Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Too much depth can hinder growth...

  1. #1

    Default Too much depth can hinder growth...

    In the NBA, there is a contractual element that can affect the value of any player. It's not an issue of whether or not a player is good, it's is he good relative to his salary. Austin Croshere, Al Harrington, and Jonathon Bender all went through that process with the Pacers, and with all of them on the same roster behind Jalen Rose then Ron Artest it took too long to determine their value.

    No team wants to give up on a player too early, i.e. Jermaine O'Neal and Portland, and worse, they don't want to be the 'next team' to give up on a kid. The fear of losing a player is far worse than sticking with one who doesn't quite live up.

    Three 'tweeners coming off the bench was one too many. Good subs in the NBA often get 25-30 minutes on average. It seemed clear to me Croshere was definitely a second team defender and a special situations player. Rotate him early vs. the other team's 2nd PF, create matchup problems on the other end, and use him in situations where his shooting can create space.

    Bender had the most potential but was frail. Still, he had a year or two early where he was able get minutes. Harrington always wanted to start, and he was the one who was able to step up.

    The log jam three years ago killed any shot at Indiana getting much for Bender or Croshere (minus the Antoine Walker flirtation). The backcourt depth suffered, and while I like Jax, I'm not sure he is ultimately the best fit with this lineup. Harrington is dealt, for Jax, but last year's turn of events just killed any shot any sense of normalcy.

    Enter Granger. Granger is an absolute steal at this point, but with Croshere and Bender on the roster with inflated contracts, how are they going to develop any sort of value? They have two years left on their contracts. That can be valuable to a team looking to clear some cap space in the future. Not that the Pacers want to be burdened with salary, but it's a nice chip to have to get additional help.

    Granger, Bender, and Croshere all need minutes. It would be nice if Bender could stay healthy to the point of showing he has a future here, or showing he can be used to fetch help at another position. Croshere has probably shot his wad in terms of value, but he has provided some pretty important play for the Pacers over the years, especially when Isaiah Thomas isn't coaching him. Granger may indeed be the future for this franchise at the forward spot. I don't get the impression he's going to be "injured" as has been the past for others.

    I'd like to see the Pacers get a real shooter who can start. It would put the roster where it should have been last year, balancing out the positions. It won't please Jackson, but he would be PERFECT off the bench. He can play both wing positions. He's just as much of a 'tweener as the forwards above. Coming off the bench, he could still 30+ minutes.

    With the depth the Pacers have, the best thing for them to do is balance their roster out and add a shooter behind or in front of Jackson. The prototype would be Ray Allen, and behind him would be Michael Redd, Richard Hamilton, or a Joe Johnson. I'm not suggesting any of these players are available. Behind Jackson could be Mike Miller or Cuttino Mobley.

    It would have been nice to parlay of this depth toward a Martell Webster or Francisco Garcia in the draft as an additional pick.

  2. #2
    Pacer Junky Will Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,045

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    All we really need is a healthy team. Getting one seems to be the problem.

  3. #3
    Member Jon Theodore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,759

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    I agree with a lot of what you said. It's very true, a lot of players on this team could be much more productive somewhere else (statistically.)

    But, we need to get rid of some PG"s and get a Center, not another shooter.

    Sjack/Sarunas/Artest/Jermaine are all great shooters from different spots on the floor. And Sjack/Artest/Jermaine are all among the best defenders in the league at their position, none of them are have a compromised offensive game either.

    Sjack/Artest/Jermaine all compliment each other well with what they bring, mainly they are all excellent defenders as I stated.

    Defense wins championships, not ray allen. If we get a defensive minded Center, game over for anyone we play. Simple as that.

    All we have to do is beat people with our depth. Guys like Ronnie/jermaine could be expected to play 40 minutes a night, but here they don't have to do that.

    This not only increases their longevity as players, but should make them a lot better off come playoff time.

    If i were carlisle, i would play the bench a lot during the regular season. Just wear teams out by constantly throwing fresh legs at them. Everyone on our team can put the ball in the basket, we build a lead and put in our starters to hold it down defensively.

    All I know is this season can't start soon enough and I just drank three cups of coffee and typed this.

    GO PACERS!!!! God I love this team.

  4. #4
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    I'm really hopeful that Bender can stay healthy for long enough to raise his trade value.

