Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

    http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...510140552/1088

    October 14, 2005


    PRESEASON: PACERS 99, JAZZ 92
    Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback
    Rookie responds in 4th quarter, still working on his defense

    By Mike Wells
    mike.wells@indystar.com

    It hasn't taken long to figure out why Indiana Pacers president Larry Bird racked up the frequent flier miles traveling back and forth to Europe to watch guard Sarunas Jasikevicius play.
    He can shoot. He can pass. And he can find a way to get to the basket.
    It also hasn't taken long to see that the 29-year-old rookie is going to need time to adjust to the NBA game defensively.
    He gets beat off the dribble. He struggles to fight through screens. And he's not considered quick for his position.
    Jasikevicius, whom Bird referred to as the best player in Europe, did wow the 11,390 fans at Conseco Fieldhouse on Thursday night in the Pacers' 99-92 victory over the Utah Jazz.

    "We all know Sarunas can do some great things offensively, there's no question about that," Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. "His biggest adjustment right now is learning our system defensively and learning the personnel in this league. Offensively, he's creative and unselfish and he's highly skilled. There's a reason we got the guy."

    Bird spent a couple of seasons watching Jasikevicius light up the competition in Europe before convincing the 6-4 guard to spurn the Jazz and Cleveland and sign a three-year, $12 million deal over the summer.

    Jasikevicius gave glimpses of what he can do against the Jazz when he
    scored 13 of his 18 points in the fourth quarter, including hitting a 3-pointer to tie the score 79-79.

    "I was more aggressive," Jasikevicius said. "I was looking for my shot. I didn't go into New Jersey (Tuesday) and do many things. I was just trying to get my first game under my belt and move on. The season is very long. The most positive thing for me is I'm more comfortable with every minute. That's the only thing I can ask for right now."

    It's easy to see Jasikevicius' potential leadership skills. Jasikevicius, who added four assists and three rebounds, directed the offense fluently, showed his passion for winning and constantly talked to his teammates on the floor. He had 11 of his fourth-quarter points in the final 51/2 minutes.

    "He has a great sense for the game, he has a great sense for when the opponent is off-balanced," Carlisle said. "His vision on the floor is tremendous and he showed that."

    Jasikevicius' offensive game has never been questioned. It's his defense where many expected him to struggle.

    Jazz rookie point guard Deron Williams, the No. 3 overall pick in this year's draft, exposed several of Jasikevicius' weaknesses when he was able to cross him up several times and run him off screens en route to scoring 17 points and adding six assists.

    "It's going to be a big development for me," Jasikevicius said. "I've never played at this level. Hopefully I can make it quick. I am still a rookie. It's going to be an adjustment, no doubt about it. I just hope it's going to be a quick one."

    Jasikevicius is consistently going to face quicker guards, so he has to figure out a way to make up for his lack of speed.

    "It's about learning the league, learning the guys he's playing against, what their tendencies are and what their strengths are because those are important things to defend well," Carlisle said. "We have a system of defense that's solid and he's in the process of learning that. For him, he's an experienced enough player and certainly has a high enough basketball IQ that he can pick it up quickly."
    UTAH (92)
    MinFG-AFT-AOR-TAFTPts
    Kirilenko213-112-35-80418
    Okur244-112-32-524010
    Whaley211-40-02-50522
    Brown222-66-70-012110
    Palacio120-22-20-11022
    Ostertag51-11-20-10013
    Humphries143-50-01-12216
    Giricek144-80-00-00029
    Violette192-30-12-31414
    Williams236-104-41-462117
    Lang100-10-01-20630
    Collins174-50-01-14318
    McLeod134-51-10-03119
    Nelson122-30-01-33144
    Owens120-20-00-20510
    Totals36-7718-2316-3623392292

    3-point shooting: 2-8 (Williams 1-2, Giricek 1-3, Kirilenko 0-1, Okur 0-1, Owens 0-1). Steals: 10 (Brown 2, Kirilenko 2, McLeod 2, Humphries 2, Lang 2). Blocked shots: 5 (Kirilenko 2, Brown, Nelson, Whaley). Team rebounds: 8.
    PACERS (99)
    MinFG-AFT-AOR-TAFTPts
    Artest366-1310-112-623323
    Bender120-22-20-11612
    Pollard191-11-22-60103
    Jackson264-107-80-114315
    Tinsley181-30-01-21252
    Croshere322-613-130-223417
    Johnson220-32-21-42412
    Jasikevicius256-94-50-343118
    Walker202-34-61-20128
    Granger244-110-02-41019
    Gill40-00-00-01000
    Hunter10-00-00-00000
    Brown10-00-00-00000
    Totals26-6143-499-3115272199

    3-point shooting: 4-9 (Jasikevicius 2-4, Artest 1-1, Granger 1-2, Croshere 0-2). Steals: 7 (Tinsley 2, Artest, Croshere, Granger, Jasikevicius, Pollard). Blocked shots: 5 (Pollard 2, Bender, Granger, Jackson). Team rebounds: 12.
    Urah10273421--92
    Pacers14262534`--99

    Officials: Luis Grillo, Jess Kersey, Courtney Kirkland. Attendance: 11,390.

