Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers vs Rockets POST Game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

    Houston also played a junk defense for three quarters and still won. Teams are not supposed to be able to play three quarters of junk defense and beat a good NBA team.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

      I love Vogel but his end of game / end of quarter play calls are the worst. I mean there's nothing to them. Get the ball to PG and let him go 1 on 1 and 9/10 miss. Last night he goes to Monta at the end of the game who dribbles for 15 seconds....DOES get a screen and then throws up a bad shot. I don't understand.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

        Originally posted by D-BONE View Post
        One thing we've learned this year is you can't emulate Golden State's offense without true sharpshooters. PG and CJ just aren't consistent from distance. They're streak, but you need better than that if you intend to be a team that depends on the 3. No Korver (despite his craptacular year), K Thompson, Curry, Reddick, etc. GHill's pretty dependable, but again, consistent on the level of those aces? Then there's Monta who's played well in an overall floor sense, but who's bereft of his long-standing midrange game and who we seem hell bent on allowing to shoot from downtown as well, knowing full well he's not good at it.
        Like D-BONE said, it's tough to get shooters the quality of Golden State so I think we need a slight adjustment in our philosophy. Cut down on the 3 point attempts, get legitimate bigs that are athletic and can consistently hit from 15-20 feet. Continue with an uptempo pace.

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
          Well after the game I watched the Rockets post game show hoping that they would show that play maybe from a different angle. They did show it from a slightly different angle and it does appear that the ball glances off Monta's finger tip - at least the way the ball was spinning appears to change. it was not obvious, but that one angle is likely what the replay center used to change the call.
          If you watched gametime on NBA TV, they had a different angle of the play as well. I am assuming this is the angle that you saw because in that replay it did appear that the ball went out off of Monta.

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

            Originally posted by sav View Post
            Like D-BONE said, it's tough to get shooters the quality of Golden State so I think we need a slight adjustment in our philosophy. Cut down on the 3 point attempts, get legitimate bigs that are athletic and can consistently hit from 15-20 feet. Continue with an uptempo pace.
            Lol you mean be the Atlanta Hawks

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

              Originally posted by TMJ31 View Post
              I don't think you can make the claim that the play in question didn't have a direct impact on the game. It clearly did.

              No, the refs didn't cause us to leave Ariza open for the 20th time in the quarter. BUT they did make a terrible call that gave the Rockets the opportunity to get that shot, and an opportunity for the Pacers to play terrible defense.

              I don't know about everyone else. But I would rather have just accepted the fact that we played poor defense in the quarter and squeaked out a win by having the ball with a 3 point lead at that juncture. As opposed to giving them another crack at tying the game.

              That's what I don't understand about folks who (with all due respect) just shrug this stuff off and basically say "Well we were playing bad at that point, we didn't deserve to win anyway. So whatever."

              Seriously? This is now 3 blatant L's almost certainly should have been W's. THREE. Likely a huuuge factor in the playoff race when it's all said and done.

              Were there plenty of other plays during those games that could have tipped the outcome in our favor? Of course there were. But we didn't make those plays. But you know what DID happen? The league acknowledged that they blew/missed calls in the waning seconds that compounded our mistakes.

              Maybe we weren't playing great winning time basketball. But we were in a position to win (or send to OT) each and every one of those games. But the officials mistakes removed that possibility from us in that moment.

              In those precise moments, it was not the Pacers lack of execution, poise or focus that cost us the game. It was the officiating. It's indisputable. You can go read the reports on the official league website.

              THIS is what upsets me.

              I know full well we're playing like garbage at the end of games. But despite allllll that, we should have still (with near certainty) won against the Heat and Rockets and had a chance to take Bulls games to OT.

              We're just going to have to disagree on the significance of the issue. I have too much respect for you and others who share your opinion to get in a shouting match over it.

              I don't think the refs/NBA are "out to get us" with malice - with that being said, their mistakes HAVE indeed "gotten us" now several times this season.
              Your argument would have much more validity if Ariza would have hit that shot at the buzzer to tie the game, then you could at least argue that the play directly impacted the final outcome. However he hit that shot with 17 seconds left to play. That means the Pacers had 17 seconds to get off something resembling a quality shot and we all see how that went.

