Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

    http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/lance...profile-170412

    Please don't forget the link in future



    Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers








    by Mark Montieth
    Pacers.com Writer
    @MarkMontieth
    Posted: Apr 13, 2017




    The text messages are still sitting there on Lance Stephenson's phone, dozens of them, dating all the way back to his rookie season with the Pacers a lifetime ago.

    They came from Larry Bird, part of the two-way correspondence between the two that probably could be compiled into a book. It would be a tale of friendship, trust, mentoring, a real-life bro-mance that goes beyond the traditional formal relationship between a player and team president.

    "I have them all," Stephenson says. "Neither of us ever changed our number."

    They don't need to text now, although they still might. Stephenson is back home again in Indiana — he's the one who keeps referring to it as "home" despite being from the mean streets of Brooklyn — and can talk with Bird face to face if he wants. Bird's office is practically on top of the Pacers' locker room, one floor above. He attends all the team's practices and is a frequent visitor to the locker room on off-days.

    For Stephenson, it feels like a welcome reunification after a difficult breakup and gradual reconciliation, a career-reviving, if not career-saving event. For Bird, it's more like something that was likely to happen eventually, but the timing had to be right.

    And, man, was it ever right.

    Stephenson had been lost at sea for three years, floundering on the waves of the whims of NBA executives, lapping ashore occasionally, only to be cast back out to the waters. He had played for Charlotte, signing a free agent contract after his marketplace value was overestimated and his representatives had rejected the Pacers' every-nickel-we-have-offer. He had been traded to the Clippers. He had been traded to Memphis. He had signed with New Orleans, suffered an injury, and been waived. He had signed two 10-day contracts with Minnesota, suffered two more injuries, and was released again.

    He had found a semi-comfortable fit only in Memphis, where he was traded on Feb. 18 last year. Injuries forced him into the playing rotation and he responded, scoring a career-high 33 points in one game, and surpassing 20 three other times. His final game with the Grizzlies, he scored 26 points in a playoff series-ending loss to San Antonio.

    Even then, the Grizzlies didn't attempt to re-sign him before the start of this season. Stephenson had one year left on his contract for $9 million, at a team option. The Grizzlies could have released him, waited for him to clear waivers, and then signed him to whatever deal they wanted to offer. They didn't. New Orleans signed him, but released him on Nov. 7 after he suffered a groin injury that required surgery.

    He was adrift for three months, until Minnesota gave him a 10-day contract.


    "Stuff like that can bring your confidence down," Stephenson says. "I went from being traded twice to being a free agent again and being on the minimum in New Orleans, then getting cut and then doing 10 days. I thought, 'Man, I can't be that bad. I know I can help a team. You're telling me I can't do nothing?'"



    Bird could have sat back, smiled smugly and said one big, fat "I told you so" to himself, or for that matter to the world while all this was going on. After all, he had practically rescued the rough-around-the-edges kid from New York, taking him in the second round of the 2010 NBA Draft after just one uneventful season at the University of Cincinnati, and had nurtured him through four seasons with the Pacers. Stephenson blossomed amid the Pacers' patience and nurturing, becoming a starter on two teams that reached the Eastern Conference Finals, and, in his final season, nearly making the All-Star team, producing a league-high five triple-doubles and finishing as runner-up in the Most Improved Player voting.




    It seemed a slam-dunk that Stephenson would return to the Pacers in free agency. He talked openly of his affection for Bird. And Bird had made clear his desire, too. Presiding over the press conference to announce the re-signing of Paul George, he had spotted Stephenson at the back of the audience and said something along the lines of, "Don't worry, Lance, you'll be up here next year with your daddy."

    Even in the face of rejection that could have been fairly viewed as betrayal, Bird wasn't bitter. He understood the business decision for Stephenson to test the free agent waters. He had spearheaded a recruiting effort that produced an original video – more like a documentary than a highlight reel – to entice Stephenson, and made the obligatory 12:01 a.m. call on the opening day of free agency and offered a five-year, $44 million contract. He made it clear that was the all the money he could offer without exceeding the luxury tax, and invited Stephenson's camp to come in a look over the books to prove it.

    Stephenson's agent, family attorney Al Ebanks, said no, he wanted to see what other teams had to offer.

    Bird said fine, no hard feelings, but he was moving on.

    "You think I'm going to wait until August to see if you're signed?" Bird said.

    Bird filled his need backcourt needs by signing C.J. Miles and then Rodney Stuckey – for less money combined than Stephenson could have made the following season. Bird stayed in touch with Ebanks all along, but with each signing the available financial pool for Stephenson shrank.

    Stephenson says he didn't truly understand the situation at the time. He says he thought the Pacers were just throwing out a number to see if anyone would surpass it, and that he would have an opportunity to accept that offer if nobody did.

    "I was young," he says. "That was my first time going through free agency and being a (prominent) player.

    "When you think you're about to get rewarded, you feel good about yourself. It went from feeling good to right back down, like I didn't do nothing the whole time while I was here."

    Stephenson was fortunate to land a last-minute deal with Michael Jordan in Charlotte, but it didn't work. It rarely did, really, with the notable exception of his sixth game, when he hit a game-winning 3-pointer at the buzzer to cap off a 17-point, 13-rebound effort over Atlanta. His playing time with the Hornets dropped from 35 minutes in his final season with the Pacers to 26. His scoring average dropped from 13.8 points to 8.2. His field goal percentage dropped from 49 to 38. His 3-point percentage dropped from 35 percent to 17 percent – an NBA record for futility.

    "I was getting forced shots or shots I wasn't used to," he says. "The Pacers, we were playing unselfish. David West would get the ball in the post, if he turned and saw me open, I knew I was going to get it. As soon as I got to Charlotte, it wasn't like that. It was forced threes, forced shots.

    "It was tough, because we didn't have a primary shooter. It was me, Kemba (Walker) and (Michael Kidd-) Gilchrist. Teams were clogging up the paint and daring us to shoot. We needed a shooter out there and we didn't have one. I need the ball in my hands and Kemba needed the ball in his hands. It just didn't fit."

    It didn't fit anywhere else, really, which made Stephenson long that much more for his Indiana home. He stayed away from Bird that futile season in Charlotte, but renewed their communication the following summer. He was spending a few days with Paul George in Las Vegas, talking about how much he missed the Pacers and Indianapolis. George decided to take action, texting Bird on the spot and suggesting he bring back his wayward son. Stephenson followed with a text of his own, and Bird responded.

    There was nothing he could do at the time. His roster was filled with guards with guaranteed contracts. But that exchange began a second round of pen pal-ish texting and telephone conversations that never stopped. Bird couldn't talk with him while he was under contract with another team, but in between those stretches, they talked often — Stephenson saying he wanted to come back, Bird saying he would try but couldn't do anything yet.

    "It wasn't like I was punishing him for not signing," Bird says. "I wanted him back. We all wanted him back."

    Bird continued to encourage Stephenson, though, whenever he called to tell Bird he had an offer from another team.

    "He always said, 'Go do it. Something's going to happen,'" Stephenson says. "And something happened."

    What happened was that Stuckey got hurt. Again. After battling injuries for the past two seasons, Stuckey suffered a strained tendon in the Pacers' game against Philadelphia on March 26, an injury that would keep him out at least four weeks. With Glenn Robinson III also out with a strained calf muscle, and with a clause in Stuckey's contract that the Pacers would not be obligated to honor the final season of it if they waived him before the end of the season, the Pacers had little choice.

    They waived Stuckey, who still goes to The Fieldhouse for treatment and plans to return to Seattle over the summer and rehab his way back into the league for another two or three seasons. They needed a guard, badly, but that was only half the fateful moments that led to the reunion with Stephenson. He had suffered two ankle injuries in Minnesota, the second occurring when a teammate collided with him two minutes into his appearance in a game in Boston on Feb. 8.

    He was due to sign a contract that would take him through the rest of the season the next day.

