Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

    http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/question_050712.html

    Could Thomas Crack the Roster?

    Tuesday, July 12, 2005
    QUESTION OF THE DAY, Conrad Brunner

    Q. I noticed that the Pacers have Chris Thomas on their summer league roster. Since I wasn't too impressed with the play of our point guards last year (especially when Jamaal Tinsley was hurt), what is the chance that he might make the roster for this coming year? I have to believe that with his passing ability and quickness, he might benefit the Pacers, who already have (Stephen) Jackson, (Jermaine) O'Neal, and (Ron) Artest as scoring threats. Why not take a chance on a younger guy who has proven he can be a playmaker and even score himself (over 2,000 points and 800 assists)? (From Nick in Mishawaka, Ind.)



    A. Given the Pacers have three veteran point guards under contract (Tinsley, Anthony Johnson and Eddie Gill), you'd think it would be extremely difficult for an undrafted rookie to crack that roster at the position. But Thomas just might be an exception. For one thing, the Pacers showed quite a bit of interest when inviting him to their summer camp, which indicates at least a strong curiosity about his potential to help the team. For another, Thomas is an extremely accomplished college player, a four-year starter of prolific productivity, and it's rare to find someone with his resume available after the draft.

    The Pacers coaches like his proven abilities to shoot, make plays and keep constant pressure on the defense. Only two other players in NCAA history racked up 2,000 points and 800 assists (Gary Payton and Sherman Douglas), and he was a career .363 shooter from the 3-point line. What they'll need to see from Thomas is the ability to bring the ball up against high-pressure defenses, and then get a team into its offense quickly and efficiently. They'll also be watching him on defense quite a bit to see if he can use his quickness to be more disruptive, particularly in the passing lanes.

    Thomas impressed the Pacers by reporting immediately, arriving at Conseco Fieldhouse within two days of the draft, to begin working out on his own with the coaches. If he can use that time to reinforce his strengths while mitigating his perceived weaknesses, it will have been time well spent. By most accounts, Thomas is a player with NBA ability. Whether that translates into a job with the Pacers remains to be seen, but he just might have more of a chance than most might think.
    -----


    http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/thomas_050712.html

    Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream Alive
    By Conrad Brunner | July 12, 2005

    For the first time in his basketball career, Chris Thomas is fighting for a job.
    It's a new challenge for a player who has been among the elite at each of his previous levels, but his response has been encouraging to the Pacers. Among the 20 players on the rookie and free agent minicamp roster this week, the former Pike High School and Notre Dame standout has made a strong early impression.

    "We know he's an excellent shooter," said Coach Rick Carlisle. "We know he can score. We know he can make plays. We're looking for his ability to be able to run a team at the NBA level. That includes decision-making on offense and getting guys the ball in positions where they can do things with it and, defensively, being able to get up 94 feet and disrupt.

    "That's going to be the key for him to have an opportunity to make our team, how much of an impact he can have defensively with his quickness because we know, offensively, he's a very accomplished player in many ways."

    Thomas finished his career as one of the most accomplished players in all of college basketball. He posted career averages of 17.1 points, 6.5 assists, 4.1 rebounds and 1.9 steals at Notre Dame. He is one of just three players in NCAA history to total at least 2,000 points and 800 assists (joining Gary Payton of Oregon State and Sherman Douglas of Syracuse). He started all 128 games of his career with the Irish, and only Austin Carr and Adrian Dantley scored more points for Notre Dame than his 2,195.

    Despite it all, Thomas didn't hear his name called on draft night. Though not entirely unexpected – his senior season was the least productive of his career – the slight has helped motivate Thomas, while also serving to his benefit. As an undrafted player, he was able to select which opportunity best suited him, rather than being bound to a team through the draft. A native of Indianapolis who has followed the Pacers closely for years, Thomas responded almost immediately when the Pacers expressed interest.

    "It was a no-brainer for me to come here," Thomas said. "I worked out the second day after the draft and I've been here ever since. Maybe going undrafted was a blessing in disguise. … The Pacers have been watching me since Isiah Thomas was the coach and I was in high school, so I think they've always liked some things about my game. They just want to see that first-hand.

    "It's a great opportunity. Everybody's pushing for me and it's great to see the level of interest in the coaching staff and the scouts. I'm in here every day. They see I love to work hard and am doing whatever it takes."

    A prolific offensive player at Notre Dame, Thomas must demonstrate other skills to make the jump to the NBA as a point guard.

    "If he can run a team and get the ball to spots and get a team into the offense, he'll have a chance to be in this league," said assistant Dan Burke, who along with Chuck Person is coaching the summer league team. "We like guys that can shoot, of course. Right now, what we want to see from him is to get up, pressure the opponents' point guard, turn him a couple times. We also want to see if he's able to bring up the ball against pressure, get us organized and get us into our offense in a timely manner."

    After practicing in Conseco Fieldhouse through Thursday, the Pacers will take a team to Minneapolis for five summer league games in five nights beginning Friday. Veterans Ron Artest, Jonathan Bender and David Harrison are all expected to play in varying quantities.

    With three veteran point guards (Jamaal Tinsley, Anthony Johnson and Eddie Gill) on a roster that already includes 14 players under contract for 2005-06, Thomas knows he's facing an uphill battle to make it with the Pacers.

    He likens it to his freshman year at Notre Dame. Coming off a prolific Pike High School career that included two Class 4A state championships and the 2001 Indiana Mr. Basketball award, Thomas felt like he was starting from scratch when he reached college.

