Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

A confederate flag??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: A confederate flag??

    I almost didn't hit the reply button on this one....I hope I can adequately express my thougts here. First off let me say I think people that fly the Confederate flag here in Indiana are absolute white racist trash. I am white, and my wife is black and I admit to being pretty sensitive to racist comments, which any long timer posters here should remember. Indiana was a northern state as earlier pointed out, so flying the flag here can only tie yourself to the negative connotations that have attached themselves to the Confederate flag.

    With that said you have to remeber that the Civl War like Skaut pointed out was not fought that long ago. In relative terms, my grand father is 84 years old making him born in 1921, the Civil war started in 1861 which was 60 years prior to my grand fathers birth which means my great grandfather most likely was alive during the Civil war, that makes me only 3 generations away from it. I know thats basic mathmatics, but when I think about it those terms it seems eerily close.

    You have to remember that the South was fighting to protect its way of life, obviously slavery is wrong but at that time it was socially acceptable in the South. I read an interesting article about the South where the authour stated that because during the 1800's the South had no deep water ports, most European transfer of culture occurred in the North because thats were the ships and trading partners conducted business. At that time the southern states mostly made their livings with farming. Most European countries outlawed slavery in the early 1800's so they were almost 60 years in front of us. I always found that to be an interesting hypothesis.

    Anyway, once the war got underway the southerners generaly felt that the North was restricting their way of life. But when the war ended you still had quite a bit of bitterness to the North and a sense of pride as to belonging to the Confederacy. These were true believers of their cause, right or wrong, most fought and lost family members to the war, and in that struggle, pride for the South was formed. Most of the north which culturally and econmically was way ahead of their southern countrymen, created an inferiority complex, and when the abolishinist movement was being forcefully fed into federal government, many Southerners felt that they were no longer being represented by the government. And individual representation of the people has always been a sensitive subject for Americans.

    Which is where I think most of the pride for the Confederacy comes from, most of the Southern states incorporated the Southern Cross into their State Flag. Hell South Carolina just in the last 10 years quit flying the Confederate flag underneath the American flag at their state capitol! Which leads back to how recent this war really occurred. I believe Mississippi still has not removed the Southern Cross from it's state flag.

    Unfortunately the Confederate flag became something more than just a symbol of Southern pride. It became the symbol for racisim. The KKK, adopted it as their flag in the late 60's when the civil rights movement was in full swing. In fact if you look at old pictures of Klan rallies ( a college proffessor of mine pointed this out to me), you rarely see the Confederate flag. Most of us remember watching the Dukes of Hazzard on TV, and although I was pretty young, I never remember hearing any negative rethoric about the flag displayed on the car each week. Feelings of discord came much later in the late 80's and 90's.

    In conclusion I think the Confederacy was an important part of our history, unfortunatly the symbol has been twisted into meaning something entirely different. And most likely when you see it being flown today the bearer usually uses "southern pride" as an excuse to cloak their true feelings of racisim.

    Also I challenge anyone to defend the statement that the Civil War was not fought over slavery. Those that point out that it was fought over "States-Rights" often forget that the states rights that the south was fighting for was the states right to allow slavery!!
    "I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post."

    --Jack Nicholson as Colonel Nathan Jessup in A Few Good Men

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: A confederate flag??

      Yes, the South had an inhumane pratice of slavery and that issue did play a role in why the Civil War was faught, however, I hate the smugness that comes across as history talks about going to war to free the slaves.

      The North fighting the war to free slaves had as much to do with slavery as the Iraqi War being faught to free the Iraqis--both good causes but neither the main reason for the wars. The North went to war because the South left.

      I believe a lot of the pride in the Confederacy comes from the resentment the South has about how the North shames them. Despite there being race riots in LA and Detriot so often the North says "Yeah, there are race problems in America--in the South" which there are but there are race problems in all 50 states. I honestly believe that the Bars and Stars would be laid to rest quicker if America admitted that it had a race problem in all 50 states.
      "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

      "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: A confederate flag??

        Originally posted by MarionDeputy
        Also I challenge anyone to defend the statement that the Civil War was not fought over slavery. Those that point out that it was fought over "States-Rights" often forget that the states rights that the south was fighting for was the states right to allow slavery!!
        Look at the passage I posted from Wikipedia above. A couple of other main reasons why Civil War occured...

        Slavery was not the biggest issue!

        Arcadian has it right. Spot on.

        The only reason the North went to war was because the South had and was seceding into a Confederacy of States. I don't care how many times you hear it in revisionist history books. The main issue was not slavery.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: A confederate flag??

          Originally posted by Skaut_Ech
          "Yup. Don't need to bring in any more negras. We got enough. Let's pass something to stop the international trade. We'll just grow our own!"



          As I said, a step in the right direction, albeit a small, tiny, miniscule one...

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: A confederate flag??

            Originally posted by Arcadian
            Yes, the South had an inhumane pratice of slavery and that issue did play a role in why the Civil War was faught, however, I hate the smugness that comes across as history talks about going to war to free the slaves.

            The North fighting the war to free slaves had as much to do with slavery as the Iraqi War being faught to free the Iraqis--both good causes but neither the main reason for the wars. The North went to war because the South left.

            I believe a lot of the pride in the Confederacy comes from the resentment the South has about how the North shames them. Despite there being race riots in LA and Detriot so often the North says "Yeah, there are race problems in America--in the South" which there are but there are race problems in all 50 states. I honestly believe that the Bars and Stars would be laid to rest quicker if America admitted that it had a race problem in all 50 states.

            Good post.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: A confederate flag??

              Originally posted by Arcadian
              Yes, the South had an inhumane pratice of slavery and that issue did play a role in why the Civil War was faught, however, I hate the smugness that comes across as history talks about going to war to free the slaves.

