Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Stein's playoff power rankings (ranked in order of title chance)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stein's playoff power rankings (ranked in order of title chance)

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playof...=2042250&num=0

    And the winner is ...

    By Marc Stein
    ESPN.com

    There is no need for Power Rankings in the playoffs. The playoffs settle all the debates our beloved Power Rankings generate.

    However ...

    After the final edition of my regular-season Power Rankings and before the playoffs start, there is one more handy list to share:

    It's our countdown of playoff qualifiers from No. 16 to No. 1, in order of each team's title chances.


    16. Washington Wizards
    This is a franchise that hasn't won a playoff series since 1982, and only the Clippers (stretching to their Buffalo Braves days in 1976) have a longer drought.

    To end their own barren spell and beat Chicago, these Wizards must have dominance from each arm of the league's highest-scoring trio (Gilbert Arenas, Larry Hughes and Antawn Jamison).

    The Bulls are shorthanded, true, without the sidelined Eddy Curry and Luol Deng, but Curry wasn't an automatic fourth-quarter participant for coach Scott Skiles in spite of his status as Chicago's only down-low scoring threat. Figure that the Bulls, even without Curry, can punish Washington's defensive and rebounding shortcomings while making Arenas, Hughes and Jamison work hard for their points. In what has to rank as one of the surprises of the season, in a season filled with them, Chicago still leads the league in opponent field-goal percentage at .422. Which makes me believe the Bulls advance at Washington's expense.

    15. New Jersey Nets
    If they didn't have to play Miami, the Nets would undoubtedly be generating plenty of East Sleeper pub now that Richard Jefferson will be joining Jason Kidd and Vince Carter for the postseason. Of course, it should be noted that Jefferson's physical activity has been limited to almost nothing since his January wrist surgery, raising questions about just how much he'll be able to contribute. "To put a whole lot of stock in (the idea) that he's going to be a big factor would probably be putting too much on him," Nets coach Lawrence Frank told us on Tuesday night's "NBA Nation" on ESPN2.

    Yet we're guessing the Heat would have been a lot happier to see LeBron James' Cavaliers in Round 1.

    14. Sacramento Kings
    Imagine a Sacto playoff lineup without any of the following names: Chris Webber, Peja Stojakovic, Brad Miller, Vlade Divac, Bobby Jackson and Doug Christie.

    It's a very real possibility with Webber, Divac and Christie in exile and the other three Kings mainstays dealing with injuries. Jackson (wrist) will undoubtedly play some against the Sonics, but he was planning a return to action for Wednesday night's regular-season finale (after missing 57 games) without the benefit of a single practice. Stojakovic (groin) is questionable for Saturday's series opener at Seattle and obviously won't be at full strength if he does play. And Brad Miller (leg) might have to wait a few games before joining the fray, meaning that the Kings could be missing all three of the passing big men who made them so dangerous in years past. Mike Bibby remains one of the league's better clutch shooters, but Bibby alone can't replace the missing production of the aforementioned quintet.

    13. Memphis Grizzlies
    Because of the Grizzlies' depth and physical nature on the perimeter, Phoenix insiders have considered Memphis an unappetizing matchup for some time. The Grizzlies have the capacity to rough up Steve Nash and keep the tempo reasonable, as the Suns learned by failing to reach 100 points twice in the three games Nash played in the season series.

    The bigger concern for the Grizz is its own offense. After a gutty 15-8 run to solidify its playoff position with Pau Gasol out for nearly two months, Memphis has struggled to transition back to Gasol getting 20-to-25 touches in the low post every night. Without Pau, Memphis had settled into more of a pick-and-roll/penetration-and-pitch flow, relying on smaller lineups and the occasional long ball, too.

    What's clear is that the Grizzlies won't let regular-season success breed overconfidence, after winning three of four meetings with San Antonio last season and then losing four straight to the Spurs in the first round. "Last year we learned a great deal about hoping to play someone in the playoffs," said swingman Shane Battier. "We didn't want them -- you never want Tim Duncan -- but we had some confidence. And they just destroyed us."

    12. Philadelphia 76ers
    Folks like to focus on how much Chris Webber has struggled since moving from Sacto to Philly. I see it differently.

    Now that the Sixers are in the playoffs, the pressure is totally off them, especially since they're facing a title contender instead of the Celtics, which would have given the Sixers a reasonable shot to advance. In this no-win situation, Webber can relax a tad and try to finally find a groove alongside Allen Iverson, as opposed to being blamed for the Sixers' demise ... which is surely what awaited Webber had Philly failed to qualify.

    History tells us that only one Iverson teammate has ever averaged 20 ppg -- Jerry Stackhouse (20.7 ppg) in The Answer's rookie season -- but I still say it's too soon to write off the partnership. The way Iverson has dominated lately, willing the Sixers into the playoffs, maybe for his next trick he and Webber can give the Pistons a little scare.

    11. Boston Celtics
    The Celtics have intrigued me all season, without any arm-twisting from Bill Simmons and even before the reacquisition of Antoine Walker. No one else in the 16-team field can offer a similar array of big-name vets with fiery personalities (Paul Pierce, Ricky Davis and Gary Payton in addition to Toine) flanked by a clutch of promising youngsters (Al Jefferson, Tony Allen and Delonte West). The encouraging comeback of Raef LaFrentz is another boost, providing the Celts with some size (by East standards) to offset the indifference displayed by a hugely disappointing Mark Blount.

    In spite of all that, though, I wonder how long these guys can hang around. Boston was my pick all along to win the Atlantic (again, before Toine's return) but I don't like its chances in the first round, especially now that the Celtics are facing the Pacers rather than the Sixers. The Celtics are just too porous defensively, and those personalities are just as apt to clash as they are to mesh if Boston falls behind in a series.

    10. Houston Rockets
    The Rockets are 35-16 since Jan. 1 and sport a 28-19 record against teams with records over .500, placing them fifth in the league in both categories. They have a blossoming one-two punch in Tracy McGrady and Yao Ming and they figure to have an edge at point guard in their intrastate clash with the Mavericks by sending Bobby Sura and Mike James against Jason Terry and rookie Devin Harris.

    What they won't have in these playoffs is the know-how of Juwan Howard, a former Mav who was the only player on Jeff Van Gundy's roster who had a remote chance of shadowing Dirk Nowitzki. Howard's unavailability for the rest of the season might force Van Gundy to give McGrady some Dirk duty, which obviously isn't the ideal scenario given T-Mac's offensive responsibilities.

    Houston has been almost as hot as Dallas lately, but the Mavericks are the deepest team in the league and have finally found health at a time when so many other clubs have serious health issues. Those developments will likely make the difference.

    9. Denver Nuggets
    So who are these guys? The Nuggets who went 17-25 before George Karl's arrival? The Nuggets who went 24-2 from Feb. 23 to April 15? The Nuggets who got waxed at Houston and at Phoenix in the past week after the nationwide buzz starting getting really loud?

    Even after those recent hiccups, Denver remains the Lower Seed No One Wants To Play because of its second-half surge ... and because the Nuggets, unlike Houston, are expected to have their full complement of players available in the postseason -- even sharpshooter Voshon Lenard, who went down with Achilles' tear on Opening Night.

    It's tough to see the Nuggets winning a Spurs series, but San Antonio is undeniably worried, knowing that Karl will push the pace at every opportunity to put as much strain as possible on Tim Duncan's tender ankle. You're also bound to see Karl throw a variety of bodies at Manu Ginobili in an attempt to work over the Spurs' second-best player as well. In the end, however, Denver will rue its inability to rise to No. 6. It's safe to say the Nuggets would have widely favored to upset Seattle in the first round if they hadn't fallen short of the sixth slot.

    8. Chicago Bulls
    For only the 10th time in league history, a team is heading to the postseason without its leading scorer ... and eight of those 10 teams were dismissed in the first round.

    The Bulls, though, aren't fretting too much about history, for a couple of reasons. Reason No. 1: Curry is indeed Chicago's top scorer at 16.1 ppg, but the Bulls' go-to guy is the very available Ben Gordon, a Goose Gossage-like closer (21 double-digit fourth quarters) who's bidding to become the first rookie ever to win Sixth Man Award honors. Reason No. 2: In spite of the scary Curry situation and the loss of Deng and a brutal schedule in February and March, Chicago is a stunning 38-17 since Jan. 1. That ranks the Bulls fourth in the league, behind only Detroit (39-14), Dallas (38-14) and Phoenix (37-15) and ahead of three more heavyweights: Houston (35-16), Miami (34-16) and San Antonio (34-16). They can handle adversity, in other words, as confirmed by the Bulls' recovery from that 0-9 start.

    7. Seattle SuperSonics
    Let's be honest. Media types all over would be picking against the Sonics in Round 1 even if the Sonics were healthy. Since they're not healthy, and not really close to full strength, Ray Allen says he can't get too upset at anyone underestimating his team. "Rightfully so," Allen said when asked to react to the notion that lower seeds have been lining up a first-round shot at the Sonics. Vladimir Radmanovic (foot) is likely to miss the start of the Sacramento series and Rashard Lewis (foot) and Luke Ridnour (plantar fasciitis) will be playing hurt for as long as Seattle lasts in the postseason. The good news? The Kings are in worse shape physically than the Sonics, which gives Allen hope that his team can shame anyone who picks Sacramento ... just as Seattle made so many of us look bad by racking up 52 wins and a comfortable margin at the top of the Northwest Division.

    6. Indiana Pacers
    They've survived all the suspensions and injuries. They've welcomed back Jermaine O'Neal and resurrected Dale Davis to join the retiring Reggie Miller for one last playoff run. They didn't finish the regular season especially well, but trust us: This is a team none of the East top seeds wants to see.

    "I feel extremely confident that we're going to be a tough team to knock out," O'Neal said, refusing the chance to complain about the absence of Ron Artest for the playoffs. "We're at the point where we think something good has to happen for this team."

    Said team president Donnie Walsh: "I know that no matter what happens in the playoffs, I'm going to be very pleased with the way this team has handled the whole season."

    Even without Artest, I fully expect the Pacers to upset the No. 3 Celts and then take the Pistons to seven in Round 2. Pacers vs. Pistons has to go seven -- those are the rules.


    5. Dallas Mavericks
    So how do you recover from the loss of the NBA's MVP? Or, at the very least, the NBA's MVP runner-up?

    All Dallas did to soften the blow of Steve Nash's departure is splash out millions on its first productive center (Erick Dampier) since James Donaldson ... replace the Sixth Man Award winner (Jamison) with a sixth man (Jerry Stackhouse) who's even more aggressive and effective ... take on a huge contract (Keith Van Horn) so that it has a seventh man more dangerous than most teams' top reserve ... and find a coach (Avery Johnson) who actually has the Mavericks scoring more than they did for Don Nelson but defending worlds better.

    In Johnson's 17 games in charge as the full-time head coach, Dallas is averaging 102.9 points (compared to 102.3 under Nelson) while allowing on 92.5 points per game on 42.6-percent shooting. Write it down: If the Mavericks consistently hold teams under 93 points in the playoffs, they really are the title contender the locals in Big D increasingly believe they are.

    4. Miami Heat
    Rather surprisingly, this was not the best regular season in franchise history. The Heat of 1997-98 won 61 games, two more than Shaquille O'Neal's crew.

    But Miami was a first-round victim in the spring of 1998, losing to hated New York in five games. Chances are far better that this edition of the Heat will not be beaten before the conference finals, and it's certainly capable of going all the way to the championship round.

    What could stop them? Besides Shaq's uncertain health, Miami's areas of concern are rhythm -- which has been lost totally with O'Neal in and out of the lineup during the past few weeks -- and Detroit's ability to guard O'Neal straight-up. No team is better staffed to deal with O'Neal than the Pistons, which limits the abilities of those around him. To unseat the defending champions, Miami will have to have monster play from Dwyane Wade and a healthy contribution from Alonzo Mourning.

    3. Phoenix Suns
    One of the most ill-conceived comparisons we hear regularly is the notion that the Nash-era Suns play the same game seen from the Nash-era Mavs. Not so. Nash's Suns have more 3-pointer shooters than those Mavs did and an even bigger difference: Amare Stoudemire. The Mavs have never had a power player in the class of Stoudemire, who makes the defense protect the rim and thereby opens up the floor for all the shooters.

    That's why we're picking Phoenix to beat Dallas when the teams meet in the second round. Believing this week's insistence from commissioner David Stern that games will be called in the playoffs the same way they were called in regular season -- which translates to cracking down on excessive contact on the perimeter -- we see San Antonio as the only team out West capable of stopping the Suns from making a storybook sprint to the Finals.

    2. Detroit Pistons
    They finished the season with an 11-1 spurt. They can claim a 16-2 record over the past two Aprils. So the defending champs move from an uneven regular season into the playoffs making you wonder if they knew exactly what they were doing all along.

    "We didn't have the best season, but we feel like we have the best team," said guard Chauncey Billups. "If other teams feel like that, they have to come through Detroit."

    The Pistons, actually, will have win some big road games to repeat, since they're unlikely to have home-court advantage in the conference finals or the NBA Finals. But don't expect to see any serious fretting out of Detroit. No team out there can top the Pistons' 40 wins since Jan. 1 and not even the drama surrounding Larry Brown's likely exit at season's end has distracted them lately. Expect to see them in the Finals again.

    1. San Antonio Spurs
    Spurs insiders are understandably nervous about Duncan's tentative movement after three ankle sprains and the lingering discomfort in Ginobili's groin. But I prefer to focus on the attributes that make this group as dangerous as any team they've ever had in San Antonio, including the two that won championships.

    With Ginobili and Tony Parker constantly progressing and two dangerous shooters off the bench (Brent Barry and recent signee Glenn Robinson) the new Spurs are equipped to win with offense as well as defense.

    The concern is the front line, and not just because of Duncan's iffy health. San Antonio still must prove it can win a title without David Robinson, which equates to Duncan getting quality help from Rasho Nesterovic, Nazr Mohammed, Robert Horry and Tony Massenburg.

    Just don't forget that the Spurs have something that only Detroit, of the 16 teams listed here, can claim: title-tested veterans who have another gear or three to go to at tournament time. "By the time we blinked, the playoffs were over," Memphis' Battier said, recalling the Spurs' sweep of the Grizzlies last spring. "San Antonio played at a different level than they did when we played them in the regular season. It was a totally different level, and that's why they're always one of the favorites."

    Marc Stein is the senior NBA writer for ESPN.com. To e-mail him, click here. Also, click here to send a question for possible use on ESPNEWS

  • #2
    Re: Stein's playoff power rankings (ranked in order of title chance)

    Pacers v. Pistons only went to 6 last year...

    Still, I agree.
    This space for rent.

    Comment

    Working...
    X