Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

So how many more chances will Artest get

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So how many more chances will Artest get

    I realize for many of you Ron has already used up his chances and then some.

    For others of us still hanging in there, I would like to know specifically will make you say enough is enough, Ron must go.

    Let me say one thing in response to Kravitz column. No, Ron has never led his team to the NBA Finals. Neither has T-Mac, KG, Lebron, Wade, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce, Steve Nash, well I could make a really long list.

    One other thing, I hear people say well Artest is a top 20, top 15 or maybe even a top 10 NBA talent. If that is all it was, if all he had was talent even that much talent, I would not be such a huge fan. But when you combine his talent, with his physical toughness, effort, energy, constant hustle and all the other good intangibles he brings, then you really have quite a player.






    http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...507120400/1034

    How many more chances will this guy get?



    "I'm older and more mature now": Ron Artest says he will be on exemplary behavior upon returning to the Indiana Pacers. -- Sam Riche / The Star



    They still see what they want to see, still believe what they want to believe. And so the Indiana Pacers' brain trust sits in various spots around Conseco Fieldhouse on Monday, watching Ron Artest and knowing, absolutely knowing, that Artest can finally be trusted to stay out of trouble.

    They are seeing something I don't see. (And it's not for a lack of effort on my part. I've strained so hard to see Artest through their eyes, I've given myself a hernia.)

    But I fear the Pacers are fooling themselves once again.

    They are clinging, incredibly enough, to the notion that Artest will return next season a changed man and will help lead them to an NBA title.

    "What have you learned about yourself during this long time away from the game?" I asked Artest as he spoke Monday to the local media for the first time in months.

    He looked me in the eyes and smiled.

    "I always knew I'm a ghetto-type guy; I'm from the 'hood. I'll be ghetto the rest of my life," he said. "At the same time, there's a lot of kids who look up to you. For that, I'll change."

    So let me understand.

    Artest is going to manage his temper better because he wants to be a better role model for kids?

    Sorry.

    I'm a suburbs-type guy.

    So maybe I don't get it.

    But it seems to me there are a lot more important reasons Artest must get his act together as the Pacers grant him yet another last chance -- his eighth, if my count is accurate:

    How about changing for his teammates, who risked their safety during the Throwdown in Motown and played through unimaginable circumstances?

    How about changing for an organization that has always publicly (if not always privately) given Artest support and second opportunities?

    How about changing because at his current pace, he risks becoming another Dennis Rodman, a sad caricature who becomes known for his antics rather than his talent.

    For Artest, though, there's this ominous bottom line: "I'm a 'hood cat."

    That's the explanation for the multiple missteps over the years?

    I remember something Isiah Thomas once said as he recalled his impoverished childhood in Chicago: "I'm from the ghetto, but I'm not of the ghetto."

    Give me five minutes, and I'll give you a list of 50 players who come from circumstances as bad or worse than Artest. And I'll promise you none of them has drawn a near yearlong suspension for hitting a fan.

    When Artest was asked Monday if he went to any therapy sessions during his suspension, he looked into the distance. "It was suggested," he said. "But I turned it down."

    If he did engage in some kind of therapy, I can appreciate his desire to keep that private. For some people, there's a stigma attached -- even though there shouldn't be.

    All I'll say is, if he didn't get some kind of counseling, he completely wasted the best chance he will ever have to turn around his life on the court.

    "Do you think you have an anger management problem?" I asked later.

    "No," he said evenly. "I'm ghetto. That's it."

    I believe people can change.

    But I've heard this all before: "I'll learn from my mistakes" and "I know now that I've got to put the team first" and "I'm older and more mature now."

    I can understand if fans buy into that nonsense. They're supposed to be true believers.

    But Pacers CEO Donnie Walsh? And team president Larry Bird? Wasn't there the overwhelming sense that when Bird was hired, he would be a no-nonsense leader who would trade a player in a heartbeat if he disgraced the game or this organization?

    Remember how he immediately busted on Jermaine O'Neal for expressing his affinity for Thomas, the previous Pacers' coach?

    When last season ended, Bird used the occasion to challenge O'Neal once again. Not that O'Neal couldn't use a healthy kick to the posterior, but at least he played and often played hurt.

    How about Artest, who was ready to abandon his team early in the season, even before the brawl?

    And to think, we used to rip Thomas for being too soft on Artest.

