Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

    We know most of this, but it is worth a quick read

    http://www.latimes.com/sports/basket...rts-nba-clippe


    The NBA
    Carlisle's Robotic Reputation Computes to No. 1 in the East
















    Be careful what you wish for, all you little coaches out there, attending your clinics, drawing your Xs and O's on napkins in diners at midnight, dreaming your dreams….

    Rick Carlisle had a dream job of his own as an Indiana Pacer assistant under Larry Bird. When Bird stepped down, the Pacers hired Isiah Thomas and Carlisle was on the street.

    So he went to Detroit, where he became coach of the year as a rookie with the Pistons, then finished fourth in the balloting in his second season, right before they fired him.

    Luckily, for Carlisle anyway, Bird, who had just returned to Indiana as general manager, fired Thomas and hired Carlisle back.

    Thomas subsequently became the Knicks' general manager and got to fire a coach too — Don Chaney.

    If you want to know how, astonishingly, 14 of 15 Eastern Conference NBA teams changed coaches within nine months, it started last spring when the Pistons pulled the plug on Carlisle, who, until that moment, had been considered a success story. That set off nine months of musical coaches, only Atlanta's Terry Stotts surviving, and only because his team was being sold.

    Nine months later, Carlisle sat innocently for interviews at All-Star media day, wearing a baseball cap, his forelock tumbling boyishly over his forehead, as earnest as ever but no more colorful.

    His presence as an All-Star coach represented an epic turnaround, so everyone plumbed the depth of his heartbreak. Unfortunately, he was not Dennis Rodman and this wasn't the Oprah Winfrey show.

    "Hey, my experience in Detroit was great," Carlisle said, acting as though he were serious.

    "For two years I had terrific players who wanted to win, and for a first-time coach to get into a situation like that was a great opportunity. I owe a lot to [GM] Joe Dumars and to Mr. [owner Bob] Davidson for giving me that chance.

    "You know, when it was over, I looked back and just felt really fortunate to have had the chance."

    He probably felt really fortunate to have had all summer to relax and collect unemployment too. In Detroit, reporters called Carlisle "Rain Man" for his somber tone and "robotic" for his emotional range. Even Bird, his sponsor, says, "He's just a weird dude."

    Of course, students of the game might also have noticed that Carlisle took a 32-50 Piston team to two 50-win seasons, won two division titles and is still in first place in the same division with a different team.

    Who knows, maybe it's not a coincidence.

    "He won 50 games [in each of his two seasons] with a Detroit team that didn't have as much talent as we have," says the Pacers' Jermaine O'Neal. "So you put him with a team that has the talent and the ability that we have, I mean, it's a great thing.

    "I mean, if I had to choose a coach to replace Isiah Thomas, it'd be Rick Carlisle."

    That wasn't what O'Neal said last summer when he got the news. He went off to the media, saying management had promised him Thomas was coming back, adding that if he'd known what was coming, he wouldn't have re-signed.

    And it wasn't that O'Neal didn't know Carlisle, who was an assistant in Portland when O'Neal was a rookie.

    This Carlisle person takes some getting used to — and not everyone does that.

    Mowed Down in Motown

    Not that there aren't more out there like Carlisle these days.

    There's a new studious breed of NBA coaches, who weren't former stars or even former NBA players — or, in the case of New Jersey's Lawrence Frank, even a high school player.

    They may not look any more dashing than the 5-8 Frank, who's also known as Doogie Howser and jokes about not being able to get into games or movies; or Houston's Jeff Van Gundy, or Toronto's Kevin O'Neill, or Carlisle.

    These are the guys who are revolutionizing the game, or choking it by slowing it down, depending on your point of view.

    They're obsessives who worry about spending more time with their VCRs than with their children. They may look sad-eyed, like Van Gundy; dweeby, like Frank; or like a store window mannequin, like Carlisle, but they're united by a love of the game that's greater than they could tell you, if they ever opened up to anyone but each other.

    They attract fellow obsessives, even if they're different in every other way, as when Carlisle, a lowly Celtic scrub from upstate New York, hit it off with Bird, the Celtic superstar who used to bill himself as "the Hick from French Lick," which is where Carlisle used to go in the summer to work out with Larry Legend.

    "He'd come down to French Lick and we'd work out and about an hour after we'd worked out, he'd be gone for four or five hours and you wouldn't see him," says Bird. "Somebody would say, 'Where'd Rick go?' and I'd say, 'I don't know; he'll come back.'

    "And sure enough, he'd come back and he'd be doing something, and all of a sudden, he's gone again …

    "He's just a weird dude. My wife and I would just go, whatever. That's just Rick."

    Returning to Indiana in 1997 to try coaching, Bird hired Carlisle to run his offense and Dick Harter to run his defense, turning over X's and O's to them. Bird set the tone, though, which included chilling Carlisle out when he got too shrill.

    However, Bird never meant to make it a career and three seasons later, within weeks of their 2000 Finals loss to the Lakers, he was gone. Carlisle was considered as his successor, but the job went to Thomas.

    Carlisle got his shot a year later but not with an East power. Instead, he took over the downtrodden Pistons, who'd just lost Grant Hill and sunk to 32-50.

    Reorganizing their nobodies around 6-8 Ben Wallace, Carlisle improved their defense from 25th to sixth, and changed the 50 losses to 50 wins.

    As if to answer speculation that he'd been passed over for the Pacer job because the players didn't want him, or to show his new players how much he cared, he went to unprecedented lengths.

    Late in the season, he even called dozens of writers from other cities, touting his guys for awards, giving everyone his cell phone number in case they ever needed him for anything. He reached one on a Laker trip, in a hotel next to the airport in Miami, after persuading the desk to give out the telephone number.

    Whether because of Carlisle's help or not, Wallace won the first of his consecutive awards for defensive player of the year.

    That spring, the Pistons needed a Game 5 victory at home over the Toronto Raptors to get out of the first round. When it was over, a jubilant team President Tom Wilson ran up to Carlisle to congratulate him, but Carlisle shouldered right past him without stopping.

    Of course, Carlisle was probably just off in his old thousand-yard stare, thinking of the Celtics in the second round, and hadn't even seen Wilson.

    Nevertheless, the story was still circulating a year later, and others like it. The tone was so tense, Piston beat writers were asking if Carlisle was in trouble at midseason, when it seemed unthinkable on merit.

    Dumars later said privately that his bosses had made him dump Carlisle and he grabbed the best coach he could find, who turned out to be Larry Brown, who had just left the 76ers.

    Carlisle was resigned to spending another year doing radio commentary when the earth opened up under yet another coach, Thomas, who was fired by Bird.

    Bird hired Carlisle, showing that rain doesn't always fall on the same Rain Man's head every day.

    Home Again in Indiana

    With the Nets withdrawing their extension offer to Byron Scott, who was going into the last year of his contract, all but officially confirming speculation he was in trouble, the coaches of the Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 finishers in the East were now either gone or going.

    When not firing coaches, the East has been busy getting walked on by Western teams in five successive NBA Finals, raising the question of just what is it they're doing back there?

    The Pacers, however, aren't the basic, little Eastern finesse-you contender. They have one of the game's best young big men, O'Neal, whom they got the old-fashioned way, stealing him from Portland for Dale Davis, shortly after their 2000 Finals loss to the Lakers.

    In fact, Pacer President Donnie Walsh had started retooling the season before, trading Antonio Davis for the draft rights to a high school player, Jonathan Bender.

    Bender remains an unfulfilled promise, but the Pacers hit it big with O'Neal.

    "People told me that [trading Antonio Davis] cost us a championship, Tony could have helped us against Shaq [O'Neal]," Walsh says. "I watched Tony against Shaq. If that's the best we've got, we ain't beating them….

    "When I got on the plane to come home [after losing to the Lakers in 2000], I looked at a lot of our guys and I went, 'They're never going to do it again. They gave everything they could give. This is over.'

    "And that's when I started making up my mind. I knew Rik [Smits] was going to retire. Jack [Mark Jackson] got a four-year deal in Toronto for big numbers. Then I traded Dale. And that was it."

    With Bird's leaving, Walsh tried the ex-local hero route again, hiring Thomas, who had two mediocre seasons (41-41 and 42-40) but seemed to break out in his third, with the young Pacers leading the NBA at 39-14 at the break.

    However, they were doing a sons-of-Isiah's-Bad-Boys routine that, pale as it was, kept them in the headlines, leading to recurring suggestions that the officials and the league were out to get them. Ron Artest, a comer but a mercurial one, was suspended so many times for flagrant fouls, the Pacers feared he would just ride off the reservation and never return.

    "Oh, I was scared to death last year," Walsh says. "I was really nervous about it because I couldn't tell if he could control it or not control it. I was talking to him all the time…. I told him, 'Look, Ron, you have to change. Because, if you keep going like this, they won't let you stay in the league.' "

    The Pacers unraveled from the All-Star break all the way to summer, finishing 9-15, then going home in the first round after being upset by No. 6 Boston.

