Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2004-01-26

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2004-01-26

    Who will make the all-star cut?
    By Chad Ford
    NBA Insider
    Updated: January 26
    12:49 PM ET

    The fans have spoken. The media have spoken and spoken. Soon, the
    coaches will get their say too.

    The final All-Star Game voting tallies won't be announced until
    Thursday, but if all goes according to current voting trends, Vince
    Carter, Jermaine O'Neal, Allen Iverson, Tracy McGrady and Ben
    Wallace will be in the East starting lineup. Kevin Garnett, Tim
    Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Steve Francis and either Shaquille O'Neal or
    Yao Ming (the one race still too close to call) will start in the
    West.

    Not that there's anything wrong with that. The East starting five is
    solid. At least, this year, Carter is actually playing. The West
    starting five is a bit shakier. TD and KG are obvious choices. Kobe
    is an interesting fan vote given his legal troubles at the moment.
    But given the contenders at the two guard position (Ray Allen,
    Emanuel Ginobili, Michael Finley) can you blame them? Francis is
    about the fifth-best point guard in the West this season, but who's
    counting.

    Once the starters are announced, the league will turn to the coaches
    to make the final seven selections. Predicting what they'll do has
    turned into a laughable proposition.

    The all-star selection process is one of the great unsolved
    mysteries left in the universe. There is no rhyme or reason. No
    pattern. No logic. Might as well sacrifice small animals, throw
    their innards on the ground and let a shaman or two divine the
    stars.

    The fans would vote in Michael Jordan and Charles Barkley if they
    could. Everyone thought LeBron James would be a shoo-in with the
    hype and the shoes. Go figure that, per the latest NBA results, he
    ranked behind Carter, O'Neal, Wallace, Iverson, McGrady and Jason
    Kidd in fan voting in the East. The fans want to see the stars, the
    flash and the dunks. Period. There's nothing wrong with that.
    The media love to rail on the fans for getting it wrong. Of course,
    we too, rarely get it right (witness the Jazz and Bucks). We're
    great at hyping our pet projects or making selections that bolster
    preseason predictions -- but what do we know?

    The coaches have the better chance of getting things right. They do
    more than peruse box scores or breath heavily over the latest flavor
    of the month. They're less likely to be swayed by a good player
    putting up great stats on a horrible team. And they're more likely
    to give a guy who busts his butt every night (read Ron Artest) over
    a no-substance scorer (read Shareef Abdur-Rahim).
    They also have
    grudges. That's why you'll never see Rasheed Wallace or Latrell
    Sprewell get any love this time of year. Again, nothing wrong with
    that.

    With that said, here's the part where I tell you to ignore all of
    that and listen to me. I don't, however, have all of the answers. My
    all-star ballot doesn't make much sense either. Is it OK to vote in
    a guy like Zach Randolph, whose entire team needs to be checked into
    a rehab center? I have no idea. What about a guy like Brad Miller?
    His numbers are all at career highs, and he's a key player on the
    best team in the Western Conference. The Kings would be lost without
    him. But, is he really among the best six or seven big men in the
    West? It's debatable.

    Company policy forbids me from mutilating squirrels, so, for the
    second year in a row, I went for the next best thing. I called up
    five successful GMs and asked for their perspective. I respect the
    GMs' opinions for a couple of reasons. One, they see the whole
    picture. Skill, work ethic, bang for the buck, marketability and
    character all play into it for them. Second, they see the whole
    league. GMs are constantly scouting other players, looking for a
    good fit, or that guy who will put them over the top. It's not an
    exact science. But to these five guys, all of whom wished to remain
    anonymous, it's as close to science as any of this gets.

    While no one agreed on everything, here's a rough consensus of who
    should be flying first class to Los Angeles in February.

    Eastern Conference Starters

    G- Jason Kidd, Nets
    G- Tracy McGrady, Magic
    F- Ron Artest, Pacers
    F- Jermaine O'Neal, Pacers

    C- Ben Wallace, Pistons

    Comments: All five GMs agreed that Kidd, O'Neal and Wallace were the
    best at their positions in the East. McGrady and Artest garnered
    four votes, with one vote going to Paul Pierce and another going to
    LeBron James.

