Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

    10 days before draft night 2015, so today we journey to the Lone Star state to take a look at a rare center prospect available at this point in the draft, University of Texas center Myles Turner. In previous draft articles this year, I have examined 3 players I have given my total stamp of approval to: (in alphabetical order): Devin Booker, Stanley Johnson, and Frank Kaminsky. I was lukewarm on Tyus Jones and Willie Cauley Stein at best, and I have recommended that the Pacers make a hard pass on Kevon Looney, Jerien Grant, Kelly Oubre and Trey Lyles.

    Today, we examine Myles Turner in depth, and try to see which one of those groups he belongs in.

    Turner provides a rare opportunity to draft a center, without being in the top 5 of the draft. Despite his protests to the contrary, Turner is a 5 man and nothing else, and I don't project him to have any positional versatility. He measured in at 6'11 1/2 inches, with a wingspan of 7'4. Turner weighs a rather skinny 239lbs but has room to strengthen his body, though I don't think you'd want to add any weight to his body based on how he plays and moves on the court.

    Speaking of his movement and body type, that has been a major topic of discussion and investigation already so far with Turner. His agent has tried to get ahead of the game by releasing his medical findings and results from a biomechanical tests that he had Turner go thru....those results if you want to find them are on draftexpress.com, among other places, under the players profile.

    Not included in that article is the fact that Turner has extremely oddly shaped feet reportedly. He actually should fit into a size 19 shoe, but because of the strange shape of his feet and the way he runs, Texas had to get him a specially made size 21 shoe for his comfort.

    Whether his actual biomechanical and physical running issues can be solved or mitigated is a puzzle and mystery that teams interested in him will have to decide for themselves. He clearly is slow and struggles to move his body in an efficient way in just running and sliding and making basketball movements. He takes little choppy steps, and seems to struggle to sprint and change direction. His agent seems to say that those all can be fixed with exercises and therapy......but what will the teams believe?

    Teams all have medical experts that study such things in their private workouts they have with players. Little known technology has been out there for years, as teams have looked for an edge in trying to predict future injuries based on how athletes move.....it isn't new science, though it is new to most of the public.

    I have no clue who the Pacers use now for this specific purpose, but I do know they have long been in the forefront of such research. Here is a link to their former person they consulted with in regards to drafting or signing players with biometrical concerns: http://donecamps.com/don_hoover

    I have met Don and discussed matters like these with him in the past, so I have emailed him about Turner's specific test report just to see if he will give me any opinions about his peculiar movement style and pigeon toed type of run......it is hard to see on tape the exact problems from a sideline view, but from just a back view you can see that his knees come way too close together when he runs, and his entire gait is crooked. It certainly will have to get fixed for Turner to be able to survive big minutes over an 82 game schedule and playoffs.

    If Don emails me back with any opinions, I will add it to the bottom of this report.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Turner, like most big guys, is likely to be a late bloomer. Born on March 24, 1996, Turner is all Texas, born and raised. He played for a traditional football school there just outside of Bedford Texas called Trinity High School, where he grew into the eventual #2 ranked player in his high school class, ahead of many of the players who will likely be drafted ahead of him on draft night. Turner played for the prestigious USA basketball program, mainly as a role player who played 15 minutes or so per game.

    While not exactly a basketball prodigy, Turner played baseball and football until he outgrew both sports, and his family has had the means to provide him with a personal trainer since the age of 13, an athletic training legend named Slim Roberson, who also trained other Texas school boy greats named LaMarcus Aldridge, Chris Bosh, and Karl Malone. Roberson followed him to college, and will likely be part of the package that goes with Turner wherever he is drafted.

    Turner is an extremely well spoken and intelligent young man, who has a strong intellectual basketball understanding even if he can't always translate it yet to the floor. He rides a bike everywhere he goes since it easier on his feet and legs, and likely will be among the best interviews on the team he ends up on from day 1. He also has a strong chance to be the best dressed/most uniquely attired player at draft night, which is always a fun things to watch from afar.....Turner is fond of bow ties and fashion in general.

    His college career was not nearly as successful as it could have been playing for the mess that was Texas under former coach Rick Barnes. In playing style, development, strategy, and personnel around him, Austin was about the worst city he could have chosen to play in last year. Playing out of position at the 4 some, and coming off the bench sometimes also, Turner struggled to only a 10.1ppg and 6.5 RPG over just 22 minutes a night. He put up huge numbers as a shot blocker for Texas, averaging over 2.6 blocks a night, and did even better than that playing for Team USA last summer. Turner is a huge favorite of the analytical crowd, as they rate him much higher in advanced stats than even some of the very top names in this draft, mainly due to his high free throw percentage of 83.9%, and his rim protection.

    Analytics aside, let me truly put his game to the test in the scouting report below.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unlike many players in this draft, Turner at least POTENTIALLY, gives you some value on the court at both ends. Let's break it down and look at his offensive game first from a scouts point of view.

    You have to dream on Turner and project him to what he could be in your mind 3 to 4 years from now, because right now, he isn't nearly as good as his reputation says he is.

    On the block in a traditional center's role, Turner has one post move and one post move only, which is a right shoulder fadeaway jumper. He shoots this shot with nice technique and a high finish and follow through, and really good touch. It is a major NBA ready weapon potentially. Any of the older fans on here remember the pet move of James, "Buddha" Edwards? It is a very similar looking move and result as he had back 30 years ago.

    Of course, there is a reason why this is the move that Turner prefers right now, which is that he is so weak physically that he can't go through any contact, so he has to jump away from the defense. Turner has no clue and has been poorly coached to this point in how to gain low post position with his feet, and how to hold it. He is very easy to push off the block, even by shorter players who can gain leverage on him by pushing at his lower body and torso. Turner makes himself weak by not getting his knees flexed when he posts up, standing straight up in the post and looking like a baby deer on ice skates.

    When the defense can take away his one pet move, at this point in his development, Turner has no real countermoves. He can't go to his left shoulder at all, and he can't dribble in any sort of traffic.....which means that once he is pushed off his spot, that currently he can't take even 1 or 2 dribbles to get where he wants to go. His footwork is about as bad as I have seen a player have in the low post, so whoever drafts him in my view has a major long term project in teaching him how to be a back to the basket low post player.

    Other back to the basket problems are aplenty for him. Turner is an awful passer, not because I think he is selfish, but because I think he just struggles at this point to control his limbs so much that he loses track of the defense, especially if he teams "dig" or swipe him in the low post when he has the ball. He also has absolutely no left hand, so he struggles to either pass or finish plays around the rim over size since he brings everything back to his strong hand. He basically has to either take the fadeaway jumper or face up and take a long jumper over the defense.....both of those are inefficient shots by the way.

    Basically, what I am saying is this: currently, with his back to the basket offensively, Turner sucks. His footwork is at an elementary level, and his body isn't currently ready for NBA speed and power. Now, can you dream on him, and teach him how to play slowly day by day and potentially eventually have something really good? But for now, he basically is unplayable offensively if he has to play against dudes his own size with length and/or strength.

    Yes, I think you can dream on him and project him out, but it is years and years away in my view. But, at just age 19, he has plenty of time, and if he is taught correctly and holds up health wise, by age 23 or so he will be a 4 year veteran who is just entering his prime.....the question is, do you want to wait that long and can you as an organization develop him correctly, and do you even want to?

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Turner's jump shot and face up game are potentially much better, though from my scouting eye I think at this point they are overrated.

    Turner does have really good shooting mechanics, though they aren't perfect. His release is a little slow, and his arc is WAY WAY too high in my opinion. His shots are the prettiest in the nation when they go in, but he only actually makes 27.4% from downtown in college. I do think that will improve to a 35%-38% eventually in the NBA level potentially, but there are problems even in that!

    How will you get him those shots? Can he move well enough to be a "pick and pop" guy? To do that, you have to have agility enough to get space....and Turner needs a little extra room to shoot accurately anyway. Plus, Turner at this point HAS NOTHING HE CAN DO WHEN THE DEFENSE RECOVERS TO HIM IN TIME. Seriously, he can't drive a bad closeout, and he can't pass when pressured....he is a turnover waiting to happen. And, he isn't going to be able to roll hard to the rim after a ballscreen and collect lobs or at least shrink the defense, because he isn't going to be athletic enough to do any of that well enough to scare anyone.

    I think Turner will look good in workouts by himself, but I don't see him being a very good player in 5 on 5 situations right now.

    Again, you can dream on him if you have vision and patience. Maybe 4 years from now he is improved enough with his body to be flexible enough to get open....maybe he develops a one dribble floater game, and maybe he becomes a player who can actually attack and create against a bad closeout.

    But, I don't see a particularly strong weapon here with him as a shooter, particularly because I worry about him becoming over reliant on it, and actually hurting his development in other areas.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We all know that you can win with a defensive minded, rebounding center. So how does Turner project in those areas?

    As a rebounder, he certainly puts up decent stats. 6.5 rebounds in college in just 22 minutes is a solid rate, and almost 5 a game for team USA in just 15 minutes a game is solid also....generally, I look for a rebound every 4 minutes of play as a scout, so at least he has some production.

    But again, it isn't as good a picture as the raw numbers seem to paint, at least for me.

    Turner is a poor rebounder versus teams and players that can match his size and length. Turner is a high effort, box out and hold type of defensive rebounder, and he works as hard as he can to attack the ball in the air. He also has pretty good hands and doesn't lose the ball once he has it. This high effort fundamental style works much of the time.

    But.....he misses rebounds against better players, who easily just body him underneath the rim, putting him out of the action as the ball goes over his head. Some dudes are so freaking athletic that they just leap up and reach backwards well and get rebounds like this anyway, but Turner is among the 98% of the human population who can't do that. Turner might lead the league in rebounds that he tries to get but can't, as the ball sails just over his hand and over his head to the guy behind him. He simply lacks strength in his core and balance, and his leg issues show up here because he has a narrower base to gather strength with.

    He will be an average defensive rebounder in the NBA due to effort and technique, but until he gets entirely more agile, substantially more strong in his core, and in much better athletic shape he will never be much better than average. Look for his raw numbers to go down a bit most likely.

    Again, you still have the dream. 4 years from now he might have entirely different body as he grows and matures and learns how to use leverage...the kid does seem smart and teachable.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    What is Turner like defensively?

    This is where he can hang his hat potentially earlier in his career, though this isn't all rainbows and unicorns either.

    Turner is statistically just a good a rim protector as Karl Anthony Towns, except that Turner got almost all of his blocks against smaller players coming from off the ball. That is a highly effective thing for a player to have, but it isn't the same as having a center who can single handedly block the shots one on one of other back to the basket centers.

    Still, any good defensive team needs at least some rim protection, and Turner potentially can provide that. One potential flaw I see however is the same flaw that effects his offensive game inside, which is that TURNER HAS NO LEFT HAND. Turner blocks all shots with his right hand, even if he has to allow the ballhandler past him to for the block that way, or even if he has to allow the offensive guy to get an angle on him so he can turn in such a way to block it from behind or the side.

    It is my experience that this cannot be taught or fixed, so he will likely always be a right handed shot blocker only. That means he will likely struggle with foul trouble at the next level some, which is also indicated by what is at this point less than average quickness and maneuverability. At the college level, Turner struggled with the verticality rule, so any team who picks him will have to get that idea taught to him.

    Off the ball, I think he ends up projecting as an above average rim protector in time, but not necessarily super special because he will have other defensive flaws that will mitigate it.

    On the ball, defending his own man in the low post, I'd be worried about him.

    He does have high effort, but he is so weak and so clumsy that I think most slower and smaller dudes will still be able to get position on him, and use their higher skill level to take advantage of his poor footwork and oddly shaped body. Teams ran many seal plays against him, and he struggled to defend them due to his lack of balance and strength. Foul trouble will be a big deal early, but his length will help him against smaller guys at least, so he will be able in time I think to at least hold his own water. But against the top notch post guys, he likely will need double team help some of the time to have a chance. In other words, he will be good against the non elite guys, but not a top NBA all defensive team guy or anything.

    Against the ball screen is where you have to worry the most. Texas hid him as much as they could by playing a lot of 2-3 zone, but NBA teams wont have that choice. He will need to play on a team that plays far back and sags (like Indiana does currently), because he won't have any chance to be a guy who can hedge, trap, slide/drag, blitz, "cling", or any other choice.....he is limited in value as a rim protector only in this circumstance.

    Still, I like Turner's effort and intelligence defensively. I do think that he ends up being above average in an overall package, I just don't see him as a huge difference maker on that end. Teams will have to account for and plan for him, but they will be able to do that....and he will be a potential liability against the ballscreen, so much so that you might not be able to play him.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    So, what do we have in Myles Turner?

    We have an extremely likeable, well spoken, high character intelligent big man with a lot of development to do, and who has severe body and health question marks that may or may not be fixable. We have a guy who clearly isn't ready to play right away, and who will in my view need 2 to 3 years to become playable in an important NBA game. We have a guy who has an overrated jump shot, who shoots free throws well but who won't get fouled that much. We have a guy who has raw tools, but no clue how to play yet from an offensive point of view.

