Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

  1. #1
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

    It gets to the root of those nasty "which one do we trade for" problems by getting both.

    Pacers trade Ron, Tinsley, Pollard, Austin, and AJ
    Lakers trade Odom, Kwame, Devean George, Sasha Vujacic, and Von Wafer.

    Lakers get three probable starters out of the deal: Austin, Ron, and either Tinsley or AJ (AJ might actually be a great PG in Jackson's triangle).

    We get a starting lineup of JO/Odom/George (I know, I know)/Jackson, and Saras, with Foster/Kwame/Granger/Jones/Sasha off the bench. That's a solid 10-man rotation, if a little weak in the backcourt.

    No chance, I know. Like I said, just for fun.

    EDIT: Mods, please move this to the correct forum. Sorry about that.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  2. #2
    Rebound King Kstat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    27,677

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

    Phil Jackson wouldn't want tinsley. He isn't a triangle PG.

    He'd love Austin, but enough to make him want to give up Odom? I don't know.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

  3. #3
    How are you here? Kegboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Northside Bias
    Posts
    12,950

    Default Re: Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

    I didn't know anybody wanted Kwame.
    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

  4. #4
    Member Pacers#1Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,781

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

    I heard Kwame mentioned in the forum a couple of times but nothing pressing.

  5. #5
    extreme
    Guest

    Default Re: Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

    According to any trade proposals, Kwame is in the trade and not Odom.

  6. #6
    Go Colts! Shade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    36
    Posts
    44,169

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

    NO.

  7. #7
    Member naptownmenace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    4,620

    Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Just for fun... why not Odom AND Kwame?

    After the Pacers trade Artest to GS I'd love it if they would make a trade for Kwame.

    Pollard and a 2nd rounder for Kwame might work. The Lakers are getting a big center for the rest of the year and $6 million in cap space this summer. The 2nd round pick is just a little sweetener but maybe they'd rather have Eddie Gill instead.
    Quote Originally Posted by vnzla81
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Larry is not coming back, he didn't have a meeting with Orlando for not reason, yeah he is coming back to the NBA but not to the Pacers, the notion that he is a taking a year off and then come back is absurd.
    Quote Originally Posted by Trader Joe View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    GOOD GOD THAT'S LARRY BIRD'S MUSIC!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •