Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

How To Beat The Colts?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How To Beat The Colts?

    Yes, the Colts can be beaten; here's how to do it


    Dec. 7, 2005
    By Clark Judge
    CBS SportsLine.com Senior Writer
    Tell Clark your opinion!








    I watch the Indianapolis Colts destroy another opponent, and I wonder if anyone's playing the same game as these guys. I know, I know, their next three opponents -- Jacksonville, San Diego and Seattle -- are 27-9, and the Jaguars have a history of playing Indy tough.

    Marcus Stroud is half the Jaguars' defensive tackle tandem that could give the Colts trouble. (Getty Images)
    But my question is: Forget about playing close; does Jacksonville have a legitimate shot at winning. Does anyone?
    "Sure they do," said an assistant coach who faced Indianapolis this year. "The Colts can be beaten."
    Then he told me how. So did a couple of others Indianapolis vanquished. Now we make the case for you, and Jack del Rio, feel free to take notes. While all those interviewed conceded the Colts are the most complete team out there, they also insisted they're not impregnable.
    Here's what you must do:

    1. Extend your drives and punctuate them with points or field position.
    "It's not enough to keep them off the field," said one defensive assistant. "You have to get points or field position. You can't go three-and-out or five-and-out. You can't get anxious. I don't care if you don't score. Make sure you get something out of your drives." He has a point. Look at Indianapolis' last loss, that 20-3 defeat in the 2004 playoffs. People forget that New England led by only 6-3 at the half, and we had a ballgame. Then the Patriots struck with two enormous second-half drives -- one of 15 plays and 87 yards; the other of 14 plays and 94 yards. They didn't panic. They were patient. And they consumed yards -- and the clock -- with lots of Corey Dillon, who ran for 144 yards, and error-free play. Having a big-time back is essential to completing this job, and Jacksonville has one in Fred Taylor ... if he's healthy. San Diego has one in LaDainian Tomlinson, too. Seattle's Shaun Alexander not only leads the league in rushing, he's on schedule to break Priest Holmes' record of 27 touchdowns in one season. Remember: In the Colts' past three meaningful losses (I discount that season-ender at Denver last year) each opponent had a 100-yard rusher. But let's not forget the second half of this equation -- the idea of gaining field position if you don't gain points. Look at what happened in that January loss to New England. Six of the Patriots' drives ended in Colts territory, and their worst finishing position -- discounting the game-ending kneel-down with four seconds left -- was the New England 43. Now look at the Oct. 31, 2004, loss to Kansas City: 11 of the Chiefs' 13 drives ended on the Colts' end of the field. And the loss to Jacksonville a week earlier? Eight of the Jags' 10 possessions finished in Colts territory, including the last five. I think you get the message.

    2. Avoid third-and-long.
    The key to the Colts' defense is their two safeties, particularly hard-hitting Bob Sanders. Indianapolis likes to sit back in a two-high setup, and you want to -- no, you must -- force the Colts out of it. "The key to beating them," said an offensive coordinator who played the Colts, "is positive yardage on first and second downs." When Pittsburgh became the Colts' 11th victim a week-and-a-half ago the Steelers produced nothing early. On the first play of their first series, running back Willie Parker was stuffed for a 1-yard loss. On the first play of their second series, he was stuffed for a 3-yard retreat. On the first play of their third series, Jerome Bettis didn't gain an inch. Say good night, folks. The problem with getting into third-and-longs is that now you're forced to protect against the Colts' edge pass rushers, which means keeping everyone in except, oh, maybe three receivers. The Colts, meanwhile, drop seven into coverage, and you don't have to be a math major to figure out who holds the advantage there. The solution: Run early and often at the Colts defensive ends. They're better against the pass than they are defending the run. Make yards against them, and you force the safeties to move forward to support the run. That, in turn, loosens up the secondary and makes it easier to succeed with the pass. Can it be accomplished? Two of the Colts' next three opponents, San Diego and Seattle, are among the league's leaders in first-down production. The Chargers average 6.16 yards a play, second only to Indianapolis; the Seahawks average 6.14 yards, best in the NFC. Yeah, I'd say each has a chance.

    3. Take away one of their two explosive threats.
    You either contain Edgerrin James or bottle up their receivers. You can't do both. Some of that is up to your offense. The longer it stays on the field, the less your defense sees of Peyton Manning & Co. Most of it is on the defensive coordinator, and few opponents defense the Colts better than Jacksonville. "Because of those two big defensive tackles (John Henderson and Marcus Stroud), they can play the run with their front seven," said one assistant. "They don't need help." That is significant, and, yes, I know James has nine 100-yard games this season and is an MVP candidate. But look at the Colts' last three meaningful losses: James failed to rush for 100 yards in each. In fact, in two of those games he didn't make it past 39, and in seven career starts before this season he never once produced 100 against Jacksonville. Then the Jags threw a changeup at the Colts in September, attacking Manning and daring the impatient Colts to beat them with James. The strategy was effective ... until, that is, the Colts turned James loose in the second half. On the game-winning 17-play drive, Manning handed off 14 times. Nevertheless, the point was made: The Jags demonstrated they could neutralize Indy's pass attack. And they lost by a touchdown.