    Turner to me has proven how raw he is by being a non factor in many big games Texas played last year. He got his arse kicked by Kentucky, and looked like he didn't belong when he played any sort of well coached or decent sized opponent next year. He will look better in workouts than he did on tape, and I am sure he will interview well. I actually like his potential, but I just also know what a long process it will be to get him to that point, and I don't think he is good enough to wait on, especially in this above average draft. I'd pick him ahead of some guys I have profiled, but not enough.

    I think the Pacers will pass on draft night in regards to Turner, and he certainly wouldn't be one of my top choices either. However, his potential, if he reaches it, is higher than some others......I think he has a medium high ceiling but a very low floor.

    Pacers will pass I think, and I think there will be better options on the board as well.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comps are difficult in some ways, because there never really has been a rim protecting, jump shooting combination like Turner could potential be if he hits the absolute highest ceiling that he can be.

    In the end, I see a player with a shorter career, who also takes a while to develop....maybe a 5-7 year career with some higher end play in the middle, marred by the potential of injuries derailing him.

    So in the end, I am going with.....

    NBA comparable: Sam Bowie

    I could be wrong about Turner as well of course. get him on the right team who is patient and can help him develop slowly, and he can be something..... Andrew Bynum landed in a perfect place for him in Los Angeles a few years ago, who is another player that I can see Turner being like.

    In this case, I think his most likely landing spots (and the best for him) are Boston at #16 (or in a trade up scenario), Oklahoma City at #14 (Serge Ibaka is ideal to play next to him eventually, and they can bring him along slowly there), or Phoenix at #13 (best training staff to handle his physical issues).

    In the end, I suspect he ends up a Boston Celtic on draft night, somehow, someway.

    Of course, my opinions are just my own, and feel free to disagree if you so wish. We know Turner is working hard in Las Vegas with the Impact gym and training staff, and we know that he has high character and a strong work ethic. He is very much a long term pick with not much short term impact, but he does have long term value if you can harness it and bring it out of him.

    I just don't see Indiana as the place that will end up happening....but I have been wrong before.

    Tbird

  • #2
    Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

    Way too raw for me. Pacers need to win next year, not sit on/develop a player for 3 years. Someone should post that Conrad Brunner (I think) video off Twitter that he filmed yesterday at the workouts. I know Grady shared the link. He drove baseline and blew a layup....looked real bad. Myles Turner reminds me of JuJuan Johnson.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

      Turner's ceiling, IMO, is Roy Hibbert. So...pass.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

        So that guy has had a physical trainer since the age of 13 and still has the biomechanical problems with his legs, running, gait, etc....and rides a bike everywhere instead of walking? PASS.......OMG.

        I mean whats more believable to you. This kid is able to fix al his mechanical abnormalities in the next 6-8 months, or this kid's body completely breaks down over the course of an 82 game season?
        Last edited by graphic-er; 06-15-2015, 04:49 PM.
        You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

          Another chance to use a favorite sound bite.

          Another guy that looks to be two years away from being two year away.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

            We are not in a position at number 11 to have to take a huge gamble like this. We will have several options of guys with similar ceilings without the huge risk. We took Granger at 17, and he worked out pretty well for a lot longer than some thought. 11 is just too high.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

              I still love the kid and would be ecstatic if we picked him at 11. I just really don't see anyway he lasts past the top 10, so I guess its probably doesn't matter.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                I need a break from the deer on ice type center. Glad to read this I was starting to be intrigued and considered him a fallback pick if others weren't there. Not now.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                  Turner and Lyles are my least favorite picks among the guys who have been linked to us. Turner sounds good on paper, and his agent really did a nice job getting him preemptively cleared by doctors. But even if his physical problems get resolved, he would still need to learn to run all over again, all while learning how to play at the pro level. You have to wonder when, if ever, you get any payoff with him.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                    What Turner could become is very intriguing. A rim protecting 3 point shooting center can be a game changer. I'm more concerned about his health than his fundamentals. I'd say he doesn't get past Phoenix or OKC.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                      A project AND an injury risk. Pass. If Pacers select Turner over Kaminsky I'll be p*****. We need contributors now.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                        Originally posted by presto123 View Post
                        A project AND an injury risk. Pass. If Pacers select Turner over Kaminsky I'll be p*****. We need contributors now.
                        I have a horrible feeling in my gut that Bird would do this
                        Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                          Originally posted by Pacergeek View Post
                          I have a horrible feeling in my gut that Bird would do this
                          Ughhh! lol

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                            Big man with weird feet should be taken off the board instantly no matter how good they are.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #10: Myles Turner

                              Dying to hear about Cam Payne

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X