    Granger looks like a perfect backup to both forward spots, which means no minutes for Bender.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,257

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Theodore
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    Sjack/Sarunas/Artest/Jermaine are all great shooters from different spots on the floor.
    I have yet to locate a spot on the floor from which Sjax is a great shooter. He is NOT a great shooter.

    I don't think the Pacers have a great shooter on their team. I haven't seen enough of Sarunas to know for sure. Other three guys mentioned hardly qualify as great shooters. They are great at other things, just not shooting.

  6. #6
    White and Nerdy Anthem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    23,738

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Agreed that this team has no great shooter. But then, last year's spurs didn't either. And don't say Horry.
    Welcome to Pacers Digest! New around here? Here are three tips for making the forum a great place to talk about Pacers basketball.

    • Log in. Even if you want to read instead of post, it's helpful because it lets you:
    • Change your signature options. You can hide all signatures by choosing "Settings" (top right) then "General Settings" (middle left) and unchecking the box "Show Signatures" (in the "Thread Display Options" area).
    • Create an ignore list. I know it may seem unneighborly. But you're here to talk about the Pacers, not argue with someone who's just looking for an argument. Most of the regular users on here make use (at least occasionally) of the "Ignore" feature. Just go to "Settings" -> "Edit Ignore List" and add the names.

    Enjoy your time at PD!

  7. #7
    Member Jon Theodore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,759

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Maybe not great shooters like Allan Houston or Reggie Miller. But they all can knock down enough shots.

  8. #8
    18to88
    Guest

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    How do you think we would get Ray Allen or Michael Redd?

  9. #9
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Depth is one of the most overrated terms in the NBA.

    Depth only helps a team survive the regular season. It is not important during the playoffs.

    If one of your three best players go down in the spring, you probably aren't going to win, period.

    If your three best players aren't good enough, it doesn't matter how good guys #4-8 or 9 in the rotation are. And guys #10, #11 & #12 are not relevant.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  10. #10
    flexible and robust SoupIsGood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lappy Go Hucky
    Age
    26
    Posts
    17,540

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    I feel like I'm reading a thread from a couple months ago, before Saras signed on. He is a great shooter, he is that shooter you want behind Jax.
    You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    40
    Posts
    726

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay@Section204
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Depth is one of the most overrated terms in the NBA.

    Depth only helps a team survive the regular season. It is not important during the playoffs.

    If one of your three best players go down in the spring, you probably aren't going to win, period.

    If your three best players aren't good enough, it doesn't matter how good guys #4-8 or 9 in the rotation are. And guys #10, #11 & #12 are not relevant.

    Jay I know this has always been your stance....and i agree to a point. But a few guys off the bench can help situationally in the playoffs ....

    Robert Horry has been key off the bench for both LA and SA. Steve Kerr hit big shots off the bench for Chicago....Sam Cassell was a monster for Houston in the Mid 90's playoff runs.

    If we have a key starter (JO, Tins, Jack,Feisty,Ron) limping into the playoffs Harrison, Granger, Saras, FJ, JB, AJ could be key to holding the fort until that starter got back for a later round.

  12. #12
    Jimmy did what Jimmy did Bball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    20,022

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by waxman
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Robert Horry has been key off the bench for both LA and SA. Steve Kerr hit big shots off the bench for Chicago....Sam Cassell was a monster for Houston in the Mid 90's playoff runs.
    But those guys don't even get that chance without the contributions of the main cogs.

    I agree with Jay.

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right. I was wrong. Frank Vogel has retained his job.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

  13. #13
    Banned Destined4Greatness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,668

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Wow, just wow. I mean Wow, Some of the recent stupidity when it comes to trades has just been WOW.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lifelong Indy-area resident
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,654

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    It is a good point that we have SCORERS, but really do not have a single SHOOTER. At least not yet. I think many of us hope that Saras proves himself to be the shooter we need.

    And Jay, I agree with Waxman about subs being situationally vital. Not just important, but vital.

    Most would probably agree that a deep team uses 10 players, give or take, during the regular season. And, I know that it is your stance during playoffs that teams only need to primarily use their starting 5s, with maybe contributions from 6-8 where needed.

    But I think subs 9-12 play a much more important role than that. For a good case in point, just look at our series against the Pistons this past season. We were giving the Pistons all they could handle, even with an injured and short lineup, until Brown suddenly discovered that he had Arroyo on his bench.

    Arroyo for god's sake. What was he? Maybe #10 in Brown's rotation. But voila... Brown inserted the bugger and he was more than we could handle. We couldn't stop his passing, his penetration and the few mid-range shots that he took. So, I think that Detroit's #10 player was the difference-maker. He may not have decided the playoffs, but he was the player who seemed to swing things to their favor.

