Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

    Originally posted by jrwannabe View Post
    Would have been happier keeping Scola and not signing JHill
    Can someone explain why we didn't do this? I never understood why we just let scola walk when we were desperate for bigs and he was cheaper than JHill.

    Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
    Lifelong pacers fan

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

      Originally posted by pacers_heath View Post
      Can someone explain why we didn't do this? I never understood why we just let scola walk when we were desperate for bigs and he was cheaper than JHill.

      Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
      I want to say that he didn't fit or didn't want to be part of the "faster tempo" gameplay in the beginning of the season. Keep in mind, Paul George was suppose to play the PF spot which made Scola kinda expendable.


      Remember when we could have gotten 1-2 solid players and a possible Top 3 draft pick in the 2017 NBA Draft by trading away Paul George?

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

        Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post
        I want to say that he didn't fit or didn't want to be part of the "faster tempo" gameplay in the beginning of the season. Keep in mind, Paul George was suppose to play the PF spot which made Scola kinda expendable.
        Yeah and that has worked out great for us. One is the starting PF for the 2 seed and the other plays in garbage time for the 7 seed.

        Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
        Lifelong pacers fan

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

          Originally posted by pacers_heath View Post
          Yeah and that has worked out great for us. One is the starting PF for the 2 seed and the other plays in garbage time for the 7 seed.

          Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk
          No...Paul George refusing to play PF is what killed that gameplay. The roster was constructed under the assumption that Paul George was on board. Although, Jordan Hill was technically brought in to be the back up center behind Ian, so I can't speak on why Jordan Hill is suddenly getting DNP's while Lavoy Allen is getting all the playing time. In a vacuum, I don't see how Allen is considered to be a better player than Hill.


          Remember when we could have gotten 1-2 solid players and a possible Top 3 draft pick in the 2017 NBA Draft by trading away Paul George?

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

            Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post
            No...Paul George refusing to play PF is what killed that gameplay. The roster was constructed under the assumption that Paul George was on board.
            I agree, but that was never a good idea in the first place. I know it worked for Larry later in his career, but PG and Larry are totally different kind of players. Asking a guy still rounding himself into shape from "the injury" to bang with PF's bigger than him just didn't make sense.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

              Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post
              In a vacuum, I don't see how Allen is considered to be a better player than Hill.
              I've mentioned this midway during the season; but, I was never too impressed with JHill. I don't consider Lavoy a great player by any stretch, but I like what he does more than Hill. Hill is a better shooter, but he also has Al Harrington syndrome. You might as well start going toward the basket for a rebound because he's most likely shooting it regardless if double-teamed or out of his shooting comfort zone. Lavoy usually fights for a rebound, sometimes almost or actually fouling to get to it. I've seen many times Jordan (whether a body on him or not) just watching the ball bounce off the rim, and an opposing player that was damn-near close to the 3-point line run in and rebound.

              Again, I'm not saying Lavoy is a bonefide starter or such...but, at least, I see him hustling and trying. Hill, on a lot of plays, has a "what's going on?" reaction, especially on the defensive end.

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                One thing (of many) that really disappointed me was how we lost composure so soon into the game. And don't anyone give me that "refs were favoring Raptors" sob story. They were getting hit and pushed just as much; but, they weren't pissing and moaning about it after every single play like we were. Hell, on some plays we were even pulling guys down to the floor and wasn't getting any fouls called.

                Plus, and I don't know whom to blame (players or coaches)...but how we could never match their energy or intensity. They wanted it more and it showed. We acted like since it was a home game, we'll automatically get every call and coast to a victory; or, that the last game was just an aberration, and that Toronto got lucky.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                  Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post
                  No...Paul George refusing to play PF is what killed that gameplay. The roster was constructed under the assumption that Paul George was on board. Although, Jordan Hill was technically brought in to be the back up center behind Ian, so I can't speak on why Jordan Hill is suddenly getting DNP's while Lavoy Allen is getting all the playing time. In a vacuum, I don't see how Allen is considered to be a better player than Hill.
                  Allen gets time cause PG-13 has said that prefers him on the court. When your star feels he plays better with certain players, the coach listens. This just isn't a good series for Allen. Scola pulls him away from the basket and has the ability to switch on the PnR. IMO, Whit is a much better fit in this series than Allen or J.Hill.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                    Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post
                    I want to say that he didn't fit or didn't want to be part of the "faster tempo" gameplay in the beginning of the season. Keep in mind, Paul George was suppose to play the PF spot which made Scola kinda expendable.
                    I think it was more that they didn't see the fit. Scola said he wanted to stay in Indiana and was willing to take less money and was saddened that it wasn't even an option.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                      Originally posted by pogi View Post
                      ............. I don't know whom to blame (players or coaches)...but how we could never match their energy or intensity. .......
                      IMHFO, this ALWAYS has to fall on the players on the court. A coach can only be so rah-rah and try to get guys pumped up and ready to play and all that stuff - but the guys on the floor are the ones that are responsible for not getting humiliated by the other team.

