Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat


    WITNESS THIS!


    -VS-




    Game Time Start: 8:00 PM EST
    Where: AmericanAirlines Arena, Miami, FL
    Officials: D. Stafford, J. Phillips, G. Willard, M. Smith


    Media Notes: Indiana Notes, Miami Notes
    Television:
    Local Radio: WIBC 93.1 FM
    NBA Feeds:

    REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you


    2

    6-3
    Away: 3-1
    2

    6-3
    Home: 4-1
    May 24
    May 26
    vs
    at


    If Necessary
    C
    PF
    SF
    SG
    PG
    HIBBERT
    WEST
    GRANGER
    GEORGE
    HILL
    C
    PF
    SF
    SG
    PG
    TURIAF
    BATTIER
    JAMES
    WADE
    CHALMERS

    Pacers
    None to report



    Heat
    Chris Bosh - Lower Abdominal Strain (out indefinitely)
    Jonathan Auping: By the Numbers

    The Miami Heat and Indiana Pacers are tied at two games a piece. There are a lot of
    obvious things that anyone who has been watching the series will have noticed: Lebron
    and Wade did crazy things in Game 4, both teams’ defenses have put on the clamps,
    the shooting is down, Danny Granger will let any Heat player know when something
    rubs him the wrong way, and Roy Hibbert’s size and skills are a huge advantage for
    the Pacers (but his lack of speed is an advantage for the Heat).

    But a look at the total series statistics shows us a few surprising tidbits. Basketball is
    a game played 48 minutes at a time so we cannot look too much into these statistics,
    but we have four full games of evidence to analyze now and they do give us a good
    look at who is giving consistently good performances.

    16 Rebounds (Chalmers) vs. 8 rebounds (Hansbrough)

    Four games into this series, Mario Chalmers has doubled Tyler Hansbrough up in
    rebounds grabbed. To be fair, Chalmers has played more than double the minutes of
    Tyler, but does that really remove all the shock? Eight rebounds in nearly 52 minutes
    over four games? Two rebounds per game? One rebound every six-and-a-half
    minutes? Hansbrough has yet to have the momentum-swinging impact on a game in
    this series that earned him the nickname Psycho-T.

    20-for-57 FGs (Granger)

    Danny Granger has been aggressive at times and made some big buckets in this
    series. He has played with great effort and has had the task of guarding Lebron James
    on defense. Also, no one is going to question how much he wants to win this series and
    he has made 7 of his last 15 three-pointers. But the fact of the matter is that he is
    shooting 35% (eFG% of 42.1%) through four games and is certainly not making up for
    that with only 8 free throws attempted. (In the regular season, he shot 41.2% with an
    eFG% of 48.1% while averaging 4.7 free throws per game). This might be a troubling
    reminder of how dangerous it can be when your best player relies on low-percentage
    shots to score.

    93 points (Granger + George) vs 210 points (Lebron + Wade)

    This one might not be so surprising. I don’t think anyone expected George and Granger
    to match the scoring of Wade and James. But has it really seemed that lopsided for the
    series? Didn’t it seem like Granger and George were playing nice defense on Wade and
    James while also providing a nice scoring punch of their own? Sure, Game Four’s 70
    points from Wade and James might skew this a little, but keep in mind it also factors in
    a 5 point game from Wade in Game 3.

    123 minutes (Hill) vs 73 minutes (Collison)

    Should it really be that one-sided? Collison was the starter for most of the season,
    does it make sense to minimize his role this much? I understand that you are rarely going
    to give two point guards equal minutes, but if you are going to be using the “stick with the
    hot hand” approach, wouldn’t Collison have more minutes in this series? Collison’s
    weakness in this series is that he can only guard Mario Chalmers due to his size. Since
    Chalmers starts wouldn’t it make sense to start Collison so that Hill could come in when
    the Heat bring in...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s




    3-on-3 preview: Heat-Pacers, Game 4

    In another installment of the Heat Index's 3-on-3 series, our writers give their takes on
    the storylines before the Heat host the Pacers in Game 5 of the East semifinals.


    1. Fact or Fiction: Rest of the series will be more like Game 4 than Game 3.

    Tom Haberstroh: Fiction. I'm not sure the Heat can duplicate Udonis Haslem's hot
    shooting display that rescued the supporting cast in Game 4. Also, I'm no doctor but I'm
    not completely sold that Dwyane Wade's knee will respond positively after Sunday. Oh,
    and LeBron going 40-18-9? Probably not happening again. Expect the Pacers to be more
    prepared.

    Michael Wallace: Fact. Not necessarily in terms of the outcome, but more along
    the lines of how closely the game was played throughout. I still don't feel comfortable
    predicting who will win this series. But I'd bank on close games with vicious
    momentum swings before I'd anticipate another 20-point blowout.

    Brian Windhorst: Fiction. If ever there was an outlier, it was Game 4. It is
    unrealistic to expect that kind of production from Wade and James every night. Also,
    the Pacers got very little from David West and Roy Hibbert. Probably the most
    important thing for the Heat to replicate is getting a contribution from Haslem.


    2. Fact or Fiction: Wade's knee is more worrisome than LeBron's fatigue.

    Haberstroh: Fiction. I'd say it's equally concerning. The minutes and responsibilities
    are piling up for LeBron, even with Shane Battier as a much-needed battery in tow. The
    Chris Bosh injury ruined whatever hopes that LeBron would stay fresh in the playoff run.
    He admitted he was gassed in Game 4. Even though Wade had his knee drained, I wonder
    how much longer LeBron can stay in fifth gear.

    Wallace: Fact. Wade won't discuss the knee, but it certainly is an issue that could
    affect the outcome of the series if the problems flare up again. No one knows if he will
    need to have it drained again. What we do know is he overcame physical limitations and
    emotional outbursts to bounce back from one of his worst postseason performances with
    one of his best. Meanwhile, LeBron has been a beast all season. He'll play through fatigue.

    Windhorst: Fact. It may not be a serious injury; Wade can still play, after all. But
    the past week showed how much the knee can effect Wade's play. As he said, he feels
    differently on different days. Without Bosh, the Heat badly need Wade's knee to stay
    healthy.


    3. Fact or Fiction: Frank Vogel has won the chess match so far.

    Haberstroh: Fiction. After starting Dexter Pittman in Game 3, Erik Spoelstra got
    showered with nation-wide blame, but I don't even think that was all that egregious. That
    disaster lasted all but three minutes. Vogel has been impressive with his defensive
    strategies, but the Pacers have been absolutely dreadful when he goes to the bench.
    Making Hibbert and West ride the pine during crucial situations in Game 4 is on Vogel.

    Wallace: Fiction. Both coaches still have their power pieces on the table and in
    play. Tonight's outcome will determine the first real "check" position of this series, when
    one team pushes the other to the brink of elimination. Spoelstra's Game 3 adjustments
    were awful. But Vogel also produced a major head-scratcher in Game 4 when he chose
    to leave Hibbert and West on the bench with four fouls a bit too long.

    Windhorst: Fiction. Vogel has made some excellent moves and assembled a game
    plan that's been very effective. But he made some questionable moves in Games 1 and 4.
    On Sunday, it seemed like he got stuck watching the show instead of making adjustments
    when the Pacers started getting run over.




    Ethan Sherwood Strauss: What was Roy Hibbert thinking?

    Much attention was paid to what followed this Roy Hibbert foul. Dwyane Wade didn’t
    like it. Danny Granger got in Wade’s face. A technical was called. Hubie admonished
    Danny. A rich debate over Granger’s faketoughguyness was held in the Twitter high
    court.

    But I was more fixated on the foul itself than on the ensuing drama. Wade blew past
    Hibbert, and the center reacted by intentionally hacking. The idea was to not cede an
    easy bucket, to make Wade “earn it at the line.” Dwyane did miss one of two, so
    mission accomplished, right?

    Not so fast. To quote Zach Lowe of Sports Illustrated:
    “Simultaneous foul trouble to power forward David West and center
    Roy Hibbert made the Pacers easier to guard on offense and far less
    intimidating on defense. Those foul issues also forced coach Frank
    Vogel to deal with several rotation-related dilemmas at once, including
    how long to sit his big men and whether/when he should use a small
    lineup with only one of the Tyler Hansbrough/Lou Amundson backup
    duo that has been shaky all season.”

    Before that hack, Roy Hibbert had gone nearly a whole half while accruing only one
    foul. The Heat had and have no answer for him. So long as he stays on the court,
    Miami appears at a disadvantage. So is getting 1/6 of the way fouled out worth the
    chance that Dwyane Wade misses a free throw? Hibbert picked up a quick two fouls
    in the third quarter, which sent him to the bench. When Hibbert finally came back in
    the fourth quarter, he appeared tentative on plays at the rim, perhaps fearing
    ignominious disqualification. What if he had been playing with three fouls instead of
    four?

    Beckley showed you Gregg Popovich’s mundane genius for fouling when appropriate.
    The other side of this is that the Spurs are among the least fouling teams, year after
    year. Fouling is usually bad. It can take your players out of the game, it can put you
    closer to a penalty situation wherein the other team marches to the free throw line.
    If your average free throw shooter went to the line, every possession, his team’s
    offense would crush it...CONTINUE READING AT HOOPSPEAK





    Pacers
    Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
    Jared Wade @8pts9secs
    Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
    Tom Lewis @indycornrows
    Ian Levy @HickoryHigh


    Heat
    Brian Windhorst @windhorstESPN
    Tom Haberstroh @tomhaberstroh
    Peninsula is Mightier @DavidDwork
    Last edited by avoidingtheclowns; 05-22-2012, 04:16 PM.
    This is the darkest timeline.

  • #2
    Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

    We're a better TEAM than them. If we play our game then we should be able to win it.
    Originally posted by Piston Prince
    Bobcat fans telling us to cheer up = epic fail season
    "Josh Smith Re-building the city of Detroit one brick at a time"

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

      Originally posted by yoadknux View Post
      We're a better TEAM than them. If we play our game then we should be able to win it.
      I agree. Let's see if we decide to pound it inside today.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

        "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

        "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

          I'm feeling cautiously optimistic. We've already beat them at home once in this series. We can do it again tonight and wrap things up at Conseco Banker's Life on Thursday.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

            Need to keep the pressure on Wade. Make sure he doens't get started early on the inside and at the line. He'll be content with shooting bad jumpers if we let him. Lebron will keep putting up eye-popping stats; just keep him off the boards. If Roy and West show up, we'll be able to keep the rotation tight as everyone suggests and keep this game at a slow grind. And we need to win the third quarter!
            You Got The Tony!!!!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

              We need Hill,Roy and West to be aggressive today if we want to win today, Danny and George need to stop losing Lebron and Wade, they were open by themselves so many times that is not even funny, and can the real Tyler Hansbrough please stand up? we need him to stop sucking, hopefully he plays out of his mind today.

              Go Pacers
              Last edited by vnzla81; 05-22-2012, 05:08 PM.
              @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                Pound it inside, control the boards, limit dribble penetration, make them a 3 point shooting team, run when the opportunity presents itself.

                This has an almost must win feel about it to me, although the fact that it's every other day here on out as long as it lasts is in our favor I think.
                I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                -Emiliano Zapata

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                  Don't take a **** load of 3s to start the game, avoid foul trouble and contain their role players. If we do this, we can pull this out
                  Originally posted by IrishPacer
                  Empty vessels make the most noise.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                    I really we wish we had Foster. At this point I think I'd take anybody over Amundson.

                    Anyways, its going to be a tough game, most likely a dogfight...Go Pacers!
                    //

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                      If we lose this im gunna flip a ****!


                      @Coupe460

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                        Am I the only one who misses Boston Connection's game-thread polls?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                          Originally posted by Coupe View Post
                          If we lose this im gunna flip a ****!

                          You Got The Tony!!!!!!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                            This is definitely a must win.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 5/22/2012 NBA Playoffs, Second Round - Game Thread #5: Pacers Vs. Heat

                              I don't have a good feeling about this series now. In game four wade and born attacked Hibbert and got him in foul trouble I expect that to be our undoing. I pray to the basketball gods that I am wrong.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X