Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Saras Article-very good read

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Saras Article-very good read

    http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...78/1004/SPORTS

    newest pacer
    Comfortable fit
    Lithuanian who played for past 3 European champs picks Pacers over other NBA suitors.

    He's 'crazy' for basketball: Sarunas Jasikevicius bares his emotions when he plays and loves to celebrate titles, like he did last season with Maccabi Tel Aviv. He also played for the previous two European champs. -- Tatyana Makeyeva / Getty Images

    Related articles
    Lithuanian high on new Pacer

    Related links
    Pacers message board
    Ask the expert: Pacers reporter Mark Montieth


    Related news from the Web
    Latest headlines by topic:
    Sports
    NCAA Basketball
    NCAA Women's Basketball
    Indiana Pacers
    Indiana Hoosiers Women's Basketball
    Indiana Hoosiers Basketball
    NCAA
    NBA
    Indiana University

    Powered by Topix.net

    Sarunas Jasikevicius
    Born: March 5, 1976, in Kaunas, Lithuania
    Ht./wt.: 6-4/190
    Nickname: Saras
    Number: Has worn No. 13 through most of his career, but David Harrison wears it for the Pacers.
    Family: Parents live in Lithuania. His younger brother, Vytenis, will play high school basketball at Pace Academy in Atlanta next season.
    Career notes: Originally came to U.S. to play high school basketball at Solanco High School in Quarryville, Pa. . . . Accepted scholarship to Maryland, where he played shooting guard. . . . Began professional career in Lithuania in 1998 after he went undrafted by the NBA. Played the following season in Slovenia. . . . Played following three seasons for FC Barcelona, leading team to 2003 Euroleague championship. Led Lithuania to European Championship the same year, earning MVP honors. . . . Played past two seasons for Maccabi Tel Aviv, winning Euroleague championship both seasons.
    Quote: "He's a tremendous open-court passer, a big-game player, and a big playmaker, the likes of which you don't find every day anywhere. When the money is on the line, Saras is going to step up and make plays."
    -- David Blatt, former assistant coach for Maccabi, as told to the Washington Post


    Pacers point guards
    The addition of Sarunas Jasikevicius to the Indiana Pacers' roster could have ripple effects. How does it affect their other point guards?

    Jamaal Tinsley
    Should be safe as the starter. Pacers will want to break in Jasikevicius slowly and they have no way of knowing yet if he'll be better than Tinsley. Besides, Tinsley is entering the first year of a contract extension, so his outgoing trade value would only be 50 percent of his $5.4 million contract. Bottom line: Pacers would be better with both Tinsley and Jasikevicius.

    Anthony Johnson
    Has been the No. 2 point guard for two seasons and has started frequently in Tinsley's absence. Not likely to accept a demotion to No. 3 without a fuss, which logically makes him a trade candidate. His experience, maturity and reasonable salary ($2.4 million) would make him attractive to other teams, but the Pacers say they want to keep him. Bottom line: Pacers can't count on Tinsley to stay healthy and Johnson remains an important piece.

    Eddie Gill
    Will earn a minimum veteran's salary ($819,000) next season, the last of a two-year deal. Pacers could include him in a trade or simply release him and eat his contract. Jasikevicius can play shooting guard, though, which could leave a part-time spot for Gill as a No. 3 point guard. Bottom line: He's capable of contributing as he did last season, but he's the most expendable player on the roster.

    -- Mark Montieth



    By Mark Montieth
    mark.montieth@indystar.com


    He's a reluctant gypsy, a native of Lithuania who owns a home in Spain and has worked the past two seasons in Israel. Now he has an uncertain role and an uncertain future with a new team in a place he has never visited. He has never met any of his new teammates and doesn't even know what jersey number he will wear.

    It's a unique circumstance for Europe's most famous basketball player, but Sarunas Jasikevicius has this much going for him: He loves basketball like people from Indiana are supposed to love it, and it just so happens he's coming here to continue his nomadic career.

    "I'm just in general a crazy person about basketball," he said.

    "I've heard about Indiana basketball, and I've watched 'Hoosiers.' I don't know how close that is to the real situation, but you see people in the NBA talking about Pacers fans being one of the best. I guess I know as much about the situation as a person from Lithuania can know."

    That's a good starting point for the 6-4 point guard who will sign a three-year, $12 million contract with the Indiana Pacers this week. A mega-celebrity among basketball fans in Europe, he'll begin a new life as an unproven backup, in essence starting his career again.

    Jasikevicius knows a lot of what he is getting into, however. He began following the NBA when he was about 12 years old in Lithuania, idolizing Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls most of all. He followed the rest of the league, too, and paid particular attention to the Pacers in the early 1990s because of Detlef Schrempf, the German forward. European players were still rare in the NBA at the time, and those who excelled as Schrempf did were points of pride in all the European countries.

    Jasikevicius got a closer look at the league when he attended high school in Quarryville, Pa., and then college at Maryland. But when he went undrafted in 1998 after averaging 12.6 points as a senior shooting guard -- out of position, it turned out -- he returned to Lithuania to begin his professional career.

    Seven years later, at 29, he's widely regarded as the most NBA-ready international player since Manu Ginobili joined San Antonio in 2002. He is not as athletic as Ginobili, who averaged 16 points last season as the Spurs' starting shooting guard, but he is an outstanding shooter and passer who plays with passion and intelligence.

    With all that going for him, his defensive shortcomings have been easier to ignore.

    "I'm not the world's most athletic player," he said. "I know my limitations and my good points and try to work around them."

    Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said he's not concerned. He compares Jasikevicius to former Pacers Mark Jackson, Chris Mullin and Derrick McKey, and believes whatever defensive liabilities Jasikevicius has can be covered by his team defensive concept.

    Team CEO Donnie Walsh is more blunt. "I have the same kind of concern I had for Larry Bird's defense," he said.

    That would be none.

    Major recruiting effort

    The Pacers, Cleveland, Utah, Portland and Seattle all made a run at Jasikevicius in July. Utah offered the most money, about $14 million over three years, but Jasikevicius wasn't giving up the career he had taken so long to build in Europe to play for a losing team.

    His choice came down to the Pacers and Cleveland. It took a major recruiting effort and a bit of luck for the Pacers to win out.

    Jasikevicius and Cavs center Zydrunas Ilgauskas have been best friends since they met at a basketball camp when Jasikevicius was 6. Jasikevicius was the best man at Ilgauskas' wedding, and the two attended Wimbledon together this summer. He is also close friends with Cavs forward Anderson Varejao, a former teammate in Barcelona, Spain. Saying no to the Cavaliers still haunts him a little.

    "That's why I was taking such a long time to decide," he said in a telephone interview from Tel Aviv, Israel, where he played the past two seasons. "It was a terrible time for me.

    "One of our dreams was to play with one another, but ultimately I felt like the Pacers were the better fit for me. We were both disappointed. This is the biggest downfall to signing with Indiana. I'm not going to play with my childhood friend."

    Jasikevicius chose the Pacers primarily because he believes they're closer to winning a championship than Cleveland. The Pacers also helped themselves, however, with a determined courtship. Team president Larry Bird and scouting director Joe Ash made trips to Europe to scout him, and met with him in Tel Aviv last winter. Carlisle called at least 20 times. Assistant coach Chuck Person called, too, often enough that he has Jasikevicius' cell phone number memorized. Pacers starters Jermaine O'Neal, Stephen Jackson and Ron Artest checked in as well.

    The Pacers also made their devotion known by presenting an offer to his agent, Doug Neustadt, on July 1, the first day of the NBA's negotiating period. He clearly was their top priority, whereas Cleveland has dabbled in trade talks for Los Angeles Clippers point guard Marko Jaric and explored other options.

    "They were there from day one," Jasikevicius said. "They did it in a very classy way."

    The Pacers' financial situation was also more clearly defined. Cleveland didn't know what it could offer because of pending signings and completion of the collective bargaining agreement.

    "I felt like the Pacers . . . they've already been there," Jasikevicius said. "They've been through a lot of wars. Cleveland, you can't deny they're making impressive moves. I don't know. I just felt like it was a great situation (in Indiana).

    "Whether I'm right or wrong, we can talk in one or two years."