                      We don't have that one guy that will throw himself around, run just a little harder, defend just a little more. (I'm looking at you PG ................)

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                        Originally posted by jrwannabe View Post
                        I think it was more that they didn't see the fit. Scola said he wanted to stay in Indiana and was willing to take less money and was saddened that it wasn't even an option.
                        Plus, the numerous consecutive games where he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn didn't help neither.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                          Originally posted by joey View Post
                          I'm surprised that people are down on Solo in this thread. I thought he played well. I'll be really disappointed if Bird doesn't bring him back. He's a high character guy who out-efforts everyone on the court almost every game. He might be my favorite Pacer for that reason alone. Win or lose, I want guys like that on my team.
                          Solo has been much more useful than Miles or Stuckey. He is at least active. Stuckey is not active and CJ Miles looks like he's in his own head.


                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                            We have to be very realistic about the talent of this team. We have 1 top tier talent (Paul George), 1 very good young talent (Myles Turner), 2 good NBA players that are flawed (GHill and Monta), 1 good player who is injured right now (Ian). Then we just have a lot of "stuff" and "spare parts". Compare that to the Raps, Lowry, Derozan, Carroll, and Valanciunas are all guys that are top 12ish at their position in the NBA and almost all of those guys are complete players for what Toronto asks them to do (much like the really good Pacers teams Larry has built in the past), then they've gotten out and picked up strong specialists who fill in around that core plus a very complete off the bench point guard in Corey Joseph (which has been a major mismatch for Toronto all series long). Pacers bench turned back into the bench it was for most of the year outside of 6-7 games in April which is really just get their butts roundly beat by their matchup.

                            Lavoy Allen is a guy who should be a 15th man, realistically even though I like his effort this series, Solomon Hill is a guy who should be a 12th man, these are 2 guys we are picking between to start at power forward, that is a major talent pit for this team.

                            This is a transition year. Larry will make or break the next 5 years of the Pacers franchise this summer, that's where the real pressure lies. IMO you must find a way to move GHill or Monta to the bench. You need to slide Myles in as a starter and you need to upgrade the 4. Those are the 3 big offseason moves for Larry, if you can find the money to keep Ian as the backup then fine, but I wouldn't break the bank for it.


                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                              Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                              Do we think Monta would accept a role off the bench?

                              Also, I'd love to add Rondo for two reasons.

                              1. I love his passing ability. He truly makes guys better. He also knows his limitations and is able to shoot a high percentage in spite of his inconsistent jumper.
                              2. I love his edginess/toughness. I think that's something that's missing from this team and he could bring it in a big way. He would definitely be the alpha male in terms of personality
                              Hell yea. Pacers should have gotten rondo instead of Ellis

                              Sent from my Nexus 5X

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: ***Raps vs IND Game 3***Post game

                                Originally posted by jrwannabe View Post
                                Allen gets time cause PG-13 has said that prefers him on the court. When your star feels he plays better with certain players, the coach listens. This just isn't a good series for Allen. Scola pulls him away from the basket and has the ability to switch on the PnR. IMO, Whit is a much better fit in this series than Allen or J.Hill.
                                I must have missed that quote, but it sounds like Paul George is heading into that Lebron territory of dedicating what happens with the coaching. What happened to the days of where players played and coaches coached?


                                Remember when we could have gotten 1-2 solid players and a possible Top 3 draft pick in the 2017 NBA Draft by trading away Paul George?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X