Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Crunchtime lineup

  1. #1
    Member Jon Theodore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,758

    Default Crunchtime lineup

    What do you all think will be the lineup in the 4th quarter of close games.

    This is all just speculation, but I think this lineup could do some good things.

    Sjack/Artest/Granger/Bender/Jermaine

    Ok, so you can sub someone else for Bender if you think he sucks. But, if he's producing like we know he can, I think he's got to be in here.

    Another major question is can Sjack guard point guards or can he run a team. If not Artest could possibly do it. I don't think this team really needs a point guard who can dribble circles around people. As long as Sjack/Ron could bring the ball up that's all we need.

    Now the major benefit of this lineup, is defense. That might be the best defensive lineup in the history of the game. (of course, assuming Bender is playing real Bender basketball) And in the 4th quarter you NEED stops.

    I don't pretend to be a basketball guru, so if you totally disagree you can save the hostility and simply state what you believe to be wrong with this.

  2. #2
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    52,583

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    I'd have Sarunas, Jackson, Artest, Granger, O'Neal

  3. #3
    Member Pacers#1Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,781

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd have Sarunas, Jackson, Artest, Granger, O'Neal
    I don't think you could get much better than that.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,257

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    I think that lineup would struggle bringing the ball up the floor against pressure, and getting into an offense quick enough. IMO, they would need one good ball handler in that lineup.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Richmond
    Age
    24
    Posts
    100

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd have Sarunas, Jackson, Artest, Granger, O'Neal
    I would have that same one too. I think we could definitely rely on that lineup.
    31 Forever

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lifelong Indy-area resident
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,653

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicks
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd have Sarunas, Jackson, Artest, Granger, O'Neal
    I'd go for that lineup, tempered not by the defensive liability of Saras against the elite PGs.

    I wouldn't worry about us being able to get the ball up the floor. We could always have Jackson or Artest bring it across the line if Saras has problems.

    But if some combination of JO, Granger or Artest is experiencing foul trouble, then I worry about Saras or Tinsley either one playing the PG position. I think either one of these guys, because of their defensive liabilities, opens up the risk of our interior players fouling out of close games. And this is particularly true against the elite PGs, the ones who will definitely recognize the weakness (defensively at PG) and exploit it.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Southern CA
    Posts
    77

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    IMHO, I would have Tins, Jack, Artest, O'Neal and Foster.
    **(before you boo, tel me explain.)

    Foster has an uncanny ability to come down with every big rebound. In a close 4th Q, I want a defensive lockdown. Cabbage has to prove his ball handling abilities before I put him in. I know Tins can beat pressure and as others have stated, Jack and Artest could help here.

    Granger... well, I need to see more. I would rather err in experience late in the game rather than pin my hopes on a rookie with limited PT.

    Given his history, I'd also believe anything Rick says at this point. If Rick puts Pollard, Bender Gill Johnson and Harrison on the floor, I would leer at him skeptically, but accept his judgement. :>
    "It's wanting to know that makes us matter."
    -- Tom Stoppard, Arcadia

  8. #8
    Call me Kauffie Kaufman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Haven, Connecticut
    Posts
    3,453

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    I think this is a pretty good question myself. One additional question I always ask though is, WHO IS GOING TO SHOOT YOUR FREE THROWS???? Think about it. When we are up by two and trying to nurse a lead, and Gary Payton goes looking for the ball to foul the handler, who's hand do we have the ball in?
    "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

  9. #9

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Once Foster is healthy, I definitely believe he should be in.
    Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

  10. #10
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Right now, I'd take Tinsley over Sarunas, but I haven't seen Runi yet. Tinsley's plenty clutch, though.

    It's really coming down to Granger vs. Foster. That's hard.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  11. #11
    Banned Destined4Greatness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,668

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Tinsley
    Jackson
    Artest
    Bender or Granger
    O'neal

    If we are ahead, I would say Granger. You know, Crunchtime can be both ways. If we are behind. Bender is automatic offense.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Tinsley
    Jackson
    Artest
    JO Foster


    I love both what I've seen from Saras and Danny, but I don't think that we should put our completley capable center on hold for a guy that we aren't sure can react accordingly to clutch situations.
    Life without water is tough, life without air is hard,life with one leg only is wobbly, Life without Reggie Miller, is impossible.

    Do Not Trade Austin

    Quote Originally Posted by Conrad Brunner
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Veteran Austin Croshere, the longest-tenured Pacers player on the roster, has proven reliable when called upon, invariably ready to step in regardless of the circumstance.

  13. #13
    flexible and robust SoupIsGood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lappy Go Hucky
    Age
    26
    Posts
    17,540

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    Tinsley
    Jackson (Maaaaaybe Granger, although Jax has proven to be clutch, so I'd choose him for now)
    Artest
    O'Neal
    Harrison

    However if Harrison's rebounding is still lacking...

    Tinsley
    Jackson
    Artest
    Granger
    O'Neal

    Also, Saras could sometimes be put in for Jax, if he has had one of his ugly nights.
    You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

  14. #14
    Team Raskolnikov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Ghent, Belgium
    Age
    29
    Posts
    4,596

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    as everyone knows by now, saras had a reputation in europe for taking over the game (offensively) in the fourth quarter (because he, well, actually did take over games in the fourth quarter)

    question of course remains whether he can do that in an nba game (there were already some good signs in a couple of preseason games); regarding the pressure i think he will do fine but defensively he can be a liability. tinsley would probably be a better choice if you look at ball handling and defensive ability; but saras' passing (his 3 point shooting too of course, but his passing even more i think) can be an enormous weapon in the crunch : easy baskets are still the ones that can make you win basketball games

    for now i d go with

    tins
    jax
    ron
    jo
    fost

    when everything goes well with our rookies, in the playoffs id go with

    saras
    jax
    ron
    granger
    jo
    Word on the street is he doesn't want your money, he only wants to please your ears...
    Bum in Berlin on Myspace

  15. #15
    Grumpy Old Man (PD host) able's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    8,699

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    and the one everyone is overlooking:

    Tins; Saras; Jax; Ron; JO

    where Jax is interchangable and Hulk, Foster or Granger (or even Fred) can move in

    But the last thing that would surprise me is Tins and Saras on the floor together.

    Tins has proven last year beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is clutch, not only with a 3, drive, floater but also in taking FT's (sinking 3 in the fan-jam)

    If I would look at players in and out of the "clutch time" rotation I would say that Jax is the first to rotate, Saras second, but that the chances that Tins, Ron or JO are not in are extremely slim.
    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

    If you've done 6 impossible things today?
    Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!


  16. #16
    Banned PacerMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    It's all about chemistry, and that will only work out over the course of the season and a whole bunch of minutes. Doesn't matter what mix of talents it looks like.

  17. #17
    The Last Great Pacer BlueNGold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    15,136

    Default Re: Crunchtime lineup

    I like this line-up against small teams:
    Tinsley, Jax, Artest, Granger, O'Neal
    ...and this against large teams:
    Tinsley, Granger, Artest, O'Neal, Harrison

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •