Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The NFL Offseason Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

    I know the Colts are going to London this fall but even though its a road game I still hate it because at some point it is going to end up being a home game only a matter of time.

    All to cater to countries who's fans aren't going to care nearly as much about divisional games as we do.

    Comment


    • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

      Originally posted by Basketball Fan View Post
      Eh the NFL and all major pro sports have a level of shadiness associated with them but back then you could actually hide it.

      Not today though.

      I am bothered by them putting games overseas though I mean you have owners who blackmail cities into giving them stadiums and they want to take the games elsewhere.
      Agreed! Seeing more and more regular season games going abroad is so frustrating to see and upsets me as it is only a matter of time before Indianapolis loses a home game. The owners spout how much revenue that the local community gets during these home games when they want a new stadium. Yet, the owners turn around and send home games to other countries, which then is one less game for the city to receive that revenue.

      Comment


      • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

        It's all about the $$$. Players, coaches, owners say it over and over again...its a business

        Sent from my Nexus 5X

        Comment


        • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

          I wouldn't be surprised if we open the season in Denver


          http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...e-on-thursday/

          NFL will announce schedule on Thursday


          We now know when the “when” will be supplied to the “who” and the “where” of the 256 regular-season NFL games.

          The NFL has announced that the schedule will be announced on Thursday, April 14 at 8:00 p.m. ET.

          The plan originally had been to release the schedule next week, on Tuesday, the 19th, Wednesday, the 20th, or Thursday, the 21st. It’s unclear why the change was made.

          The schedule being ready for release is one obvious factor in the adjustment. Another factor could be the looming New York primary on Tuesday, which will generate far more interest than previously expected because the presidential races are tightening up in both major parties.

          Regardless, the evening before Tax Day will be, at least for this year, become Schedule Night for the National Football League.

          Comment


          • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

            http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...analytics-guy/

            Colts hire an analytics guy

            With the four low-rent years of Andrew Luck’s career squandered in Indianapolis and the Colts now faced with seeing their franchise quarterback consume a much larger chunk of the franchise’s salary cap, it becomes critical to make the most out of all draft picks and free-agent moves.

            They can start by, you know, not trading a first-rounder for guys like Trent Richardson.

            To assist in the process of getting the most out of the players who won’t be making $25 million or so per year, the Colts have announced that John Park has been hired for football research/analytics. “Park will incorporate and utilize statistical resources to provide support in various efforts such as player evaluations, salary cap, coaching, strength and conditioning and medical,” the team said in the press release announcing the move.

            Park’s NFL experience is limited. He spent the last four months as an intern in the NFL Player Engagement department. Before that, he spent time with the Browns as a remote independent contractor, working as a game charter.

            He graduated from Columbia after spending four years in the music industry, obtaining a degree in cultural anthropology. Park then worked as an actuary, consulting with Alvarez & Marshal’s and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

            Park has no title attached to his role, such as director or V.P. or anything like that. As a result, it’s unclear how much sway he’ll have with G.M. Ryan Grigson when the time comes to make decisions.

            Regardless, the fact that the team would announce the move so prominently shows that the Colts realize that they need to embrace this new approach to evaluating and developing players in some way, because they now need to not squander a single draft pick or low-level free agent signing, because the best draft pick they’ve made since Peyton Manning will soon be getting paid a lot more money than Manning ever made

            Comment


            • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

              The Titans have traded the #1 pick in the draft to the Rams.


              The Tennessee Titans and Los Angeles Rams agreed to terms on a trade that would see...

              Titans trade the number one overall pick, along with their fourth round (113 overall) and sixth round (177 overall) picks this year.

              Rams trade their first round pick (15), two second round (43 and 45) selections and third round (76) pick in 2016 ---- along with the Rams first round pick and third round picks in the 2017 NFL Draft.


              The Titans now own nine selections in the 2016 Draft, including six of the top 76 picks in the draft.
              "I have never taken the high road, but I tell other people to ’cause then there’s more room for me on the low road."

              Comment


              • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                Originally posted by TOP View Post
                The Titans have traded the #1 pick in the draft to the Rams.


