Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29

Thread: This Harrington thing is interesting

  1. #1
    Boom Baby'er ABADays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Coliseum
    Posts
    6,248

    Default This Harrington thing is interesting

    I'm not a big, big fan of Harrington but having dealt with the likes of Artest, Jax and Tinsley he would almost be a breath of fresh air. So . . .

    Do you absolutely think he is headed here - at least no later than next year? I think he is because to Walsh he is a known quanitity. I do think he has matured enough - and has experienced what it is like to play for a terrible team - to also appreciate what he had and could have here.
    The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

  2. #2
    Rebound King Kstat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    28,142

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Would Harrington accept the MLE? I'm not sure.

    This summer is Al's "big payday." He's not going to get a better contract than he's going to get this summer. Obviously he doesn't like to lose, but if he feels the Hawks are heading in the right direction (like I do) he might take more money from them and stay.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

  3. #3
    sweabs
    Guest

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    So long as Carlisle goes with a lineup of Granger at the 3, Harrington at the 4, and Jermaine at the 5, we could be safe. We are getting killed on the boards, and a frontline of Baby Al and JO is still not that great - but Granger would definitely be needed to get some of those boards.

    I don't want Al taking any PT away from Granger, and I don't want to see him played at the 3 spot at all.

  4. #4
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,260

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    As a FA, I doubt he is headed here unless his market value makes him a bargain.

    As a return in trade for Artest... I have to wonder if Harrington is too much to expect.

    IF he is already a Pacer next summer then I'm not certain what our interest would be in keeping him and at exactly what cost.

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  5. #5
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by PTstyle272
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    what is the report on his knee? didn't he say that he had to play through pain?
    He's been playing through pain since he came back in '03.

  6. #6
    Naptown Seth
    Guest

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    I don't think we'll sign him in the offseason. Like I said, he'd have to accept a well below market value contract (MLE), or we'd have to work out a sign & trade to land him.
    If Al ends up back in Indiana within the next year, it's gonna be because Donnie lands him in the Ron trade.

  7. #7
    Rebound King Kstat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    28,142

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    If he's in pain, it's hard to tell.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

  8. #8
    Pacer Junky Will Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,049

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Naptown Seth
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I don't think we'll sign him in the offseason. Like I said, he'd have to accept a well below market value contract (MLE), or we'd have to work out a sign & trade to land him.
    If Al ends up back in Indiana within the next year, it's gonna be because Donnie lands him in the Ron trade.
    I agree, but if we get him for Ron I think he will sign an extension. Al will be 26 in Feb. He could probably sign a 4 year extension with us for $34.7 Million and then maybe be able to sign another contract when he's 30. If not, a five year contract would be, $45.2 million, and a six year contract would be $56.4 million. If he wants more than that he's just being a greedy Boozer.

  9. #9
    Banned Jermaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Your baby moms house
    Age
    26
    Posts
    11,717

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Will Galen
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I agree, but if we get him for Ron I think he will sign an extension. Al will be 26 in Feb. He could probably sign a 4 year extension with us for $34.7 Million and then maybe be able to sign another contract when he's 30. If not, a five year contract would be, $45.2 million, and a six year contract would be $56.4 million. If he wants more than that he's just being a greedy Boozer.
    How do you figure we can give him all that money? We dont have any cap, we only have the MLE.

  10. #10
    Rebound King Kstat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    28,142

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    How does he sign an extension with a team that he doean't play for?

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

  11. #11
    Pacer Junky Will Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,049

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Jermaniac
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How do you figure we can give him all that money? We dont have any cap, we only have the MLE.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kstat
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How does he sign an extension with a team that he doean't play for?
    Read my post again! I said, "If we get him for Ron!"

  12. #12
    Naptown Seth
    Guest

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Believe me, Donnie knows what kinda money Al will fetch thius offseason, so if he trades for him, I'm sure he's already decided he'll pay him what it takes to keep him. He's not gonna trade for him if he doesn't think he's worth paying.

  13. #13
    Banned Jermaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Your baby moms house
    Age
    26
    Posts
    11,717

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Will Galen
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Read my post again! I said, "If we get him for Ron!"
    Okay how the hell does that change what I asked? If we get him for Ron how are going to resign him without any cap room? I dont really understand the CBA so maybe you can explain it to me.

  14. #14
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,260

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Jermaniac
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Okay how the hell does that change what I asked? If we get him for Ron how are going to resign him without any cap room? I dont really understand the CBA so maybe you can explain it to me.

    He would be our own FA at that point so we could go over the cap to re-sign him (unless something has changed in the new CBA) BUT we'd still have to deal with the ramnifications of the luxury tax if we cross that threshold.

    So it will ultimately be a matter of what TPTB would and could pay as dictated by those who control "the gold".

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  15. #15
    Administrator Unclebuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    32,833

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Anyone watching Al destroy the Nuggets. His passing is much better, he is just a much better player than two seasons ago

  16. #16
    Member Swingman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    726

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Please no Harrington. He's not what we need.

  17. #17
    Member Evan_The_Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis, In. via Oakland, Ca.
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,413

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Who else on this team would you consider a reliable shooter besides Saras? I think that answers the question about what we need. Al is good, but he's not exactly what we need at the moment. Not unless O'Neal is going to play the 5 for the rest of his career.