    But we can't trade him.

    Wrong.

    They can trade him tomorrow.

    The issue is, they know they can't get equal value, or anything close to equal value.

    They know that when Artest is concentrating on winning basketball, he's the greatest bargain in the NBA.

    Tell me, though, how many times has Artest led his team to the NBA Finals?

    And how far did the Pacers get in last season's playoffs with a team whose players trusted one another, and were willing to sacrifice for the good of the team?

    Let's get this straight:

    I like Artest. I want Artest to become a superstar instead of a national punch line. There is absolutely nothing personal behind the criticism.

    But it's time, past time, for Walsh and Bird to think with their heads, and not with their hearts.

    Bob Kravitz is a columnist for The Indianapolis Star

  • #2
    Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

    First off, I never ever take anything Kravitz says seriously, because he's there only to upset people in the first place. It's his job

    Artest, for me, gets chances because the guy is too good. I want to believe that he has truly changed after what happened last year, and I am willing to keep him here for that. He is just such a great great player. If he has one more thing like last year, then maybe it's time to get rid of him. But I don't think it will happen, and I think he will have a superb year.

    What happened last year, with us going to the semis, was nice and all, but I don't think we could do it again this year. That was won with quite a bit of heart, and a lot of Reggie and Dale. What we need now is for these group of players to play as a team, but Artest has got to be a part of it. All of the characteristics UB mentioned are so vital, and we saw that this year many of those would have really helped the team. I remember how it was before the 19th, how good this team really was. I'm excited to think that we can become that again.
    Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

      Ron deserves and is getting at least one more chance, that's for sure.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

        Originally posted by Unclebuck
        Let's get this straight:

        I like Artest. I want Artest to become a superstar instead of a national punch line. There is absolutely nothing personal behind the criticism.

        Bob Kravitz is a columnist for The Indianapolis Star
        What a bunch of BS this is. The only part that is truthful is Kravitz saying it's not personal with him. How could it be personal, did Artest ever do anything Kravitz?

        Just by reading Kravitz articles you know he prefers stirring the pot. He does not want Artest to get his act together because then there are no stories. Kravitz problem is he has a dream of being one of the talking heads on Around the Horn. Of course you have to have a personality to do that and Kravitz has none.

        By the way, ONE more screw-up (and I don't mean a simple tech) and Artest needs to be cut.
        You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

          kravitz is just like a minority of fans....

          he can say how its a huge mistake and artest will never change and should be shipped off.....that he ran out of chances and so on and so forth...

          then if something does happen, he can say i told u so.....

          and if nothing does happen, then he can allude to what else he said....that he was glad that ron did change-as he truly had hoped that all along...and that he couldnt be happier for the pacers....and bird and walsh once again have proven how good they are if they could truly rehab a guy that was as bad off as artest....

          its really a joke....call them spineless...call them a bunch of pu$$ies....call them whatever u like....its just a way of setting themselves up for an excuse....people love to say i told u so....and many peoples main concern is being right....

          bottom line is i trust bird and i trust walsh....kravitz and a minority of fans have very little actual info....just like most fans, kravitz has gotten very few details....yesterday was the first time he had talked to artest in almost 8 months....it cracks me up how kravitz and fans can speak so authoritatively and judgementally on something they have very little knowledge of....

          bird and walsh have all the details....they know ron and his situation far better than some lame brain writer or fan....ill trust their judgement and knowledge of the situation....since they seem to be far better suited to make such judgements...

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

            Originally posted by sixthman
            Ron deserves and is getting at least one more chance, that's for sure.

            I realize that, I guess I'm more interested in what "one more chance" means.

            One missed practice, one flagrant foul, one refusal to get on the team plane, one league suspension for any reason if it is only one game

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

              ron should be treated the same as any other player on the team....

              i really dont like this one more chance thing....

              if ron or anyone else does something that merits being gotten rid of, i assume donnie and larry will do so....

              bottom line is ron hasnt done anything to do that....because hes still here....

              we could just as well be discussing the same situation with jack or jo or tins or anyone else....

              does anyone wonder that if jack continues to reference his gang ties he will be shipped out?

              sorry, but the whole frame of reference seems to go back to the wanting to say 'i told u so' thing....

              i hope noone on the team does anything to warrant any action by the team....

