Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

So what do you do now if you were Bird?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

    I think I'd move Artest out if I was Bird. Trade him out West and try to get some center depth. BTW, since many older Pacers posters remember from the older days, I am a Mav fan. The Mavs are about to use the new waiver rule to buyout Michael Finley. Since fin is going to get a huge buyout, he'd be much cheaper and easier to obtain than allen or Redd. Fin is a class act and IMO, has some productive years left in him as a shooter. Not a stellar defender but not a liability either.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

      Originally posted by sig
      I think I'd move Artest out if I was Bird. Trade him out West and try to get some center depth. BTW, since many older Pacers posters remember from the older days, I am a Mav fan. The Mavs are about to use the new waiver rule to buyout Michael Finley. Since fin is going to get a huge buyout, he'd be much cheaper and easier to obtain than allen or Redd. Fin is a class act and IMO, has some productive years left in him as a shooter. Not a stellar defender but not a liability either.
      Why would we trade our best player for a center when we have like 4 and then drafted another one who will be playing here in a few years.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

        Originally posted by Jesus Shuttlesworth
        Why would we trade our best player for a center when we have like 4 and then drafted another one who will be playing here in a few years.
        Nobody said anything about trading Jermaine.
        Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
        Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
        Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
        Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
        And life itself, rushing over me
        Life itself, the wind in black elms,
        Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

          I really really don't see us Trading Artest one bit

          WHY would we, we would have been TEN times better of to trade him mid season and get some immediate help last year then now, does anyone seriusly think he has more value now then he did Mid Season, sure he can play but after that I think not,

          I see us standing phat and i'm happy that way, see above
          Ya Think Ya Used Enough Dynamite there Butch...

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

            If I were Larry Bird, I'd explore the options for landing Redd, Magloire or Allen but I would probbly err on the side of staying with the core roster we already have. If one of those teams offered us something that would obviously improve the team then you'd have to jump on it.

            Signing Sarunas J. would be my highest priority. If Tins is to remain the starter then having 2 capable backups would be essential. I think AJ would play along if he became 3rd string, because he knew he would get ample opportunity if Tins got injured.

            I'd really like to retain JJ, but would understand if he recieved a great offer elsewhere, monetarily or minutes-wise. If the waived players, who mainly seem to be swingmen, really dampened his free-agency options and we could get him for a couple of seasons relatively cheap then I wouldn't hesitate.

            I think DD will be content with a 2-3 year vets min contract.

            If a trade came along where we could move Cro for expiring contracts I'd do that to provide the option of getting a decent trade at the deadline, which would allow some last minute adjustments to our roster. If we were going to be paying luxury tax then i'd probbly just waive him, since he doesn't fit at all with our roster.

            So essentially more of the same. Take a great opportunity if it arises, but otherwise just let this team find its rhythm and address any issues as they come up.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

              Originally posted by GO!!!!!
              Magloire SUCKS, Christ, we have one of the BEST Post Players In Jermaine, A solid Rebounder in Foster, unless we can get Ming,ShaQ, Stoudamire, or some one that can make a real differnce I don't want to trade NO ONE and I don't want to Trade Freddie,


              Freddie, Artest, Foster for Stoudamire works for me but after that forgetttt it, tell my why o why Maglore is better then Foster, We don't really need a Offensive from the C, we got 3 Gunners, a Point 2 Pass, and a Foster for rebounding and Harrison for Devolpment future C

              Larry, go play Golf and watch the summer league Team Blossom, them come back and lets Win Some Games

              I woulden't mind seeing Freddie Play some Point and if anything trade AJ's 4 Mill a year away..

              Dale if we can resign him to a Low Level deal which I'm sure he'll do can help Tutor Foster,Harrison and play some minutes when we need him

              I really Think we are WINNERS right here with this team...

              get the team in to shape and i want to see fireworks come Nov 1

              As much as i don't like Isiah I woulden't mind seeing Artest run the Point during some games, I was watching a old pacer game that I'm converting to DVD and we had Shrempf being a Point Foward, that was awesome to watch and we was kicking ***...