    But basically, I believe that your #9-#12 are the players that provide a different twist to your lineup. You put them in, and every now and then, you get lucky. And all they have to do is collectively have one of them contribute just enough to swing one game. One game. That's oftentimes enough to get you to the next round.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    40
    Posts
    726

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by Bball
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    But those guys don't even get that chance without the contributions of the main cogs.



    -Bball
    Of course they don't. My point is there are valuable contributions to be made off the bench during the playoffs....in key situations and gave noted examples... yeah , none of these guys would've had the opportunity without the Superstars....but neither would the roll playing starters.

    The reverse is true as well.

    Jordan & Pippen didn't win 6 titles by themselves, the Bulls did.....Shaq & Kobe didn't win 3 titles, the Lakers did.....Tim Duncan & whoever....you get it right?

    I didn't say I completely disagree.... a 10 man rotation ain't gonna help you much in the finals.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    South Side
    Posts
    4,171

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by beast23
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It is a good point that we have SCORERS, but really do not have a single SHOOTER. At least not yet. I think many of us hope that Saras proves himself to be the shooter we need.

    And Jay, I agree with Waxman about subs being situationally vital. Not just important, but vital.

    Most would probably agree that a deep team uses 10 players, give or take, during the regular season. And, I know that it is your stance during playoffs that teams only need to primarily use their starting 5s, with maybe contributions from 6-8 where needed.

    But I think subs 9-12 play a much more important role than that. For a good case in point, just look at our series against the Pistons this past season. We were giving the Pistons all they could handle, even with an injured and short lineup, until Brown suddenly discovered that he had Arroyo on his bench.

    Arroyo for god's sake. What was he? Maybe #10 in Brown's rotation. But voila... Brown inserted the bugger and he was more than we could handle. We couldn't stop his passing, his penetration and the few mid-range shots that he took. So, I think that Detroit's #10 player was the difference-maker. He may not have decided the playoffs, but he was the player who seemed to swing things to their favor.

    But basically, I believe that your #9-#12 are the players that provide a different twist to your lineup. You put them in, and every now and then, you get lucky. And all they have to do is collectively have one of them contribute just enough to swing one game. One game. That's oftentimes enough to get you to the next round.
    Actually, Arroyo was the Pistons 8th man last year. The Pistons 9th through 12th men:

    Elden Campbell (completely useless against any team that doesn't have Shaq)
    Darvin Ham (useful for 30 second stretches at the end of quarters)
    Ronald Dupree (slightly less useful than Ham)
    Darko Milicic (don't ask)

    The Pistons essentially played 7 guys, and one of them was Lindsay Hunter, who 90% of the time was an absolute offensive disaster in the playoffs last year. Richard Hamilton had to play 48 minutes against the Heat in Game 7.

    That group of 7 was one quarter away from winning a title against the Spurs, who also pared their rotation down to 7 (Barry & Horry) in the finals. I agree with the thought that depth is important in the regular season, but in the playoffs you need a top-notch 7 or 8 guys. The Pistons got by last year with 6.

  17. #17
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Hold on,

    I agree that good quality subs are important because of whatever role they play. I don't want you to think that I think the entire starting five should play all 48 minutes. (Although I probably would recommend that for Game #7 of The Finals.)

    But having the right role players is much different than having "the deepest team in the league".

    Let's just talk about Steve Kerr as an example. Nobody in their right mind would've said that Steve Kerr & Co. made the Bulls better because he gave them great depth.

    Steve knew his role and was generally excellent at it. But if Harper or that other guard on their team went down, nobody would've been saying, "well, with Steve Kerr they've got great depth so I think they can still win it all."

    I'm just saying that I agree that having really good role players is important, but having a bunch of backups that might be good enough to start on other teams isn't all that helpful.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    40
    Posts
    726

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Yeah at least 7 preferably 8 solid guys.

    A solid second ballhandler , swingman, and Big.

  19. #19
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by shags
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Actually, Arroyo was the Pistons 8th man last year. The Pistons 9th through 12th men:

    Elden Campbell (completely useless against any team that doesn't have Shaq)
    Darvin Ham (useful for 30 second stretches at the end of quarters)
    Ronald Dupree (slightly less useful than Ham)
    Darko Milicic (don't ask)

    The Pistons essentially played 7 guys, and one of them was Lindsay Hunter, who 90% of the time was an absolute offensive disaster in the playoffs last year. Richard Hamilton had to play 48 minutes against the Heat in Game 7.

