False. Even nobel laurates at my institution teach. Certainly younger faculty carry a heavier teaching load, but plenty of top-notch world famous researchers teach on a regular basis.
Originally Posted by Gamble1
False again. In the last 10 years the pharmaceutical industry in particular, and other science-based industries have undergone tremendous consolidation, layoffs, restructuring, and brain drain. Nearly every major university and research institution I know of has faculty who left industry.
You find very few people who go from industry to real academic research
Wrong again. My teaching commitment is rather light and I focus most of my efforts on research grants. I am an investigator on 4 funded grants currently, with others in review.
i think you teach and do research on the side
Compared to some other chemists, biologists, or MDs, no. Relative to the general public, perhaps yes.
Are you really an expert in PEDs?
Neither will I. Spikes was incredibly stupid to not go through proper channels and I have never defended him at all for failing to doing so.
I won't defend a guy who is caught doing a banned drug.
In this thread I ponted out time and again that it is stupid to characterize what the Colts did with the simulating the snap as cheating and wanted the thread title changed. Still, many insisted and also thought it was idiotic for Brady to be upset about it. After the Colts were penalized in another game for exactly the same infraction, I pointed it out. I had never posted any link to this second unfraction until in this thread, and again you falsely accused otherwise.
So basically everything you have recently posted that has been directed at me has been factually inaccurate.