              The North fighting the war to free slaves had as much to do with slavery as the Iraqi War being faught to free the Iraqis--both good causes but neither the main reason for the wars. The North went to war because the South left.

              I believe a lot of the pride in the Confederacy comes from the resentment the South has about how the North shames them. Despite there being race riots in LA and Detriot so often the North says "Yeah, there are race problems in America--in the South" which there are but there are race problems in all 50 states. I honestly believe that the Bars and Stars would be laid to rest quicker if America admitted that it had a race problem in all 50 states.
              I agree with that statement, good post. I am from Detroit originally and race relations there are still a sensitive subject. That part about embarassment is dead on thats what I was trying to get across in my post, you just said it a lot better and in about a third of many words!!!!
              "I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post."

              --Jack Nicholson as Colonel Nathan Jessup in A Few Good Men

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: A confederate flag??

                I don't know why people fly the confederate flag, but I spent part of a day in Gettysburg last week.

                Lee must've been crazy to send so many men across this field......

                Here's the monument that stands on the spot where Lincoln gave the Gettysburg address........
                PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: A confederate flag??

                  Originally posted by indygeezer
                  I had realtives chased from their homes in North Carolina because as Quakers they were Abolishionist.
                  Geezer, we might be related. Me too.
                  You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
                  All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

                  - Jimmy Buffett

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: A confederate flag??

                    Found this quote from Lincoln, "The Great Emancipator", from his first debate with Douglas...from 1858....

                    http://www.nps.gov/liho/debate1.htm

                    "Now, gentlemen, I don't want to read at any greater length, but this is the true complexion of all I have ever said in regard to the institution of slavery and the black race. This is the whole of it, and anything that argues me into his idea of perfect social and political equality with the negro, is but a specious and fantastic arrangement of words, by which a man can prove a horse-chestnut to be a chestnut horse. [Laughter.] I will say here, while upon this subject, that I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and the black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position. I have never said anything to the contrary, but I hold that, notwithstanding all this, there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. [Loud cheers.] I hold that he is as much entitled to these as the white man. I agree with Judge Douglas he is not my equal in many respects-certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral or intellectual endowment. But in the right to eat the bread, without the leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every living man. [Great applause.]"

                    _________

                    Lincoln's thoughts changed with public opinion. You'll find quotes about how he detests slavery, then you'll find quotes about how he should not, will not, and cannot do anything about slavery...

                    Just some food for thought...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: A confederate flag??

                      The second debate is also a good read.

                      http://www.nps.gov/liho/debate2.htm

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: A confederate flag??

                        Had a great conversation tonight with friends about the flag issue.

                        One guy related the use of the confederate flag along the lines of the use of the skull and crossbones. He talked a lot about the history of the S&B, and how it was designed as a symbol of terror and crime but through time and temperment is now displayed with ease at amusement parks.

                        That led to another friend talking about the use of pro sports team logos to proclaim gang affiliation. For a long time in LA, flying Raiders gear in the wrong neigborhood would have been asking to get shot at.

                        But everyone in the conversation aknowledged that the meaning of symbols change easily. If Islamic extremists suddenly adopted the rainbow flag as thier symbol, you'd have to be a damn fool to show up at a gay pride parade with one and not know that it has a different meaning.
                        “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                        “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: A confederate flag??

                          I think what Arcadian was saying was spot on. There still exists racism in all 50 states. I know a lot of people, too many to count actually, that either fly the confederate flag or have a confederate flag sticker on their vehicle; and this is IN CALIFORNIA! They're not flying because of Southern pride, but because of their hate for black people. And if you ask them about it, they'll openly admit that fact, even with a sense of pride in their voices. It's absolutely sickening to me that people can have such a deep hatred, an abhorrance, for fellow members of the human race just because of the color of their skin. I look all around myself and I worry for the future of America.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: A confederate flag??

                            Originally posted by Skaut_Ech
                            When you grow up in Indiana and have to deal with different forms of racism on a weekly basis, seeing something like that makes me wish I was single again so I could date his daughter as the ultimate revenge.
                            So you're saying you would date his daughter just to get revenge? Scott that sounds like using womem to me. Just pointing out we ALL have to recognize how easy it is to be hurtful. I also know you're just blowing off steam.

                            Also everyone talks about the Klan in Indiana when in reality the most dangerous group is called World Church of the Creator. These sick @ssholes target colleges and high schools to recruit new members. While the Klan or Aryan movements pretty much spell out their hatred the WCOTC try the sneak approach by planting the seed minority students receive more favorable treatment compared to white students. It's sad but international terrorism is only part of what we REALLY have to worry about. Domestic groups or pieces of **** like Tim McVeigh are far more plentiful.
                            You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: A confederate flag??

                              I just got back from 3 days in Tennessee where I saw the Stars and Bars aplenty. What I saw, heard, felt was that it was a rallying symbol for young, country music lovin, beer drinking, whatevers, that wanted to appear rebellious and anti-authority. I don't think they were thinking of blacks one way or another. For the most part they seemed to want to identify with an image of the tough ol' country boy, and in my opinion 99.9% would **** down their leg if anybody ever pointed a gun in their direction.
                              Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: A confederate flag??

                                skaut,
                                My advice to you is do not go to Stone Mountain, GA where there is a huge granite memorial in tribute to the Southern leadership from the Civil War, akin to Mount Rushmore. It also features a museum detailing the history of that area during the civil war. Not to be flippant but I don't know how there is a good way to preserve that era of history and its symbols because of their varying representation to different people without offending some. I know that is totally different from your initial posting regarding someone from Indiana flying the confederate flag to represent some kind of redneck pride. In the South I think there is a legitimate pride in aspects of their civil war independence that has nothing to do with racism. But, your reaction is totally understandable.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X