Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

    Originally posted by Basketball Fan View Post
    Ideally we all want to see teams with players on an even playing field but its not realistic either. I mean we've had players busted for PED's which is also considered cheating. In the MLB it matters(which I find laughable but I digress). Jerry Rice admitted to using Stickum that's an unfair advantage. List goes on.

    I know people want to believe that integrity matters in professional sports but if it really did the Pats wouldn't have been so successful all these years. To them it was worth it because they were winners.

    Now winners with a blemish but still they won. Which is all that really counts in sports.


    As for Lance, Sosa, Bonds etc being thought less off well a lot of these guys weren't well liked to begin with so this didn't really change much for them and well they lied about it.

    Andy Pettite used PED's and admitted to it I don't see anyone condemning him.
    Well this is my point. IF the assumption is that cheaters always prosper so why have rules goes back to my point of why people care. The majority people care to varying degrees because in the end of the day they invest monetarily and emotionally in a product that is sold with a label of fair play. We can all go back a bring up examples of how the game was cheated on but if you accept this a just how it is then it divulges into ridiculous attempts that will and have gotten out of hand.

    To me each sport is different and each sport has its own bags of cheaters to varying degrees so if the object of it is just winning then why have a salary cap. Why even have small market teams? It all boils down to profit and anything "limits" the amount of people invested in the game is why we have such rules. Will Toms or the Pats punishment mean anything against the superbowl rings they have? Not really but getting caught does change things. IT does add to the correct perception to fans and legacies. It also just like a speeding ticket serves a purpose to get players to toe the line more frequently than if nothing was every done. It doesn't eliminate it but it does sets precedents that let people know that there is a cost to cheating even if some people organizations are willing to pay it.

    Comment


    • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

      Originally posted by Since86 View Post
      Especially after how complicit they were destroying evidence in Spygate and trying to cover up the Ray Rice situation. Maybe they actually learned a lesson.
      Those two incidents don't cut right down to the playing of the game itself like this does though. With Spygate, the players still had to make the plays in the game. Having a softer football is actually making it easier to physically make the plays. It's affecting the physical playing of the game. And arguably the mental side too because if you have an advantage like that you probably have more confidence in a broader range of playcalls and your own abilities.

      Spygate, even though it led to an advantage, could be spun in ways this can't. The Pats, at best, are left with arguing that it really wasn't an advantage... Except why do it then? Or that it wasn't a game changing advantage... except why do it then?
      Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

      ------

      "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

      -John Wooden

      Comment


      • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

        Originally posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
        Facts:


        1) The scientists hired to study the issue properly calculated the expected pressure drop that occurred due to temperature, assuming an inflation temperature and a halftime temperature. There result was the same that I gave you months ago, that footballs will lose 1.13 psi in pressure due to the temperature drop.


        2) The officials measured the drop in pressure of the Patriots footballs. Using one gauge they measured a drop of 1.39 psi. Using another gauge they measured 1.01 psi. Average: 1.20 psi.


        3) We have no way of knowing which of the two gauges, used interchangeably, was used in the pregame analysis where the Patriots footballs were set to 12.5 psi. Based upon the fact that one gauge always reads 0.4 psi below the other one, and that we don't know which one (if either) was accurate, then the Patriots footballs, pregame, may TRULY have been set at anywhere in the range of 12.1-12.9 psi.


        4) The officials measured the drop in pressure four of the Colts footballs. Using one gauge they measured a drop of 0.37 psi. Using another gauge they measured 0.56 psi.


        5) The drop in pressure of the Colts footballs is thus inconsistent with the valid scientific prediction that footballs will lose 1.13 psi in pressure, just due to the temperature drop.


        6) For some reason, the fact that the Colts footballs apparently did not obey the laws of physics has not, to this point, concerned anyone. It should. But it is easy to explain! The officials didn't even have time to test all of the Colts footballs because the 13-minute halftime was ending. The Colts footballs had been in the heated room for at least 10 minutes before they were ever tested. They warmed up, maybe halfway to room temperature, which would explain a measurement of about half of the drop that was expected: 1.13/2 = 0.515.


        7) The Colts partly warmed-up footballs were used as the "control" for the earlier-analyzed Patriots footballs. A huge degree of importance was placed into the fact that the difference in the drop in pressure of the Colts footballs vs. the drop in pressure of the Patriots footballs was statistically significant. The difference in the order in which the two groups of footballs were analyzed, as they were of course warming up toward room temperature, could fully account for this statistical significance, however.


        8) The most puzzling evidence is the relatively higher variability of the Patriots footballs. That looks suspicious. But other possible explanations, such as that perhaps some footballs were used in a heavy downpour and some were not used at all, were never considered. They did not consider the "wet football factor" at all, for that matter.


        9) Pressure gauges used by the refs varied in accuracy by about 0.4 psi. The Patriots footballs dropped in pressure in the range of 1.01-1.39 psi. This range encompasses the expected number, based only on temperature, of a 1.13 psi drop. The accuracy of the gauge is + 0.4, so saying that 1.13 is truly different than 1.20 (or even 1.39) is shaky at best. I do not see scientific grounds for saying that the Patriots footballs were, on average, outside of expected norms, just based upon the data provided.


        Other evidence such as the text messages paint a clouded picture, but the scientific basis for such a serious accusation falls short of anywhere near the level of certainty that one would reasonably demand in order to issue a serious punishment, or any punishment at all for that matter.

        Punish Brady because you are 50.1% sure and 49.9% unsure that he may have been "generally aware" that someone was doing something wrong? Please.
        Dude...it's over. Don't be "that guy."

        Comment


        • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

          I don't think spygate can be spun either. The same "why do it" questions apply. Let's not forget that part of spygate was accusations about headset frequencies. The allegations were that NE had radio jammers, which made play calling from the sidelines difficult, and at the same time, they had illegal radio frequencies into Brady's headset that allowed constant communication.

          I think it's awfully big coincidence that the Pats win SB's, get busted for cheating, go long periods of time of being a "normal" team, and win another SB and then get busted for cheating. There's an awfully large pattern going on, and one that will stick with Brady/Pats forever.
          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

          Comment


          • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

            Originally posted by Since86 View Post
            I don't think spygate can be spun either. The same "why do it" questions apply. Let's not forget that part of spygate was accusations about headset frequencies. The allegations were that NE had radio jammers, which made play calling from the sidelines difficult, and at the same time, they had illegal radio frequencies into Brady's headset that allowed constant communication.

            I think it's awfully big coincidence that the Pats win SB's, get busted for cheating, go long periods of time of being a "normal" team, and win another SB and then get busted for cheating. There's an awfully large pattern going on, and one that will stick with Brady/Pats forever.
            I meant the NFL was a little more comfortable with Spygate than how they realize having a team play with a non-regulation ball that makes throwing, receiving, and holding onto it easier will play in the general public perception of the fairness of the game... Let alone when this episode is taken in context with Spygate.

            So I think the NFL has decided it can't just sweep it under the rug. Not that I have any idea whether they'll severely penalize anyone for it though... But they didn't bother to whitewash the investigation. They still could go easy in the penalty phase.
            Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

            ------

            "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

            -John Wooden

            Comment


            • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

              Originally posted by Shade View Post
              Dude...it's over. Don't be "that guy."
              Its too late Shade. He has already ran down the rabbit hole to save face but in the end of the day Brady didn't hand over potential evidence. He lied which is obvious and if he was innocent he would not have tried to cover up anything because nothing would of been found.

              Scientist like Slick get paid to punch holes in other peoples theories but in the day I think he knows it not only looks probable but highly likely that Brady took this route in altering balls.

              The simpler the explanation given all the evidence often is the answer and I think Slick needs to be reminded of this or he will just try to rationalize text messages from McNary and bold face lies of Brady as just odd circumstances in a report that he has to use the words "maybe" and made up timelines for temperature drops and measurements to explain why the report is wrong.

              Comment


              • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                Originally posted by Bball View Post
                I meant the NFL was a little more comfortable with Spygate than how they realize having a team play with a non-regulation ball that makes throwing, receiving, and holding onto it easier will play in the general public perception of the fairness of the game... Let alone when this episode is taken in context with Spygate.

                So I think the NFL has decided it can't just sweep it under the rug. Not that I have any idea whether they'll severely penalize anyone for it though... But they didn't bother to whitewash the investigation. They still could go easy in the penalty phase.
                I think that the punishments will be rather substantial. The NFL crossed the point of no return with such a damning report. Can't follow that up with just simply punishing millionaires some meaningless money.

                Comment


                • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                  So how does this affect the traditional dome vs outdoor team debate? Come January we get the constant they're a dome team wait till they have to do this or that in the elements. Yeah if you get to deflate the ball out in the elements the outdoor team really knows how to play outdoors now don't they.

                  Actually Bball has tried to make this point several times in this thread in reference to the it didn't make any difference cause the Colts were blown out. The more I think about it the more I become convinced he's right. At various times I have to give a speech before a sizable crowd and will practice what I will say and how I will say it. I'm an introvert but by being confident and feeling comfortable before hand I'm able to pull it off. When I haven't had the chance to study what I'm going to say it is much harder with a few more glitches. While Andrew (or any other team's qb) has to think about the grip of the ball and will I be able to place it where it needs to go Tom Brady gets an additional calming/confidence in that respect.
                  Last edited by RWB; 05-07-2015, 02:14 PM.
                  You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

                  Comment


                  • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                    So I guess Peyton goes down as the best QB of the era since there are no NFL investigations about him violating the integrity of the sport.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                      http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com...of-the-iceberg

                      I suggest reading this guy's series of articles --- it's pretty damn incriminating.
                      There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                        Originally posted by Shade View Post
                        Dude...it's over. Don't be "that guy."
                        following the report, I don't see how anyone can dispute the fact that the Patriots deflated the footballs. I suppose one could argue whether Brady specifically asked that the balls be under-inflated or just constantly complained that the balls were not inflated to a pressure that he would prefer.

                        I personally think he had definite knowledge that they were being under inflated. And, everything points to the conclusion that he was requesting it.

                        It it just seems pointless to argue it. One has their head buried in the sand if that much isn't clear. By now the conversation should have switched to who will get punished and how severe that punishment shoul be.

                        In doling out punishment, I think prior disregard for the rules should be considered. So I say:
                        - ban McNally and Mr J.
                        - fine the Patriots the maximum allowable
                        - reduce their cap amount by $10M
                        - no 1st and 2nd rounders for TWO years
                        - suspend Brady for 6 games or just castrate him; his choice

                        That's right. I'd throw the effing book at them. Their organization has earned the right to be sometimes arrogant due to their performance on the field. But the fact that some of that success has been achieved by cheating simply should not be tolerated. Or rewarded by not acting harshly enough.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                          They can't say 100% guilty because this isn't a court of law, this is just a simple investigation into an incident that's illegal in the NFL but not in real life...saying more than likely and probable is what they have to say.
                          "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

                          ----------------- Reggie Miller

                          Comment


                          • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                            Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                            So I guess Peyton goes down as the best QB of the era since there are no NFL investigations about him violating the integrity of the sport.
                            But he only won one SB though ....

                            (this is sarcasm)

                            However this really doesn't change anything about that debate either.
                            Last edited by Basketball Fan; 05-07-2015, 10:56 PM.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                              Originally posted by Gamble1 View Post
                              Well this is my point. IF the assumption is that cheaters always prosper so why have rules goes back to my point of why people care. The majority people care to varying degrees because in the end of the day they invest monetarily and emotionally in a product that is sold with a label of fair play. We can all go back a bring up examples of how the game was cheated on but if you accept this a just how it is then it divulges into ridiculous attempts that will and have gotten out of hand.

                              To me each sport is different and each sport has its own bags of cheaters to varying degrees so if the object of it is just winning then why have a salary cap. Why even have small market teams? It all boils down to profit and anything "limits" the amount of people invested in the game is why we have such rules. Will Toms or the Pats punishment mean anything against the superbowl rings they have? Not really but getting caught does change things. IT does add to the correct perception to fans and legacies. It also just like a speeding ticket serves a purpose to get players to toe the line more frequently than if nothing was every done. It doesn't eliminate it but it does sets precedents that let people know that there is a cost to cheating even if some people organizations are willing to pay it.

                              I guess for me as amusing as this is to see the Pats and Tommy Uggs look bad you could look at every team and find them doing something less than ethical and people don't care as much because they don't win championships like the Patriots do.

                              That's what it really comes down to its about who you like vs who you don't and outrage varies. When Cheater A is just as unethical as Cheater B.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Colts vs Pats AFC Title Game (and Deflategate discussion)

                                Originally posted by thewholefnshow31 View Post
                                That is why I have to laugh at anyone who thinks Brady will be suspended. The NFL will be "outraged" and fine him and Brady will shrug it off and everyone will move on. The NFL just is not going to suspend Brady when the Pats play in the leagues opening game and then a few weeks later play the Colts.

                                I think at best we might get the NFL league supplying the game balls and do away with the teams bringing their own balls to play with.
                                I think this is what will end up happening as well do you really think the season opener is not going to have Tom Brady in it. And what great drama it will be there are those who will root for him since its a home opener and then there's the rest of us who will actually be glad(well okay with) the Steelers beating them.

                                As if the NFL couldn't have scripted it any better....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X