              Artest, Jax, Bender, O'neal, Foster

              Hell YEAH
              How does Magloire suck? He's a great post player who hasn't been statistically great because of all the double teams thrown at him. I bet you haven't even ever watched a Hornets game.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                Originally posted by GO!!!!!
                Magloire SUCKS, Christ, we have one of the BEST Post Players In Jermaine, A solid Rebounder in Foster, unless we can get Ming,ShaQ, Stoudamire, or some one that can make a real differnce I don't want to trade NO ONE and I don't want to Trade Freddie,


                Freddie, Artest, Foster for Stoudamire works for me but after that forgetttt it, tell my why o why Maglore is better then Foster, We don't really need a Offensive from the C, we got 3 Gunners, a Point 2 Pass, and a Foster for rebounding and Harrison for Devolpment future C

                Larry, go play Golf and watch the summer league Team Blossom, them come back and lets Win Some Games

                I woulden't mind seeing Freddie Play some Point and if anything trade AJ's 4 Mill a year away..

                Dale if we can resign him to a Low Level deal which I'm sure he'll do can help Tutor Foster,Harrison and play some minutes when we need him

                I really Think we are WINNERS right here with this team...

                get the team in to shape and i want to see fireworks come Nov 1

                As much as i don't like Isiah I woulden't mind seeing Artest run the Point during some games, I was watching a old pacer game that I'm converting to DVD and we had Shrempf being a Point Foward, that was awesome to watch and we was kicking ***...

                Artest, Jax, Bender, O'neal, Foster

                Hell YEAH
                EXACTLY!

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                  Originally posted by Harmonica
                  I'm sure a lot of you children are not going to like what I'm about to say, but if I'm Bird, I do not, under any circumstances, allow Ron the opportunity to destroy this team again. I package him and whoever else it takes to get someone like Magloire or Pierce and pray that the Hornets or Celtics bite.
                  Pardon my childlike understanding, but how do you "under no circumstance, allow Ron...to destroy this team", then make a deal which you ~pray~ the other team accepts? If you want Larry to be committed to dealing Ron, then don't you just send him out for whatever trade you can get?
                  "If you ever crawl inside an old hollow log and go to sleep, and while you're in there some guys come and seal up both ends and then put it on a truck and take it to another city, boy, I don't know what to tell you." - Jack Handy

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                    Originally posted by Moses
                    How does Magloire suck? He's a great post player who hasn't been statistically great because of all the double teams thrown at him. I bet you haven't even ever watched a Hornets game.

                    I have seen enough of him to know he's 6'11 and we have ten people like that on our team, all he will do is talk the ball away from Jermaine and as if we need that....

                    Man when will reallity set in, trading for Maglore would make us a worse team...
                    Ya Think Ya Used Enough Dynamite there Butch...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                      Originally posted by IndyPacers67
                      I think if I was Larry I would sign Sarunas first off. That has to be the number one priority right now. This guy is going to be incredible in the NBA. He really, really will.

                      The second thing is re-signing JJ and Dale.

                      The third thing is standing pat with the team we have now. Adding Granger and Sarunas is enough for me this offseason.
                      I agree, this is what I want too. As for Sarunas being incredable, the jury hasn't even got to the jury box yet.

                      Bird was quoted after the draft as saying the Pacers were not though. I've read that the Pacers have the inside track with Sarunas so I wondered when I read that if he would be though once and 'IF' they sign Sarunas.





                      I'm thinking from all I hear that we have the inside track with Sarunas

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                        Originally posted by GO!!!!!
                        I have seen enough of him to know he's 6'11 and we have ten people like that on our team, all he will do is talk the ball away from Jermaine and as if we need that....

                        Man when will reallity set in, trading for Maglore would make us a worse team...
                        Sorry but that just sounds funny that Maglore, an all star, will make us a wrose team. I mean heck I know he isn't a player to die for but he is a top 5 center in the league, yes top 5 if not he is pretty close to it.

                        He would be an upgrade over ANY center we have and allows Jermaine to guard the other teams PF AT ALL TIMES. JM is a legit center. Foster, Pollard, and Dale are better off as backups and David probably won't be ready for a starting role next year. Besides Pollard will probably be traded anyway and Dale is still a free agent, so technicaly we only have Jeff and Daivd.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                          Just because we've got sixteen bazillion below average C's doesn't mean we shouldn't try to get a potential all-star at the position.
                          Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                          Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                          Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                          Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                          And life itself, rushing over me
                          Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                          Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                            Originally posted by rommie
                            Sorry but that just sounds funny that Maglore, an all star, will make us a wrose team. I mean heck I know he isn't a player to die for but he is a top 5 center in the league, yes top 5 if not he is pretty close to it.

                            He would be an upgrade over ANY center we have and allows Jermaine to guard the other teams PF AT ALL TIMES. JM is a legit center. Foster, Pollard, and Dale are better off as backups and David probably won't be ready for a starting role next year. Besides Pollard will probably be traded anyway and Dale is still a free agent, so technicaly we only have Jeff and Daivd.

