Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Good Article on Pacers on NBA.com

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Good Article on Pacers on NBA.com

    Like the title says, there was a pretty good article written on the Pacers, and I actually saw it on the front page. My reaction can be summed up as:

    My favorite part is Larry/Frank talking about a winning culture, and not tanking. I think we need to become a franchise that people just think of as a winner. We're on the way I believe. There's some stuff about Miles, Lance, and some quotes from Sloan and Cope behind the scenes I liked. Good read, and there's some videos if you follow the link. This, however was my favorite part:

    "We are not a tanking team,'' said Bird. "We are the type of team that sets a good culture. We expect players to meet expectations.''




    With that said, the article:

    Pacers searching for a way during a painful, lost start
    Injuries, upheaval force one-time contender to dig deep for help

    BY Ian Thomsen

    http://www.nba.com/2014/news/feature...=iref:nbahpt6f

    On the road. Trailing 96-94 with 12.1 seconds left in overtime. The weary end of a back-to-back, a sprint of four games in five nights. Five of their best players injured.

    Frank Vogel, coach of the Indiana Pacers, did not need a computer for this algorithm.

    "I told them we were going for the win,'' he said.

    Vogel knew what his team needed to hear. He had done with his own career what they were trying to do with theirs. No one ever envisioned Vogel as an NBA head coach: He had been a student manager at the University of Kentucky, a video coordinator, an advance scout, an assistant for several NBA teams. For his entire adult life Vogel had been driven by the same stubborn belief that was mirrored in the eyes of the players staring back at him. They believed they could be stars. This was their chance.

    The final play last Wednesday was designed for Chris Copeland, last on the team in minutes played per game during the 2013-14 season. Copeland inbounded and ran a curl to the 3-point line, but Donald Sloan, essentially the fourth-string point guard, could not deliver the ball to him. Instead, Sloan spun into the lane and kicked out to the one teammate who was open, 24 feet away from the basket: Roy Hibbert, the 7-foot-2 center. He had made six 3-pointers in seven NBA seasons.

    "I cringed,'' Vogel said the next morning. And then he laughed. "And then I hoped it went in.

    "What a great story, what a great night, if that goes in.''

    Consider Vogel's view from the sideline in Washington. You lead the Pacers to successive Eastern Conference finals. The dream of controlling your own team in the NBA has come true, even as you realize that so much is beyond your control: free agency, injuries, and now this awkward 3-point shot by Hibbert, the last of Indiana's healthy starters.

    The ball caromed short to Copeland, who had circled in where Hibbert was supposed to be. Copeland knew what to do with the ball, but he didn't know how. Moments later he was hunched over, hands on his knees, thinking about the hurried fallaway shot he had left on the front rim, wishing for another chance.

    Changes bring about new certainty

    The five injured Pacers that night were All-Star forwards Paul George and David West, point guard George Hill, combo guard Rodney Stuckey and backup point guard CJ Watson. Their replacements, 1-4 on the season to that point, were fighting for the identity of their team as if it were April or May. For the unlikely starters of Indiana's provisional rotation, the upcoming game against the Celtics loomed like Game 6 of a playoff series.

    The first warning sign that this season might be different emerged last July, when shooting guard Lance Stephenson rejected an offer of $44 million over five years to re-sign with the Pacers. If he could have known that George, the Pacers' leading scorer, was doomed to be sidelined for this season, Stephenson would have returned to Indiana, Vogel believes.

    "I think he probably -- and we probably -- would have approached it differently,'' Vogel said over breakfast in Boston the morning after the loss to the Wizards. "The money would have to have been right, and we would've had to figure that out. But he would have had much more incentive to stay.''

    Stephenson had to find out whether he could command more money with LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony off the free-agent market. The Pacers could not afford to wait . So they replaced their best playmaker by pursuing C.J. Miles and Stuckey, a reliable pair of shooting guards entering their prime years.

    "There is reason to believe that we can be just as good with those two guys as we were with Lance, no question,'' said Vogel. "You know what you're getting. Solid isn't a bad thing. These two guys are solid.''

