Originally posted by Anthem
                  I hate it when people say that. It's not theft, it's copyright infringement. That doesn't make it right. But calling it theft is lying, which isn't right either.

                  The plain fact is that's a terrible deal for customers... but who ever accused the NBA of caring about things like that?
                  I would say taking a product that was created to be used in one place, removing it, and then using it in another place without the person's permission is stealing their "property." I would be doing the same thing if I buy a teacher resourse book for school that forbids me to copy it and then making copies for everyone I know. I broke the agrement I made when I bought it. Stating it as copyright infringement is a way to make it more pallatable I guess.

                  So it being a bad deal makes it o.k. to obtain it illeaglly? Shoot in that case I think I'll go down to Best Buy and walk out with that $12,000 HD t.v. 12 grand just isn't a good deal for me.

                  As for the product, I doubt I would purcase it beause i have no desire to watch a complete game on my computer. Can it be watched through a gaming system? Also, do you get unlimited viewings with the purchase or is it a one time rental?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                    Originally posted by SycamoreKen
                    I would say taking a product that was created to be used in one place, removing it, and then using it in another place without the person's permission is stealing their "property." I would be doing the same thing if I buy a teacher resourse book for school that forbids me to copy it and then making copies for everyone I know. I broke the agrement I made when I bought it. Stating it as copyright infringement is a way to make it more pallatable I guess.
                    No, using something without the person's permission isn't steeling unless you take something from that person and he'll lose it. Does author loose his content when you copy it? No, so it's not stealing it's copyright infrigiment.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                      Still way behind MLB.... I want to be able to watch all games on the Internet LIVE!!! .... GRRR....
                      Here, everyone have a : on me

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                        Thanks for wonderful news Kstat!!!
                        Now I'll be able to watch all Indiana games and argue with you after each game!!!
                        Great!!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                          AHHHH
                          Its not ready yet...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                            Originally posted by nevermind
                            No, using something without the person's permission isn't steeling unless you take something from that person and he'll lose it. Does author loose his content when you copy it? No, so it's not stealing it's copyright infrigiment.
                            That is one juicy rationalization nevermind. Orwell would be proud of
                            your last sentence. I doubt it will be very financially rewarding for
                            the NBA if you cannot view multiple times for the price you pay or
                            you are not allowed to copy it. What is strange about this is that you
                            can already record a game for your own use and watch it multple
                            times.



                            owl
                            {o,o}
                            |)__)
                            -"-"-

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: BIG NEWS OF THE DAY...NBA games on google.com for $3.95

                              Originally posted by owl
                              That is one juicy rationalization nevermind. Orwell would be proud of
                              your last sentence. I doubt it will be very financially rewarding for
                              the NBA if you cannot view multiple times for the price you pay or
                              you are not allowed to copy it. What is strange about this is that you
                              can already record a game for your own use and watch it multple
                              times.



                              owl
                              No one has said that copyright infringement is right.

                              They're just saying that it is different from stealing.

                              And it is.

                              The difference (restating here):

                              When you "steal" something from somebody, the original owner doesn't have that thing anymore. For example, if I steal your car, you no longer have your car. That's obvious enough.

                              When you infringe a copyright, you are not necessarily stealing anything from anyone. If I illegally download an mp3, for example, the original copyright holder(s) of the song still have their song, and they still have just as many copies of it as they did before I downloaded it.

                              Is copyright infringement illegal? Yes. Is it wrong? Possibly. But is it "STEALING?"

                              NO. BY DEFINITION, IT IS NOT STEALING. IT'S DIFFERENT.

                              Whether or not stealing is morally equivalent to copyright infringement is another story, and there should be a genuine debate there, but I can certainly sympathize with people who are sick of hearing somebody equate the two automatically whenever a discussion about copyright infringment/downloading comes up. BECAUSE THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X