    Bad luck again, he thought.

    "Imagine that," he says. "After that injury, I'm like, 'Man, I'm done. I'm getting ready for next year.'"

    He was back in New York, immersed in another round of rehab, when his cell phone rang. It was his new agent, Mark Bartelstein, with whom Stephenson signed last summer. The Pacers had called.

    "Are you ready to get back?" Bartelstein asked.

    "Yeah!" Stephenson shouted.

    Stephenson's actually not ready. Not as he'd like to be. The injury was a Grade 2 ankle sprain, one that usually requires about a month to heal. He's playing in pain, and estimates he's at about 75 percent of his normal athleticism. But he's trusting in the Pacers' training staff and believes he can get through the playoffs, if not improve.

    He's just happy to be with the Pacers again, under the protective roof of Bankers Life Fieldhouse and amid a fan base that once seemed fairly evenly divided on him, but now is head-over-heels in love with the passion and athleticism that has kick-started a team stuck in neutral.

    Stephenson didn't talk directly with Bird until he arrived at The Fieldhouse and walked in Bird's office two weeks ago. It was their first face-to-face conversation since 2014, the culmination of all those text messages. He had made it a point to look over at Bird when he was on an opposing team at The Fieldhouse — twice with Charlotte and once with the Clippers — but didn't dare speak to him then.

    "I was scared," he says, "because I hadn't seen him since I saw him during the games when I played here. It was weird going in there. We talked about all the stuff we went through."

    "You're happy to be back, huh?" Stephenson recalls Bird saying.

    "Yeah!" Stephenson shouted.

    "I always believed in Lance," Bird says. "He's older now, and I know what he said to me on the phone and in texts. I know he was crushed by not being back here, especially after it didn't work out in Charlotte. I know he believes in our medical staff. He knows they can fix him in a heartbeat. He's got some (physical) problems, and it's going to take awhile to get (healthy again). He'll be here all summer, he'll work hard and he'll be great next year."

    There's more to it than that, however. Bird could have had Stephenson for the bare minimum. There were no competing offers, and Stephenson would have taken anything. He had made that clear to others in the Pacers' front office, even offering to go to Fort Wayne to play for the Mad Ants and work himself back into shape.

    Bird, however, went beyond that. He signed Stephenson to a far more generous guaranteed contract. He wanted to give Stephenson the security of a guaranteed contract for next season, which will allow him to work out at The Fieldhouse all summer, protect the franchise's interests and give Stephenson the opportunity to earn a bigger contract.





    Pacers owner Herb Simon signed off on the deal. It's a bargain for the franchise, because the mid-level salary next season will be more than $8 million, and starting two-guards are making about $14 million per season. Bird considers Stephenson a starting-caliber player, and didn't want to take advantage of his vulnerable position.

    "He wasn't getting anything before," Bird said. "A lot of people said it was a stupid move, but I didn't want to bring him in on a minimum."




    That kind of commitment resonates with Stephenson, further enhancing his devotion to the franchise he once spurned.

    "It means a lot," Stephenson says. "Just for them to have that same confidence in me from when I left. They still believed in my talent. Those three years went by so last. For Larry to still believe in me and believe Lance can do it … he always told me to stay confident and stay working hard. I did that the whole time, I just wasn't getting rewarded for it."

    Now he has been. He gives the impression it would take a crow-bar to get him out of Indianapolis now. He's living in a hotel now, but has begun house-hunting in the suburbs and will spend the summer here, getting back in shape. Bird told him they'll have to tear down and rebuild his body and game, and he's ready.

    "I need that," he says. "My body was breaking down a little bit.

    "Right now, I'm playing off just hanging on. My body is not the same as when I was here before. Now I'm in good hands with great trainers. I think I'll be all right now and get back to moving the way I was when I was here before."

    Stephenson already is playing the way he was when here before. He's allowed to have the ball in his hands, make plays, create for teammates. Memphis aside, the other teams tried to make him a classic off-guard, a catch-and-shoot wing. That's not Stephenson. His game was honed on the playgrounds and in the gymnasiums of New York, and has always been at his best when he has the ball in his hands.