                            I Love all this talk, but what about Team Chemistry, what about Jermaine !, Brad Miller, Jeff Foster, Dale Davis, there all no frills Centres, perfect partners for Jermaine, if anything maybe acquiring a Kurt Thomas type cheap would be a better fit...

                            you really think that trading Freddie, and Bender etc for Maglorie would make us a better team, I doubt it, I think everyone is a year older and wiser and we will be a better team then last year regardless, we don't need offensive production from the C, we need Solid Defence and Dale/Foster/Harrison provide that very easy, Dale can handle your BIG Men for about 24 MPG, Foster is fit & enthusiastic and can guard your Medium Range Big Men and Harrison can do it all once he's up to standard

                            Magloire is a Top Ten centre, but he's only 6'll and I don't think his Minute production is that much better then Foster/Davis's

                            sim a few games on your favourite NBA console game and see what the stats are with and with out Magloire..


                            They might surprise everyone...


                            and anyway, he plays for the hornets, was an all star when the east was as weak of big men as i am now of cash.... I think he's good but better then Foster and Freddie combined, I have my doubts.

                            Not that stats matter in this game but if you actully compare the 2 then Foster is a leaps and bounds better play for this team.... Chemistry Baby thats what it is all about...
                            Ya Think Ya Used Enough Dynamite there Butch...

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                              Originally posted by Harmonica
                              I'm sure a lot of you children are not going to like what I'm about to say, but if I'm Bird, I do not, under any circumstances, allow Ron the opportunity to destroy this team again. I package him and whoever else it takes to get someone like Magloire or Pierce and pray that the Hornets or Celtics bite.
                              Originally posted by Harmonica
                              You're right. Bird did say he wanted someone in the draft who could be a solid contributor by mid-season. Okay, so I hope that Ron puts up great numbers, looks like DPOY, doesn't have any incidents and then I ship him out at mid-season for a player that will help us in the playoffs, never forgetting that Ron came unglued during the ECFs because he couldn't handle the pressure.
                              am i the only one that finds these statements a bit....hypocritical?....trade ron because hes come unglued in the playoffs...for a player that came unglued in the playoffs....hmmmmm....makes sense to me....

                              i do think the telling part is when u say u are never forgetting that Ron...

                              never is a very big word....

                              and a very telling one also....

                              heres hoping noone takes that sort of attitude with u in whatever life dealings u might have...i would venture to guess that you have had things in ur life take place, that if others would have taken this same attitude as yours, you would not have liked much.....

                              forgiveness is a necessity in life...never forgetting something to the point that u would allow it to prevent possible good in the future...well...lets just be nice and say its a bit closeminded and very immature...and thats being nice...

                              and since we all know that u couldnt possibly be that way....maybe it was just a very poor choice of words....

                              ever heard of cutting off ur nose to spite ur face??

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: So what do you do now if you were Bird?

                                Originally posted by GO!!!!!
                                I Love all this talk, but what about Team Chemistry, what about Jermaine !, Brad Miller, Jeff Foster, Dale Davis, there all no frills Centres, perfect partners for Jermaine, if anything maybe acquiring a Kurt Thomas type cheap would be a better fit...

                                you really think that trading Freddie, and Bender etc for Maglorie would make us a better team, I doubt it, I think everyone is a year older and wiser and we will be a better team then last year regardless, we don't need offensive production from the C, we need Solid Defence and Dale/Foster/Harrison provide that very easy, Dale can handle your BIG Men for about 24 MPG, Foster is fit & enthusiastic and can guard your Medium Range Big Men and Harrison can do it all once he's up to standard

                                Magloire is a Top Ten centre, but he's only 6'll and I don't think his Minute production is that much better then Foster/Davis's

                                sim a few games on your favourite NBA console game and see what the stats are with and with out Magloire..


                                They might surprise everyone...


                                and anyone, he plays for the hornets, was an all star when the east was as weak of big men as i am now of cash.... I think he's good but better then Foster and Freddie combined, I have my doubts.
                                Well if NO is willing to trade JM for Bender and Freddie id jump all over that. Bender= IL warmer and Freddie= A combo guard who can be replaced.

                                The big reason I want JM is because I really think he would guard the other teams center full time which is a big lift off of JO.

                                And sim some games on my favorite console? One my PS2 doesn't work and 2 I would never get my realistic opinion from a video game.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X