    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

    I still have yet to see Saras play, what does his shot look like, is it an orthodox shot like Chris Mullin's was, or more of an unorthodox one like Reggie's, I'm just wondering.
    "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

      I only saw him a little on Tuesday, but it seemed very conventional, very quick, and very soft. He hit a 3 Tue. that hit the front of the rim, bounced up several feet, and dropped back in. Let's just say you won't see that happen for Jack or Fred.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

        Originally posted by Hicks
        I only saw him a little on Tuesday, but it seemed very conventional, very quick, and very soft. He hit a 3 Tue. that hit the front of the rim, bounced up several feet, and dropped back in. Let's just say you won't see that happen for Jack or Fred.
        yeah I loved that 3...it was just toooo niiiiiiiice!

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

          He is just so smooth, the team really feeds off him well. He looked better than Tinsley running the offense. the players weren't even expecting half the passes. It kind of reminded me of Mark Jackson when he first got here. Balls flying down the middle and being mishandled due to the lack of being together.

          Man do we have something special here or what?

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

            I liked what I heard last night.

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

              as a Maccabi Tel-Aviv fan, I just want to quote what I posted yesterday before the game against the Jazz:

              "Yo guys, give Saras a little credit.

              I know him from Israel, and I'm telling you he has the BEST passing skill I have ever seen (even in the nba!!).

              BUT, it all depends on the chemistry between him and the rest of the team, and the team fans.
              If he really find his place socially in the team, you guys will win the jackpot. Not to mention the extreme increase in alley-oops per game...."

              http://www.pacersdigest.com/forums/s...searchid=31493

              YOU GUYS HAVEN'T SEEN NOTHING YET FROM SARAS!!!!!

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

                Originally posted by xoxo66
                as a Maccabi Tel-Aviv fan, I just want to quote what I posted yesterday before the game against the Jazz:

                "Yo guys, give Saras a little credit.

                I know him from Israel, and I'm telling you he has the BEST passing skill I have ever seen (even in the nba!!).

                BUT, it all depends on the chemistry between him and the rest of the team, and the team fans.
                If he really find his place socially in the team, you guys will win the jackpot. Not to mention the extreme increase in alley-oops per game...."

                http://www.pacersdigest.com/forums/s...searchid=31493

                YOU GUYS HAVEN'T SEEN NOTHING YET FROM SARAS!!!!!
                As a long time Pacers fan who spent every day for many years cutting out box scores and saving them from newspapers, I can see something peculiar with Saras. Not in his shooting either, but in his playmaking and confidence. He comes off like he's a little in over his head, but once play begins the guy works into a different world out there. For instance, last night I noticed that before the game he had some pregame jitters, but once he got in the game he morphed into something else. I pride myself in watching good passes develop, but this guy stays three steps ahead of me WATCHING?!?!??!?! That's really something. Now, JT does that too, but spotty and with less frequency compared to Saras (so far). AJ doesn't do it at all, and Eddie even less so, but each of the players bring a certain set of skills that helps overall, and even Eddie was able to make some crucial plays last year that helped win ballgames.

                We're in for a treat, and I love watching him play. He's the first guy I've seen play this game that plays with this much focus. I love it! He's a dynamo!

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

                  Originally posted by PaCeRs_GuRL
                  http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...510140552/1088

                  October 14, 2005


                  PRESEASON: PACERS 99, JAZZ 92
                  Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback
                  Rookie responds in 4th quarter, still working on his defense

                  By Mike Wells
                  mike.wells@indystar.com

                  It hasn't taken long to figure out why Indiana Pacers president Larry Bird racked up the frequent flier miles traveling back and forth to Europe to watch guard Sarunas Jasikevicius play.
                  He can shoot. He can pass. And he can find a way to get to the basket.
                  It also hasn't taken long to see that the 29-year-old rookie is going to need time to adjust to the NBA game defensively.
                  He gets beat off the dribble. He struggles to fight through screens. And he's not considered quick for his position.
                  Jasikevicius, whom Bird referred to as the best player in Europe, did wow the 11,390 fans at Conseco Fieldhouse on Thursday night in the Pacers' 99-92 victory over the Utah Jazz.

                  "We all know Sarunas can do some great things offensively, there's no question about that," Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. "His biggest adjustment right now is learning our system defensively and learning the personnel in this league. Offensively, he's creative and unselfish and he's highly skilled. There's a reason we got the guy."

