Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Antoine Walker and Pacers???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

    Originally posted by Fig Newton
    Nice to see someone has the same opinion.

    It's pretty lame that everyone repeats what they see from other posters. It's like a broken record. If the majority of the people here had their way, the Pacers would be the EXACT same team. The EXACT same team won't get us a title. Change is necessary, and a player with Walker's talents would be very valueable to us. He's alot better than people give credit. The guy is an All-Star several times over and just because he hasn't had the chance to be coached by an awesome coach like Rick Carlisle or play on an awesome team like the Pacers is not his fault. Atleast give the man a chance before you put a hex on him.
    IIRC, Toine pretty much reverted back to his old self deep in the first round of the playoffs. I remember a lot of bad shots going up by him in Game 6/7.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

      Originally posted by Fig Newton
      Nice to see someone has the same opinion.

      It's pretty lame that everyone repeats what they see from other posters. It's like a broken record.


      Irony at its best.
      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

        Originally posted by Shade
        I'm still not completely convinced that that isn't why Brad is no longer a Pacer.

        I am. DOnnie just choked on that one!
        ANDY: I guess it comes down to a simple choice, really. Get busy winning or get busy losing.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

          Originally posted by Shade
          IIRC, Toine pretty much reverted back to his old self deep in the first round of the playoffs. I remember a lot of bad shots going up by him in Game 6/7.
          I just found out what IIRC was not 1 minute before I read your post. Ironic, yes.

          I'm not saying Antoine is the best player in the world and doesn't make mistakes. But he can score and that's what the Pacers need.

          Here is a good example of what the Pacers need. The Spurs are a defensive oriented team right? Wrong. They have players like Brown and Barry that are purely there for their offensive abilities, but defensively, are very lacking. I'm not saying that Walker can be a total slacker, but he doesn't need to be a defensive specialist. If he can play atleast a little d, and be there when the Pacers hit their slumps on offense, I don't see why he wouldn't fit in.

          And I believe in Rick and I believe that he could coach a player like Walker into being a winner.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

            Originally posted by SoupIsGood


            Irony at its best.

            No, irony at it's best is laughing at your friend when he get's monkey feces thrown at him and then having a gorilla throw one of his patties directly into your face as you're still pointing your finger and laughing.

            You simply read into things much.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

              Originally posted by Fig Newton

              You simply read into things much.
              As do you.
              You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

                Originally posted by Fig Newton
                I just found out what IIRC was not 1 minute before I read your post. Ironic, yes.

                I'm not saying Antoine is the best player in the world and doesn't make mistakes. But he can score and that's what the Pacers need.

                Here is a good example of what the Pacers need. The Spurs are a defensive oriented team right? Wrong. They have players like Brown and Barry that are purely there for their offensive abilities, but defensively, are very lacking. I'm not saying that Walker can be a total slacker, but he doesn't need to be a defensive specialist. If he can play atleast a little d, and be there when the Pacers hit their slumps on offense, I don't see why he wouldn't fit in.

                And I believe in Rick and I believe that he could coach a player like Walker into being a winner.
                If it's a scorer we desperately need, I'll just go with signing Saras then. Saras and Jack in the backcourt should suffice, with JO and Ron to score in the front.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

                  Originally posted by Shade
                  If it's a scorer we desperately need, I'll just go with signing Saras then. Saras and Jack in the backcourt should suffice, with JO and Ron to score in the front.
                  As would I. But not ever possible scenario is a feasable one.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

                    NO i hate Fatwoine.Hes so ****ing slow.And he misses way too many open shots.Hes overpaid and out of shape.....

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

                      Walker might not be a bad addition depending on the price.

                      If he is signed for an average of 6-7 million a year he isn't that bad. The guy is one of the best all around players in the league.

                      Take a look at his stats:

                      http://www.nba.com/playerfile/antoine_walker/index.html

                      For his career he has averaged 8 rebounds a game while scoring 19 points.

                      While some might be concerned about how our defense will be with Walker and JO my question is how will the other team guard us with Artest, Walker, and JO?

                      With that said, I do have 2 cocerns with Walker and there are....

                      1. His turnovers.
                      He averages 3.15 TOs for his careers. Although I will cut him a little bit of slack because I know he does have to carry alot of the ball handling duties everywhere he has been. In Boston for the most part, in Dallas when they tried him as a point forward, and in Atlanta.
                      2. His shooting percentages.
                      Antoine is a 41% career shooting from the field while hitting 32% from the 3 point line. He is just a 64% foul shooter. Although this is not a huge concern for me. Ron shoots about the same from the field and 3 point line thorughout his career as well.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

                        Walker CAN ONLY BE effective if he is on a team that doesn't care about defense ( like the Kings or Mavs ) or has enough players where they don't care about his lack of defense ( like the Spurs or Pistons ) and he can be the 1st or 2nd scoring option on the team. That way he can do what he does best...shoot the ball.

                        That said.....if Walker is placed on a team where he will either be a 2 to 4th scoring option....Walker will become another version of Croshere.....a PF who hovers beyond the arc waiting for a 3 pt shot. If he provided some other talents...like play some defense or pull down boards...then he would be fine.

                        The only way that I would have him on the team is if he is the backup PF and playing ONLY backup PF minutes....which would probably be about 15-20 mpg. I don't want him playing any SF minutes at all....we have enough SF as it stands.

                        I want a PF who can bang inside and score close to the basket....not a PF who occassionally pulls down rebounds and loves the 3pt shot.

                        I will Pass on Walker.
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

                          Walker is a huge talent. I always wonder what could have been with this guy. He reminds me of Derrick Coleman.I always wondered what could have been if both of those guys had a stronger work ethic. Offensively he has all the skills , hes a good passer( when he does decide to pass the ball) excellent ball handling skills, good rebounder, 3point range on his jumper and can score in the post and just on skill alone hes become a consistant 19-20pt 10bd and 4 assists a night guy. The guy can certainly put up numbers in volume but when the going gets tough Walker will dissapear.

                          Its a shame the guy has pathetic work ethic, hes never in shape, doesn't have any desire to defend and doesn't seem to play with a high IQ.Theres times with that big frame of his he should be down in the low post not trying to take quicker guys off the dribble or jacking up threes. I said before the trade deadline when there was talk of aquiring him from atlanta that if is one of your stars that you have to rely on to win a championship its never going to happen. I don't want him on this team.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Antoine Walker and Pacers???

                            I'm not saying Antoine is the best player in the world and doesn't make mistakes. But he can score and that's what the Pacers need.

                            Pacers front line is:
                            JO, Foster, Sjax, Tinsley, and Ron..
                            I would say we have players who could score.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X