    Vogel was explaining why -- despite the compound tibia-fibia fracture that George suffered while scrimmaging with USA Basketball in August -- he believed then and now in the ultimate promise of this season. "We're thinking we have George Hill, David West, Roy Hibbert. To me that's enough,'' Vogel said. "Roy and George were underutilized because of the explosion of Paul George and Lance Stephenson.''

    Vogel's backup plan was to play through the old-school frontcourt of Hibbert and West, an option once Stephenson left. "He had the ball in his hands a lot,'' Vogel said of Stephenson. "A lot of times there was less ball movement than we would want to have, that we would hope to have. And that's not a knock on Lance: Some guys dominate the ball to be effective. [Rajon] Rondo does it, Chris Paul does it, LeBron [James] does it. But I think in some ways it's tough to keep Roy Hibbert and George Hill in a good rhythm.''

    Adding to Vogel's confidence was the summer regimen of Hill, who rededicated himself after a disappointing postseason. "I've never seen a guy really work that hard,'' Vogel said. "Yoga in the morning, weights, boxing, shooting -- it was like a 9-to-5 job, every day. He looked like a different player.''

    Hill is not going to be available until December after suffering a bruised left knee in the second-to-last preseason game at Minnesota. West (right ankle), Stuckey (left foot) and Watson (right foot) already had been sidelined when Hill went down. The morning after the Pacers were clobbered 107-89 by the Timberwolves in the preseason, Vogel wrote one word on the whiteboard. "Culture,'' he recalled. "I said we've got to understand it doesn't matter who's in uniform, we're going to play the game a certain way. This is who we're going to be. This is the standard that you all understood we are going to have.''

    Since that Oct. 22 meeting, the Pacers had been competitive into the fourth quarter of every game, even though they ranked second to Oklahoma City in games missed to injury. Both the Pacers and Thunder had entered the summer as title contenders who had built their programs the right way. They had invested shrewdly in the long term. They had raised their young players to put the team first, and it was proof of the amoral randomness of injuries that the likes of Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook and George and West and Hill had been struck down.

    "My expectations were to have a chance to win it all again -- a real chance, especially when LeBron left [Miami],'' Vogel said. "When you reach a certain level with a core group, you have extraordinary confidence, almost certainty, that you can reach that level again. That you can get back to the conference finals. The Pistons, when they went to the conference finals six straight years -- I really envisioned that for us if we were able to keep everybody together and not have injuries. I thought we would be able to do that, and if you're there year after year, one of those years you punch through. That's what I was envisioning.''

    Vogel is 41, still young for his position, and he neither looked nor sounded like a victim after the Washington loss as he sat at breakfast in a white T-shirt. Just the opposite: He refused to let go of that vision. He continues to reinvent it, rework it, as if giving himself the same kind of lifelong pep talk that earned him this job when no one else believed.

    "What's removed is the certainty of knowing that a certain group can get to a certain level,'' Vogel said . "Now, can this group get there? Maybe. It's unlikely, losing the star power of Paul George. But there is no certainty with this group at all. There's none. There's no certainty that says we're going to stink, and there is no certainty that says we're going to be one of the best in the league. Teams that go through injuries reform every year and surprise people every year. There are surprise teams every year. So why can't we be one of them?''

    New faces eager to help Pacers thrive

    "We had dinner last night,'' C.J. Miles said.

    Vogel took Miles out in Boston, just the two of them. They were talking and laughing and telling stories for nearly an hour about everything except the troubles that Miles was having in his opening weeks with the Pacers. He was shooting 25.4 percent in five games. He had missed all but five of his 29 3-pointers.

    "He said, 'It's understandable,'' Miles recalled. "He said people go through this. 'And everything you're going through,' he said, 'I saw Roy going through it last year' -- that [Hibbert] went through the same thing after he signed his [four-year, $58 million] deal.'

    "And Roy's come to me and said, 'I can see it, I was there, I know what you're going through.' He said: 'Is there anything I can do for you?' And I said, 'Man, nothing you're not already doing. I appreciate it.'"

    The more understanding his new coaches and teammates are, the more Miles feels the burden of his slump. He is accustomed to demanding environments. His first NBA coach was Jerry Sloan, whose Utah Jazz drafted Miles as an 18 year old from Skyline High School in Dallas. Over his last two seasons in Cleveland, where he played for Byron Scott and Mike Brown, Miles shot an impressive 38.8 percent from the 3-point line.

    "To my parents, my friends, my family, I'm saying this is not about me. It's a slump. I'm going to get out of it. I've been here 10 years and this is something I know I'm going to get out of," said Miles, 27. "But I look at the 14 guys around me and I want to help them. I want to help them win games.

    "My biggest thing is, I want to look to the guy next to me and have him look back at me and have him know that I'm going to be where I'm supposed to be and I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing and what I'm capable of doing to help him. That's what bothers me when I'm going through a slump. It's not about personal accolades. It's about winning games.''

    The Pacers' game that night provided a crucial opportunity to end the losing streak. The Celtics are healthy, mostly, and are only beginning to establish the winning identity and character that has defined Indiana. No one understood better than Miles that one timely three from him could put his team over the top.

    "It's, like, I have to do this,'' said Miles, sitting on his team's bench after the morning shootaround in Boston. "I have to. It's like you have the weight of the building on your shoulders a little bit. You start looking at the game a different way. You have a game where you take five shots and you missed the first four, and instead of saying, 'I just made that last one,' you say 'I should have made the first four.' So instead of being happy you made one, you become angry. You look at this injury bug we're having, guys are going down, and you say: It has to happen right now. For me, it has to happen. Because we're shorthanded. And that's a little bit of a burden right now.''

    Six hours later, in the hallway outside his locker room, Vogel revealed that Miles was experiencing migraine headaches that would keep him out of the game against the Celtics.

    'A whole different world'

    They lost 101-98 in Boston. In the far corner of the visitors dressing room in Boston, Copeland and Sloan sat at lockers next to one another. More than 15 minutes had passed and Copeland was still in uniform, elbows propped on his knees, head cradled in his hands.

    "I'm making mistakes that I shouldn't be making,'' he said. "I'm learning, but it's just not good enough. I've got to get better.''

    The Pacers have been trying to fill in at small forward with 6-foot-7, 220-pound Solomon Hill, their first-round pick of 2013, as well as the 6-foot-8 Copeland, who is normally a stretch 4. Copeland spent the preseason in three-man drills contrived to teach him to fight through screens and stay with small forwards defensively.

    "It's a whole different world,'' Copeland said after the game. "But I've got the capabilities. I've shown that I can do it in spurts. I've just got to be able to do enough of it to help us win the game.''

    The 1-5 start after the Boston loss was the Pacers' worst since 1993. Copeland takes the losses hard. "I can't speak for everybody, but I know most of us are,'' he said. "We're winners in here, no matter what our record looks like. I don't know how to handle this right now. That's frustrating. Very frustrating.''

    Eventually Copeland got up to take a shower. When he returned to his locker, he could overhear Sloan giving an entirely different kind of interview.

    "I wouldn't say it's frustrating,'' said Sloan, a 26-year-old point guard from Texas A&M who had brief stays with eight teams in the NBA, D-League and China before joining the Pacers last season. "We want to win. But it's a different year for us. We have a lot of guys out right now. The face of the team is out, possibly the whole year. I would say this is encouraging. We're losing a lot of these games by two to four points. You've got to see the bright side in them.''

    Sloan scored 31 points in the overtime loss at Washington. He generated 15 points with four assists and no turnovers against the Celtics.

    "There's a lot of guys out there for us right now, including me, that didn't get that opportunity last year,'' Sloan said. "So take the opportunity to show Coach that you got some more guys over here if needed. I think guys are doing a great job of that. A lot of people don't understand the 15th, 14th, 13th guy on every roster is capable of doing good things if given the opportunity. Give me a legitimate opportunity on any given night and I can show you why I deserve to be playing.''

    The reactions represented two ends of the spectrum, and both were right and true. The Pacers were going to need all sources of inspiration. This was an opportunity for them to prove themselves, and at the same time to hold themselves accountable. They needed to be what they were trying to become, and they needed to be that now.

    "When you go from eight minutes a game to 32 a game, it's a whole different world,'' said Pacers president Larry Bird. "Everybody reacts different. The pressure is on them now. The reason they're not playing as much is not because they're not good players. It's because they're not as consistent. Some guys take full advantage of the opportunity; some revert to their old ways, and that's the reason why they come off the bench. It always boils down to being consistently good night in and night out.''

    This particular Pacers' loss was decided by an errant midrange jump shot from Celtics guard Avery Bradley. The long offensive rebound went to Jeff Green, whose ensuing free throws gave Boston a three-point advantage with 6.1 seconds remaining. "We as a team need to be dedicated to getting that one rebound that Jeff Green got,'' Hibbert said at the end of the night. Hibbert is an example of a self-made player: A No. 17 pick who had transformed his body and his game to become a two-time All-Star. He takes no solace from the moral victories that his less-established teammates are earning.

    "It's good for them, but I'm seven years [into his NBA career] and I've got to win now,'' Hibbert said. "I can't be going through a rebuild process.''

    Indy's ideals bigger than wins, losses

    The next night, in a rematch with the Wizards in Indianapolis, Hibbert banged knees with Hill, which forced the Pacers to play the final three quarters of a 97-90 loss without their top seven players. The Pacers dropped to 1-6.

    And then, when their losing streak was looking as if it may never end, it did.

    On Monday night in Indianapolis, Hibbert returned to score 29 points. A.J. Price, signed to a 10-day contract after the Pacers were granted an injury exemption, provided 22 points off the bench, including 10 in the fourth quarter of their 97-86 win over the fatigued Utah Jazz, who had survived a one-point win themselves the previous night at Detroit.

    "I'm playing for my life," explained Price.

    As a team, the Pacers are fighting to hold onto a sense of themselves that began with Bird building the team, that was practiced daily by Vogel, that was embraced by all of their best players. They were losing games, certainly. But they were holding onto the larger ideal of who they had been and who they want to be.

    "We are not a tanking team,'' said Bird. "We are the type of team that sets a good culture. We expect players to meet expectations.''

    West is expected back within another week, maybe. Miles will be healthy eventually. Stuckey, who had been a candidate to lead his new team in minutes, will be playing a crucial role soon enough. By December Hill and Watson will be reclaiming their roles as the Nos. 1 and 2 point guards, and they will be surrounded by more options -- by Hill, who is emerging as a productive scorer and prodigious leader, by Lavoy Allen and his double-double capability off the bench, by Copeland and Sloan and the more familiar cast of contenders.

    "Life deals you a certain hand?'' said Vogel with a shrug. "You've got to play the hand.''

    The win Monday over the Jazz was their first since opening night. The way the Pacers look at it, it was just the beginning of something better.

  • #2
    Re: Good Article on Pacers on NBA.com

    Here is another one that was linked to on the homepage as well:

    Replay Center aims to help refs make the calls quickly
    Also this week: Banged-up Pacers, Raptors rise up the charts

    BY David Aldridge

    http://www.nba.com/2014/news/feature....html#dribbles

    No, center Roy Hibbert was not supposed to take the potential game-winning 3-pointer last Wednesday for the Indiana Pacers' game against the Washington Wizards.

    This is easily explained, as the 7-foot-2 Hibbert was a career 6-for-20 on 3-pointers entering 2014-15. Even the advanced stats crowd can agree that it's better for Indiana if Hibbert shoots twos rather than threes. He's become quite good at them the last couple of seasons, and has coach Frank Vogel's blessing to let the hooks and dropsteps fly in the paint.

    But when Hibbert got the pass from point guard Donald Sloan, there were four seconds left. Sloan passed Hibbert the ball out front because he was the only guy remotely open. That was because the Wizards easily contained Sloan in a pick-and-roll with forward Lavoy Allen, and got out to contest a potential 3-pointer by small forward Chris Copeland.

    It is here where you might be confused.

    Donald Sloan? Lavoy Allen? Chris Copeland?

    The Thunder have, rightly, gotten most of the national attention during the first couple of weeks of the season with their injury problems, which have shelved Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook. But Indiana can, unfortunately, match Oklahoma City strain for strain.

    David West has missed all seven games so far after suffering a sprained ankle late in the preseason. Point guard George Hill will be out at least another week with a left knee contusion.

    Veteran point guard C.J. Watson is still out with a bruised right foot. Rodney Stuckey, signed from Detroit in the offseason, is currently out with a sore left foot. Hibbert is now day-to-day after banging his left knee against the Wizards on Saturday.

    And there is, of course, the worst of the worst. Paul George suffered a broken leg in early August during an exhibition game for USA Basketball before the U.S. team went to Spain for the 2014 FIBA World Cup. He's expected to miss the entire season.

    Things have been so grim that the Pacers were granted a hardship exception by the league on Thursday and signed veteran guard A.J. Price for a second tour of duty.

    So Sloan starts for Hill at point guard. C.J. Miles, signed this summer to try to help replace the departed Lance Stephenson, is in the midst of a terrible slump. Solomon Hill, Indiana's first-round pick in the 2013 Draft, starts for George, and veteran Luis Scola starts for West. Copeland started Wednesday for Miles.

    Sloan was brilliant Wednesday, scoring a career-high 31 points against the Wizards, but he didn't want to force a shot in the final seconds of overtime. Copeland was covered in the corner. That left Hibbert to take the shot, and it way off line. Copeland got the rebound, but missed an 8-footer that would have tied the score at the buzzer.

    " 'We're gonna go for the win' doesn't mean 'Roy, go for the win,' " Vogel said afterward.

    But that's where the Pacers are right now, a group of loosely affiliated players (think of the "Unified Team," the remnants of the Soviet Union after its dilution, that competed in a couple of Olympic Games in the early 1990s) with no overarching philosophy. That's not a critique of Vogel -- there's no way that there can be any continuity when you're down to your fourth point guard and playing European import Damjan Rudez way more minutes than was expected.

    This is not the team Vogel was planning on coaching.

    "It's a challenge, but we've got guys who are capable of making basketball plays, and they've got to come together as a group," Vogel said.

    It continues a stunning fall for a team that, on this date a year ago, was 7-0 and looked for all the world like a team that would, finally, take out the Heat and make The Finals, after two straight losses to Miami in the playoffs. As late as March 13, Indy was 46-13, with the best record in the Eastern Conference. George was having a brilliant season, making a second All-Star appearance and, later, being named to the NBA's All-Defensive first team and All-NBA third team.

    But then came the denouement, lowlighted by self combustion. Hibbert fell into an inexplicable funk, becoming a shell of the player who'd dominated opponents in 2012-13. There were rumors, never corroborated, about player relationships with women that impacted the locker room. Hibbert, famously, talked about "selfish dudes" on the team, the finger pointed at either George or Stephenson, depending on who you were talking to. And the Pacers, despite getting to the Eastern Conference finals again, were little more than fodder for the Heat en route to their fourth straight Finals appearance.

    Then, Indy lost Stephenson to Charlotte on a three-year, $27 million deal -- a contract that was barely more per season than the Pacers were offering. Stephenson could certainly drive teammates to distraction in any number of ways, but he was a force on defense. Plus, he became a willing and very effective passer last season. At 24, he was expected to be a huge part of the Pacers' future.

    Losing him was an especially tough blow for team president Larry Bird, who had gone to the wall for Stephenson since taking him in the second round in 2010, and who had helped Stephenson raise his game and his profile to a high level.

    What the hell has happened to this franchise?

    "It's kind of surreal," Hill said last week. "I'm a big believer in things happen for a reason. And with Paul going down, and losing Lance, and then to start the season without D West and myself, and the injury to Stuckey, and the injury to C.J. Watson, I mean, I think it's a great opportunity for the other guys, to really showcase what they can do.

    "And to show Coach that we're a deeper team, that we have a lot more guys than we normally do. At this point, I'm just wishing that everything was a dream, that we could wake up and start all over, and start the season fresh."

    It is a new and difficult reality to accept for a team that was built to compete for championships, not moral victories. But George's injury changed the calculus. The ripple effects are still being felt.

    "We were [contenders] at one point, and really not of our own doing, the injury bug is on us now," West said. "You've just got to be confident. You don't know what's going to strike. You've just got to be able to keep the guys who can play on the floor, keep them motivated."

    George, West and Hill are all traveling with the team, trying to be vocal in the film room. But it's not what they were brought to Indy to do.

    "Like I tell all the guys here, it's not about who's playing, how many minutes they're playing, how many points people are putting up," Hill said. "Everyone has a job, and right now, my job is not playing on the court; my job is to be a leader, to tell guys things that I've learned that's helped me in games, and things like that."

    George is off crutches. He lost the walking boot at the team's media day, and he's started shooting stationary shots on the floor. But there's no scenario to speed up the nine-month minimum time frame he'll be out, which would almost certainly cost him the whole season -- unless Indy makes an improbable run deep into the playoffs.

    It still stuns how quickly a franchise's fortunes can change. There is, indeed, a short window of true title contention for most teams. Twelve months ago, Indy's looked wide open. But it slammed shut the second George landed wrong in Las Vegas on Aug. 1. It was a major blow, especially for veterans like West, who has a player option for 2015-16, the final year of his three-year contract signed in 2013.

    "I was at home in North Carolina watching the game," West said. "I mean, any time you see that happen to any part of your body, you know that's a serious injury. I actually talked to him that night. He was, his mind was in a different space. Obviously, he knew it was going to be a long, long road."

    George is "pushing himself to get healthy," West said. "We've got to keep him around the game as much as possible, keep his mind focused on what's coming for him in the future."

    Hibbert was packing for a wedding in San Francisco the next day. He flew to the Bay Area, then went to Las Vegas the following day to see George in the hospital.

    "I made a promise to him that every week I'd come to his house and just chill with him until he gets back on the court ready to play," Hibbert said. "I missed last week; we've been having a lot of games. But [when] we go by the house, we go fishing, play some shooting games in his court in his house, we'll watch movies. We was watching "Love and Hip Hop L.A." Just act like it's normal, any other day."

    The injuries have wrecked continuity. There's no ability to practice because there just aren't enough healthy bodies. Sloan had no backup until the team signed Price. (Indy was going to sign former Mavs guard Gal Mekel, but Mekel reportedly ran into issues trying to get a visa.)

    "A lot of us aren't used to playing a ton of minutes," Sloan said. "Last year, we has this great team where the rotation was very limited. We had an itch all year to show, you know, 'Coach, I can do this, I can do that.' Unfortunately, it's come around this way. You don't want to see your teammates hurt, guys out. But we have to make the most of it. We have to compete."

    Sloan went undrafted out of Texas A&M in 2010, and bounced around: the NBA D-League, brief stints abroad in the Philippines and China and cups of coffee with the Atlanta Hawks and the then-New Orleans Hornets (now Pelicans). He played in 45 games for the Cleveland Cavaliers over parts of two seasons before signing in 2013 with the Pacers as a third point guard behind Hill and Watson.

    He ran Indy's scout team, picking up Hill full court to give him a good look at the opposition's tendencies in practice.

    "I was the guy that was like a John Wall, Damian Lillard, put pressure on him at the offensive end," Sloan said. "So I've always had to kind of keep that style with me, even not playing last year. But then I get thrown out there, and I go right back into the role of, I have to make this player better, I have to make this player better. I feel like for us to do anything while a lot of these guys are out, I have to be a little more aggressive."

    Since being put into the starting lineup, Sloan knows that it's one thing to pretend to be Wall or Rajon Rondo in practice. It's quite another to try to guard them for real. He's been picking Hill's brain for pointers, and Hill's told him when to be aggressive, what shots are available for which players and when he should shoot or get someone else going.

    "He's seen these guys night in and night out the last few years," Sloan said. "I've only, even when I have played, I've only played against other backups. I haven't really seen the John Walls or the Derrick Roses or the Jeff Teagues. He's in my ear before games, during games, after games, showing me -- 'Push up on him like this,' going into the last minute, or fight over a little more, or he's gonna fake like this. For my growth, and for me developing, it's key for him to be around me."

    Sloan may have earned himself some minutes in the rotation when Hill and Watson return. At the least, he could allow Watson or Hill to play some two-guard pairing with him at the point against certain lineups.

    He more than held his own against Wall, taking Wall off the dribble frequently to get into the paint. Of course, Wall did pick his pocket at a key moment in overtime, leading to a fast-break Wizards' bucket. But Sloan didn't throw up on himself playing against an All-Star.

    "It shows that there's a lot of good guys in this league, and just given the right opportunity, the right stage, a lot of people can see that," Sloan said. "It's all it takes. There's a lot of guys that get bashed for being the 15th guy on the bench, the 14th guy, guys that don't really get to play. Those [bleeps] can play. They can play. And me, I've been that guy for the past few years."

    The Pacers are high on Solomon Hill, who's currently starting in Stephenson's old spot. He got some time last season playing behind George while Danny Granger was rehabbing his knee injury, but once Granger returned, Hill's minutes evaporated. And Vogel went with Evan Turner, acquired for Granger at the trade deadline, for the stretch run. But with George out for the next few months this season, Hill's getting his chance.

    "Solomon Hill, for a young player, has assumed a big leadership role," Vogel said.

    But they have to lean now, more than ever, on Hibbert. Against Washington, he scored just two points and looked lost offensively. (He rebounded with 22 points Friday, though the Pacers lost again, in Boston.)

    But Hibbert continues to beat himself up mentally when he struggles, and the Pacers can't afford for him to go down the rabbit hole again this season.

    "He comes over here down that he didn't help his team a lot better scoring the ball," George Hill said. "I said it's not always about scoring. You know me, coming from San Antonio, it was always a team first team. The way Coach [Gregg Popovich] Pop went about things, it wasn't just about scoring the basketball. There's so many different ways you can impact the game.

    "I said [to Hibbert], 'From the times you're in there, you bust your butt on the defensive end, blocking shots, altering shots, rebounding. You may not have the game you wanted offensively, but defensively you still protected the paint pretty well tonight. We're in the game. We're 47 seconds, down by one point in overtime, on the road, to a tough team that's probably going to be one of the top teams in the East. You have to live with that consequence.'"

    On the one hand, you love that Hibbert cares so much. On the other, the Pacers thought Hibbert had turned the corner emotionally a couple of years ago, when everything came together for him on the court and he finished second to Marc Gasol for Defensive Player of the Year.

    "He's a competitor," George Hill said. "He just wants to do what's right. He feels like with all the guys out, and him being the only leader out there from last year's starting group, a lot sits on his shoulders. When he feels he don't perform the way that maybe the outside world feels he should perform, he feels like he's let everybody down.

    "And I'm like, it's not about that, what people think on the outside. It's what this team thinks. It just wasn't your night offensively; it was Donald Sloan's night. It was [Chris] Copeland's night. But defensively, you did you job, and we have to live with that."

    For his part, Hibbert says he's fine, and is focusing on trying to lead while so many of his teammates are out.

    "You've got guys playing that were on the bench last year," Hibbert said. "Just keep supporting them, hit them when they're open."

    The cavalry is, slowly, making its way back. Stuckey's return is imminent. Watson should be back next week; West and George Hill will take a little longer, but are hopeful to return sometime this month. And, it could be worse, right? At least Indiana's in the East.

    Except, George Hill's not buying that argument.

    "I think that's an idea we have to get away from," he said. "We have to get away from the mentality of, hey, we're wounded, let's just see where it takes us, let's just try to win a game. I think we have to have that mentality where we expect to win. I think we still have a great group of guys in this locker room and a great basketball team, wounded or not."

    That may be. But it's not the team that looked so formidable such a short time ago, meticulously put together over four years by Bird, Donnie Walsh and Kevin Pritchard to be able to compete with, and ultimately conquer, the SuperFriends. Those Pacers are gone, and we may not see an Indiana team reach those heights again for a while.

    "You think about what could be," Hibbert said. "But you realize that Paul's probably not coming back this year. There's guys hurting that might not be back for another month. You just have to make the best of it, roll with the punches, and play hard."

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Good Article on Pacers on NBA.com

      Great quotes from everyone, but especially from Vogel. I said before the season that I consider him one of the stars of the team. I really don't think getting to playoffs is possible with this squad, but with Frank I'm not ruling anything out.

      Love Cope's competitiveness. He can't defend and makes tons of mistakes, but man he cares. Miles has the right attitude, I think. Hope he gets better, whatever it is that's ailing him. Those migraines seem serious.

      Sloan can't hide how ecstatic he is to get minutes, haha. Can't say I blame him really. Love that Hill is tutoring him.

      Not going to comment on the Lance thing, not in this thread anyway.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Good Article on Pacers on NBA.com

        If Frank ever decides to stop coaching Lord knows he will have a job waiting for him as a motivational speaker if he chooses.

        Comment

        Working...
        X