                  Bird spent a couple of seasons watching Jasikevicius light up the competition in Europe before convincing the 6-4 guard to spurn the Jazz and Cleveland and sign a three-year, $12 million deal over the summer.

                  Jasikevicius gave glimpses of what he can do against the Jazz when he
                  scored 13 of his 18 points in the fourth quarter, including hitting a 3-pointer to tie the score 79-79.

                  "I was more aggressive," Jasikevicius said. "I was looking for my shot. I didn't go into New Jersey (Tuesday) and do many things. I was just trying to get my first game under my belt and move on. The season is very long. The most positive thing for me is I'm more comfortable with every minute. That's the only thing I can ask for right now."

                  It's easy to see Jasikevicius' potential leadership skills. Jasikevicius, who added four assists and three rebounds, directed the offense fluently, showed his passion for winning and constantly talked to his teammates on the floor. He had 11 of his fourth-quarter points in the final 51/2 minutes.

                  "He has a great sense for the game, he has a great sense for when the opponent is off-balanced," Carlisle said. "His vision on the floor is tremendous and he showed that."

                  Jasikevicius' offensive game has never been questioned. It's his defense where many expected him to struggle.

                  Jazz rookie point guard Deron Williams, the No. 3 overall pick in this year's draft, exposed several of Jasikevicius' weaknesses when he was able to cross him up several times and run him off screens en route to scoring 17 points and adding six assists.

                  "It's going to be a big development for me," Jasikevicius said. "I've never played at this level. Hopefully I can make it quick. I am still a rookie. It's going to be an adjustment, no doubt about it. I just hope it's going to be a quick one."

                  Jasikevicius is consistently going to face quicker guards, so he has to figure out a way to make up for his lack of speed.

                  "It's about learning the league, learning the guys he's playing against, what their tendencies are and what their strengths are because those are important things to defend well," Carlisle said. "We have a system of defense that's solid and he's in the process of learning that. For him, he's an experienced enough player and certainly has a high enough basketball IQ that he can pick it up quickly."
                  UTAH (92)
                  MinFG-AFT-AOR-TAFTPts
                  Kirilenko213-112-35-80418
                  Okur244-112-32-524010
                  Whaley211-40-02-50522
                  Brown222-66-70-012110
                  Palacio120-22-20-11022
                  Ostertag51-11-20-10013
                  Humphries143-50-01-12216
                  Giricek144-80-00-00029
                  Violette192-30-12-31414
                  Williams236-104-41-462117
                  Lang100-10-01-20630
                  Collins174-50-01-14318
                  McLeod134-51-10-03119
                  Nelson122-30-01-33144
                  Owens120-20-00-20510
                  Totals36-7718-2316-3623392292

                  3-point shooting: 2-8 (Williams 1-2, Giricek 1-3, Kirilenko 0-1, Okur 0-1, Owens 0-1). Steals: 10 (Brown 2, Kirilenko 2, McLeod 2, Humphries 2, Lang 2). Blocked shots: 5 (Kirilenko 2, Brown, Nelson, Whaley). Team rebounds: 8.
                  PACERS (99)
                  MinFG-AFT-AOR-TAFTPts
                  Artest366-1310-112-623323
                  Bender120-22-20-11612
                  Pollard191-11-22-60103
                  Jackson264-107-80-114315
                  Tinsley181-30-01-21252
                  Croshere322-613-130-223417
                  Johnson220-32-21-42412
                  Jasikevicius256-94-50-343118
                  Walker202-34-61-20128
                  Granger244-110-02-41019
                  Gill40-00-00-01000
                  Hunter10-00-00-00000
                  Brown10-00-00-00000
                  Totals26-6143-499-3115272199

                  3-point shooting: 4-9 (Jasikevicius 2-4, Artest 1-1, Granger 1-2, Croshere 0-2). Steals: 7 (Tinsley 2, Artest, Croshere, Granger, Jasikevicius, Pollard). Blocked shots: 5 (Pollard 2, Bender, Granger, Jackson). Team rebounds: 12.
                  Urah10273421--92
                  Pacers14262534`--99

                  Officials: Luis Grillo, Jess Kersey, Courtney Kirkland. Attendance: 11,390.

                  that smiley wasn t part of the article, i suspect...
                  Word on the street is he doesn't want your money, he only wants to please your ears...
                  Bum in Berlin on Myspace

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

                    Originally posted by btowncolt
                    Where does "Urah" play?
                    I don t know, but he did score 92 points in one game, and that against a whole pacers team! eat that, wilt chamberlain.
                    Word on the street is he doesn't want your money, he only wants to please your ears...
                    Bum in Berlin on Myspace

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: Jasikevicius learns quickly, leads comeback

                      Originally posted by Raskolnikov
                      that smiley wasn t part of the article, i suspect...
                      nope. I just liked what I read so I hada use it!

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next
                      Working...
                      X