Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

    I thought this deserved it's own thread especially because the "Bird too far" thread was getting into our front court depth.

    Pretty good article that shows how we may have improved down low and maybe the transition for PG won't be dramatic.


    Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

    The Pacers are changing their fundamental style this season, chasing the trends of uptempo, small-ball and versatility that won the Warriors a championship three months ago. According to team president Larry Bird, playing Paul George a lot at power forward is a big part of the plan.

    A lot of the appeal of playing George at power forward is about turning defense into offense, pushing the pace and attacking in transition. The Pacers spent the past four seasons with David West and Roy Hibbert manning power forward and center, but in losing both this offseason, were gearing for a new look. That's all well and good, but figuring it out how it all works is a little murkier.

    Projecting George into small-ball units is a bit of a challenge, as there is really no sample size to go on. For essentially his entire career, the Pacers have been committed to pounding the ball inside and packing the paint with big lineups. According to Basketball-Reference's position estimates, George has never played more than 1 percent of his minutes in any season at power forward.

    That likely means a change in role. The shot chart below, courtesy of Seth Partnow, shows the average shot distribution for power forwards from last season:



    Comparing that to George's shot chart from 2013-14 reveals a lot of similarities:



    This shot chart shows both George's distribution of shots and how effective he is from each area, compared to the league average field goal percentage. The distribution has some overlap with what we see from power forwards — activity around the basket, at the elbows, along the baseline, and behind the three-point line. The difference is in how those shots are created.

    At Nylon Calculus, Adam Mares looked at the ways in which NBA bigs are involved on offense, using the NBA's Synergy Sports play type statistics. Mares' research found that the average NBA big uses most of his half-court possessions in one of three ways — post-ups, spot-ups or as the screener in the pick-and-roll. Although we only have six games worth of data for George last season, he didn't finish a single possession in a post-up or screening in the pick-and-roll.

    It remains to be seen exactly how committed the Pacers are to this small-ball experiment and exactly how many minutes Bird is talking about when he says, "a lot." A guesstimate of somewhere between 10 and 40 percent gives a wide and somewhat reasonable starting point. This would put George in the same range as players like Carmelo Anthony, Tobias Harris and Chandler Parsons — the point being that even in small lineups, we shouldn't expect Indiana to use him as they would a traditional power forward.

    In the past, George has frequently been used as a spot-up shooter but the rest of his offensive responsibilities are filled out with isolations and screens from other players, both off the ball and with the ball in his hands. The Pacers like to run George along the baseline, setting screens and curling out to receive the ball at the elbow. Those sets, in particular, could be interesting in small-ball lineups. Instead of having two bigs pulling defenders into the paint, like he saw in the past with David West and Roy Hibbert, George could find plenty more room to operate with three or even four other three-point shooters around him.

    Depending on the context, we might also expect to see George getting more opportunities to post-up in advantageous matchups. In May, Grantland's Zach Lowe wrote an extensive piece about the rebirth of the post-up game in the NBA. One of the key threads was that creative lineups create mismatches and that postups are a way to take advantage. Lowe specifically mentioned smaller players who could pass out of the post as an emerging weapon, saying, "Guards who can post up are especially valuable because they are natural passers. Smart post passing is a necessity now that defenses can bait post-up threats with all kinds of tricky help coverages."

    Being able to post-up George against certain players, particularly with the added spacing and shooting their new roster features, could open a world of possibilities. The other side of that coin is that other teams will almost certainly try to take advantage of him in the same way.

    This is where the rubber meets the road — how Indiana's small-ball lineups will adjust defensively. Obviously, George's health is a huge concern and how his legs will handle the pounding of defending larger players. Even if he's healthy, there are challenges to be worked out. The Pacers have several options at center — Jordan Hill, Ian Mahinmi and Myles Turner — who offer varying levels of rim protection. Mahinmi is excellent. Turner certainly looked great at the Orlando Summer League. Hill at least tries.

    George likely won't be asked to provide a ton in that area but he certainly can help if called upon. According to Partnow's Rim Protection statistics, in his limited minutes last season, George's interior defense saved an average of 2.7 points per 36 minutes. That's well above the 1.94 mark for an average NBA wing.

    In a perfect world, George could be dynamic defending opposing bigs in the pick-and-roll. He's quick enough to hedge aggressively or switch onto a small ball-handler. He's also a turnover-creating machine and finished eighth in the league in steal percentage in 2013-14. However, there will also be a temptation to adjust defensive matchups when George is on the floor. He's the Pacers best perimeter defender and in the past has almost always matched up with an opponent's best wing scorer. The need to use him as a stopper for players like Jimmy Butler and LeBron James may be too great, forcing the Pacers to get creative with who defends the opposing power forward.

    Ultimately, imagining George as a power forward is just that — imagination. He's never been slotted into anything resembling this role at the NBA level, so it's extremely hard to project how it will work for him. And Indiana has never really used anyone in this role, at least not in the Frank Vogel era.

    What they ask of George will depend on how far they are willing to go in this experiment.

    http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/stor...outlook-season

  • #2
    Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

    There's no question PG will be effective offensively. The question is how to handle defending tradition 4's with PG.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

      Then again, how many "traditional" power forwards are there? He won't go up against David West (the proto-typical power forward) every night, and he could probably do ok against him anyway.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

        Originally posted by PaceBalls View Post
        Then again, how many "traditional" power forwards are there? He won't go up against David West (the proto-typical power forward) every night, and he could probably do ok against him anyway.
        When Melo and LeBron played at the 4, were you fearful or happy?

        I was always happy.
        This space for rent.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

          Originally posted by Anthem View Post
          When Melo and LeBron played at the 4, were you fearful or happy?

          I was always happy.
          Really?!

          I hated it. I want them around the perimiter taking jumpshots. Both are a tough cover catching on the block and going to work.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

            Originally posted by Anthem View Post
            When Melo and LeBron played at the 4, were you fearful or happy?

            I was always happy.

            Replacing LeBron at the 4 with Shane Battier single-handedly saved Miami in the 2013 series. Before that change, LeBron was worn down from trying to guard West.


            And LeBron is much bigger than Paul George.

            The only argument I've seen so far to warrant George at the 4 was Rashard Lewis at the 4 for the Magic.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

              Melo PER and production is better at the 4.

              Lebron, while pretty much the same in scoring, posted career highs in rebounds and steals when he moved to the 4 in 2012.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                Originally posted by freddielewis14 View Post
                Really?!

                I hated it. I want them around the perimeter taking jumpshots. Both are a tough cover catching on the block and going to work.
                They're also a tough cover when they're taking their man off the dribble. One of them (sorry Melo) is a scary passer at the top of the key. Neither of them can control the game as well on the block.

                Most of all, though, playing the 4 made them tired. Sure, it looked good early, but it wore them down over the course of a game and especially, in the playoffs, a series. I don't want to see Paul George worn down, even though I believe he'll get good numbers at either the 3 or the 4.
                This space for rent.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                  Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                  Replacing LeBron at the 4 with Shane Battier single-handedly saved Miami in the 2013 series. Before that change, LeBron was worn down from trying to guard West.


                  And LeBron is much bigger than Paul George.

                  The only argument I've seen so far to warrant George at the 4 was Rashard Lewis at the 4 for the Magic.
                  Right, and Battier is much smaller than Lebron.



                  So it has a lot to do with freshness of the body and our man Larry has made sure we can put a lot of 4s on the Nenes and Westes of this world by getting rid of the players who can only play the 5 (or comparable the 1). IMO Bird is a genius and lots of normal folks have difficulties understanding how geniuses think. Even if for some reason the Paul at the 4 or the only combo guards doesn't work out, I think it's GREAT he is trying innovative stuff like this this and if it doesn't work out, there is still Conley or Horford.

                  We are the Pacers, we don't have luxury tax to spend. We won't get the biggest names like Durant in draft or FA. We have to be creative, think about stuff before others think about it.
                  That's how we gonna we a title. Jeez, it's almost training camp, time to switch those negative buttons off and wait till it actually happens. Do you gain anything by being so negative about something that hasn't even happened? I call that wasted energy, no matter what the outcome.

                  I never thought we would win anything with Hibbert and I tried to trade him multiple times and bashed him multiple times, but every time the season and playoffs started, I felt a positive vibe that Hibbert was going to prove me wrong...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                    Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                    They're also a tough cover when they're taking their man off the dribble. One of them (sorry Melo) is a scary passer at the top of the key. Neither of them can control the game as well on the block.

                    Most of all, though, playing the 4 made them tired. Sure, it looked good early, but it wore them down over the course of a game and especially, in the playoffs, a series. I don't want to see Paul George worn down, even though I believe he'll get good numbers at either the 3 or the 4.
                    I agree with some of this, but the point is versatility. Lebron and Melo being able to play or start at the 4 is an advantage when used correctly. The Pacers are looking to gain that same advantage.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                      Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                      Most of all, though, playing the 4 made them tired. Sure, it looked good early, but it wore them down over the course of a game and especially, in the playoffs, a series. I don't want to see Paul George worn down, even though I believe he'll get good numbers at either the 3 or the 4.
                      It could happen at the 3 as well though. Few best players of their teams find the energy to be great on both sides of the court. Even Lebron found out. I doubt there would eb much difference if he had to chase a player a lot in stead of battling him trough contact.
                      This is why I'm praying Solo can contribute offensively, cuz we could really use another defender to take pressure off Paul. But I'm guessing it will be Birds next move to find another very good 3/4 defensively, now that we have the offense covered with Monta.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                        Lebron first played the 4 for Miami's first championship and in the regular season 82% of his minutes were at the 4 and that went to 92% in the playoffs.

                        It's pretty hard to argue that Lebron and Miami wasn't successful with James at power forward when that's how he got his first ring.

                        For Melo we can compare what he produces...

                        Last edited by freddielewis14; 09-22-2015, 11:51 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                          Originally posted by MvPlumlee View Post
                          This is why I'm praying Solo can contribute offensively, cuz we could really use another defender to take pressure off Paul.
                          Who would he play in front of? Even if we put PG and Chase as our full-time PF combo , here's what we've got as a depth chart.

                          George Hill, Joe Young, Toney Douglas
                          Monta Ellis, Rodney Stuckey
                          C.J. Miles, Solomon Hill, Glenn Robinson
                          Paul George, Chase Budinger, Lavoy Allen
                          Jordan Hill, Ian Mahinmi, Myles Turner, Shayne Whittington, Rakeem Christmas

                          I don't get it.
                          This space for rent.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                            Originally posted by Anthem View Post
                            Who would he play in front of? Even if we put PG and Chase as our full-time PF combo , here's what we've got as a depth chart.

                            George Hill, Joe Young, Toney Douglas
                            Monta Ellis, Rodney Stuckey
                            C.J. Miles, Solomon Hill, Glenn Robinson
                            Paul George, Chase Budinger, Lavoy Allen
                            Jordan Hill, Ian Mahinmi, Myles Turner, Shayne Whittington, Rakeem Christmas

                            I don't get it.
                            Candace tweeted Chase is competing for starting 3. So our depth would look closer to this with starting center/rotation being undecided...

                            GHill/Young/Stuckey
                            Ellis/Stuckey/Ghill
                            Chase/CJ/Solo
                            PG/Lavoy/Jordan Hill/Whittington
                            Turner/Ian/Jordan Hill/Christmas

                            The reason why the depth chart seems so screwy is the NBA is moving away from a traditional 1-5 and simply just playing the best combination of players that are versatile enough to effectively defend and score. The Pacers are trying to achieve that with players that are fast for their size, long, and can play multiple positions.
                            Last edited by freddielewis14; 09-23-2015, 01:01 AM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Paul George at power forward: Pacers' crazy plan can work

                              Originally posted by freddielewis14 View Post
                              The reason why the depth chart seems so screwy is the NBA is moving away from a traditional 1-5 and simply just playing the best combination of players that are versatile enough to effectively defend and score. The Pacers are trying to achieve that with players that are fast for their size, long, and can play multiple positions.
                              And I hope it works because I call that that jack of all trades, master of none basketball system. It's the kind of thing that sounds good on paper but seeing it in action it never plays out like you hope. You can always have an uber-versatile player. Maybe if you are really lucky, two. But reality is, it's hard finding that one player, let alone a team of them.
                              Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                              ------

                              "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                              -John Wooden

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X