Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Old Article from Rick's Piston days

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Old Article from Rick's Piston days

    I was found this looking for Kozol's Death at an Early Age oddly enough.

    It's all dated but still interesting. Detriot Free Press

    An hour straight, and the guy played defense against him the entire time. That was interesting, Jerry Stackhouse thought. He made a mental note of it.


    He was aggressive, too, this rookie Pistons coach who sweated alongside Stackhouse and Mateen Cleaves at the gym last Wednesday.


    Rick Carlisle hasn't played in the NBA in a dozen years. And Stackhouse, the Pistons' star forward, said he wasn't much familiar with the coach's background. No reason to know of Carlisle's career as a longtime assistant, how it was born the same day he was waived as a player.

    Stackhouse was just working up a sweat, trying to finesse his way around the 41-year-old coach and former NBA guard who, at that moment, was Stackhouse's new boss and defensive nightmare at the same time.


    "I mean," Stackhouse said, lowering his voice, "some of his fouls are a lot harder than the guys I play against."


    Through it all, though, Stackhouse couldn't help but wonder about one thing. Nothing big, but the gym was hot that day. And Carlisle, Stackhouse was astonished to discover, did "almost the whole workout with a sweatshirt on."


    "I said to myself, 'This guy, there's something goin' on!' " Stackhouse said with a chuckle. "He's either in hell of a good shape or he's trying to lose weight, either one. He pushed just as hard as I pushed."


    By the end of the workout, their first meeting together, Stackhouse had it all figured out.


    And that was the interesting part.


    "In my own case, I'll never forget the first night I stood up there as head coach. I was over 52 years old at the time and had coached at every level.


    "I said to myself, 'I've got to learn who I am.' "


    -- Chuck Daly, 70, who coached the Pistons in 1983-92, including their only NBA titles in franchise history, in 1989 and '90.


    Understand one thing about Rick Carlisle: He's all about basketball.


    Certainly, not all basketball to his wife, Donna, a pediatrician, or to his parents back home in Lisbon, N.Y.


    Maybe not all basketball to close friends like radiologist Hal Cohen -- his childhood pal from upstate New York -- or to his brother Bill and sister Kari and his 12 nieces and nephews.


    But for the thousands of folks tired of seeing the Pistons struggle, Carlisle wants it known that he is focused on a single mission.


    For instance, spend an hour with Carlisle, whom team president Joe Dumars selected 13 days ago to become the Pistons' 23rd coach in franchise history, and it takes only minutes for a trend to develop.


    Bring up his hometown. He talks about basketball.


    Ask about his childhood friends. He brings up basketball.


    Explaining his reluctance to stray too far from the court, even in casual conversation, Carlisle says straight off: "I understand that there is some interest in who I am. I don't have a history with the Pistons other than the fact that I played with Boston for three years during the real heavy rivalry years.


    "I don't mind talking a little bit about these kinds of things, but for the most part, I think my strength is understanding the dynamics of this league. At this point in time, it's more important -- the things that me and my staff can do to help my players get ready to play -- than what people know about how I grew up and whether I took a few piano lessons and this or that."




    His point? It could be that he doesn't want to detract from his job. At least, that's one perception.


    After all, the Pistons gave him a three-year guaranteed deal, worth about $5.5 million, and Carlisle expects success from himself from the start.


    It's just that along the way, he will try his darndest to downplay attention on his reputation as a brilliant fellow away from the game. Discussions about his hobbies, such as his accomplishments in music (he's a terrific pianist, friends and family say) and other sports (he's also a talented golfer), won't be encouraged.


    Besides, if you really want to know, he's not much for sharing when it comes to his personal side.


    "The most important thing is that we get things going on the basketball side," said Carlisle, an NBA assistant coach for 11 years. "There are a lot of critical things that are going to happen that's going to shape this franchise for not only the next year, but over the next five or 10 years. Joe and I both understand that what's going on right now is really, really important."


    This week, Carlisle is at a pre-camp draft in Chicago. He is close to hiring the remaining assistants on his staff. He already has met with a few of his players.