    There aren't any huge surprises here. Baron Davis is having,
    arguably, a better season than Kidd this year. What kills Davis,
    according to the GMs, is his 38 percent shooting percentage and his
    love affair with the 3-point shot. Everything else -- points,
    assists, steals, defense and ability to carry his team -- is great
    this year. McGrady is having a down year, especially when you
    compare it to what he did last season, but he's still the most
    talented swingman in the game. Artest should finally get the love
    this year based on his tough defense (Will he actually defend in the
    All-Star Game?), emerging offensive game and his calm demeanor this
    season on and off the court.

    O'Neal may be the only guy in the group having an MVP season. He
    continues to mature every season and has turned into the East's most
    dominating big man on the offensive end.
    I always get a kick out of
    putting Wallace at center. He doesn't play the position, hasn't for
    the past two season[s], but in the size-challenged East, he's as close
    to an All-Star as you can get. All 15 starting Eastern Conference
    centers just don't make the cut. So you must move on to the
    second-best power forward in the East and that's Wallace by a
    landslide.

    Eastern Conference Bench

    G - Paul Pierce, Celtics (5 votes)
    G - Baron Davis, Hornets (5 votes)
    G - Allen Iverson, Sixers (4 votes)
    G - Michael Redd, Bucks (3 votes)
    F - Vince Carter, Raptors (3 votes)
    F - LeBron James, Cavaliers (3 votes)
    F - Lamar Odom, Heat (3 votes)

    Comments: Everyone knows that the East is very guard heavy, but this
    is a little ridiculous. Depending on how you rank positions, there
    are six guards here and just one forward, Odom. Carter and James can
    technically be listed at forward because of their size and the
    positions they play on their team, but objectively, they're closer
    to guards than they are to forwards. What happened to the rest of
    the forwards? The problem is there are few players worth voting for.
    Odom barely made it in with just three votes. The Nets' Kenyon
    Martin got two votes, the Cavs' Carlos Boozer and the Nets' Richard
    Jefferson got one each. No one else even garnered so much as a vote.

    The nature of the guard-heavy East also produced a two interesting
    snubs. The Knicks' Stephon Marbury and the Pistons' Chauncey Billups
    garnered just two votes each. Marbury was probably hurt the most
    because of his teams' poor records. Billups has been huge for the
    Pistons this season, but his numbers, when stacked up against the
    other top guards in the East, aren't as convincing.

    Western Conference Starters
    G- Sam Cassell, Timberwolves
    G- Peja Stojakovic, Kings
    F- Kevin Garnett, Timberwolves
    F- Tim Duncan, Spurs
    C- Shaquille O'Neal, Lakers

    Comments: Garnett and Duncan were the only unanimous selections this
    year. Stojakovic edged out Kobe, 3-2. Shaq beat out Yao Ming 4-1.
    Cassell edged out Steve Nash 4-1. It's tough to argue much of
    anything here. Stojakovic at two guard? I let that slide. It was
    clear that the GMs weren't comfortable voting in Kobe and were
    looking for an out. If we let Eastern Conference GMs vote Ben
    Wallace in at center, then why not Stojakovic at the two. He can
    play the position and does it about as often as Wallace plays
    center.

    Cassell was a little bit of a surprise. He's having a career season,
    but given his inability to make the team previously, it's nice to
    see the voters put the past behind them. Shaq may not be having a
    great season, but the fact that, whenever he does play he's
    dominating, gives him the edge this year.

    Western Conference Bench

    G- Kobe Bryant, Lakers (4 votes)
    G- Steve Nash, Mavericks (3 votes)
    F- Dirk Nowitzki, Mavericks (4 votes)
    F - Brad Miller, Kings (3 votes)
    F - Pau Gasol, Grizzlies (2 votes)
    F - Zach Randolph, Blazers (2 votes)
    C - Yao Ming, Rockets (5 votes)

    Comments: There's room for plenty of healthy debate here. Let's
    start with the guard snubs. Ray Allen, Michael Finley, Steve
    Francis, Emanuel Ginobili, Mike Bibby and Gary Payton got one each.
    Allen would've been a lock had he played most of the season,
    according to several GMs who left him off the ballot. There was a
    feeling that he just hadn't played enough to earn a spot. Francis
    is, by all accounts, having an off year, though the GM who voted for
    him said we shouldn't penalize him for trying to play with Jeff Van
    Gundy's system.

    One GM, in love with Ginobili, thought he was the second most
    important cog on the Spurs. Bibby has been great this year, but gets
    lost in the shuffle with so many Kings. Payton has been good for the
    Lakers, but like Bibby, just got lost in the shuffle a little bit.
    The West is big heavy, so it was no surprise to see them grab five
    of the seven other spots. Yao was the only reserve everyone seemed
    to agree on. It was a little surprising that one GM left Nowitzki
    off his vote completely. He's struggled this season, but not that
    much. There was a popular sentiment for Miller who, in addition to
    scoring and rebounding, has turned himself into one of the best
    passing big men in the game.

    After that was really wide open. Shawn Marion, Andrei Kirilenko,
    Elton Brand, Erick Dampier, Carmelo Anthony and Rashard Lewis all
    got one vote each. In my mind, Kirilenko is more deserving than
    Randolph based on his overall contribution to his team. The Jazz are
    winning and Kirilenko is getting it done in every category.
    Randolph's scoring and rebounding numbers are better, but he gives
    up as many points as he scores every night on a terrible team. It's
    also surprising that three teams with winning records -- the
    Nuggets, Sonics and Jazz -- don't have any representatives on the
    team.

    But what do we know?

    "This isn't rocket science," one GM said. "You just kind of vote
    your gut and try to keep the past out of it. But bottom line, this
    is just personal preference. The coaches will see things differently
    and I could absolutely see a guy like Kirilenko or Dampier, who give
    them fits every night, get in. We'll find out soon enough."
    Spoken like a true shaman.

    Joe All-Star

    Now that we've got that out of the way, I'd be remiss if I didn't
    mention five guys who didn't get much support for their all-star
    bid. Whether it's because their team is terrible, their play isn't
    highlight-reel quality, or they've just appeared on the radar,
    here's my vote for five average Joes "almost all-stars" who are
    doing special things in the NBA this year.

    Andrei Kirilenko, G, Jazz
    The Stats: 16.3 ppg, 7.9 rpg, 2.9 bpg, 2.1 spg, 47 percent shooting
    The Skinny: He may be the most complete player in basketball. His
    numbers are never flashy on the surface, but dig a little deeper and
    he's pretty amazing. He became just the third player in the past
    decade to have a game in which he scored at least five points, had
    five boards, five assists, five blocks and fives steals. The fact
    that he's already done it twice this season is just amazing. He
    won't make the all-star cut this year, but Kirilenko has been the
    big reason behind the Jazz's surprise run this season.

    Andre Miller, G, Nuggets
    The Stats: 15.9 ppg, 6.2 apg, 4.3 rpg, 1.6 spg on 46 percent
    shooting
    The Skinny: The Nuggets added two big weapons to the worst team in
    basketball last summer -- Miller and rookie Carmelo Anthony. While
    Anthony himself is also worthy of all-star recognition, Miller was
    given the keys to the Nuggets' offense and he's been running it to
    perfection. The fact that he's bounced back from a horrible season
    in Los Angeles proves that Miller isn't just a guard who puts up
    good numbers on a bad team. He's also a leader capable of turning
    around a team when he has the right talent around him.

    Carlos Boozer, F, Cavs
    The Stats: 13.7 ppg, 10.8 rpg on 50 percent shooting
    The Skinny: Lost in all of the LeBron hoopla is the emergence of
    Boozer as one of the most dominating power forwards in the Eastern
    Conference. Not bad for a second year player who mysteriously
    slipped into the second round on draft night. Boozer seems to
    improve by the game. When LeBron went out with ankle injury, Boozer
    proved that he can be a lethal scorer in the paint as well. He's
    averaged 23.5 ppg, 16 rpg and 1.5 bpg over his last four. With Cavs
    GM Jim Paxson slowly weeding out distractions, it may be just a
    matter of time before Boozer works his way into the All-Star Game.

    Emanuel Ginobili, G, Spurs
    The Stats: 12.9 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.9 spg
    The Skinny: The Spurs have one of the most boring, traditional and
    lethal offenses in the league, but thanks to Ginobili, it now has
    the requisite spice to make it palatable. Ginobili has been amazing
    for San Antonio, especially when Tim Duncan is struggling or out
    altogether. His quickness and gambling on the defensive end have
    made him one of the team's most valuable players in the plus/minus
    stats. In a conference with a dearth of great two guards, give
    Ginobili another year to get his feet wet and he should be well on
    his way to his first all-star selection.

    Elton Brand, F, Clippers
    The Stats: 20 ppg, 12.2 rpg, 2.2 bpg on 53 percent shooting
    The Skinny: Don't hate the guy just because he plays on the
    Clippers. The former all-star will likely be passed over because the
    Clippers are struggling once again, but there isn't a more
    consistent double-double guy in the NBA. Brand may not be exciting,
    but the consistency in horrible conditions is enough to impress us.
    Honorable Mention: Erick Dampier, Warriors; Shawn Marion, Suns;
    Donyell Marshall, Raptors; Keith Van Horn, Knicks; Jim Jackson,
    Rockets; Richard Jefferson, Nets; Chauncey Billups, Pistons.

    The Kids

    While we're at it, the league is set to announce the rosters for the
    Rookie-Sophomore game this week as well. They've traditionally done
    a pretty good job of getting it right, but just in case there's any
    confusion at the league office, here's our take on who should be in.

    Rookie All-Stars
    STARTERS
    G - Dwyane Wade, Heat
    G - Kirk Hinrich, Bulls
    F - LeBron James, Cavs
    F - Carmelo Anthony, Nuggets
    C - Chris Bosh, Raptors

    BENCH
    G - Leandro Barbosa, Suns
    G - T.J. Ford, Bucks
    G - Raul Lopez, Jazz
    G - Keith Bogans, Magic
    F - Jarvis Hayes, Wizards
    F - Josh Howard, Mavericks
    C - Chris Kaman, Clippers

    Comment: The top five are pretty easy to pick. All five have been
    outstanding at their positions. Given their relative draft
    positions, none of it should come as big surprise. The bench isn't
    that controversial either. The biggest snubs are Udonis Haslem of
    the Heat and the Jazz's Aleksandar Pavlovic getting pushed out by
    Lopez and Bogans for the last positions on the team. Still, when you
    look at this list, there's no question that this is one of the best
    rookie classes ever.

    Sophomore All-Stars
    STARTERS
    G - Frank Williams, Knicks
    G - Emanuel Ginobili, Spurs
    F - Tayshaun Prince, Pistons
    F- Carlos Boozer, Cavs
    C - Yao Ming, Rockets

    BENCH
    G- Ronald Murray, Sonics
    F- Amare Stoudemire, Suns
    F - Jiri Welsch, Celtics
    F - Drew Gooden, Magic
    F - Mike Dunleavy, Warriors F/C - Mehmet Okur, Pistons
    F/C - Nene Hilario, Nuggets

    Comment: This group was considered a huge success for a rookie
    class, but it pales in comparison with the Class of 2003. Yao,
    Stoudemire, Boozer and Ginobili all look like they have star written
    on them. Prince, Murray, Nene, Gooden, Dunleavy and Welsch also
    appear to have a bright future. Last year's point guard class was
    awful, however. Frank Williams and Jaric were the best that we could
    come up with, and neither player has done more than impress in small
    stretches.

    What's also interesting is who's not on the list. Caron Butler was a
    starter last season but has struggled to rebound from offseason knee
    surgery. Dajuan Wagner was supposed to be the second coming of Allen
    Iverson, but injuries have wreaked havoc on his young career. An
    injury to Jay Williams, another starter from last year, may end his
    career. Several other players are just now starting to come around.
    The Wizards' Jared Jeffries, the Clippers' Chris Wilcox, the Lakers'
    Kareem Rush, the Suns' Casey Jacobsen and the Bucks' Dan Gadzuric
    are having promising seasons, but not enough to make the cut this
    season.
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you


  • #2
    Re: 2004-01-26

    Thanks for posting. My computer monitor is still out, and I'm banished to distant computer labs to work.
    There's one more article to come... but my boss is making me work today so I haven't gotten it yet...
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

    Comment

    Working...
    X