    "I had something to prove, just that I belonged there," he said. "It's the same situation. The coaches have told me, 'Chris, you're going to play in this league. You've just got to be patient, stick to your strengths and play with a lot of confidence.' That kind of feedback makes you want to work harder because they see the talent in you."

    It should be noted that Thomas has risen to similar challenges when moving up to higher levels. As a high school freshman, he led Pike to the 1998 state title. In his first college game, he posted the first triple-double in Notre Dame history (24 points, 11 rebounds, 11 assists) and went on to be named the national Freshman of the Year by two publications.

    This is a guy, then, who knows what it takes to make the next step. He'll need to apply all of that knowledge to separate himself from the pack of players scratching and clawing to get into the NBA by any means necessary.

    "It's like all-out war out there," he said. "People are trying to fight for a job and fight for their dreams."
    ------------

  • #2
    Re: Conrad Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster?

    Sure hope this kid can make the team some how.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Conrad Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster?

      I'd love for him to be on the team as I rooted for Notre Dame this last season but I just don't see where he fits in if Indiana keeps Jamal and Anthony and they decide to add another point guard like Sarunas.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

        Like other's I'd like to see this guy make the team. If not that I would like to see him playing for the Pacers in the NBDL.

        Has anybody read how that is going to work? Do players have to be signed to the Pacers and sent down, and thus count against their 15 man roster? Or can the Pacers sign people to play in the NBDL?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

          Originally posted by Will Galen
          Like other's I'd like to see this guy make the team. If not that I would like to see him playing for the Pacers in the NBDL.

          Has anybody read how that is going to work? Do players have to be signed to the Pacers and sent down, and thus count against their 15 man roster? Or can the Pacers sign people to play in the NBDL?
          My understanding is we can sign him and send him down, since he has less than 2 years in the league. Which means we could send Edwards or even Harrison down as well, but couldn't send Gill or JJ.

          No idea if it would count towards the 15 or not.
          Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

            isn't it now a 17 man roster?
            Here, everyone have a : on me

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

              Originally posted by ILovethePacers
              isn't it now a 17 man roster?
              No, it's still 15.
              ----------------

              The NBA plans on two NBA teams sharing an NBDL team. If so it has to mean teams can have more than just 15 players under contract.

              The NBDL will have to have at least ten man squads. That would be five from each mother team. Some NBA teams need more than 10 players because of injuries. Last year we had 6 players for one game. That would have meant we would have called everyone up from our share of the NBDL team.

              I can't want until we get all the particulars of this latest bargaining contract.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                I hope he does well in the summer league...I think it's going to take a stellar effort to unseat Gill, though (only because Gill is already under contract and is a known quantity). The only other way I see him making it is if a trade occurs and Gill or AJ are included (and I doubt AJ is included in anything given Tinsleys injury-prone history...I don't think they want a rookie/inexperienced PG going into next season).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                  Originally posted by Will Galen
                  No, it's still 15.
                  ----------------

                  The NBA plans on two NBA teams sharing an NBDL team. If so it has to mean teams can have more than just 15 players under contract.

                  The NBDL will have to have at least ten man squads. That would be five from each mother team. Some NBA teams need more than 10 players because of injuries. Last year we had 6 players for one game. That would have meant we would have called everyone up from our share of the NBDL team.

                  I can't want until we get all the particulars of this latest bargaining contract.

                  Cool, thanks!!
                  Here, everyone have a : on me

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                    I never saw anything in him that suggested he could make this team. I'd say he actually regressed the last year or 2. But then passing Gill wouldnt't take that much.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                      Originally posted by Will Galen
                      No, it's still 15.
                      ----------------
                      I think that is yet to be determined. I'm under the impression there is a good chance because of the new NBDL rules, roster size may expand to 16 or 17.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                        Thomas was on The Drive with JMV last evening and sounded thrilled to be with the Pacers. He also mentioned what competitive pickup games at Pike High School where he is an alum.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                          Originally posted by sixthman
                          I think that is yet to be determined. I'm under the impression there is a good chance because of the new NBDL rules, roster size may expand to 16 or 17.
                          The question was is the roster size 17 now. But the answer is still 15 as of now.

                          People are guessing they will change the roster size because of the NBDL, but NBA teams sometimes need their full 15 man roster to field a team, so there are no extras there. However, increasing an NBA roster to 16 or 17 still wouldn't fill an NBDL team roster.

                          Sometimes teams have horrible years injury wise and the NBA league office permits them to sign more than 15 players. That happened to Toronto several years ago and to us this past year. What would have happened if we would have had an NBDL team last year is we would have called all our players up. That would have left our partner team in a bad spot needing to fill the whole NBDL team with their players.

                          Something obviously has to be worked out. That's why I'm interested in hearing what they come up with July 22ed. Until then anything we hear is just talk.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                            I don't think NBDL teams are going to be made entirely of players sent down from NBA teams. At least to start with, my bet is teams will be able to assign a couple players, and that's it. The rest will sign with the NBDL teams themselves, in keeping with the current system.
                            Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Brunner} Could Thomas Crack the Roster? Plus, Thomas Fighting to Keep NBA Dream

                              Well there are concerns about Chris Thomas ability to handle pressure bring the ball up, from what I saw in college hes no worse then AJ in that department. I just love his defensive ability and hope he makes the team. He'll be more valuable then Eddie Gill was last year.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X