Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Looking forward - for 3 seasons

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

    3 seasons is a long time. If I had to bet a lot of money on it, I might just say PG is the only current player here in 3 seasons.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
      3 seasons is a long time. If I had to bet a lot of money on it, I might just say PG is the only current player here in 3 seasons.
      Note that I was basically discussing the team to start the 2016-17 season with. That is just 2 seasons (minus few games) away. Not 3 seasons.

      If we look same amount of time backwards, we have 5 players left from that time : PG, GHill, Hibbert, West & Mahinmi. That seems to me like a rather standard amount of makeover. In that sense, prognosticating the lengthy contracts of Paul, George Hill & CJ Miles to remain seems pretty legitimate guess. Because it is cap-wise easier to re-sign your own players over bidding for other teams' guys I do believe that Hibbert will stay. And based on what he is showing right Solo is a keeper IF he will not become a piece in a major trade.

      So I would surely take a bet of "more likely to minimum of 6 to stay than just one in Paul George!". It would include at least 4 out of 5 mentioned above + two from "might-be-heres".

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

        Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
        PG. That's the only "I want him until he retires short of something stupid" guy. I think Roy will continue to be effective in the short-ish term but until the league stops being more and more perimeter oriented I think his value will fall yearly. Love the guy's interior D but he's just too limited offensively w/o a top tier offensive big next to him. I mean a 1b scoring big type, not West, and West is obviously not a spring chicken.

        I mean, if I GOTTA pick 4 current guys, it's PG then a massive gap of "well, we got em so..." guys. So PG, Roy, Hill cuz he'll be here, and...Solo? If our rookie next year counts then he's a notch above PG for the second spot. Short of PG there's not a guy on the roster I'm committing too, much as I like a lot of em.
        Bird will have the opportunity to sign/trade/draft the future Starting PF for the Pacers between now and the start of the 2016-2017 season ( yeah, 2 seasons away ), so I think your concern for getting a 1b Scoring PF ( that can rebound ) will be addressed.
        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

          Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
          PG. That's the only "I want him until he retires short of something stupid" guy. I think Roy will continue to be effective in the short-ish term but until the league stops being more and more perimeter oriented I think his value will fall yearly. Love the guy's interior D but he's just too limited offensively w/o a top tier offensive big next to him. I mean a 1b scoring big type, not West, and West is obviously not a spring chicken.

          I mean, if I GOTTA pick 4 current guys, it's PG then a massive gap of "well, we got em so..." guys. So PG, Roy, Hill cuz he'll be here, and...Solo? If our rookie next year counts then he's a notch above PG for the second spot. Short of PG there's not a guy on the roster I'm committing too, much as I like a lot of em.
          With 4 slow, un-athletic, limited starters around him - the Pacers are still a top 10 defensive team somehow. Roy's defensive value will always be high IMO.
          Last edited by Ace E.Anderson; 11-11-2014, 02:52 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

            Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
            No, I wouldn't. JR Smith though...
            I hope that you are joking......
            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

              Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
              With 4 slow, un-athletic, limited starters around him - the Pacers are still a top 10 defensive team somehow. Roy's defensive value will never always be high IMO.
              Is "never always" some double negative that cancels each other out?
              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                Is "never always" some double negative that cancels each other out?
                typo!

                Lol thanks for catching that. Damn cell phone!

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                  Won't there be even more player movement in the next 3 or 4 years because of the significant increase of the salary cap and luxury tax. Plus if you figure in the next CBA things will swing a little bit back in the players favor - that will increase player movement as well.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                    Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                    typo!

                    Lol thanks for catching that. Damn cell phone!
                    So...I assume that you are saying that Roy's defensive value will always be high IMO.
                    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                      Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                      I think you're close but I would deal West to the Kings for Jason Thompson and their pick. Or to the Sixers for Wroten and their first round pick. We need two first rounders and to dump salary. Sixers would probably be interested since they have MCW, Embiid, and Nerlens Noel. Do they need anymore youngsters there? Time to add a vet and attempt to win something.

                      I'd move West and Hill for picks or young players who can start for us or expirings. I'd keep Copeland. Copeland and Miles off our bench next season with Solo and Rudez will be a thing of beauty. A three way trade could work too...

                      Waiters to Philly, Wroten to Indy, George Hill + Scola's expiring to Philly. Sixers 1st to Cleveland.
                      The Sixers are intentionally tanking. Where have you been? They've also tried to ship MCW. They traded a very solid player in Thad Young, who plays the same position as D West. No, they will not take him.
                      And in your three way trade we move Hill and Scola for Tony Wroten? Please just stop.
                      I don't know why I continue to bite on these..

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                        So...I assume that you are saying that Roy's defensive value will always be high IMO.
                        Yes. I edited my post. I was meaning to say the Roy's defensive value will always be high.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                          Originally posted by PetPaima View Post
                          Note that I was basically discussing the team to start the 2016-17 season with. That is just 2 seasons (minus few games) away. Not 3 seasons.

                          If we look same amount of time backwards, we have 5 players left from that time : PG, GHill, Hibbert, West & Mahinmi. That seems to me like a rather standard amount of makeover. In that sense, prognosticating the lengthy contracts of Paul, George Hill & CJ Miles to remain seems pretty legitimate guess. Because it is cap-wise easier to re-sign your own players over bidding for other teams' guys I do believe that Hibbert will stay. And based on what he is showing right Solo is a keeper IF he will not become a piece in a major trade.

                          So I would surely take a bet of "more likely to minimum of 6 to stay than just one in Paul George!". It would include at least 4 out of 5 mentioned above + two from "might-be-heres".
                          Good point and something I agree with. I am 66% sure that we already have part of the future core of Players on the roster already.

                          1 ) PG13 - Starting SG / SF ( as in 1 of the 2 Starting Wing-men )
                          2 ) GH - Starting PG, Starting SG or 6th Man / 1st Guard off the bench
                          3 ) Hibbert - Starting Center ( you don't give up on defensive anchors )
                          4 ) Solo - Starting SF / SG ( as in 1 of the 2 Starting Wing-men ) or 1st Wing off the bench
                          5 ) Miles - Backup Wing-man ( we are stuck with him cuz of his long-term contract )
                          6 ) Lavoy - My hope is that Bird is smart enough to make a concerted effort to re-sign Lavoy as our Backup PF or 1st Big off the bench ( cuz seriously, I do not want another "All Things Lance" type thread that is devoted to Lavoy ).

                          That's 6 Players that I think will and should be part of the future core.

                          That would mean that Bird has 3 to 4 more roster spots to fill up a future core of Players:

                          - Future Starting PF
                          - Future Backup Center ( fill via the Draft? )
                          - Future Backup PG ( fill via the Draft? )
                          - Dependent on what role you think that GH and/or Solo will serve on this Team; a Future Starting PG ( if you think that GH is not the solution at the Starting PG spot ) or Future Starting SG ( if you do not think that GH or Solo can fill that role ) or ( at the very least ) another Backup Wing-Man.

                          between now and the 2016-2017 offseason via the draft ( we should have two 1st round draft picks between now and the 2016-2017 season ), trade or via Free Agency.

                          I think that we are in the starting phase of another Bird 3 Year Retooling plan. My hope is that Bird has the patience to make the right moves between now and the 2016-2017 offseason ( cuz I agree with the notion that we should be patient and go after Conley as our future Starting PG ) and think that we should be able to get our future Starting PF via a trade or ( more than likely ) via the Draft.
                          Last edited by CableKC; 11-11-2014, 04:18 PM.
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                            Won't there be even more player movement in the next 3 or 4 years because of the significant increase of the salary cap and luxury tax. Plus if you figure in the next CBA things will swing a little bit back in the players favor - that will increase player movement as well.
                            I just realized something......

                            Knowing that the 2016-2017 contracts are going to likely be higher......should the Pacers make moves now to clear Cap Space this season ( likely trading West for an Expiring Contract while acquiring some assets ) to sign Free Agents in the 2015-2016 season?

                            or

                            Make trades between now and the 2015-2016 Trade Deadline to get Players that are under a Pre-2016-2017-New Revenue Contract?

                            For example, it's been brought up that PG13...as his current contract....will be a good price for the last 2 years of his guaranteed contract....which should be 2 years into the new Revenue enhanced contracts starting in the 2016-2017 season.

                            In other words, should the Pacers make moves to acquire/sign Key Players ( who will likely be had at a cheaper price ) before the price of Free Agents goes up in the summer of the 2016-2017 Offseason?
                            Last edited by CableKC; 11-11-2014, 04:16 PM.
                            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                              Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                              In other words, should the Pacers make moves to acquire/sign Key Players ( who will likely be had at a cheaper price ) before the price of Free Agents will be going up in the summer of the 2016-2017 Offseason?
                              Valuable free agents simply are not going to sign contracts that obligate them any farther into the new CBA timeframe than absolutely necessary. So, clearing cap space and going after FAs is likely not to net anything.

                              Trades might be available for impact players that can be kept cheaply for a few years, but there won't be very many who have contracts extending for 2+ years and whose teams would be willing to give them up for an unequivalent asset.
                              BillS

                              A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                              Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Looking forward - for 3 seasons

                                Originally posted by BillS View Post
                                Valuable free agents simply are not going to sign contracts that obligate them any farther into the new CBA timeframe than absolutely necessary. So, clearing cap space and going after FAs is likely not to net anything.

                                Trades might be available for impact players that can be kept cheaply for a few years, but there won't be very many who have contracts extending for 2+ years and whose teams would be willing to give them up for an unequivalent asset.
                                I'm suggesting going after Free Agents that will hit the market in the July 2015. Players that are in contract years now....and will require signing a new Contract....will have to do so under the Pre-2016 Revenue era, right?

                                I'm suggesting going after those Players ( assuming that we clear capspace ) so that we lock up Players under a Pre-2016 contract.

                                At most, for these Free Agents that will hit the market without contracts in July 2015....even if they don't want a super long-term contract ( think what Bird did with Lance ), I would hope that we can lock them up for 3 seasons starting in the Summer of 2015. That should have them coming off the books at the same time as PG13, who will likely opt out by July 2018 ( as in the 2018-2019 Offseason when PG13 will likely opt out to hit Free Agency again ).
                                Last edited by CableKC; 11-11-2014, 04:25 PM.
                                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X