              However this is all a moot point now anyway since NBA tv is showing the other angle which has the ball going ever so slightly off of Ellis's fingertips thus making the call the correct call. But even if they were wrong, we still had 17 seconds to do something.

              The Miami game would be more of an issue since I believe Wade hit that basket with almost no time left on the clock.


              Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                In crunch time, either Vogel is calling garbage ISO plays or the players are butchering the plays he calls and going ISO on their own. It's beyond frustrating how we will have good ball movement for much of the game, but then when it gets to be under a minute we run garbage ISO junk that fails virtually every time. What the hell is Vogel drawing in those timeouts?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                  I don't see blaming the 3 for the Pacers offensive woes on a macro level. The Pacers are 16th in the NBA in percentage of FG attempts from 3 point range and 9th in 3 point percentage. They are 14th in free throws per field goal attempt.

                  The biggest thing that sticks out when looking at the Pacers numbers is that they shoot way too many long 2 point shots. They are 3rd in the league in percentage of attempts from 16 feet to the 3 point line, and they are only 23rd in field goal percentage from that distance.

                  The Pacers do need to get to the basket more (they have a glaring deficiency in shots less than 10 feet although it doesn't show up in their free throw numbers), but their 3 pointers are one of the best parts of their game. League average attempts, top 10 efficiency. I'll take that every time.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                    I can't wait till CJ hits a hot streak again. Sometime in the next 3 to 4 games PG and CJ will both be hitting shots, and we'll spank some team by 20.
                    Danger Zone

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                      Originally posted by Cubs231721 View Post
                      I don't see blaming the 3 for the Pacers offensive woes on a macro level. The Pacers are 16th in the NBA in percentage of FG attempts from 3 point range and 9th in 3 point percentage. They are 14th in free throws per field goal attempt.

                      The biggest thing that sticks out when looking at the Pacers numbers is that they shoot way too many long 2 point shots. They are 3rd in the league in percentage of attempts from 16 feet to the 3 point line, and they are only 23rd in field goal percentage from that distance.

                      The Pacers do need to get to the basket more (they have a glaring deficiency in shots less than 10 feet although it doesn't show up in their free throw numbers), but their 3 pointers are one of the best parts of their game. League average attempts, top 10 efficiency. I'll take that every time.
                      Well when 2 of your primarily ball handlers specialize in shooting free throw line extended jump shots, you are probably going to see that number pretty high. (Stuckey and Ellis)
                      There is no NBA player named Monte Ellis.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                        Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                        Lol you mean be the Atlanta Hawks
                        Yep. They seem to do pretty well...until the playoffs and since we supposedly have one of the top 5 players in the league, we should do better than them in the playoffs.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                          '
                          Originally posted by Peck View Post
                          Four games on the road, four leads in the 4th quarter squandered. Two wins two losses in overtime.

                          What is the common denominator in all 4 games when we start to lose 4th quarter leads? We feature a lineup of Jordan Hill, C.J. Miles & Rodney Stucky. We alternate between George Hill, Monta & Little Big Dog for the other two.

                          They are in, they lose momentum and then we try and rush in Ian & Paul to stem the tide. Twice it worked twice it didn't. I might point out that the two times it worked we were playing lower rung teams and the two times we lost one was a winning team (Miami) and the other was a talented team that has under performed (Rockets).

                          C.J. Miles played 26 min tonight and did not deserve to be on the floor 1/4 of that time.

                          I think I would just as soon Frank go back to starting Miles as opposed to giving him so many minutes with this group. They simply stated are atrocious when they are paired up unless they are scoring at will, which they have not been. I do NOT understand why we are using Miles exclusively at the 4. This is messing up rotations across the board and forcing us to play this crappy lineup. Again Myles Turner should get more minutes and Jordan Hill is more than capable of playing the 4 spot. All we have to do is move C.J. to the 3 and if you have to play him just don't play GR3 or play him at the two or something, anything would be better than this lineup.

                          I haven't hated a lineup this bad since Frank has taken over. I give him full credit for getting some development time for the young players but again why overplay Miles. I get what he is supposed to be and when he is hitting he can be superb but the fact of the matter is he isn't hitting and he hasn't been hitting for a few weeks other than here or there. Teams are not stretching their defenses to guard him right now and that again cuts off driving lanes.

                          Ugh.....I just do NOT see why this isn't crystal clear, or maybe I'm totally wrong I have no idea but I just hate that lineup.
                          It would seem to these old, jaded eyes that we lose or at least struggle in every game we start Lavoy over Miles. CJ is a rythmn shooter and seems to get better looks and rythmn playing with GH3 and Jumppass Ellis(New nickname!). If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Start Ellis, Hill, Miles, Paul, Ian. Make teams matchup with us, not us try to match up with them. Have to go big? Ellis or G3, Miles, Paul, Ian and either Turner or Jordan. IMHO, Lavoy has no reason to ever start. Having him on the floor setting screens that no one uses and missing most bunnies is a waste of time. Frank may well be at the place of having lost this team. I find it hard to believe he calls some of the best plays at timeouts and suddenly can't call one at the end of quarters or games. Maybe he needs to subtract the folks won't or can't run the plays he calls? Or could he be trying to get fired so he can move on up to the big city of Brooklyn?

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                            Originally posted by JimmyJames View Post


                            I agree with all of that brother. 29% from 3 as a team doesn't look good.

                            9/31 3's at 29% is disastrous. THIS TEAM SHOTS WAY TOO MANY 3's!!!! It's either in the paint baskets of some type or 3 pters. Need more mid-range scoring and LESS 3 pt shooting. You live by the 3 and you die by the 3. Personally, I'm tired of seeing 27 & 29% 3 pt FG shooting and 20 plus 3 pt shots. There is more ways to score than shooting 3 pters. You created this problem Bird now fix it.

                            P/s PG you aren't Meadowlark Lemon with the your dribbling and passing. This off season you need to work on your dribbling and watch video of your sloppy TO's.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                              Originally posted by Cousy47 View Post
                              '
                              It would seem to these old, jaded eyes that we lose or at least struggle in every game we start Lavoy over Miles. CJ is a rythmn shooter and seems to get better looks and rythmn playing with GH3 and Jumppass Ellis(New nickname!). If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Start Ellis, Hill, Miles, Paul, Ian. Make teams matchup with us, not us try to match up with them. Have to go big? Ellis or G3, Miles, Paul, Ian and either Turner or Jordan. IMHO, Lavoy has no reason to ever start. Having him on the floor setting screens that no one uses and missing most bunnies is a waste of time. Frank may well be at the place of having lost this team. I find it hard to believe he calls some of the best plays at timeouts and suddenly can't call one at the end of quarters or games. Maybe he needs to subtract the folks won't or can't run the plays he calls? Or could he be trying to get fired so he can move on up to the big city of Brooklyn?
                              They said during the broadcast that the team is 8-2 (now 8-3) when Allen starts. I believe all of our most positive of the +/- five man lineups have LaVoy Allen in them. Believe me there are times I want to throw something at my tv when he plays because I perceive him to be just coasting and has such a low motor. But then there are times when I am amazed at how well he does things and how when he plays really well the rest of the team gets a boost.

                              IMO the problem is that Frank for whatever reason feels the need to play C.J. at the 4 only now and that is cutting time from a player who should not have his time cut (Myles Turner). Jordan Hill is now exclusively a 5 which should not be the case, he should be playing with Turner at the 4. I say that because I love that J Hill has low post moves and boards but he offers zero in the way of paint defense or much defense of any nature for that matter.

                              Starting Miles is fine if it means that LaVoy will be playing along side of Myles Turner and Turner would be playing the vast majority of the backup 5 minutes. IMO this season is mostly about making sure that Turner develops because I believe he is our future.


                              Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Pacers vs Rockets POST thread

                                While I don't think you can blame the refs entirely for a loss, I think it's perfectly fair to complain about blown calls in close games on the road. No matter how well you execute, it's hard to win games on the road and every edge matters.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X