                The Tennessee Titans and Los Angeles Rams agreed to terms on a trade that would see...

                Titans trade the number one overall pick, along with their fourth round (113 overall) and sixth round (177 overall) picks this year.

                Rams trade their first round pick (15), two second round (43 and 45) selections and third round (76) pick in 2016 ---- along with the Rams first round pick and third round picks in the 2017 NFL Draft.


                The Titans now own nine selections in the 2016 Draft, including six of the top 76 picks in the draft.
                Your thoughts?
                Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
                I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...

                Comment


                • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                  Originally posted by Natston View Post
                  Your thoughts?
                  FK.....
                  You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

                  Comment


                  • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                    Rams have the 1st pick then nothing until 2 4th rounders. it's a great move for the Titans.

                    Comment


                    • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                      Jeff Fischer FINALLY helping Tennessee win.

                      Comment


                      • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                        Originally posted by Natston View Post
                        Your thoughts?
                        Fisher and Rams are idiots. They probably could've gotten a QB where they were.

                        If not, they at least could have traded down just a bit and maybe only lost a 2nd rd pick

                        Comment


                        • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                          Did the Rams not learn from their fleecing of the Redskins? Sure they may get their QB, but then they do not pick again until the 4th round and they have to give up their first round pick next year for this guy. Its not like there is a cannot miss prospect like Luck sitting there.

                          It is cute to see the Rams think they will be anything other than .500 with Jeff Fisher as their head coach. I feel bad for this rookie QB and Gurley as they will be wasted for another season.

                          Comment


                          • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                            Originally posted by Natston View Post
                            Your thoughts?
                            I think it was great for the Titans. When I heard the package they turned down from the Eagles for Mariota, my mind was blown. Since then, I am glad they didn't since Mariota has been so good and by not taking the Eagles package(a bunch of players included on top of swapping picks)it could have won the titans a game or two keeping them from the 1st overall pick that just brought this haul in. I would have loved to get Tunsil to protect Mariota or maybe Ramsey if not Tunsil but Titans have so many needs that I like the trade a lot. I was looking forward to adding a potential cornerstone LT for Mariota and didn't care for moving back when protecting your franchise QB that has no protection should be priority number one. I didn't know they would get such a big offer though. It's a better package going forward building than the package the Eagles offered for Mariota and for now, Mariota has looked like a legit young QB going forward and was hyped more than these QB's in the draft who have yet to play a snap in the NFL. After keeping Mike Mularkey, I am at least glad they have a new GM(first timer) since something needed to be changed and I am more glad he made this move. Titans had the number one pick for a reason and no one player or rookie is going to turn them into a playoff team. Now have a lot more opportunities to hit on higher picks in hopes that multiple pan out and move forward with Mariota for years to come. If you take Tunsil and he turns out to be Robert Gallery, you're crap out of luck. They needed a way to add depth to this team and this trade gives them a better shot at rebuilding imo.
                            "I have never taken the high road, but I tell other people to ’cause then there’s more room for me on the low road."

                            Comment


                            • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                              I also like this for the Titans because they have the Rams #1 next year as well and the Rams will apparently be playing a rookie QB. Rams are a better team than the Titans and that's why they're picking middle of the draft instead of 1st like the Titans but if the rookie struggles or plays extremely poorly, Titans could be picking higher than 15 next year with the Rams 1st as well as their own 1st. If the rookie has a disaster year and the Rams finish bottom 5, Titans definitely didn't give up anything going forward. I like the trade regardless assuming the Rams at least miss the playoffs even if the pick isn't top 5 or 10. The potential could be there with a rookie QB though. Hate to root against a rookie... don't mind cheering against the Rams so much after the damn super bowl though. Jeff Fisher signing with the Rams annoyed me followed by signing a bunch of former Titans players but I now appreciate this trade he's hooked up Tennessee up with.
                              "I have never taken the high road, but I tell other people to ’cause then there’s more room for me on the low road."

                              Comment


                              • Re: The NFL Offseason Thread

                                Huge win for the Titans here. Odd move by the Rams. I could understand it better if there was a clear cut #1 quarterback but neither Goff or Wentz seems like that great of a prospect to me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X