              and if they do i trust bird and walsh to do the right thing....

              peoples love for the dramatic, hence one more chance, has very little to do with the basketball team....

              i look forward to seeing what the final roster is for opening nite and watching just how great this team will be.....

              not looking to see if artest or someone else screws up

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                I just wrote Kravitz and told him that he fits perfect in this state.
                Always negative and never believing in any team. I wonder why
                Kravitz left Denver to come to here. Maybe he got fired for being
                a rock in the cities shoe. I don't even know why he still has a job
                here.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                  What one more chance means to me is not that complicated. There is a certain norm we do expect society to follow. That's all I expect from Ron. We shouldn't have to come up with a specific and unrealistic list considered the taboo things that would get Ron fired (ala Bob Knight).
                  You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                    Originally posted by foretaz
                    ron should be treated the same as any other player on the team....

                    i really dont like this one more chance thing....

                    if ron or anyone else does something that merits being gotten rid of, i assume donnie and larry will do so....

                    bottom line is ron hasnt done anything to do that....because hes still here....



                    I just have to ask why you're on a message board? Why waste your time talking about something that Bird and Walsh will handle perfectly anyway? If I was that trusting I would never read a sports page, go on a message board, or listen to a sports show. I would just watch a game and know that anything good that happened was due to Managements great judgement and that anything bad that happened would be a fluke.

                    Originally posted by fortaz
                    call them a bunch of pu$$ies


                    Perhaps I'm just being one of these, along with the rest of those who question the divine wisdom of Larry Bird.
                    House Name: Pacers

                    House Sigil:



                    House Words: "We Kneel To No King"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                      God damn. I had thought Kravitz likes to say something stupid and ridiculous just to get a reaction, and then I read Foretaz's response. Now, I think Kravitz's piece was somewhat mellow and well thought-out in comparison.

                      Anyhow, I have mellowed a bit on Artest, so I don't really have a problem with giving him another chance. I don't think it's the greatest of ideas, but I can live with it.
                      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                        lemme see....

                        questioning someones divine wisdom...

                        because what they do differs from what u would do....

                        and they have all the facts and are directly involved with the parties involved on a day to day basis...

                        and you have no real knowledge of the situation or any involvement with the parties involved....

                        now again....whos wisdom should be questioned???

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                          Personally I had no problem with Kravitz article. His comment while some take them as a personal vendetta against Ron were legit.

                          I was under the impression Ron Artest , was ordered by David Stern to seek councelling as part of his program for reinstatement. So if thats the case Ron did .

                          Ron's refusal to admit he has any type of anger problem worries me. Admitting to a problem is the first step in controlling that problem. If he seeked help and received it but does not want to admit it - no problem. But if he didn't , I WORRY we will see very little of Ron Artest on the court this season. Ron will be tested by opponents , fans and officials like he never has been in the past.

                          The how many chances Uncle Buck poses is very real. What will be considered another chance???? If Ron is late for practice repeatedly? If Ron has outburst in practice ? During a game?

                          If these occur when is the time Larry & Donnie say enough is enough and get whatever they can for Ron??

                          Hopefully this does not occur, but the question must be asked, and Pacer brass must have a point set for when enough is enough.

                          Though I truely hope Ron Artest has changed , talk is cheap . Ron will forever be a player most Pacer fans will hold their breathe everytime there is a mild incident on the court - will Ron blow up? Lets hope Ron , will ease that fear as time goes on.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                            I 100% believe that Ron had some sort of therapy during his suspension, I just don't think he is admitting to it.

                            Didn't Stern himself say he had therapy? (Not a classy move, by the way. There's a reason Ron doesn't reveal that, Stern was an *** for doing so.)
                            You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: So how many more chances will Artest get

                              Originally posted by foretaz
                              lemme see....

                              questioning someones divine wisdom...

                              because what they do differs from what u would do....

                              and they have all the facts and are directly involved with the parties involved on a day to day basis...

                              and you have no real knowledge of the situation or any involvement with the parties involved....

                              now again....whos wisdom should be questioned???
                              Thats my point. No ones. You shouldn't waste your time with it. They obviously know exponentially more than you or I. Clearly you could just go golfing right now. It seems pretty pointless to discuss things that are completely under control and in good hands.
                              House Name: Pacers

                              House Sigil:



                              House Words: "We Kneel To No King"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X