    Still, what's a story about basketball -- about a rookie head coach who's a stranger in this town -- without learning about a few of the experiences that got him here?


    Put it another way: Who is he?


    "You've got to know both sides of the ball. I read an interesting article recently on Lou Piniella in which he said that managing baseball is all in the locker room.


    "You better understand the locker room and handle the dynamics of it. Everybody knows the game."


    -- Chuck Daly.


    Preston Carlisle thought nothing of it, even at first.


    Other players weren't keen on it -- allowing a 10-year-old boy to play on the same court with men two and three times his age.


    This was more than 30 years ago, when Preston Carlisle, Rick's father, played basketball four or five times a week, mostly to relieve stress from his job as an attorney.


    And Rick was his father's No. 1 teammate.


    The oldest son of Preston and Joan Carlisle's three children, Rick spent his childhood in upstate New York, in an area known as the North Country. He grew up in Lisbon, not far from Ogdensburg and the Canadian border.


    The surroundings of his youth were different from most. The family home was on a 185-acre horse farm called Sunnybrook, which still is owned by his parents.


    Thanks to his mother, Rick was an accomplished rider by the time he was a third-grader. But that was about the time a new hobby was developing.


    Even now, folks in Lisbon still remember Rick Carlisle.


    He was the kid who could spin a basketball on his finger like a Harlem Globetrotter. He was the first 1,000-point scorer at Lisbon Central, a small school that houses all grades -- kindergarten through 12 -- in one building.


    During those early years, Carlisle's confidence was boosted by knowing that he was the player who knew exactly where his father wanted the ball in pickup games: under the basket.


    "We would play at any gym at any place throughout the North Country," recalled Preston Carlisle, 70. "We went to Canton and Ogdensburg. We'd rent gyms. We'd play at the armory, at the high school, or St. Lawrence University. That's all I did was play basketball. Maybe that's what got him started."


    Rick Carlisle agreed.


    "Here's the deal: I would get in these pickup games with my dad, and he would always want me to throw him the ball, so I became a very good passer," Rick said. "Then I'd get out and be playing with my JV team, and he wanted me to shoot every time. There was this contradictory force -- and I laugh about it -- but he really helped me understand the aspect of vision, passing and position."


    When Carlisle was a kid, his best friend was Hal Cohen, who grew up in nearby Canton, N.Y., and played at Syracuse in 1977-80. Two years older than Rick, they met through their fathers.


    Cohen's dad was a gym rat, too.


    But in the months before joining their fathers on the court, the two boys played basketball on their own by slipping off their socks and rolling them up into a ball.


    "First of all, I think this is just a great story," said Cohen, 42, a radiologist at University Hospital in Syracuse. "Rick coming from a very small town, having this dream of playing in the NBA, and along the course of this dream he could have stopped at any point. He wasn't recruited hard in high school. He wasn't a really gifted athlete or anything. He just stuck with it and believed in himself.


    "It's a good story to tell your kids: If he can do it, you can do it."


    "There are so many different aspects of your job in addition to just coaching. Everyone wants to take a piece of your time, and you've got to learn to divvy it up and spread it around."


    -- Chuck Daly.


    Here are a few of Carlisle's idols when he was a kid: Wilt Chamberlain, Julius Erving, Bill Bradley, Scotty Bowman.


    Scotty Bowman?


    Carlisle explained: "We lived out of the city limits, and back in those days we didn't have cable TV. So what we watched, sports-wise, was 'Hockey Night in Canada' on Wednesday night and Saturday night. And in those days, the only pro coach I knew of was Scotty Bowman. I was a huge (Montreal) Canadiens fan. I remember watching Scotty Bowman behind the bench. I'm a big fan of his going back 25-30 years."


    Carlisle played hockey in the winters with his neighbors, but it didn't captivate him like basketball did.


    "I coached Rick in the ninth grade," said Al Dailey, Lisbon Central's athletic director. "He set every record we ever had at Lisbon. He was a great kid, totally devoted to basketball."