    4. Force red-zone field goals.
    We all know you're not going to keep these guys off the board. Manning hasn't been shut out in his career, and the Colts have put up at least 31 points in seven of their past nine starts. The problem with Indianapolis is that it has so many ways to beat you and can score in a hurry. Again, Pittsburgh learned the hard way when cornerback Ike Taylor was burned by an 80-yard touchdown pass on the Colts' first snap in that Nov. 28 loss. "The Colts are characterized as a finesse team," said one defensive assistant, "but that's not right. They can be physical, and they are good up front. They know exactly what you're doing, and they're going to beat you at that game. It doesn't take Peyton long to figure things out." Manning takes few sacks, but Jacksonville did pressure the pocket in September and forced him into hurried, errant throws. When it was over he had a career-low 122 yards passing and no TDs. But he also had a victory. If I'm Jacksonville, here's what gives me hope: In that game, the Colts three times were inside my 25, and only once did they produce a touchdown. If I'm Indianapolis, this is what I look at: The Jags' red-zone defense ranks 11th in the AFC and 26th overall. Now let's look at San Diego: The Chargers are ninth in the AFC in red-zone defense and 21st overall. Then we have Seattle, which is second in the NFC and second overall. In 33 series, the Seahawks defense allowed only 13 touchdowns. We're getting warmer.

    5. Stay close.
    Sure, the Colts are explosive, but try to keep them within reach. Pittsburgh withstood a furious first-quarter charge last month but imploded when a game-tying field goal went astray. Then the Steelers got stupid, trying to throw late in the second quarter when they should have been satisfied taking a 13-7 deficit to intermission and gambling on an onside kick to open the second half. It not only failed, it led to a game-clinching touchdown. "You can't afford to get down by more than 10 to these guys," said one coordinator, "because then they just turn those ends loose." The results speak for themselves: Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis have 20 sacks between them, and the Colts outscore opponents 187-71 in the second half. "You can beat these guys," said one assistant, "but an awful lot of things must go right."
    Take me out to the black, tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.

  • #2
    Re: How To Beat The Colts?

    Originally posted by obnoxiousmodesty
    4. Force red-zone field goals.

    We all know you're not going to keep these guys off the board. Manning hasn't been shut out in his career, and the Colts have put up at least 31 points in seven of their past nine starts. The problem with Indianapolis is that it has so many ways to beat you and can score in a hurry. Again, Pittsburgh learned the hard way when cornerback Ike Taylor was burned by an 80-yard touchdown pass on the Colts' first snap in that Nov. 28 loss. "The Colts are characterized as a finesse team," said one defensive assistant, "but that's not right. They can be physical, and they are good up front. They know exactly what you're doing, and they're going to beat you at that game. It doesn't take Peyton long to figure things out." Manning takes few sacks, but Jacksonville did pressure the pocket in September and forced him into hurried, errant throws. When it was over he had a career-low 122 yards passing and no TDs. But he also had a victory. If I'm Jacksonville, here's what gives me hope: In that game, the Colts three times were inside my 25, and only once did they produce a touchdown. If I'm Indianapolis, this is what I look at: The Jags' red-zone defense ranks 11th in the AFC and 26th overall. Now let's look at San Diego: The Chargers are ninth in the AFC in red-zone defense and 21st overall. Then we have Seattle, which is second in the NFC and second overall. In 33 series, the Seahawks defense allowed only 13 touchdowns. We're getting warmer.
    Playoff game against the J-E-T-S, JETS JETS JETS

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: How To Beat The Colts?

      Originally posted by btowncolt
      Am I supposed to be thouroughly impressed with this dynamite peice of journalism? Don't these rules apply to any halfway decent team?
      Well at least he didn't pull out the "play them on slow grass" card...
      Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
      I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: How To Beat The Colts?

        Yes, I too thought this was one insightful piece of work.

        I go out looking for articles about the upcoming game, and these are the kinds of things I'm finding. I think it'd be more fun we had had Bill Walton over as a guest NFL commentator. At least then I would know the speaker/writer knew he didn't have a clue what he was talking about.
        Take me out to the black, tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: How To Beat The Colts?

          Number 3 is flat out retarded. The Steelers decided to take away Edge. Guess what happened. 80 yards, first play. Come on you guys saw hte play.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: How To Beat The Colts?

            Yeah, this is a pretty decently wrote article.

            Super Bowl XLI Champions
            2000 Eastern Conference Champions




            Comment


            • #7
              Re: How To Beat The Colts?

              Crap journalism.

              Pure and simple.

              Grade A ****.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                Duh!
                The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                  Why don't you guys give the rest of us the depth you're looking for. How do you beat the Colts, in detail?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                    Originally posted by Hicks
                    Why don't you guys give the rest of us the depth you're looking for. How do you beat the Colts, in detail?
                    Make Manning make more than 3 mistakes. Well really its more like, being lucky enough to be the opposing team, when Manning makes 3 or more mistakes.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                      Hire Belichick.

                      Or hire a sumo wrestler to go sit on Manning.
                      Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                        Originally posted by Suaveness
                        Hire Belichick.

                        Or hire a sumo wrestler to go sit on Manning.
                        Yeah, because Belichick will just challenge a no question TD and pray that works.

                        Super Bowl XLI Champions
                        2000 Eastern Conference Champions




                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                          I think the only way to beat the Colts is to have more points than them. JMO

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                            Originally posted by Lord Helmet
                            Yeah, because Belichick will just challenge a no question TD and pray that works.

                            I remind you that we have only beaten them once, and they were very injured. He's kicked our *** plenty times, in more important places.
                            Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: How To Beat The Colts?

                              Originally posted by btowncolt
                              He's never once beaten the Colts.

                              The Patriots superiorly talented defense did that.

                              I think Bill would be the first person to tell you that he wouldn't look too smooth out there trying to make tackles.

                              And they weren't any more injured this year than they were when we played them in the playoffs last year, despite popular opinion.

                              You know what I mean


                              The biggest loss IMO is their LBs. Johnson retired, Bruschi has been out, and whoever else (I can't remember). Their defense relies on those LBs.

                              But I don't think they are better now.
                              Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X