    He's also feeling the love of the fans. He gets it when he walks from his downtown hotel to The Fieldhouse for practice and games, and feels it when he enters games. The ovation when he made his second debut, against Toronto on April 4, was memorable and meaningful. He had been a divisive figure when he was with the Pacers the first time, drawing criticism for in-game "antics" such as blowing in LeBron James' ear in a playoff game. But it seemed his popularity had only increased during his absence.

    Perhaps the fans recognized he was exactly what the Pacers needed.




    "He's going to be fine," Bird said. "He's real when he says he feels this is his home. That's no b.s. He wants to be here and he wants to make the fans happy. What they did for him that first night is pretty incredible. Because he needed that."

    The fan response, combined with the renewal of his role, has enabled Stephenson to recapture much of his mojo. He has no more worries, no more doubts about himself. He knows he has a job next season, and probably beyond. It shows in his play, which helped propel the Pacers along the five-game winning streak that pushed them into the playoffs.

    "It's just being comfortable again," he said. "Letting the game talk for itself and not worry if the team likes me or my teammates like me, or what the coach needs me to do. I get here and it's like, 'Do this, that, that and that and you'll be all right.' I didn't get that from no other team. It was like playing guessing games."

    Looking back, painful as it was at times, the three-year hiatus from the Pacers was a good thing in Stephenson's mind. The lessons learned from it, and the incredible fate that brought him back — his injury the day before he was to sign with the Timberwolves for the rest of the season and Stuckey's injury — makes him believe it all was meant to be.

    "I couldn't even try to be the same guy I was before," he says. "I'm so much older and smarter. Back then I was a little young and having fun and being childish a little bit. Just happy to have that opportunity and getting all the love I was getting. I was childish and playing hard and having fun. Now, I'm more serious about the game. I don't take the game for granted.

    "I feel God put me through all those situations to humble me. I was on a pedestal. I was feeling like, 'I'm the man.' I feel like God punished me because I felt so high about myself. He brought me back down to humble me."

    Have a question for Mark? Want it to be on Pacers.com? Email him at askmontieth@gmail.com and you could be featured in his next mailbag.

    Note: The contents of this page have not been reviewed or endorsed by the Indiana Pacers. All opinions expressed by Mark Montieth are solely his own and do not reflect the opinions of the Indiana Pacers, their partners, or sponsors
    .
    Last edited by BillS; 04-14-2017, 11:42 AM. Reason: Add link
    "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  • #2
    Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

    Originally posted by Kemo View Post
    It was his new agent, Mark Bartelstein, .........
    Best move Lance made.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

      While not part of this article, I love this recent quote from Paul:

      "When he gets into that mode and he gets fired-up, it's a contagious thing," George said afterward, per Brunner. "That's him, man, that's natural. That's who Lance is and that's what this locker room lacked. ... He makes guys around him believe and he brought the best out of everybody."

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

        Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
        While not part of this article, I love this recent quote from Paul:

        "When he gets into that mode and he gets fired-up, it's a contagious thing," George said afterward, per Brunner. "That's him, man, that's natural. That's who Lance is and that's what this locker room lacked. ... He makes guys around him believe and he brought the best out of everybody."

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers


          PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

            Originally posted by MagicRat View Post

            I need to thank this like a billion times.
            BillS

            A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
            Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

              Originally posted by MagicRat View Post

              Thanks for posting this. Awesome! Nostrodamus is that you?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

                Thanks for editing in the link to the story , , my bad, i forgot/.. appreciate it!!
                "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Humbled Stephenson Back with Bird, Pacers

                  Though certain posting styles about Lance makes me want to dislike him, stories like this do the exact opposite. (Which is funny because I normally am not a fan of Monteith and his over the top positive/homeristic writing style)

                  Lance sounds like he's humbled and is embracing just being a part of the city and the franchise that helped him find some success in the league.

                  I'll always root for Lance to do well here. I am extremely glad to see him back

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X