  18. #18
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    9,006

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Ev_eezy
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Who else on this team would you consider a reliable shooter besides Saras? I think that answers the question about what we need. Al is good, but he's not exactly what we need at the moment. Not unless O'Neal is going to play the 5 for the rest of his career.
    Yup! My thoughts exactly. Great player to add, but unless JO wants to play 3/4 of his time at the Center position I wouldn't even care considering it and to add the uncertainty of him staying ... makes me only more nervous of trying to get him here again.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  19. #19
    Naptown Seth
    Guest

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Ev_eezy
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Who else on this team would you consider a reliable shooter besides Saras? I think that answers the question about what we need. Al is good, but he's not exactly what we need at the moment. Not unless O'Neal is going to play the 5 for the rest of his career.
    Al is what we need, he's just not all that we need.

    He's a small forward with nice offense, defense, and very nice rebounding.

    However you're right, we also need a shooter. In order to get that we need to move 1 or more of Jackson, Tinsley, Fred Jones, Harrison, or Pollards contract. Perhaps we can get something else in the Artest deal that will make one of the above mentioned players more expendable.

  20. #20
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,260

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    I'd be OK with getting Al back if I'm told he'll be returning to his 6th man role and will be embracing it this time.

    That's not to say I couldn't accept him starting, if there was a way to make it work for the short AND long term betterment of the team. But knowing he's happily coming here ready and willing to accept and embrace a 6th man role would tell me he's matured into a team guy with few question marks.

    Of course words are one thing... actions are another...
    Gotta start somewhere tho.

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  21. #21
    Naptown Seth
    Guest

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Bball
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd be OK with getting Al back if I'm told he'll be returning to his 6th man role and will be embracing it this time.

    That's not to say I couldn't accept him starting, if there was a way to make it work for the short AND long term betterment of the team. But knowing he's happily coming here ready and willing to accept and embrace a 6th man role would tell me he's matured into a team guy with few question marks.

    Of course words are one thing... actions are another...
    Gotta start somewhere tho.

    -Bball


    That's mind boggling. Why would the Pacers bring in a player of Harrington's ability and then bring him off the bench, especially when they have a young up and ocming SF already coming off the bench in Granger? Harrington has upped his game to a near All-Star level. No way do you bring as player of tha caliber off the bench unless you have an All-Star playing in front of him, and the Pacers do not.

  22. #22
    All is full of Orange! Mourning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Age
    38
    Posts
    9,006

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Because, I think most of us don't want to see Al playing at the SF position, but at the PF position, JO's starting position usually in other words, hence why some of us made a remark not minding to have him unless JO is willing to play 3/4 or more of his oncourt time at Center.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

  23. #23
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,260

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by Naptown Seth
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote


    That's mind boggling. Why would the Pacers bring in a player of Harrington's ability and then bring him off the bench, especially when they have a young up and ocming SF already coming off the bench in Granger? Harrington has upped his game to a near All-Star level. No way do you bring as player of tha caliber off the bench unless you have an All-Star playing in front of him, and the Pacers do not.
    Did you read past the first line or so?

    That's not to say I couldn't accept him starting, if there was a way to make it work for the short AND long term betterment of the team. But knowing he's happily coming here ready and willing to accept and embrace a 6th man role would tell me he's matured into a team guy with few question marks.
    Your answer was right there.

    Technically, JO is an All Star and he'd be playing in front of Al on most teams that were trying to put a balanced lineup on the court. I see Al as more of a PF than a SF. ...altho I think Al can play SF BUT I'm not convinced he can play it as well as Granger can (potentially).

    But we don't use our true centers anyway so I don't know what kind of a lineup we'd try and put on the court if Al was here.

    Does Al automatically play SF and the rest stays the same?

    After these past few years I REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY want team guys on the court. Ballhogs, blackholes, and people putting the "I" in "TEAM" need not apply. I want to know Al is ready and willing to do whatever is best for the team, regardless of where that puts him in the rotation. That was my point. We've bent over backwards for players, egos, and attitudes long enough. If his coming here includes an agenda, then he can stay in Atlanta. If he's coming here humble and ready to get his hands dirty, and the coaches have a way to make it work (and not merely trying to fit square pegs into round holes or apply band-aids), then: "Al Harrington- Come on Down!"

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  24. #24
    Here we go Steelers.. jmoney2584's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    708

    Default

    i think with Al being best friends with JO and this now being JOs team that he would fall into the team play easily, he's not going to disrupt the offense and **** off his boy.

    sure he doesn't get a lot of assists in atlanta...but who is there to assist? they are about the worst team in the league, he's not a point guard. The team assist leader for Atlanta is freakin Joe Johnson with 5.2 a game, al harrington is second on that team with 3.2 a game, there just aren't a lot of assists going down in A-town. In the pacers system harrington would do better.

  25. #25
    Rebound King Kstat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    28,142

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: This Harrington thing is interesting

    Quote Originally Posted by jmoney2584
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    sure he doesn't get a lot of assists in atlanta...but who is there to assist?
    In all fairness, the hawks average more points than Indiana.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •