Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Grade the Pacers offseason

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

    Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
    Cle- Love, Mozgov, Thompson
    Chi- Gasol, Noah, Gibson, mirotic
    Wsh- Gortat, Nene
    ATL- Horford, Milsap, Splitter
    Mia- Bosh, Whiteside, Stoudemire

    All have at least two bigs that are better than anything we have on our roster right now.

    BK- Lopez
    Mil- Monroe
    Det- Drummond
    Cha- Jefferson
    Orl- Vucevic

    All have at least one player that is infinitely better than any big that we have

    If we aren't the worst frontcourt in terms of talented bigs, then we are pretty close.


    Milwaukee with Monroe and Parker/Henson
    Whiteside has major injury concerns, and cannot be counted on to play a full season. Lopez on Brooklyn is made of glass, and has even worse injury concerns. Nene is washed up, and doesn't bring anything to the table. Washington tried to trade him, and nobody wanted him. Stoudemire has been finished for over 3 years now. Are you really gonna say that freaking Vucevic is "infinitely" better than Myles Turner? This isn't fantasy basketball. Myles Turner is a stretch five AND a rim protector.
    Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

    Comment


    • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

      Originally posted by LG33 View Post
      As far as I can tell, these are the projected frontcourt starters for every team in the East:

      Atlanta: Paul Millsap / Al Horford
      Brooklyn: Thad Young / Brook Lopez
      Boston: David Lee / Tyler Zeller
      Charlotte: Marvin Williams / Al Jefferson (Kaminsky)
      Chicago: Pau Gasol / Joakim Noah
      Cleveland: Kevin Love / Timofey Mozgov
      Detroit: Ersan Ilyasova / Andre Drummond
      Miami: Chris Bosh / Hassan Whiteside
      Milwaukee: Jabari Parker / Greg Monroe
      New York: Derrick Williams / Robin Lopez (Porzingis)
      Orlando: Channing Frye / Nikola Vucevic
      Philadelphia: Nerlens Noel / Jahlil Okafor
      Toronto: Patrick Patterson / Jonas Valunciunas
      Washington: Nene Hilario / Marcin Gortat

      If they aren't already inaccurate, I'm sure some of them will be on opening day. It remains to be seen who will start at the PF and C positions for the Pacers. I can't imagine Paul George starting the season at the 4, nor do I see Myles Turner being the starter in the middle from Day 1. I could be wrong, but I'm going to use Jordan Hill / Ian Mahinmi as the projected starters for the sake of this comparison. Does anyone feel comfortable putting our frontcourt in the top half of the East? Top third? Top quarter?

      I'm not saying our big man rotation will be a disaster, I'm just saying that you have to concede that most other teams in the conference will begin the season with a talent and continuity head-start on the Pacers when it comes to the post positions. Hopefully, our guards and swingmen will more than compensate for any deficiencies down low.
      If our starters include both Jordan Hill and Mahinmi, which it won't be, then I would agree that our front court is garbage. Myles Turner will be starting at center, so I like where we stand
      Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

      Comment


      • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

        Originally posted by Pacergeek View Post
        Are you really gonna say that freaking Vucevic is "infinitely" better than Myles Turner? .
        Vucavic is pretty damn good man. The guy hit 20 & 10 a **** ton last season. I like me some Turner but he hasn't played one game yet. Like to keep my expectations in check for rooks. Especially 19 year old rookies.

        Vucavic may be over rated but he is one helluva solid young center. If were getting 20 and 10 from Turner by year 4 ima pretty happy camper.

        Comment


        • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

          Originally posted by PacersPride View Post
          Vucavic is pretty damn good man. The guy hit 20 & 10 a **** ton last season. I like me some Turner but he hasn't played one game yet. Like to keep my expectations in check for rooks. Especially 19 year old rookies.

          Vucavic may be over rated but he is one helluva solid young center. If were getting 20 and 10 from Turner by year 4 ima pretty happy camper.
          Vucevic is just fine, but I refuse to acknowledge that Orlando has a superior front court because Vucevic is their starting center. I refuse to believe that Vucevic is better than a stretch 5 that is also a rim protector. I had to read this same crap during Andrew Luck's rookie year. How Matt Schaub was the best QB in the division because Luck had yet to play a game. Luck was a top ten NFL QB before he took an official snap, and Myles Turner is easily a top 10 center in the East. Why set the bar so low? We should be happy if Myles Turner is as good as freakin Sasha Vucevic in a few years? I will be happy when Myles Turner is an all star in year 2. Who else in the east can stretch the floor offensively and defend the rim? Answer, nobody
          Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

          Comment


          • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

            Originally posted by Pacergeek View Post
            If our starters include both Jordan Hill and Mahinmi, which it won't be, then I would agree that our front court is garbage. Myles Turner will be starting at center, so I like where we stand
            I know you're high on Turner and I'd like to be but Ian will be a better starting center then Turner at this point.
            He isn't going to be rookie of the year and he may not even log a huge amount of minutes this year. If he does they'll be handed to him and I think we're in real trouble.
            Why do teams tank? Ask a Spurs fan.

            Comment


            • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

              Outside of the time Paul will spend at the 4 we do not currently have visibly great talent at the 4 and 5 when even compared to the East alone... New York may be the only team visibly worse... However, I believe our 4s and 5s are all good enough to not fall completely flat on their face when facing the other East teams bigs... And God only knows what Turner has in store for us...

              Now... Can someone please show me a wing comparison to the rest of the East? I have a feeling we look pretty in that comparison...
              Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

              Comment


              • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                Originally posted by Pacerized View Post
                I know you're high on Turner and I'd like to be but Ian will be a better starting center then Turner at this point.
                He isn't going to be rookie of the year and he may not even log a huge amount of minutes this year. If he does they'll be handed to him and I think we're in real trouble.
                Larry Bird said that Turner is better than he thought he was. Translation: Turner will get heavy minutes. I'm not the only person projecting Turner to start either:

                http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nba/2466/myles-turner
                Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

                Comment


                • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                  I thought it was a pretty good off-season.

                  Dodging the age 35 season of West's contract and using that money for Monta is just a miracle that I never expected would happen.

                  I'm not going to proclaim Turner as a 10 time all-star yet, but every possible indicator at this point makes it seem like that we have a very good chance at getting an excellent return on the 11th pick.

                  I would have let Hibbert finish his contract here if I were running things from the outside, but obviously things got so toxic between both parties on the inside that there was just no way that was going to happen. While it seems like we got virtually nothing for him, you have to remember that the organization would have been doing cartwheels if he would have opted out.

                  Stuckey seems a little redundant, but he was really good last year and is a nice asset to have.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                    Originally posted by Pacergeek View Post
                    Myles Turner is a stretch five AND a rim protector.
                    I get that your purposely being over-the-top in your optimism about Myles Turner, but you're stating your ideas of what he is as fact. Right now, nobody knows what he is. He played relatively well in SL, but the constant comments about Turner being this and that are probably closer to being a fantasy than it is a reality. He was labelled a project player out of college for a reason. It is extremely rare for a project player picked in the end of the lottery to even be in the conversation of ROY.

                    Bird said Turner is better than he thought. Vogel said that he expects him to play minutes this year. But neither have projected him as a starter.

                    Over hyping the guy to the moon may not be the smartest thing. If he achieves those things, that's great. But you may be setting yourself up for disappointment as well.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                      Myles Turner is 19 and has not played one second of NBA basketball. He has not scored one NBA point, blocked one NBA shot, or grabbed one NBA rebound.

                      Just going to let these facts sit here....
                      Last edited by Kstat; 07-30-2015, 12:26 PM.

                      It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                      Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                      Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                      NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                      Comment


                      • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                        Looks like the votes are in and Bird receives a favorable A- level grade for this offseason. A- was about right but I bumped my vote up to an A purely based on an exciting offseason for a change in the last 2.5 decades of Pacers basketball.

                        Either way, well done Larry Joe!

                        Comment


                        • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                          Asking for a letter grade for an offseason that isn't even over is an even worse idea than grading drafts 10 seconds after they happened.

                          There are no results to grade. It's basically a "how much hope do you have" poll.

                          It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                          Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                          Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                          NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                          Comment


                          • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                            Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                            Asking for a letter grade for an offseason that isn't even over is an even worse idea than grading drafts 10 seconds after they happened.

                            There are no results to grade. It's basically a "how much hope do you have" poll.

                            Because we're supposed to talk about all of the other exciting NBA news taking place on July 30?


                            Plenty of opinions will be given from all directions once the season starts. Nevertheless, this has been one of the wildest Pacers off-seasons ever, so it's fine for people to give their predictions as to how it will pan out. There isn't much else to talk about.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                              Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                              Because we're supposed to talk about all of the other exciting NBA news taking place on July 30?


                              Plenty of opinions will be given from all directions once the season starts. Nevertheless, this has been one of the wildest Pacers off-seasons ever, so it's fine for people to give their predictions as to how it will pan out. There isn't much else to talk about.
                              Hey, I think discussing the offseason decisions is great. But grading is a bit silly. It's like getting a score on a test you haven't taken yet based on how well you thought you studied. A letter grade is a final score, not a prediction.

                              Every team has hope right now. Every draft pick has potential.
                              Last edited by Kstat; 07-30-2015, 12:50 PM.

                              It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                              Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                              Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                              NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                              Comment


                              • Re: Grade the Pacers offseason

                                Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                                Hey, I think discussing the offseason decisions is great. But grading is a bit silly. It's like getting a score on a test you haven't taken yet based on how well you thought you studied. A letter grade is a final score, not a prediction.
                                My mom used to ask me all the time, "Do you think you got an A on it?". So yea it's used as a prediction all the time.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X