    After an ominous silence, Walsh decided to give Thomas another season. However, in July, he also turned over day-to-day control of the operation to Bird.

    Bird, of course, had his own history with Thomas, arising from the Celtic-Piston wars of the '80s, during which a hurting Thomas agreed with a Dennis Rodman jibe that Bird would just be another player if he weren't white.

    Nevertheless, Bird says he came back, expecting to keep Isiah.

    "When I came in here, I did have an open mind," Bird said. "I was a little hesitant. I even asked the owners and I even told Donnie, 'If you want me to wait a year, I'd be willing to wait a year, because it's a tough situation, not only for me, but it'll be a tough situation for Isiah because of everybody out there saying, "When are they going to make the change?" '

    "I mean, it was from Day 1, I took the job, Isiah's gone, Isiah's not going to be here."

    Worse, if there were people in the organization who thought Thomas deserved one more shot, there weren't many who had confidence in him as a coach.

    So Bird decided not to wait a season. Thomas went. Carlisle arrived. Jermaine O'Neal erupted.

    "I think people kind of misunderstood what I was saying about Isiah," O'Neal says. "Obviously, he was a good coach because he inherited a team that no one wanted to play on, took players like myself, Al Harrington, Ron Artest and Jamal Tinsley and made them players, gave them confidence to be players.

    "With me and him, it was more of a personal thing. It was more of a father figure. The whole summer, I had asked them about Isiah and it was, 'Oh, he's going to be back.'

    "So when it happened, a couple of weeks after I signed, I was a little upset but … it's a business. One thing I've learned throughout this whole process, you can't control what happens in the front office. These GMs, presidents and owners are going to do exactly what they think is best.

    "What I can control is what happens on the court, sideline to sideline, baseline to baseline."

    Sideline to sideline, baseline to baseline, things look OK for the Pacers.

    They're second in defense, up from last season's 13th. Before Wednesday's game against the Clippers, they were tied for the best road record and 4-4 against the top five teams in the West.



    "You know, I don't even think about that anymore," Carlisle says of the changes he's seen in a year.

    "I'm really enjoying my experience in Indiana. I'm really enjoying the fact I have the privilege to be here, which is a unique privilege that's been made to happen by our players. I'm looking forward. I don't look back."

    Forward is good. So far, anyway.

    *

    (
    *

    Under Coach Rick Carlisle, the Indiana Pacers — owners of the best record in the Eastern Conference — are holding opponents to 85 points per game, which is 8.3 points less than last season. A statistical comparison between last season's Pacer team when Isiah Thomas was coach and this season's team with Carlisle:

  • #2
    Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

    "I think people kind of misunderstood what I was saying about Isiah," O'Neal says. "Obviously, he was a good coach because he inherited a team that no one wanted to play on, took players like myself, Al Harrington, Ron Artest and Jamal Tinsley and made them players, gave them confidence to be players.
    What the hell is Jermaine talking about here? We had just been to the Finals. I don't think that automatically makes us the Clippers. At least don't blatantly make things up when defending Isiah "There's a game today?!" Thomas.
    It sounds silly, but then he'd know before we would how the other teams' players in the league felt about the idea of coming here. We had come of the Finals.... and then been broken up and went youth and the coach had just bolted.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

      "I think people kind of misunderstood what I was saying about Isiah," O'Neal says. "Obviously, he was a good coach because he inherited a team that no one wanted to play on, took players like myself, Al Harrington, Ron Artest and Jamal Tinsley and made them players, gave them confidence to be players.
      What the hell is Jermaine talking about here? We had just been to the Finals. I don't think that automatically makes us the Clippers. At least don't blatantly make things up when defending Isiah "There's a game today?!" Thomas.
      It sounds silly, but then he'd know before we would how the other teams' players in the league felt about the idea of coming here. We had come of the Finals.... and then been broken up and went youth and the coach had just bolted.
      I understand all that. Even with that, this was still not a team that "no one wanted to play on". Just trying to make Isiah sound like he was the franchise saviour. Even if someone liked Isiah, I doubt they would ever call him that.
      Oh I have little doubt he was exaggerating it. But I can conceive of the idea that we weren't exactly a hot spot at that time.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

        Nice article, however they missed to mention the illuster, I don't dare say his name in fear of sparking another discussion over here, SIGN AND TRADE (dubbed "TRADE" by others) last summer, which makes this season even more remarkeable.

        Regards,

        Mourning
        2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

        2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

        2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

          The Pacers, however, aren't the basic, little Eastern finesse-you contender. They have one of the game's best young big men, O'Neal, whom they got the old-fashioned way, stealing him from Portland for Dale Davis, shortly after their 2000 Finals loss to the Lakers.

          In fact, Pacer President Donnie Walsh had started retooling the season before, trading Antonio Davis for the draft rights to a high school player, Jonathan Bender.

          Bender remains an unfulfilled promise, but the Pacers hit it big with O'Neal.

          "People told me that [trading Antonio Davis] cost us a championship, Tony could have helped us against Shaq [O'Neal]," Walsh says. "I watched Tony against Shaq. If that's the best we've got, we ain't beating them….
          This quote is actually quite interesting as I would not be surprised to see a repeat of this tactic this summer with some of our players IF we make a good run (atleast reaching the conference finals and putting up a fight). Because, I guess that would seriously raise the stock of our players compared to the trading deadline just last february, which IF true would mean Donnie is taking aim at this summer and expecting to deal and position us to have an even better chance of going for the title next year. Offcourse we would be the team this time that would trade the "talent" for the "proven".

          Regards,

          Mourning
          2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

          2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

          2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

            "I think people kind of misunderstood what I was saying about Isiah," O'Neal says. "Obviously, he was a good coach because he inherited a team that no one wanted to play on, took players like myself, Al Harrington, Ron Artest and Jamal Tinsley and made them players, gave them confidence to be players.
            What the hell is Jermaine talking about here? We had just been to the Finals. I don't think that automatically makes us the Clippers. At least don't blatantly make things up when defending Isiah "There's a game today?!" Thomas.
            It sounds silly, but then he'd know before we would how the other teams' players in the league felt about the idea of coming here. We had come of the Finals.... and then been broken up and went youth and the coach had just bolted.
            I understand all that. Even with that, this was still not a team that "no one wanted to play on". Just trying to make Isiah sound like he was the franchise saviour. Even if someone liked Isiah, I doubt they would ever call him that.

            Wasn't everybody's favorite player - Mr. Jalen Rose - signing a max contract with the Pacers that summer? And wasn't he so determined to return to the Pacers that he wouldn't even meet with any other teams? So I guess JO thinks Jalen is a "no body"? :P
            Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
            Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
            Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
            Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
            And life itself, rushing over me
            Life itself, the wind in black elms,
            Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

              "I think people kind of misunderstood what I was saying about Isiah," O'Neal says. "Obviously, he was a good coach because he inherited a team that no one wanted to play on, took players like myself, Al Harrington, Ron Artest and Jamal Tinsley and made them players, gave them confidence to be players.
              What the hell is Jermaine talking about here? We had just been to the Finals. I don't think that automatically makes us the Clippers. At least don't blatantly make things up when defending Isiah "There's a game today?!" Thomas.
              It sounds silly, but then he'd know before we would how the other teams' players in the league felt about the idea of coming here. We had come of the Finals.... and then been broken up and went youth and the coach had just bolted.
              I understand all that. Even with that, this was still not a team that "no one wanted to play on". Just trying to make Isiah sound like he was the franchise saviour. Even if someone liked Isiah, I doubt they would ever call him that.

              Wasn't everybody's favorite player - Mr. Jalen Rose - signing a max contract with the Pacers that summer? And wasn't he so determined to return to the Pacers that he wouldn't even meet with any other teams? So I guess JO thinks Jalen is a "no body"? :P
              Well, Jalen was already here. I think JO was referring to outsiders.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

                Wasn't everybody's favorite player - Mr. Jalen Rose - signing a max contract with the Pacers that summer? And wasn't he so determined to return to the Pacers that he wouldn't even meet with any other teams? So I guess JO thinks Jalen is a "no body"? :P
                I know Jalen talked with Detroit... who else did he talk to?

                Also, Jalen and Croshere weren't going to sign if Carlisle was the coach.
                This space for rent.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Robotic Carlisle, LA Times article

                  Wasn't everybody's favorite player - Mr. Jalen Rose - signing a max contract with the Pacers that summer? And wasn't he so determined to return to the Pacers that he wouldn't even meet with any other teams? So I guess JO thinks Jalen is a "no body"? :P
                  I know Jalen talked with Detroit... who else did he talk to?
                  Wrong.

                  "My head and heart the entire time was to be an Indiana Pacer," said Rose, who didn't even consider an offer from another team. "I said from the beginning that I was going to continue to remain an Indiana Pacer and try to do what I could to help this team and city win a championship."

                  http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m.../article.jhtml
                  Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                  Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                  Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                  Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                  And life itself, rushing over me
                  Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                  Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X