http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=41455

Okay, maybe somebody can explain this to me. Yes, I understand that Phoenix had the best record. And Steve Nash won MVP because he made Phoenix so good. But Mike D'Antoni won COY because he made Phoenix so good. And now, Colangelo wins because he made Phoenix so good.

Well, which is it? Yes, I guess you can make an argument for Nash and Colangelo, but D'Antoni as well? It just seems like lazy voting by the media to me.