    After graduating from Lisbon Central in 1978, Carlisle didn't get any major-college offers. So he went to prep school for a year in Worcester, Mass., before playing at the University of Maine for two years. He then transferred to Virginia, sat out a year, and ended his college career as co-captain of Terry Holland's 1984 NCAA Final Four team.


    He graduated at 24, with a degree in psychology.


    "You could see that he would make an excellent coach," said Holland, now Virginia's athletic director. "He would shoot in the dark, which I discovered from him is a really good drill. Rick was one of these self-made players, and he spent a lot of time talking to coaches. I always thought he might gravitate back to college, but he's adjusted to life in the pros."


    Selected by Boston in the third round of the 1984 NBA draft -- the 70th pick overall -- Carlisle is modest when asked to describe his pro playing career.


    "Marginal would be generous," he said. "But I figured out what the business was all about. I figured out a way to survive for a few years."


    A role player who averaged 2.2 points a game, Carlisle reached the NBA Finals in each of his three seasons with the Celtics, helping them win the championship in 1986.


    After he was waived by Boston, Carlisle played with Albany in the Continental Basketball Association for three weeks. He got called up by the New York Knicks -- that lasted a season -- but during that year he suffered a dislocated shoulder. He spent the summer of 1988 trying to work his way back "and give it one more shot," he said.


    It worked. For a while.


    Carlisle caught the eye of Bill Fitch and the New Jersey Nets, who signed him to a non-guaranteed deal. But a few games into the season, Fitch called him.


    "He said, 'Well, you're waived,' " Carlisle said, recalling the phone conversation. "But he kind of said it with a sense of humor."




    That's because Fitch had a job offer. He wanted Carlisle to be one of his assistants. And that was how Carlisle got his start in coaching.


    "There wasn't a lot of thinking for me to do at that point," he said. "I was pretty much done as a player. I had a lot of nagging injuries, and it was getting to the point where it wasn't fun anymore. I had gotten basketball out of my system -- I really had. I was fortunate. Not everybody who gets waived out of the league can say that."


    "At the end of the game, the time when you take off your sports jacket, there's only one coach whose shirt is soaking wet. That's the head coach."


    -- Chuck Daly.


    As an assistant in the NBA, Carlisle has been associated with success -- two trips to the playoffs in five seasons with New Jersey, three appearances in three seasons with Portland, and three straight with the Indiana Pacers, including last season's NBA Finals.


    Known as an offensive specialist, Carlisle has worked for some of the top coaches in the league, including Fitch and Daly in New Jersey and Larry Bird in Indiana.


    When Bird resigned last summer, Carlisle was considered the favorite to become the next Pacers coach. But team president Donnie Walsh went with former Piston Isiah Thomas instead.


    Instead of diving right back to the bench, Carlisle spent this season as a television-radio analyst for the Seattle SuperSonics.


    "I missed (coaching), but in my own mind I knew that what I was doing was better for me," Carlisle said. "I think one of the most important things I've learned about myself is to be effective as who I am. I can't be Chuck Daly; I can't be Bill Fitch.


    "I've learned how to be more effective as a leader and a teacher -- as who I am -- to gain as much personal knowledge to help me be a better me. That might sound silly. There's probably a better way of saying that."


    No clarification needed for Stackhouse, whose first impression of Carlisle has been thumbs-up. Heck, he's still talking about that day in the gym.


    "You find out a lot about a person based on their competitiveness," Stackhouse said. "That's what we're trying to bring to the Pistons -- his competitive fire, my competitive fire. He's going to bring a professionalism. But different people will have different perceptions. Some people are going to perceive it as cocky or whatever, but that's where it's kind of funny -- that our parallels are similar."Asked what he meant, Stackhouse laughed.


    "Some of his knocks are also some of my knocks," Stackhouse said. "He's very confident about himself. You can tell that, and rightfully so."
    "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

    "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

  • #2
    Re: Old Article from Rick's Piston days

    Stack and Rick had a great relationship, and IMo the one year they spent together was Stack's best season to date.

    Comment

    Working...
    X