    That group of 7 was one quarter away from winning a title against the Spurs, who also pared their rotation down to 7 (Barry & Horry) in the finals. I agree with the thought that depth is important in the regular season, but in the playoffs you need a top-notch 7 or 8 guys. The Pistons got by last year with 6.
    Clearly, I agree 100%.

    I'm going to just defer to the guy that cheers for the team that our "great depth" can't seem to beat in the playoffs.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  20. #20
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by waxman
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yeah at least 7 preferably 8 solid guys.

    A solid second ballhandler , swingman, and Big.
    Bingo.

    If the solid ballhandler is a swingman (e.g. Brent Barry), you can do it with seven.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  21. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    40
    Posts
    726

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay@Section204
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Bingo.

    If the solid ballhandler is a swingman (e.g. Brent Barry), you can do it with seven.

    I can definately agree with that.... I'd still prefer 8 or 9 men through the first round or so,, (just because the playoffs tend to get so physical due to regular season officiating practices getting tossed out the window).... and then tighten up the rotation as it goes.

  22. #22
    Administrator/ The Real Jay ChicagoJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    44
    Posts
    17,000

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    The main reason I harp on the "eight man" thing is you have to spend some time doing it *before* the playoffs.

    You can't play a full five-man bench all season then magically expect the starters and subs to all pick up their new roles and responsibilities at the flip of a switch.

    I wouldn't argue that an 8-man rotation is best for the regular season, I just don't care whether we win 52 games or 61 games or whatever.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  23. #23
    Artificial Intelligence wintermute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,247

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    the pacers seem to have a very rigidly defined system of responsibilities, judging by players' comments. o'neal, for example, saying that he's been playing the center role so much that he may forget the power forward role. or sjax needing to adjust to the 2-guard role from the sf position he played last year. i would have thought that c/pf and sf/sg are the 2 most interchangeable positions.

    in such a rigidly defined system, i would think that it would not take much adjustment to pluck the backup sf and plug him in for the starting sf, for example. more adjustments would be needed if players get shifted out of position, but even then it seems like most pacers learn 2 positions anyway.

    on depth, i can think of situations where having backups good enough to be starters could be helpful. namely, injury or suspension. if your #9 and #10 players are good enough to be part of the core 8-man rotation, then you could lose 2 guys and still field a crack 8-man rotation. in fact, even if you lose 2 guys in the your top 3, as long as your #4 and #5 are good enough, you could get by.

    case in point - last season, our 3 best players were o'neal, jackson, and tinsley. both o'neal and tinsley weren't healthy, and the next best players (aj? fj?) couldn't cut it. this year, we're getting artest back, while adding 2 players who we believe to be starter quality. i believe that this year, we can lose 2 starters and still make a credible run at the title.

    the weak point is o'neal - he is the one guy in the lineup who is irreplaceable. in truth, this is a situation which all teams with a premier big man face. san antonio, miami, and detroit will all have major problems if duncan, shaq, or one of the wallaces go down.

  24. #24
    flexible and robust SoupIsGood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lappy Go Hucky
    Age
    26
    Posts
    17,540

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay@Section204
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Depth is one of the most overrated terms in the NBA.

    Depth only helps a team survive the regular season. It is not important during the playoffs.

    If one of your three best players go down in the spring, you probably aren't going to win, period.

    If your three best players aren't good enough, it doesn't matter how good guys #4-8 or 9 in the rotation are. And guys #10, #11 & #12 are not relevant.
    Yes, but for us, this is maybe the most THE key to winning in the playoffs. We've got to last the season. If we were a ultra-durable team, our depth might be a little overrated.
    You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

  25. #25
    flexible and robust SoupIsGood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lappy Go Hucky
    Age
    26
    Posts
    17,540

    Default Re: Too much depth can hinder growth...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay@Section204
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The main reason I harp on the "eight man" thing is you have to spend some time doing it *before* the playoffs.

    You can't play a full five-man bench all season then magically expect the starters and subs to all pick up their new roles and responsibilities at the flip of a switch.

    I wouldn't argue that an 8-man rotation is best for the regular season, I just don't care whether we win 52 games or 61 games or whatever.
    The Spurs did this past year. I think they did alright in the playoffs.
    You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •