Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

    Originally posted by 2Cleva View Post
    Being that its gone on since May/June and still no word - unlikely something we don't already know comes up imo. But we'll see.
    I see this the opposite way. The fact that it wasn't wrapped up quickly makes me think they must have found things that needed further investigation.

    And kudos to both the Pacers and Lakers for keeping the complaint/investigation under wraps for so long.

    My guess is that the NBA determined there was tampering before they hired the outside law firm. The law firm is just determining the extent of the tampering and giving the NBA the appearance of impartiality in the investigation.

    Comment


    • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

      Originally posted by Rogco View Post
      It's important to note that the Pacers can successfully argue that they lost value due to PG stating that he was going to sign for LA next year. It made PG a 1-year rental and significantly lowered his trade value. If the Pacers have evidence that the Lakers contacted PG and influenced his decision to publicly announce he was only going to sign LA then this is well above and beyond the usual league tampering.

      If LA had done everything exactly the same but PG had never announced he would sign next year as a FA with the Lakers, then it would be next to impossible for the Pacers to prove that LA caused the team significant harm. PG's signing with LA makes sense, and the Pacers should have known it was a likely scenario.

      But since PG announced his decision to the general public, the Pacers can easily prove that PG's trade value took a significant hit. Hell, they could get other GMs to testify to the league that they would have offered much more in trade if PG hadn't expressed his desire to play in LA. In fact, I'm sure Sam Presti wouldn't hesitate to tell Adam Silver how he would have thrown in additional picks in the trade

      The point being, because of how this all played out, the Pacers have a legitimate argument that the actions of LA and Magic in particular seriously hindered the team's ability to operate as it normally should under the agreed upon rules and regulations.
      Paul never publicly expressed anything. Everything was based off of media reports. Outside of saying that he would be willing to play the year out in Indy, he stayed quiet until he was traded

      Comment


      • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

        Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
        Paul never publicly expressed anything. Everything was based off of media reports. Outside of saying that he would be willing to play the year out in Indy, he stayed quiet until he was traded
        He doesn't have too. Paul George is in charge of his agent and publicity crew. This quote from Adrian Wojnarowski is damning:

        “Teams are trying to decide what’s the appropriate cost for a player who they’re being told, pretty adamantly by Paul George’s camp, will be a rental. No matter who you are, no matter who has checked in or who potentially will check in, they’re gonna be told that Paul George is gonna play the season out and then he’s gonna go to the Lakers, that that’s his plan.”

        The Pacers should have no trouble finding corroborating evidence.
        Danger Zone

        Comment


        • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

          Originally posted by Strummer View Post
          I see this the opposite way. The fact that it wasn't wrapped up quickly makes me think they must have found things that needed further investigation.

          And kudos to both the Pacers and Lakers for keeping the complaint/investigation under wraps for so long.

          My guess is that the NBA determined there was tampering before they hired the outside law firm. The law firm is just determining the extent of the tampering and giving the NBA the appearance of impartiality in the investigation.
          Neither team is allowed to talk about the investigation, and apparently the NBA takes a firm stance on that.
          Danger Zone

          Comment


          • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

            Originally posted by Strummer View Post
            I see this the opposite way. The fact that it wasn't wrapped up quickly makes me think they must have found things that needed further investigation.

            And kudos to both the Pacers and Lakers for keeping the complaint/investigation under wraps for so long.

            My guess is that the NBA determined there was tampering before they hired the outside law firm. The law firm is just determining the extent of the tampering and giving the NBA the appearance of impartiality in the investigation.
            I can see that angle.

            Originally posted by Rogco View Post
            He doesn't have too. Paul George is in charge of his agent and publicity crew. This quote from Adrian Wojnarowski is damning:

            “Teams are trying to decide what’s the appropriate cost for a player who they’re being told, pretty adamantly by Paul George’s camp, will be a rental. No matter who you are, no matter who has checked in or who potentially will check in, they’re gonna be told that Paul George is gonna play the season out and then he’s gonna go to the Lakers, that that’s his plan.”

            The Pacers should have no trouble finding corroborating evidence.
            Corroborating that LA talked to him is key. PG wanting to go to LA doesn't mean much. If its just Kobe talking to him, for example, LA doesn't have to worry about it.

            Comment


            • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

              I don't think the NBA is going to consider our trade return at all. It's unimportant, just like Paul's decision in 2018 is unimportant to whether or not the Lakers tampered.


              Comment


              • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                I don't think the NBA is going to consider our trade return at all. It's unimportant, just like Paul's decision in 2018 is unimportant to whether or not the Lakers tampered.
                I think our trade return is key. If the Pacers can link LA to PG's camp telling other teams he wouldn't sign with them no matter what and that hurt the Pacer's ability to trade PG, then it's not just tampering, it's tampering that resulted in serious damage to another franchise.
                Danger Zone

                Comment


                • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                  Paul george leaving or being traded is serious damage to the Pacers franchise any way you slice it. So really the only important fact is whether or not the Lakers tampered and to what extent.


                  Comment


                  • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                    Originally posted by Rogco View Post
                    He doesn't have too. Paul George is in charge of his agent and publicity crew. This quote from Adrian Wojnarowski is damning:

                    “Teams are trying to decide what’s the appropriate cost for a player who they’re being told, pretty adamantly by Paul George’s camp, will be a rental. No matter who you are, no matter who has checked in or who potentially will check in, they’re gonna be told that Paul George is gonna play the season out and then he’s gonna go to the Lakers, that that’s his plan.”

                    The Pacers should have no trouble finding corroborating evidence.
                    If they can find communication between the two parties

                    Comment


                    • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                      Originally posted by 2Cleva View Post
                      Corroborating that LA talked to him is key. PG wanting to go to LA doesn't mean much. If its just Kobe talking to him, for example, LA doesn't have to worry about it.
                      What's key is being able to link any LA communication with PG's decision to tell all other teams that he wouldn't sign with them if he was traded to them. The real issue isn't that tampering made PG want to go to LA. It's that tampering inhibited the Pacers ability to operate within the bounds of the NBA rules and regulations. If the Pacers can only prove that LA contacted PG than any penalty will be minor. If the Pacers can prove that LA's communication lead PG to tell other teams he would only sign with LA, then there will be serious repercussions.

                      It's a fine line, but the distinction is that convincing a player to sign as a free agent in his home town is a negligible offense, but convincing a player to ruin his trade value for the team that he is still contractually obligated too is a major offense.
                      Danger Zone

                      Comment


                      • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                        Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                        If they can find communication between the two parties
                        Bah, that's just assumed. Representatives of PG speaking to NBA teams are speaking on behalf of PG.
                        Danger Zone

                        Comment


                        • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                          The ultimate irony would be if the Pacers have an email from Magic from their trade talks where he writes:
                          "We spoke with Paul George and he's signing here next year anyway."
                          Danger Zone

                          Comment


                          • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                            Playing catch-up, and I'm totally surprised by the number of people who wants the Pacers to move on. Did we all forget how the LA was making moves on draft night as they were 100% sure of getting PG? They didn't even leave us a poo poo platter. Honestly, I think the Thunder trade and KP not panicking threw a wrench in the works.

                            Personally, I believe they were something happening behind scenes. It's as simple as Paul George wanting to "win", but yet he wants to go to the Lakers in the Western Conference. That makes zero sense to me. Real talk, if LA becomes a Top 3 team next season after the offseason, well....that says it all for me.

                            I will check, but I ever recall a bottom feeder team becoming a dominant team after one season.


                            Remember when we could have gotten 1-2 solid players and a possible Top 3 draft pick in the 2017 NBA Draft by trading away Paul George?

                            Comment


                            • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                              Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post
                              Playing catch-up, and I'm totally surprised by the number of people who wants the Pacers to move on. Did we all forget how the LA was making moves on draft night as they were 100% sure of getting PG? They didn't even leave us a poo poo platter. Honestly, I think the Thunder trade and KP not panicking threw a wrench in the works.
                              Agreed. The report right now is that the Kimmel interview is not the source of the tampering. My guess is the Pacers are trying to prove that something happened between June 15, when PG said he planned to remain a Pacer and his camp was telling other NBA teams they didn't expect him to be traded at the draft, and June 18, when he came out and said he was leaving for the Lakers and his camp was telling other teams that he wouldn't sign for them.
                              Danger Zone

                              Comment


                              • Re: NBA to investigate Lakers re alleged George tampering. (Vecsey)

                                Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                                The Pacers aren't filing charges because they're trying to put an end to tampering or whatever noble bs thats been suggested.

                                They're filing tampering charges BC they feel they were wronged somehow. That's well within their right, but doesn't make it any less petty in my eyes.
                                People who feel like they've been wronged, who have avenues to get recompense, go down that avenue? This is ground breaking stuff.

                                Sounds like your problem is with tampering rules in general. If pursuing a tampering team is petty, then the whole set of rules is petty.

                                Obviously the NBA and it's owners vehemently disagree or the rules wouldn't have been put in place or at least would have been scrapped prior to the little Pacers using it as revenge.
                                Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X