    A 'rock star' in Europe

    Jasikevicius has led teams to the European league championships the past three years -- Barcelona in 2003 and Tel Aviv the past two seasons. His only exposure to most Americans, however, has been in the Olympics, where he starred for Lithuania in 2000 and '04. He missed a desperate 3-pointer at the buzzer that would have defeated the U.S. team in '00, but still scored 27 points while hitting 5-of-11 3-pointers. He scored 28 points, hitting 7-of-12 3-pointers, in an upset of the Americans in Athens, Greece, last summer. Twelve of his points came in a 1-minute, 51-second stretch when he hit three consecutive 3-pointers. The U.S. won the rematch in the bronze medal game, when Jasikevicius scored 17 points and hit 5-of-9 3-pointers.

    His popularity in Europe goes beyond game heroics, however. He has rock-star fame there, thanks to his chiseled features, emotional style of play, shooting touch and compelling personality. He dates models, gets mobbed in public by fans who shower him with gifts, is hounded by the media and has inspired one female fan to construct a Web site in his honor, www.jasikevicius.com. There, he's billed as "more than a player."

    When he played his last game for Maccabi last season, the team played a video tribute on the overhead scoreboard, with teammates, scouts and a rabbi encouraging him not to flee to the NBA. A petition was presented, with 17,000 signatures from fans.

    Jasikevicius said he's grateful for his time in Israel and appreciates all the love. He doesn't think he'll miss it, though. He crossed into the realm of celebrity that became more a burden than a thrill, and he's looking forward to a quieter life in Indianapolis.

    "We get a huge following (in Tel Aviv)," he said. "This is the team of the country, basically. It's to the point where it's ridiculous, you know? When the team is doing good the following is out of control. You get no privacy.

    "Israeli people are open people. It's not like other parts of the world where people leave you alone. They always want to talk. Your private life is closely monitored, to the point where it's really getting annoying."

    Jasikevicius didn't attempt to hide his frustration with the fans and media in Israel.

    "He is an extremely intelligent individual who can't stand stupid or banal questions from the press," said Yoav Borowitz, a journalist for the Ha'aretz Daily.

    "Many people in Israel couldn't stand him because he was condescending, but then he would win them over with his brilliant game. I think that in the last six months people also started to appreciate him for his honesty and humor.

    "He is truly one of kind."

    Jasikevicius is likely to be popular with the fans in Indiana, too. But he'll arrive as a curiosity rather than a star, a backup rather than a starter.

    He is fine with that, and ready for a fresh start.

    "I'm not going there for personal stuff; I'm going to help the team," he said. "Personally, I'm fulfilling my dream. I'm excited.

    "I just hope I can be a small piece of the puzzle and help the Pacers continue their success."


    JO, Ron, and Jack checked in.....wonder why Tins didnt?

  • #2
    Re: Saras Article-very good read

    Interesting read, thanks Taz. I like what he had to say.
    No matter how much success Larry Bird attains in Indiana he'll never top that first command to fire Thomas. -Peter Vecsey. NY Post 12/4/07

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Saras Article-very good read

      Mr. Optimist:

      Originally posted by bunny
      ...a good starting point...guard


      Mr. Pessimist:

      Originally posted by bunny
      Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said he's...concerned. He compares Jasikevicius to...(Satan)...Team CEO Donnie Walsh is more blunt. "I have the same kind of concern..." he said.
      Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Saras Article-very good read

        Boy, we are really building this guy up.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Saras Article-very good read

          From the article it sounds like if he's a bust the Pacers may make money just on Jersey sales overseas. The Pacers could become The worlds team.
          "He wanted to get to that money time. Time when the hardware was on the table. That's when Roger was going to show up. So all we needed to do was stay close"
          Darnell Hillman (Speaking of former teammate Roger Brown)

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Saras Article-very good read

            "Pacers starters Jermaine O'Neal, Stephen Jackson and Ron Artest checked in as well."

            Who's missing from this list? Jamaal Tinsley. Why?

            1. He's about to get traded b/c of picking up Saras.

            2. Since Saras is competing with his position, it was awkward to ask JT to call him and recruit him.

            The second one makes sense except for the fact that Jax called, and Saras is also competing with him, so we hear. Therefore, I lean toward number one. I'm looking for a Tinsley trade at any time.
            "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Saras Article-very good read

              Trading Tinsley would be a terrible move.

              I'm guessing Tinsley didn't check in for the same reason that the other 11 guys didn't.
              You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Saras Article-very good read

                I wish I could of heard what Sjack said to this guy, lol.
                *removed* Just keep politics and religion completely out of it, please.

                Comment

                Working...
                X