Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

    Originally posted by Suaveness View Post
    I mean if Reggie thinks he can still play then it's not really backing out of not playing elsewhere since it's the Colts making the decision. I'm sure he would have thought that the Colts wouldn't cut him loose before he was ready to retire. Or something like that.

    The other FA options available don't inspire much confidence in me. I think Andre Johnson, soon to be FA Andre Johnson, is the best bet. I'm not sure if there are others worth trading for but I doubt it.

    Yes it is considering that in December he said he wasn't going to do the one year rental thing(which this would pretty much end up being if he continues to play elsewhere) it was the Colts or nothing. Now he changes his tune.

    I don't resent him for changing his mind but I do think it was ill-advised to publically say such a thing because its rare for a player to stay with one team his entire career and considering how all his former teammates got dealt the same way (Edge, Manning Freeney etc) he would be naive to think he was going to be different.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

      Don't mind if Wayne plays somewhere else next year if a team will take him up on it. Words matter, but these guys are athletes, not CEOs carefully talking to shareholders and being told exactly what to say by lawyers or whatever, so if a guy like Wayne gets caught up in emotions somehow and then changes his mind it doesn't bother me. Its not like he walked out on his contract, he would have given priority to the Colts but they chose not to sign him so he is an FA. Then again I am one of those people who would not have minded if the other Reggie went ring chasing in Boston after retiring with the Pacers.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

        http://www.colts.com/videos/videos/T...nshare:twitter

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

          Originally posted by cdash View Post
          Are you saying Harrison was better?
          Harrison has 128 touchdowns, Wayne has 82...
          Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
          I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

            Not sure how legit this is from Wells here

            http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12...anapolis-colts

            Reggie Wayne wanted 1 more year

            INDIANAPOLIS -- Reggie Wayne was hoping to sign a one-year contract with the Indianapolis Colts and then retire, a source told ESPN.com.

            The Colts and Wayne never reached the stage where money was discussed, according to the source and the team announced Friday that they would not be re-signing the receiver, who spent his entire 14-year career with the organization.

            "When he first took the field with us in 2001, we knew this day would eventually arrive. That reality is one of the things that makes pro football such a tough business," Colts owner Jim Irsay said Friday. "We feel this decision is in the best interests of the team and for Reggie as it will allow him to seek a better opportunity for playing time elsewhere if he so chooses."

            Wayne is the franchise leader in regular-season games played (211) and wins (143) and ranks second in receptions (1,070), receiving yards (14,345), receiving touchdowns (80), 100-yard games (43) and consecutive games with a reception (134). He had just 64 receptions for 779 yards and two touchdowns last season -- his worst since 2003 while dealing with an elbow injury and torn tricep.

            Wayne said multiple times last season that he could not see himself playing for another team. But now, according to the source, Wayne is open to the possibility to continuing his career elsewhere.

            Wayne had tricep surgery and had the knee that he had ACL surgery on in October 2013 cleaned out earlier in the offseason.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

              Pretty dumb move by the Colts. He looked good up until the triceps injury. Was he the Reggie of old? No of course not, he is 36 years old, but he was a good 3rd receiver, i mean you can't tell me that Hakim Nicks was any better...

              Triceps tear would probably affect the way you run and extend your arms when making various moves to keep your balance. So yea he looked slow and didnt' catch as well in the last 5 games. I don't see the harm in signing him for a 1 year vet minimum deal. If he can't cut it in training camp then you atleast you can give him proper retirement.

              Just find it hard to believe that Grigson and Irsay have no use for such Veteran Leadership on offense or in the receiving core that you would basically tell the guy he is no longer wanted in that locker room. Especially when you have gone out and signed a guy who has never played in the league and has a history of problems.

              Now they are going out to over pay for Andre Johnson's corpse, who just had one of the worst seasons of his career. Wayne would have out produced Johnson last season if not for the 2nd half injury.

              Swear, its like every year the Irsay Grigson regime goes out and stoops to a new low every off season.
              You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                Reggie was also playing with Andrew Luck while Andre Johnson had no one at QB.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                  Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                  Now they are going out to over pay for Andre Johnson's corpse, who just had one of the worst seasons of his career. Wayne would have out produced Johnson last season if not for the 2nd half injury.
                  Oh please. Look at who was throwing to him. Houston's QB were awful last season. He is not getting any younger but he can produce at least for one more year and would be a possession receiver for us. If he comes at a reasonable price too, then it would be a very shrewd acquisition for us.
                  Never forget

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                    The Colts have seen Wayne behind closed doors in the practices that we can't see. If they thought he had anything left, I don't think that they would be doing this. Its' virtually unheard of for a WR to produce in their age 37 season. Like I said earlier, the Colts have a pretty good track record of knowing when it's time to cut bait with a player. See Harrison, Saturday, Addai, Clark, Freeney, etc. Manning obviously had a lot of game left in him, but that was clearly the right thing to do. It's a tough business and sometimes you have to know when to part ways with a player, as difficult as it is. I don't think that Wayne would offer us much more than nostalgia next season.

                    Comment


                    • #56
                      Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                      Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                      Swear, its like every year the Irsay Grigson regime goes out and stoops to a new low every off season.
                      Yeah, after advancing a step further every year in the playoffs with Luck, it's really dumbfounding that people still bother following such a horribly run franchise.......

                      The Colts have a proven track record of making the right call when it comes time to painfully part ways with an aging player. Marvin Harrison, Peyton Manning, Dallas Clark, Jeff Saturday, Dwight Freeney, etc. Out of that batch, Manning is the only one who went on to do anything of note after leaving the Colts, but cutting him was still the right move for obvious reasons. Everyone else on that list was basically toast when the Colts made the right call to cut bait. The Colts saw Reggie Wayne up close all of last season. If they felt that he had anything in the tank, they wouldn't be parting ways. It's virtually unheard of for receivers not named Rice to have a productive year in their age 37 season.

                      I don't think Irsay gleefully enjoys cutting a Marvin Harrison or a Dwight Freeney or a Reggie Wayne. These are rough moments for him. But when you run a sports team, it's inevitable that you have to make these sort of decisions. I'm glad that Irsay doesn't let emotion cloud his judgments. It's led to a proven track record of knowing when it's time to say goodbye to beloved aging vets. The problem for the Colts is that they are such a great franchise to play for that no one good ever wants to leave. Thus, the Colts are forced to make the tough call.

                      Luck, TY, Fleener, etc have had three years to learn from Wayne. They have to sink or swim on their own sooner or later. They will be fine.

                      Comment


                      • #57
                        Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                        Originally posted by Mackey_Rose View Post
                        But he was the greatest Colt ever.

                        I understand that your point was beyond football abilities, but he was not the "greatest Colt ever" in any sort of capacity. He nor anyone else is in Manning's stratosphere. Reggie was a great player, a fan favorite, and extremely loyal to the Colts. Certainly one of the very best to ever put on the helmet. Manning was an icon that completely changed the Indy sports scene.

                        Comment


                        • #58
                          Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                          Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                          Yeah, after advancing a step further every year in the playoffs with Luck, it's really dumbfounding that people still bother following such a horribly run franchise.......

                          The Colts have a proven track record of making the right call when it comes time to painfully part ways with an aging player. Marvin Harrison, Peyton Manning, Dallas Clark, Jeff Saturday, Dwight Freeney, etc. Out of that batch, Manning is the only one who went on to do anything of note after leaving the Colts, but cutting him was still the right move for obvious reasons. Everyone else on that list was basically toast when the Colts made the right call to cut bait. The Colts saw Reggie Wayne up close all of last season. If they felt that he had anything in the tank, they wouldn't be parting ways. It's virtually unheard of for receivers not named Rice to have a productive year in their age 37 season.

                          I don't think Irsay gleefully enjoys cutting a Marvin Harrison or a Dwight Freeney or a Reggie Wayne. These are rough moments for him. But when you run a sports team, it's inevitable that you have to make these sort of decisions. I'm glad that Irsay doesn't let emotion cloud his judgments. It's led to a proven track record of knowing when it's time to say goodbye to beloved aging vets. The problem for the Colts is that they are such a great franchise to play for that no one good ever wants to leave. Thus, the Colts are forced to make the tough call.

                          Luck, TY, Fleener, etc have had three years to learn from Wayne. They have to sink or swim on their own sooner or later. They will be fine.


                          Gleeful? No but he sure can't keep his trap shut that's for sure talking about how hard it was for him etc. I think they were all the best decisions for the long term outlook of the franchise but don't wax poetic about how hard it was for you. I think it was harder on the guy that was shoved out the door(or in Wayne's case his contract was already up they just chose not to bring him back).

                          He made a business decision plain and simple as much as I hate all things Patriots at least they don't pretend to care when they kick someone to the curb they do it and move on.

                          Comment


                          • #59
                            Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                            Originally posted by Basketball Fan View Post
                            Gleeful? No but he sure can't keep his trap shut that's for sure talking about how hard it was for him etc. I think they were all the best decisions for the long term outlook of the franchise but don't wax poetic about how hard it was for you. I think it was harder on the guy that was shoved out the door(or in Wayne's case his contract was already up they just chose not to bring him back).

                            He made a business decision plain and simple as much as I hate all things Patriots at least they don't pretend to care when they kick someone to the curb they do it and move on.

                            Why is it so inconceivable to you that Irsay has a soul and doesn't enjoy seeing a beloved player and friend leave?

                            Comment


                            • #60
                              Re: Reggie Wayne's time as a Colt is over

                              Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                              Why is it so inconceivable to you that Irsay has a soul and doesn't enjoy seeing a beloved player and friend leave?
                              Because owners don't care about players beyond the bottom line I mean there have been exceptions but in the end its a business and as long as the player is useful to them they will stay otherwise they are out the door the minute they are no longer useful. The same will happen to Luck in a few years if someone better comes along.

                              But in Irsay's case for me its that at least with Manning he still talks about how he made the right decision to move on from him(he manages to keep his trap shut about others fortunately). Of course it was the right move but why do you feel compelled to tell everyone every time the Colts beat the Broncos.

                              Even the Pats never did this with Bledsoe they didn't have to those 4 SB trophies speak for themselves.

                              Same with Montana/Young won an SB with Young, Favre/Rodgers won an SB with Rodgers.

                              So yeah Irsay talking about how sad it is for him is just talk if you wanted these players to stay you would've kept them( not saying that he should've done that though) actions speak louder than words.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X